Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW3190503_Executed Supp EZ form_8/8/20193Vr'r'ILGIVICIV 1—CL. VVVCf[ r'HVC FORMS LOADED T INFORMATION 1 Project Name Rone Creek Station 2 Project Area ac ' 58.64 3 Coastal Wetland Area (ac)- A Q—F— IAhFcr Aroma (—I 5 Its this project High or Low Density? 6 1 Does this Droiect use an off -site SCM? No OMPLIAM MI ;t ' iflO3(4) 7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided (feet) 50 - -- ._ 8 JVVill the vegetated setback remain vegetated? Yes 9 Ils BUA other that as listed in .1003 4 c-d out of the setback? IYes 10 Ils streambank stabilization proposed on this project? I No UMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs: 11 Infiltration System _ _ l 0 12 Bioretention Cell � � 0 13 Wet Pond 0 ~ _ 0 0 0 0 14 Stormwater Wetland 15 Permeable Pavement 16 Sand Filter 17 Rainwater Harvesting RWH 18 Green Roof 0 19 Level S reader -Filter Strip (IS-FS 0 20 Disconnected Impervious Surface (DIS) 0 21 Treatment Swale 0 22 Dry Pond 0 23 StormFilter 0 24 Silva Cell 0 25 Bayfilter 0 26 Filterra 0 FORMS LOADED ESIGNER CERTIFICATION a�RSf 27 Name and Title: Robert D. Davis, P.E , Owner 28 Organization: RDDayis En ineerin , PLLG 29 Street address: 30 City, State, Zip: 31 Phone numbers : 32 Email: Certification Statement: I certify, under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision; that the information provided in the form is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete; and that the engineering plans, specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here. Signature of Designer Date DRAINAGE AREAS 1 Is this a high density project? No 2 If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs 1 3 Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule versions? No FORMS LOADED AREA INFORMATION Entire Site 4 T pe of SCM Low Density 5 Total BUA in project (sq ft 579294 sf 6permitting) New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to s ft 453412 sf 7 New BUA outside of subdivided lots (subject to permitting) (sf) 125882 sf 8 Offsite - total area (sq ft) sf 9 Offsite BUA (sq ft sf 10 Breakdown of new BUA outside subdivided lots: Parking (sq ft sf Sidewalk (sq ft 23004 sf Roof (sq ft sf Roadway s ft 102878 sf Future (sq ft sf Other, please specify in the comment box below (sq ft 11 New infiltrating permeable pavement on subdivided lots (sq ft sf 12 New infiltrating permeable pavement outside of subdivided lots (sq ft sf 13permitting) Exisitng BUA that will remain (not subject to s ft sf 14 1 Existina BUA that is already permitted (sq ft sf 15 Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft sf 16 Percent BUA 24 0 17 IDesign storm inches 1 in 18 IDesign volume of SCM cu ft 19 lCalculation method for design volume ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 20 Please use this space to provide any additional information about the drainage area(s): LOW DENSITY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H .1003 1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes 3 Has the use of piping been minimized per .1003(2)(c)? Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances (H:V) 3 sf 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? No 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s) (%) 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s) (H:V) 10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? 12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? Yes 13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes 14 ADDITIONAL 15 Are variations to rule .1003 proposed? No INFORMATION 1 Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: The site was designed to maximize protection of sensitive environmetal areas and preserve them in common open space. No curb is proposed. Max. velocity in swales is 3.38 ft/sec. prior to entry into underground storm drain system that transports the flow from the street ditches to the stream buffer. Piping is used to minimize erosion on steep slopes and reduce energy and velocity prior to release. Refer to attached plans and calculations for additional design information. Please note that for ditches designated with a letter, they are designed for maximum drainage area and the build u on area is variable. The maximum C value of 0.6 was used for all lettered ditches. DrainagT Pervious Swale BUA Area (ac) area # ac ac C Q (cfs) Slope (/o) o Vallow (fps) Vactual (fps) Flow depth (ft) 1 0.27 0.05 0.22 0.50 1.03 3.60 4.50 0.82 0.71 2 1.77 0.50 1.22 0.40 5.39 4.00 4.50 1.36 0.78 3 3.98 1.12 2.86 0.40 12.00 2.74 4.50 1.73 1.03 4 9.17 1.67 7.50 0.40 15.11 2.88 4.50 3.07 0.87 5 2.84 0.37 2.47 0.40 9.73 3.60 4.50 6.51 0.71 6 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.30 0.46 1.00 4.50 0.58 0.51 7 0.7* TYPE A varies** 0.60 3.20 1.00 4.50 0..78 1.17 8 1.18* TYPE B varies** 0.60 5.40 1.00 4.50 1.02 1.17 9 1.75* TYPE C varies** 0.60 8.00 1.00 4.50 1.25 1.17 10 2.74* TYPE D varies** 0.60 12.50 5.21 4.00 3.38 0.72 TYPE E I varies -- the drainge are indicated is the largest of it's class. the pervious area varies based on individual areas. A C value of 0.6 was used on all is the highest value encountered.