Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG120087_MONITORING INFO_20120731A� K , A NCDENR Z North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary July 31, 2012 Mr. Don Misenheimer Project Scientist Richardson Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc 14 N. Boylan Avenue Raleigh, NC 27603 Subject: Request for Representative Outfall Status Johnston County Landfill Stormwater Permit NCG 120087 Johnston County Dear Mr. Misenheimer: On July 17, 2012, Dave Parnell of the Raleigh Regional Office (RRO) observed the landfill site, with you and Mr. Rick Proctor of the Johnston County staff. The purpose of this site visit was to evaluate the facility's request for Representative Outfall Status (ROS). In a correspondence dated June 14, 2012, you proposed combining twelve existing outfalls into four ROS designations. The reasons cited were that the 4 ROS would be contiguous and similar in activity to the existing outfalls. One of the outfalls (SDO-A) is strictly for vehicle maintenance activity area and is not represent other land uses. The site visit and subsequent sample data review revealed only one sample -event has been collected by Johnston County. Accordingly, we are not approving your request for Representative Outfall Status at this time. Please proceed with the required monitoring for Year 5, Period 2 monitoring schedule, as required by your permit. Once you have secured this data (one additioan sample event), please submit these results to the attention of Dave Parnell at the Raleigh Regional Office for review. After this analytical data is obtained from all locations, DWQ will revisit your request. The RRO commends you on your proposal and manner by which similar outfalls are proposed for combining. For example, in your proposal you selected outfalls that capture stormwater from active cells that had bench mark exceedences as the designated ROS sample location. This office looks forward to seeing the additional data and revisiting your request in short order. North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1628 Phone (919) 791-4200 Customer Service Internet: www.ncwateMualitV.or[1 Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax (919) 788-7159 1-877-623-6748 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper Johnston County Landfill Representative Outfall Status Evaluation Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have questions concerning this letter, please contact me, or Dave Parnell, at (919) 791-4200. !' Sind ely, i �1J.7 Dannv Smi Surface Water Protection Supervisor Raleigh Regional Office cc: Rick Proctor, Johnston County Landfill DLR/RRO files DWM Files SWP/RRO Files Central Files Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Resort for North Carolina Division of Water Resources General Permit No. NCG030000 Datesubmitted Q1/09/2019 CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG03 0 2 S 9 SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2019 FACILITY NAME Consolidated Diesel Company SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec COUNTY Nash or ■❑ Monthly' May (month) PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Rodney Freeman LABORATORY Environmental Conservation Labs Lab Cert. # NC591 Comments on sample collection or analysis: Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results DISCHARGING TO CLASS RECEIVED JUN 11 2019 ❑ORW ❑ HQW ❑ Trout ❑ PNA ❑Zero -flow ❑ Water Supply [:]SA QOtherNSW CENTRAL FILEeLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 0 DVVR SECTION No discharge this period?2 Non -Polar O&G/ -pate Sample 24-hour rainfall pH, Total Toxic Outfafl No. Collected' amount, Total Suspended Solids Standard units Copper 'Lead Zinc Total Petroleum Organics (mo/dd/yr) Inches3 Hydrocarbons Benchmarks = => _ - 100 mg/L or 50 mglC 6.0 — 9.0 1 0.007 mg/L 0.03 mg/L 10.067 mg/L 15 mg/L i mg/L A NO DISCHARGE D NO DISCHARGE ontmy sampling kinstead or semi-annuai) must begin with the second consecutive benchmarK exceedance Tor the same parameter at the same outran. 2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring reportwith a checkmark here. 3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement. 4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies. S Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for elprtrnnir-rrvctal manufarture usP the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31). , Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012 j Page 1 of 3 Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement: "Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics (TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan." !��j ZL�A rl- Name (Print name) Title (Pr' itle) v, P, 4, (Si natur (Date) Nate: Results must be reported in numerical format. D2rtot relrt_Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must hg reported in the format. "<X&Mg/r, where XX is the numerical value of the detection limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L. Note. If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must Implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text. Part IB: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month. ❑ No discharge this period?z Outfali No. Date Sample Collected' mo dd r 24-hour rainfall amount,s Inches Non -polar O&G/TPH by Total Suspended Solids pH Benchmarks 15 mg/L 100 mg/L or 50 mg/L* 6.0 — 9.0 SU Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B * See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies. Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 5WU-245, last revised 10/25/2012 Page 2 of 3 Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text. FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS: • A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS, SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B. 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B. TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO X❑ IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES []NOrRI REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Attn: DWR Central Files 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED: "I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that tl are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." {Sign hol q (Date Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012 Page 3 of 3 Energy, Mineral and Land Resources ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY June 27, 2018 Full Circle Solutions, Inc. Attn: Robert Waldrop 136 Full Circle Drive Battleboro, NC 27809- ROY COOPER Govenior MICHAEL S. REGAN Secrelary WILLiAM E.(TOBY) VINSON, JR. Interim Director Subject: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION Full Circle Solutions, Inc. Battleboro Facility, Certificate of Coverage-NCG070177 NPDES Stormwater General Perm it-NCG070000 Edgecombe County Mr. Waldrop: On June 22, 2018 a site inspection was conducted for the Full Circle Solutions, Inc. facility located at 136 Full Circle Drive Facility, Edgecombe County, North Carolina. A copy of the Compliance Inspection Report is enclosed for your review. The site visit and file review revealed that the subject facility is covered by NPDES Stormwater General Permit-NCG070000, Certificate of Cove rage-NCG070177. Permit coverage authorizes the discharge of stormwater from the facility to receiving waters designated as Compass Creek, a Class C;NSW waterbody in the Neuse River Basin. As a result of the inspection, the facility was found to be in compliance with the conditions of the NCG070000 permit. Please refer to the enclosed Compliance Inspection Report for additional comments and observations made -during the inspection. Please be advised that violations of the NPDES Stormwater General Permit are subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to $25,000 per day for each violation. If you or your staff has any questions, comments, or needs assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please contact me at (919) 791-4200 or by e-mail at Thad. valentineCo)ncdepr_,00v. Sincerely, Thad Valentine Environmental Senior Specialist State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources Raleigh Regional Office l 1628 Mail Service Center ! Raleigh, NC 27609 919 791 4200 Enclosure cc: RRO — Land Quality Section, Storrnwater Files-NCG070177 Central Office/Stormwater Permitting Unit Central Files Nothing Compares�, State of Narth Carolina I Environmental Quality I €nergy, &Uneral and Land Resources 512 N. SaUsbury Street I 1612 MA Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 - 919 7079200 j Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCG070177 Effective: 06/01/18 Expiration: 05131/23 owner: Full Circle Solutions Inc SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Full Circle Solutions, Inc. County: Edgecombe 136 Full Cir Region: Raleigh Battlebora NC 27$09 Contact Person: Robert I Waldrop Title: Phone: 706-253-1051 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 0612212018 Entry Time: 11:00AM Exit Time: 01:15PM Primary Inspector: Thaddeus W Valentine Phone: Secondary lnspector(s): Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Prcducts Stormviater [Discharge COC Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Question Areas: In Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 4 Permit: NCG070177 Owner • Facility:'uil C;rle Sclutons Inc Inspection hate: 06/2212013 Inspection Type : ComFlian�--e EvaiJeucn Reason for Visit: Rouka Inspection Summary: 1 meet Tome Sears and walked the facility inside and onside. The facilty sold pelletized cola ash to farmers who used the materials for the lime content that Bras a biproduct €ram the power companies ahborn fiy ash capture process, The site is in compliance and they have requested a rescission from their general industrial storrnvvater permit. As of this inspection that request has been granted Page: 2 Permit: NCG070177 Owner - Facility: Full Circle Salutinr,5 Inc Inspection Date: 06/22/2018 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluaticr, Reason for Visit: Reutine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes Na NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Alan include a General Location (USGS) map? IN ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a 'Narrative Description of Practices"? M ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? 11 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ❑ ❑ ❑ # noes the Plan include a BMP summary? 19 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?. ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? IM ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? Is ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan revievied and updated annually? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ®❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? 19 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: In compliance . Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Nionitoring semi-annually? IM ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: In compliance Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Nlaintenance areas? ❑ ❑ IM ❑ Comment: In compliance Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? IN ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? IN ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? IM ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: In compliance Page: 3