NCS000222_COMPLIANCE_20180610

STORMfIVATER-DIVISION-CO D1NG-SHEET
PERMIT NO.
�(�S ODU ,.a 1
DOC TYPE
❑FINAL PERMIT
0 MONITORING INFO
❑ APPLICATION
C� COMPLIANCE
❑ OTHER
DOC DATE
❑ a- U ('I OL I 0
YYYYMMDD

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCS000222 Effective: 0110V08 Expiration: 12/31/12 Owner : Leland Land LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration; Facility: Carolina Pole Leland inc
County: Brunswick 1901 %Nood Treatment Rd NE
Region: Wilminalon
Leland NC 28451
Contact Person: Michael Rouse Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 06/1012018
Primary Inspector: Brian P Lambe
Secondary Inspectoris):
Entry Time: 02'00PM
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
M Slorm Water
(See attachment summary)
Certification: Phone:
Exit Time: 03:001'M
Phone:
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1

permit: NCSO00222 Owner - Facility: Lela no Land LLC
Inspection Date: 0374000 1 c Inspection Type : Cnrnnbance Evaluation Reason for Visit: ou:ine
Inspection Summary:
Met with Mike Rouse, Site Super.
The site has a ditch surrounding the property, outlets in the southeast corner. Mr. Rouse said they have a management
schedule for ditch maintenance, removing sediment and vegetation. The vegetation helps with water quality, so removal is
done in sections. Rouse has not seen the ditch overtop.
Toured the facility. The chemicals onsite appeared to be properly managed.
Sampling results will be reviewed during renewal Process.
Pape: 2

Permit: VrS0L=22 Owner - Facility: Letana LBno LLC
Inspection Date: 06 101201E inspection Type : wompliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwaler Pollution Prevention Plan?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location IUSGSi map?
M
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
M
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detaileo site rnap including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
M
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary seconuary containment?
a
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a SMP summary's
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spit; Prevenlion and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the flan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
M
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Slormwater Facility Inspection Program?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Poltuticn Prevention Plan been implemented?
N
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes Na NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring) ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfails Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permil and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ M ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative oulfall status, is it properly documenled by the Division? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non slormwater) discharges? ❑ e ❑ ❑
Comment:
Paae- 3

STOR.MWATER DISCILtRGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
Permit Number . CANTPUS COLLECTED DURLNG CALENDAR YEAR: &' ' �&
(rhis monitoring repnrt shall he received by the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the lab0r2t0rV.)
1..clLrry NA.I C:o�na1 ,r,A �olQ LeQt}«,� Coti.T�. �t1� t 01A_ cif
PERSON COLLECTING SAJIPLEJS) PlloNE NCI. Rtfl) -4 It - 31Z1
C ERTIFIED ].ARORATORY(S) Lab=
SIGNATURE OF PER.MITF E OR DESIGNEE
REQUIRED ON PAGE 2.
Part A: Specific Monitoring Requirements
Clutfall .-
Date . .'_--.
50050.. -. ''
-
NO.-- " ,
SaJopii
Collected .; '
.Total•. -Focal
Nlovr if a Rainfall . .'
I A�SQY1l
j
/"5'
�'r'—• " I.
�of:vtj*r j
Z i.Y1
(fl
C4]� , t
ioold&vr
MG -- .' inches..
I �..
ft� !_ •
i
A t_ .
�
, .�a,,L -,f
©
I 1
10.7)
! 5
Co.o1
40.01
co.d`a
a
63 i
k
Does this facility perforn Vehicle %lain:cnancc Activities US:-Ig raDrc than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? _ yes _no
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activitv Monitorine Reauirements
Outfalt-. '
So"; "Sample
k •, -
'Date
Collected;=.-.-'
•
S00S0:.
00556.
00530-
00400,
fatal Flow ".'
(if applicable)
Total:. Oil & Grease:
Rainfall I (if appl.). • '•
Nan -polar ,
O&G/TPH
(Method i664
S(;T-llEM), if,
'a -1.
Total
Suspended',.'
Solids '
- ..
pN ,,-
New Motor
-OH usage:.
.. -...
mot r ,
MG ..` .' -
"inches "' ia'
MO
unit.
allnto
I
Farm SWU-247, last revised 21212012
page 1 oT

S 1'OR.M% i TY,R IIISCILARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
Permit Number NCS
FACI[,1'C1'SAME �Qp}�YIA vc) _ L'e..AQ:LI_&
PERSON C.OLLECTIKG S-AMPLEfS)
CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Lab it
— Lab a
Part A: S'pedfar Monituring Requirements
SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR PEAR: c�]�
{i his munitoring report shall he received by the Division no later than 30 days from'
the date the facility receives the sampling desalts from the laboratory.)
COUNTYA LV li l (,!�
PHONE NO. ( )
SIGNATURE OF PERMI TI'EE OR DESIGNEE
REQUIRED ON PAGE 2.
Outfall !.Dale
50050
I
No:
'Sample
Collected
mofddlvr
`Total Totak
Flow lifapp� Rainfa[1
`IG inches.
' 1 V�
)tiff
PF.�1
rV'ya
`�j,�j•}stA1�..1
L
M L
"'iblLaft.Y�Q -
l L.
A�Pt�+'�A
lJf{
43
G
I�
R.5
<O.00S
1 a.Oa-)
ao.005
I to.oa
CO.c) k
I I
�I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
!
_
Does t?tis f'aci:itt• VC —Coal Vehic'e .%lai:cc;:aace A:_icitie5 using rrto: e [ltan 55 aal;om o: new -mo:or ni] pe. riontitl _ pcs no
(if yes, cumplcte Pa-t B)
Part Fl: Vehicle Maintenance Activity Monitoring Requirements
Outfal['Date
Xo:
Sample .
Collected
50050,
I
00556
06530
00400
Total Flow
(if applicable) '
Tota
Rainfall
Oil & Grease
(if appl:)
lion-polai
4aQGPiPI1'
(Method-1664 .
SGT-HEM), if
1.
Total.''
Suspended.
Solids
pH ' .
hew Ntotor j
Oil Usage
mo.rdd.1%
MG
I inches
mAA
m A
unit-,.
allmo
i
1-om: SWU-2,17, lull revised 112?2012.
pegd�,ol'5

STORAINVATER DISCHARGE 0U-'rFALI, (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
Permit Number INCS SANTIILFti COLLECTED 1) URI N6 CAI, FNDAR YEAR:
(This monitoring report shall be received by the Division no later than 3o days from,
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
FACILITY NAME, aQ, tom} A COU.N.1-v
PVRSON COLLECTING SAMPLE(S) PHONE
CERTIFIED LABORATORYiS) —Lab 4
Lab
SIGNATURF OF PFR2%IITTk.E OR DESIG.NrE
REQUIRED ON PAGE 2.
Part A: Specific.%Ionituring Requirements
Outfall Dale
50050
No, Sample
Collected
Total
Flow (if app.)
Total
Rainfall
hN�W-a- -P
TIL!
L-k_
-
—Tie- A)
mo/ddivr
MG
inches
L I L
L-
r-, i L
'-f-IA/L
I M-A I L_
I LP
Does t"is facilt:y pe-forin Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new -noto: inl per month? _ y-_5
(i Y=S, complete Pa-L B)
Part B; Vehicle Maintenance ActivitvNlonitoring Requirements
Outf2a pate
Sample
Collected
50050
00556
00530
00400
TOW Flow
I (if applicable)
'Tot31
Rainfall
oil & Grease:
(if sippi)
Non polar
o&wym
(Method 1664
SC;T-lW_NI), if
2ppl.
T6tal,
Suspended
Solids'-
PI, -New-Moto
OJI.Usage
moldd/yr
I MG
inches
mg/I
mg/l I
unit- gaurno
Form, SNXI;-Z,47, n�.�ised 21212012
Pag-5 of-C

STOPUNI"WIFER DISCHARGE OUTFALL ISDO)
MONITORING REPORT
PermitlumbersCS 0C>(D �3f:)L.
FAC I L M'NA.NlF, _C.OL_4�) V-%
MRSC1s CCII:I.F.(2'risG SAMPLE(S)
CERTIFIED LARORATORY(S) Lab r
Lab 0
Part A: Specific 3lunitoriud, Requirements
SAMPLF:S COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR )'FAR: _�I
(This moaitoriag report shall he received by the Division no later than 30 davIrum:
the date the facility receeiivees� the sampling results from the lahuratory.)
PHONE NO.
SIGNATURE OF PVR.1Il.VFEE OR DESIGNEE
RNOUIRED ON PACE
Ourfall'
Date
50050
!
I
I
sn: Sample
Collected
Total 'dotal
Flogs (if a. Rainfall
Uocs i'us faci:in' per!o7n Vehicle Maintenance Activities using mo.c tLar. 55 gallons of ncu' :notoi oi! pc: 1110nd.'1 , yes _no
(:f yes, co:aplete fart B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Arlivity' Monitoring Requirements
Outfall
No.
Date
Sample
Collected
50050.
OO Ali
00530
00400.
Total Flow
(if applicable)
Total
'Rainfall
..
.Oil & Grease Non -polar
Lj O&GfPPl3
(4lethod 1664
i a
'Tatai -
Suspended
Solids
pA lien' stotor
; Od Usage
mo/dd'v_r
inches
m fl
m.-/i
it,
I
!
! I
I
I
i 1
Form SIVU-247, la.s1 revtsed 21212012
Pagclofig

STORM E%TNT CI
1)ate
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Event Duration lhours): (only ifa?plicabIc - see pe:tnit.)
(.' more than one scorn: even; Ws sampled)
Date
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Evcnl Duration (hours): (only if a?p licable -sce permit.)
Mail Original and one copy tn:
l')ii-isson of 1kratet Quali:}
Alin, Cc: oral Files
I h 17 ,tilail Service Centel
Raleigh, North Ca:oiiva 27699-16' 7
" 1 certifv, under penalty of taw, that this document and all attachment} %ere prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system dcsigoed to assure that qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on me inquiry of the person
or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief ue, accurate, and complete. I am a%arc that there arc significant penalties for submitting false information,
lad in the passibility of fixl rid imprisonment for knowing violations."
-71,,?, S- /,�,
91i fre of Permittee) Mate)
Forty. SWU-247, lavt rrvi,sed 2/11*201
Pag6-

3NINIMMIM"

e a
Compliance Inspection Repoirt
Permit: NCS000222 Effective: 01/01/08 Expiration: 12/31/12 Owner: Leland Land LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Carolina Pole Leland Inc
County: Brunswick 1901 Wood Treatment Rd NE
Region: Wilmington
Leland NC 28451
Contact Person: Michael Rouse Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 06/10/2018
Primary Inspector: Brian P Lambe
Secondary Inspector(s):
Entry Time: 02:OOPM
Reason for Inspection: Routine
Permit Inspection Type: Stormwater Discharge, Individual
Facility Status: Compliant [] Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Certification:
Phone:
Exit Time: 03:OOPM
Phone:
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
JUGS CA,11 tle-rI(
Page: 1

rp
Permit: NCSOOG222 Owner • Facility: Leland Land LLC
Inspection Rate: 0611012018 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit; Routine
Inspection Summary:
Mel with Mike Rouse, Site Super.
The site has a ditch surrounding the property, outlets in the southeast corner. Mr. Rouse said they have a management
schedule for ditch maintenance, removing sediment and vegetation. The vegetation helps with water quality, so removal is
done in sections. Rouse has not seen the ditch overtop.
Toured the facility. The chemicals onsite appeared to be properly managed.
Sampling results will be reviewed during renewal process.
Page: 2

• t
permit; NCS000222 Owner -Facility: Leland Land LLC
Inspection Date:.0611012018 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit Routine
Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
Q ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑ `
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑ . ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ❑ ❑
#"Does.the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
0 ❑ ❑ El -
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitorinq
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
❑ N ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it property documented by the Division?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3

i
i
000s aN
-A O r f fiber � vvN J }��

IN
•,
r � SF t 4
, f L 1.
r s 4
1
- }� � T is J V I s' ..
a5•' ;
}
tV r T` I � I
\ �
7 w•-� e •qp
_ r+r` �7- �,1 �,4
_ ter ri_ s .� •t
- �' � r .. ; r•
- 't" �'_ - �\ _ �'� � ` 4 � 1 ` s'•. fr 1� ' � + �e - �Ya.L S �`� �� y Y
'�ii__. r. �, .ia-. w�' .t''�4}��iti•��"'.� ��£�M�+��.a�r. ..-.rw•. �...�-y .5�..�:•1���1."'M1�.�•..i�' � f?4',L�..T.
Lam.- � �'�. ti� ��-... �•�
ice.
y
:ILA,'
5
"'f 'L'
-F �(:.5
• »dye 1;
iy!sJ.• `.u-., y4i�,��
y
i

e Y�i
J� Ea

rG
[ � t•
oil
SAY
Vj
RIPE A

0
I
C�

a
In

o�ot WA rERQ�
r
y
. A �
August 9, 2007
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested 7006 0810 0004 4480 9360
Mike Rouse
Operations Manager
P.O. Box 370
Leland, North Carolina 28451
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested 7006 0810 0004 4480 9377
Mr. R. Michael Johnson
President
P.O. Box 1124
Orangeburg, South Carolina 29116
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Carolina Pole
Permit Number NCS000222
County Brunswick
• Dear Mr. Rouse:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross 1r., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
On August 8, 2007, Linda Willis, of the Division of Water Quality, Wilmington Regional Office,
performed an inspection of the subject facility. As part of the inspection, a tour of your facility was
conducted. All observations and recommendations are noted in the (Summary of findings/Action Items)
of this inspection report. Please respond to these action items in an expedient manner to prevent any
future problems. Remember, it is our goal to insure the quality of the surface waters of this State.
Please review the attached report. If you or your staff have any questions, do not hesitate to
contact Linda Willis or myself at 910-796-7215.
Sin ely,
Edward Beck
Surface Water Protection Section
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosures
cc: Central files
WiRO/DWQ Stormwater Compliance Files (Linda Willis)
Stormwater Permitting Unit/ Raleigh
NPS and Compliance Oversight/Raleigh
I4o°` Carolina
tu.=
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
intemet. www.ncwaterquality.org Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Ac im Employer — 50% Regdedl10% Post Consumer Paper

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
©40A INDUSTRIAL STORM WATER INSPECTION FORM
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
AlLacility:
Carolina Pole
Date: August 8, 2007
Location Address: 1901 Wood Treatment Road, Leland North Carolina
lt!�: /VCS (XOc; ) Z�i --
Contact Name: Mike Rouse, Operations Manager
Phone Number: 910-371-3131
Contact Mailing Address: P.O. Box 370, Leland North Carolina 28451
County: Brunswick
Directions:
On the left on US 74/76 pproximately 4 miles west of Hwy 17 intersection. Located just past last Leland exit.
x
Routine Compliance Inspection
Rescission Request
Complaint Investigation
x
Other — Permit renewal inspection
.:�
STORM WATER'�POLLUTION PREVENTION Pi:AN � ' �
Yes
No
NIA
Comments
1.
Is a copy of the signed and certified SWPPP at the facility?
x
Ownership change form
The permittee had sent in a change ownership form to DWQ for the state
stormwater permit and thought that would suffice for the ownership
change notification to DWQ for all permits including the NPDES permit.
needs to be sent in to the
Central Office (form
enclosed). SWPPP
needs to be updated and
signed by Mr. Johnson
2.
Does the facility's SWPPP address the minimum BMP requirements?
x
3.
Are amendments to the SWPPP clearly documented?
x
The plan should bereviewed and updated to
include the information
requested (see left). The
current site maps require
updating with better
detail.
4.
Is the current SWPPP complete?
A yearly review of the plan is required with amendments clearly defined
at the front of the SWP3. A signature and date on which the review and
amendments were made is required. The site transcends two USGS
quadrants. The map provided is not adequate. A map showing the
location of tanks, drums, treatment systems, and operating equipment
x
under the covered area should be provided. The possible contents for
each should be clearly identified. The volume of each tank should be
identified and total volume in dnim storage areas identified. The areas
where hazardous waste and raw materials are stored should be clearly
indicated. Include storage volume of secondary containment. The
Management Plan did not contain a feasibility study section.
.LStorIXmwater
VEHICLE EQUIPMENTR -:" `t� �,'s��
Yes
No
NIA
1.
Were the vehicle/equipment maintenance areas inspected?
x
2.
Are vehicle/machinery leaks and drips properly managed?
x
3.
Is vehicle/equipment washing done in a designed area so that wash water
x
can be properly managed?
Maintenance is conducted within a containment area. The Spill
Response Plan identified actions required to quickly eliminate and clean
up a petroleum spill.
4.
Was the vehicle fueling area inspected?
x
S.
Are vehicle maintenance activities kept indoors?
x
Were the vehicle/equipment storage areas inspected?
x
,ML6.
7.
Are current BMPs in vehicle/equipment/fueling areas adequate?
x
E -
3
y_ a WASTE:MANAGEMENT,�� z �rc�n r�s
tN-+P%i.['y.=�'.�3 .c4'}..h'i .5...�$rC`Y;1�
Yes
No
NIA
1.
Are containers for temporary storage of wastes labeled?
No containers were
observed.

4
4
2.
Are waste materials recycled?
x
Facility utilizes Safety
Kleen
Facility utilizes Clean
3.
Are hazardous wastes properly handled and disposed of?
x
Harbors
Raw materials, products
14.
Is processed debris removed regularly?
x
5.
Is there secondary containment for liquid wastes?
x
6.
Are current waste management BMPs adequate?
x
�.D,il_
WAIL
MATE STORAGE
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Are there appropriate BMPs for outdoor storage of raw materials,
x
products, and byproducts?
and byproducts are
stored under roof with
secondary containment
with the exception of
dried treated and
untreated timber,
2.
Are containers for chemical substances labeled?
x
3.
Is there secondary containment for liquid storage?
x
4.
Are current BMPs in material storage areas adequate?
x
Trt 44
'SPILL` CON,T#q1
Yes
No
N/A
Comments
1.
Are there procedures for spill response and cleanup?
is
2.
Are appropriate spill containment and cleanup materials kept on -site and
x
in convenient locations?
Did not check disposal
3.
Are used absorbent materials disposed of in a timely manner?
x
records or manifests.
4.
Are current spill BMPs adequate?
x
Sa fib
akjsloN T
Yes
No
N/A
T.
Given the nature of the
1.
Are unpaved outdoor areas protected from water/wind erosion?
x
site, water and wind
erosion is possible,
however it did not
appear to be a significant
problem.
A perimeter ditch
2.
Are drainage ditches or the areas around the outfalls free of erosion?
x
surrounds the 130 acre
site. The ditch shows
signs of some erosion. It
appears the grading at
the site is maintained to
reduce erosion as much
as practical.
3.
Do implemented BMPs appear effective in controlling erosion?
x
PiT FIR,
IT
Yes
No
NIA
The plan indicated no
Have all illicit water discharges been eliminated or permitted?
x
illicit water discharges
have occurred.
The site has no other
2.
Are BMPs for authorized non -storm water discharges properly
x
implemented?
discharge than
stormwater.
Are current BMPs adequate for management of authorized non -storm

4
4
1
water discharges?
x
There is a wastewater
H- :r
PROCESS,WASTEWATER CbNTRDLSyAND MONITORING � ;''
Yes
No
N/A
1.
Are wastewater treatment facilities properly maintained?
x
treatment facility, it is
The site utilizes a biological activated sludge system to reduce organics
not permitted through
the NPDES permitsystem
in the treatment water. Flocculation and a filter belt press is used to
and therefore it's
Dandle solids which are stored in a 1 cubic yard box for disposal by
Clean Harbors. This system is a non discharge reuse/recycle treatment
proper operation was not
cammeoted operation
by the
system
inspector.
2.
Has monitoring been done?
x
I `
STREAM OBSERVATIONOVACTS ; , ; •_.
Yes
Na
NIA
x
Access to the discharge
1.
Were there any stream impacts?
x
is not accessible since it
is on MOTSU property.
2.
Were field parameters taken for pH or DO?
x
3.
Were there any stream standard violations/
x
4.
Were there excessive solids in the stream?
x
5.
Were pictures taken?
x
6.
Were samples taken?
TX
.., Y �'� 'W-E,
In general, all of the operations/activities of concern involving raw material storage, treatment operations, and storage of bulk
materials is under a roof minimizing/eliminating stormwater contact. The site appeared to be very clean, no evidence of spills on
the grounds outside of the containment areas. The site is surrounded by a deep ditch (approximately 4-5 foot deep). It serves as a
collection system and conveyance for stormwater runoff to outfall 001, Stormwater collects in the perimeter ditch and exits the site
at one outfall located on the northeast corner of the property. The analytical monitoring required during the past permit cycle has
not been conducted according to the permit. Annual monitoring was missed during year 2 and the first, second and third quarters of
the fourth year of the permit cycle. Both semi annual qualitative' monitoring was missed for year five of the permit cycle. It appears
the facility was sold to Carolina Pole Leland, Inc. (president R. Michael Johnson) in 2006. The permit expired February 28, 2005
and was not renewed. The SWP3 and SPRP is quite thorough in addressing any potential on site stormwater contamination and
regular and frequent inspections of all. processes and storage areas as well as the entire site is conducted and documented. The
operations manager has been conducting qualitative monitoring even though the permit -was not transferred to the new owner by the
Division. The permitee had sent in a DWQ Coastal Stormwater Permit Ownership Change Form (twice, registered receipt) to
request the change in ownership for NCS000222 in May of 2006. The request was (likely) not acknowledged since it was on the
wrong form.
The SWP3 plan needs to incorporate the changes/apdates mentioned in the text of the inspection report (above). The Ownership
Change Form is.required (enclosed). Updated maps.need to be.sent to. the Wilmington Regional Office (WiRO) (to the attention of
Linda Willis). The bark and wood debris should be cleaned out from the stormwater conveyance ditch in the vicinity of the outfall
or any other area within the stormwater conveyance ditch where woody debris may collect. Please update the site maps (with
details identified in sections L. and M. of this inspection report) for inclusion in the SWP3 and forward a copy of each to Linda
Willis at WiRO.
k r "G z> 4 Al �%va '°Indusry
in substantial compliance
r4.
Minor deficiencies noted. Revist will be scheduled within 6 months. (date).
Major deficiencies or discharges noted and require prompt correction. Revisit scheduled for (date).
Critical deficiencies or discharges noted and require immediate correctioin. Revisit scheduled (date).
for
5.
Rescission is appropriate.

6. I Rescission is not appropriate.
Logged by: Inspected by: Linda Willis
L. Include a Map of the facility. This drawing should depict the building, parking, process, and storage areas.
If you do not have a map, draw one or request that the facility provide you one in your written
correspondence.
A more detailed vicinity map is required including ALL: buildings, storage areas, vehicle maintenance
buildings or areas, heavy equipment maintenance buildings or areas, hazardous waste storage area for
drums and/or bulk waste, wastewater treatment system including storage for treatment chemicals (polymers
for flocculation and/or pH control), settling tanks, aeration basin, storage basins, belt filter press, bulk
storage tanks, .storage areas for drums or pails, loading and unloading areas, autoclaves, drip pads, fire
suppression equipment, drying kilns etc. etc. utilize shading where secondary containment is provided and
processes are under roof. Please make sure an arrow depicting North is provided on both maps. Ensure
both maps are to scale and the scale is identified on the maps.
M. Develop a Vicinity Map for the file.
A non cartoon topographical map (USGS) is required with the overlay of the entire site on the
topographical map. The map should include any surface waters in close proximity to the site.
Provide lattitude and longitude for the outfall 001.
N. Identify all records that were reviewed.
Permit file. SWP3 Plan and spill response plan. Inspection records for the outfall and facility operations.
Employee training records. Qualitative and quantitative monitoring records.
O. Explain how Secondary Containment is being used and whether these measures are being properly
maintained. [Did you observe that the secondary containment had release valves (were they open, locked
0 etc.), was there water, waste product, sheen, etc observed within the secondary containment area? Explain
your observations]
There were no drains in the areas inspected. The contents of secondary containment areas are pumped to
the wastewater treatment facility for treatment. The water in the secondary containment area is not released
to the environment.
P. House keeping and best management practices (maintenance of BMPs) status.
Housekeeping was good. No litter, no excessive junk lying around the property, no evidences of spills of
chemicals or petroleum products to the ground were evident.
Q. Identify outfalls and receiving waters. List any observation or concerns.
Outfall 001 is the only outfall from the site that conveys stormwater to surface waters.of the state. The area
around the outfall had an excessive build up of bark and wood debris that should be removed on a regular
basis. It might be prudent to exercize some type of debris control prior to the outfall pipe, but regular
removal of debris may suffice.
R. Take digital photographs to support staff report observations and to provide assistance to future inspectors).
Digital photos available of some of the process area and outfall.
0
Logged by:
Inspector: Linda Willis i r

0
August 9, 2007
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested 7006 0810 0004 4480 9360
Mike Rouse
Operations Manager
P.O. Box 370
Leland, North Carolina 28451
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested 7006 0810 0004 4480 9377
Mr. R. Michael Johnson
President
P.O. Box 1124
Orangeburg, South Carolina 29116
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Carolina Pole
Permit Number NCS000222
County Brunswick
Dear Mr. Rouse:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins. Director
Division of Water Quality
On August 8, 2007, Linda Willis, of the Division of Water Quality, Wilmington Regional Office,
performed an inspection of the subject facility. As part of the inspection, a tout of your facility was
conducted. All observations and recommendations are noted in the (Summary of findings/Action Items)
of this inspection report. Please respond to these action items in an expedient manner to prevent any
future problems. Remember, it is our goal to insure the quality of the surface waters of this State.
. Please review the attached report. If you or your staff have any questions, do not hesitate to
contact Linda Willis or myself at 910-796-7215.
Sin ely,
Edward Beck
Surface Water Protection Section
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosures
cc: Central files
LWiRO/DW9 Stormwater Compliance Files_,(Linda: Willis_) �..
Stormwater Permitting Unit/ Raleigh
NPS and Compliance OversighttRaleigh
N���` "tCaro 'aa
' ✓v�ura
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. 127'Catdinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: wwwmcwaterguality.otE Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Af nnahve Action Employer— 50% Recycied/10% Post Consumer Paper

r
�'<<
i
s - -�

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
AMA INDUSTRIAL STORM WATER INSPECTION FORM
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Facility: Carolina Pole
Date: August 8, 2007
Location Address: 1901 Wood Treatment Road, Leland North Carolina
tE)6'#: /\i[ C�
Contact Name: Mike Rouse, Operations Manager
Phone Number: 910-371-3131
Contact Mailing Address: P.O. Box 370, Leland North Carolina 28451
County: Brunswick
Directions:
On the left on US 74/76 pproxirnately 4 miles west of Hwy 17 intersection. Located just past last Leland exit.
x
Routine Compliance Inspection
Rescission Request
Complaint Investigation
x
Other — Permit renewal inspection
A, .4
STORM;WATER:POI:LUTION PREVENTION PLAN t
Yes
No
NIA
Comments
1.
Is a copy of the signed and certified SWPPP at the facility?
x
Ownership change form
The permittee had sent in a change ownership form to DWQ for the state
needs to be sent in to the
stormwater permit and thought that would suffice for the ownership
Central Office (form
change notification to DWQ for all permits including the NPDES permit.
enclosed). SWPPP
needs to be updated and
signed by Mr. Johnson
The plan should be
2.
Does the facility's SWPPP address the minimum BMP requirements?
x
3.
Are amendments to the SWPPP clearly documented?
x
4.
Is the current SWPPP complete?
x
reviewed and updated to
A yearly review of the plan is required with amendments clearly defined
include the information
at the front of the SWP3. A signature and date on which the review and
requested (see left). The
amendments were trade is required. The site transcends two USGS
current site maps require
quadrants. The map provided is not adequate. A map showing the
updating with better
location of tanks, drums, treatment systems, and operating equipment
detail.
under the covered area should be provided. The possible contents for
each should be clearly identified. The volume of each tank should be
identified and total volume in drum storage areas identified. The areas
where hazardous waste and raw materials are stored should be clearly
indicated. Include storage volume of secondary containment. The
Stormwater Management Plan did not contain a feasibility study section.
B
VEIiICLE EQUIPMENT;, n= ��''3=YY
Yes
No
NIA
1.
Were the vehicle/equipment maintenance areas inspected?
x
2.
Are vehicle/machinery leaks and drips properly managed?
x
3.
Is vehicle/equipment washing done in a designed area so that wash water
x
can be properly managed?
Maintenance is conducted within a containment area. The Spill
Response Plan identified actions required to quickly eliminate and clean
up a petroleum spill.
4.
Was the vehicle fueling area inspected?
x
5.
Are vehicle maintenance activities kept indoors?
x
6.
Were the vehicle/equipment storage areas inspected?
x
7.
Are current BMPs in vehicle/equipment/faeling areas adequate?
x
C �
�.�rr _r�"--
WASTE --MANAGEMENT �t Y *� a 'r
Yes
No
N/A
<�
Y, s r� _. y.Y. 4. ram'
No containers were
1.
Are containers for temporary storage of wastes labeled?
J=
I
observed.

2.
Are waste materials recycled?
x
Facility utilizes Safety
Kicen
Facility utilizes Clean
3.
Are hazardous wastes properly handled and disposed of?
x
Harbors
Raw materials, products
4-
Is processed debris removed regularly?
x
5.
Is there secondary containment for liquid w-astes?
x
6.
Are current waste management BMPs adequate?
X
D"
4V
:kAtk ST(jRAbk-­z`
Yes
No
N/A
L
Are there appropriate BMPs for outdoor storage of raw materials,
x
products, and byproducts?
and byproducts are
stored under roof with
secondary containment
with the exception of
dried treated and
untreated timber.
2.
Are containers for chemical substances labeled?
x
3.
Is there secondary containment for liquid storage?
x
4.
Are current BMPs in material storage areas adequate?
x
QA
Yes
No
NIA
Comments
1.
Are there procedures for spill response and cleanup?
x
2.
Are appropriate spill containment and cleanup materials kept on -site and
x
in convenient locations?
Did not check disposal
3.
Are used absorbent materials disposed of in a timely manner?
x
records or manifests.
4.
Are current spill BMPs adequate?
x
Yes
No
N/A
Given the nature of the
Are unpaved outdoor areas protected from water/wind erosion?
x
site, water and wind
erosion is possible,
however it did not
appear to be a significant
problem.
A perimeter ditch
2.
Are drainage ditches or the areas around the outfalls free of erosion?
X
surrounds the 130 acre
site. The ditch shows
signs of some erosion. It
appears the grading at
the site is maintained to
reduce erosion as much'
as practical.
3.
Do implemented BMPs appear effective in controlling erosion?
x
MANkGE
es
No
N/A
The plan indicated no
L
Have all illicit water discharges been eliminated or permitted?
x
illicit water discharges
have occurred.
The site has no other
2.
Are BMPs for authorized non -storm water discharges properly
x
implemented?
discharge than
stormwater.
Are current BMPs adequate for management of authorized non -storm
x

3.
water discharges?
x
PROCESS WASTEWATER :CONTROLSMONITORING! •`�P'
Yes
No
N/A
There is a wastewater
1.
Are wastewater treatment facilities properly maintained?
x
treatment facility, it is
not permitted through
The site utilizes a biological activated sludge system to reduce organics
the NPDES permit
in the treatment water. Flocculation and a filter belt press is used to
system and therefore it's
handle solids which are stored in a I cubic yard box for disposal by
proper operation was not
Clean Harbors. This system is a non discharge reuse/recycle treatment
commented on by the
system.
inspector.
2.
Has monitoring been done?
x
S'TREXM.OBSERVATION,iiMPAC-TS
Yes
No
N/A
Access to the discharge
1.
Were there any stream impacts?
x
is not accessible since it
is on MOTSU property.
2.
Were field parameters taken for pH or DO?
x
3.
Were there any stream standard violations/
x
4.
Were there excessive solids in the stream?
x
5.
Were Pictures taken?
x
6.
Were samples taken?
X
ACTION'
In general, all of the operations/activities of concern involving raw material storage, treatment operations, and storage of bulk
materials is under a roof minimizing/eliminating stormwater contact. The site appeared to be very clean, no evidence of spills on
the grounds outside -of the containment areas. The site is surrounded by a deep ditch (approximately 4-5 foot deep). It serves as a
collection system and conveyance for stormwater runoff to outfall 001. Stormwater collects in the perimeter ditch and exits the site
at one outfall located on the northeast comer of the property. The analytical monitoring required during the past permit cycle has
not been conducted according to the permit. Annual monitoring was missed during year 2 and the first, second and third quarters of
the fourth year of the permit cycle. Both semi annual qualitative monitoring was missed for year five of the permit cycle. It appears
the facility was sold to Carolina Pole Leland, Inc. (president R. Michael Johnson) in 2006. The permit expired February 28, 2005
and was not renewed. The SWP3 and SPRP is quite thorough in addressing any potential on site stormwater contamination and
regular and frequent inspections of all processes and storage areas as well as the entire site is conducted and documented. The
operations manager has been conducting qualitative monitoring even though the permit was not transferred to the new owner by the
Division. The pennitee had sent in a DWQ Coastal Stormwater Permit Ownership Change Form (twice, registered receipt) to
request the change in ownership for NCS000222 in May of 2006. The request was (likely) not acknowledged since it was on the
wrong form.
The SWP3 plan needs to incorporate the changes/updates mentioned in the text of the inspection report (above). The Ownership
Change Form is required (enclosed). Updated maps need to be sent to the Wihnington Regional Office (WiRO) (to the attention of
Linda Willis). The bark and wood debris should be cleaned out from the stormwater conveyance ditch in the vicinity of the outfall
or any other area within the stormwater conveyance ditch where woody debris may collect. Please update the site maps (with
details identified in sections L. and M. of this inspection report) for inclusion in the SWP3 and forward a copy of each to Linda
Willis at WiRO.
74
I-Ra
F11
Indusry in substantial compliance
0
Minor deficiencies noted. Revist will be scheduled within 6 months. (date).
3.
Major deficiencies or discharges noted and require prompt correction. Revisit scheduled for (date).
4.
Critical deficiencies or discharges noted and require immediate correctioin. Revisit scheduled (date).
for
5.
Rescission is appropriate.

, j 6. , I Rescission is not appropriate.
Logged by:
Inspected by: Linda Willis C-c-'—,)
L. Include a Map of the facility. This drawing should depict the building, parking, process, and storage areas.
If you do not have a map, draw one or request that the facility provide you one in your written
correspondence.
A more detailed vicinity map is required including ALL: buildings, storage areas, vehicle maintenance
buildings or areas, heavy equipment maintenance buildings or areas, hazardous waste storage area for
drums and/or bulk waste, wastewater treatment system including storage for treatment chemicals (polymers
for flocculation and/or pH control), settling tanks, aeration basin, storage basins, belt filter press, bulk
storage tanks, storage areas for drums or pails, Ioading and unloading areas, autoclaves, drip pads, fire
suppression equipment, drying kilns etc. etc. utilize shading where secondary containment is provided and
processes are under roof. Please make sure an arrow depicting North is provided on both maps. Ensure
both maps are to scale and the scale is identified on the maps.
A Develop a Vicinity Map for the file.
A non cartoon topographical map (USGS) is required with the overlay of the entire site on the
topographical map. The map should include any surface waters in close proximity to the site.
Provide lattitude and longitude for the outfall 001.
N. Identify all records that were reviewed.
Permit file. SWP3 Plan and spill response plan. Inspection records for the outfall and facility operations.
Employee training records. Qualitative and quantitative monitoring records.
O. Explain how Secondary Containment is being used and whether these measures are being properly
maintained. [Did you observe that the secondary containment had release valves (were they open, locked
etc.), was there water, waste product, sheen, etc observed within the secondary containment area? Explain
your observations]
There were no drains in the areas inspected. The contents of secondary containment areas are pumped to
the wastewater treatment facility for treatment. The water in the secondary containment area is not released
to the environment.
P. House keeping and best management practices (maintenance of BMPs) status.
Housekeeping was good. No litter, no excessive junk lying around the property, no evidences of spills of
chemicals or petroleum products to the ground were evident.
Q. Identify outfalls and receiving waters. List any observation or concerns.
Outfall 001 is the only outfall from the site that conveys stormwater to surface waters of the state. The area
around the outfall had an excessive build up of bark and wood debris that should be removed on a regular
basis. It might be prudent to exercize some type of debris control prior to the outfall pipe, but regular
removal of debris may suffice.
R. Take digital photographs to support staff report observations and to provide assistance to future inspectors).
Digital photos available of some of the process area and outfall.
Logged by:
Inspector: Linda Willis

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr„ Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W, Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Cr
N , T� `SURF�ACEWATER PRUTECTIUN'SEIUN' _;' ^ z rn ' fi 4
F, PERMIT�NAr*M/OWNERSHIPICHANGE4F -7
F 1
I. Please enter the permit number for which the change is requested.
NPDES Permit (or) Certificate of Coverage
N- C -' C G: 'N
II. Permit status prior to status change.
a. Permit issued to (company name):
b. Person legally responsible for permit:
First / MI / Last
Titlr
Permit Holder Mailing Address
City state Zip
Phone Fax
c. Facility name (discharge):
d. Facility address:
State Zip
e. Facility contact person:
First I MI I East Phone
III. Please provide the following for the requested change (revised permit).
a. Request for change is a result of- ❑ Change in ownership of the facility
❑ Name change of the facility or owner
If other please explain:
b. Permit issued to (company name):
c. Person legally responsible for permit:
First I MI I Last
Titic
d. Facility name (discharge):
e. Facility address:
f. Facility contact person:
Permit Holder Mailing Address
City State Zip
Phone E-mail Address
Address
City State Zip
Phone
First I MI I Last
E-mail Address
Revised 712005

PERMIT !NAME/OWNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
Page 2 of 2
IV. Permit contact information: (if different from the person legally responsible for the permit)
Permit contact:
First I MI / Last
Mailing Address
City State Zip
(
Phone E-mail Address
V. Will the permitted facility continue to conduct the same industrial activities conducted prior to
this ownership or name change?
0 Yes
0 No (please explain)
VI. Required Items: THIS APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED UNPROCESSED IF ITEMS ARE
INCOMPLETE OR MISSING.
0 This completed application is required for both name change and/or ownership change requests.
0 Legal documentation of the transfer of ownership (such as relevant pages of a contract deed, or a bill
of sale) is re uired for an ownership change request. Articles of incorporation are not sufficient for
an ownership change.
...................................................................................................
The certifications below must be completed and signed by both the permit holder prior to the change, and the new
applicant in the case of an ownership change request. For a name change request, the signed Applicant's Certification
is sufficient.
PERMITTEE CERTIFICATION (Permit holder prior to ownership change):
1, , attest that this application for a name/ownership
change has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required
parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information is not included, this
application package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION:
Date
1, , attest that this application for a name/ownership
change has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required
parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information is not included, this
application package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
• ............... 0 • .
Date
PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETE APPLICATION PACKAGE TO:
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Revised 7/2005

07/31/2007 10:32 FAX [phone] CAROLINA POLE INC ® 002/.003
t•
-6 16-42 am 4k1C= 311�9 P 0a/�
P& ON\
Ty AOW RSo�or
Rea" tow
L CURR8iT-PH=T IFIFORMAMOM .
1. skwr N"r M� bPerms 7Dc;
�
2. Perm@ HW0M'a
4: IVfei� � Cyr •
ftw.k rp*aode Peon 4 l :� - C11D)
om om" wr. Dom raa •a
11. NEW 0WM9q l PROJV=1 ADDMSS 1NMRMATIDN
1. This request is for (Pb� deck an that apply)
• Qwnw in oMmershlp of ftw P+oPwbb�tl► con�l Ibcnw
and 04 below? .
_b. Nam dra p of pMIW QMO= =Mhft Item ■6 below) '
a Mailing sddrm d+arQa. (Please 1e ftwn 84 beivcrj
A. . Other (plime oxpiainjc '
a. Now ownnes w to be put an Osnv :
8. now mores isowwwo r namq pnd ift
4. New Matt AedmR.O . UM%vw
ftdos
MAW ewe ud some
5. Now PmIW Name to be. plaaad on p G
Pop 1 of 2 ;
i
tidemC�>�Meva�t�o�r 3�t�dloinriRe�a 1aC7� phsaa�plm7�dltitA a�eee.�
C`R/�fi. I A ACr-T TCCCGtA rTnnm Ym C7 7 J D1 J AA7-i1T-MAH

07/31/2007 10:32 FAX [phone] CAROLINA POLE INC 12003/003
w • d '1wmi
r 1 x&90 P.aWW
Olk-27-2M say Cox 6=
1PTHPlUON
UOP Will=�v�MrTTA�. - .
REQUIRED ITEMS:
11 'Thin ommidw t an.
2. LqO dcparmnbftn Of ft frog of awnemWpb
S. A copy of the ?9WW $+d deed rrsbbdona, If Mmad by fhe PWML
4. The dealpnaro owl n, P nsqukW bytha penult
5. A signed. Operaan and MdnW=m Plan. if 8 syotem that requNos M2bfpn5mc9 vdl
ffWff
HAND �Wi4PPPUC iN OMPOTED AND A OF OWNMOM THE BRBW.
pOR NAMB CHANOM CONPUT6 AND SlON ONLY THE OLqUtWT p NTC86I
CERTpriCATtON. .
t umnt Pertil~dom _
^ 1. k�A att tw. thls appitc am" kw a isa+rr-woM— .
q�rr� has na aca:rs0a'and oampmw td the bad of
artder�ltd That ag_ of thb � ars not eaenpfe�e0 and ihet ff atiAm
Inllgrtta�on and ■�mefft ere not lnduded. thin eppllcotbn jw Wl be'
'Red ss Uo�otn�i�a.
Herr Applk*Wa CeRif an: peretbe l l Vaaa for d kod"d al;
ld3mw pb fan for'an la�owf�d�g�.I
undecagred that P ell row of t b oppilml m mv not a and that d all Mwm*m a�n�6 arm not Mo A d, �loOm p w�l
ei e�p Inoorr�pl�. -
THE COMPLETED APPUCATiON PACKAG RMUDWS - ALL SUPPORTtNO
INPORMTION AND U�a'TERIaI�I, SHOULD BE SSA To THEIPOLLCMl G ADDRBO&
Nora+ CanWho Depfiftwd of Enwhmment and NoWnW Rs=ufea
alvtalon of wata� oltbi
. 12Y Cardinal Drive EXWnsbn
wiminv NC ge4ob
ATTN: Osy Beedlor
Pop 2 of 2 ,
fill ♦CTA • J GCGT TLti C•IAG iR�CIM S�Fi'i i� _JL� JAR��AL�NC��

07/31/2007 10:32 FAX B103713137 CAROLINA POLE INC ED001/003
Fax Cover
Date; 7
To: �' v
Attu:
Total pages inciuding cover:
Phone:
From: Ga
Comments:
Fax: 7/o - 3 S—v _Z o o 4-
Cox Industries
Carolina Pole
[phone]
Fix: [phone]

P. 01
TRANSACTION REPORT
JUL-31-2007 TUE 10:38 AM
FOR: NCDENR
9103502004
RECEIVE
DATE START SENDER
RX TIME PAGES TYPE
NOTE M# DP
JUL-31 10:38 AM 9103713137
48" 3 FAX RX
OK

�0 WA rEj(�Q Michael F. Easley, Governor-
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
y
0 Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 1, 2007
Mr. Mike Rouse
Operations Manager
P.O. Box 370
Leland, NC 28451 Re: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Carolina Pole
NPDES Permit No. NCS000222
Brunswick County
Dear Mr. Rouse,
The Division is in receipt of your response to the recent NPDES stormwater inspection conducted at the
Carolina Pole facility on August 8, 2007. The updated Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan appears to
thoroughly address all of the items listed in the inspection report. The plan appears to also address each
of the itemized requirements listed in Sections A through D of the NPDES Permit. The ownership
change form is awaiting signatures. Once the form is complete, please forward that form to the
Stormwater Permitting Unit at 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617.
When you receive your renewed NPDES permit, please carefully review the qualitative and quantitative
monitoring requirements specified in the new permit versus those outlined in your Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan and make any necessary amendments to your Plan accordingly. This will prevent any
discrepancies in the implementation of your current plan versus the requirements of the renewed NPDES
Permit.
Thank you for your timely response and your attention to this matter.
regarding this correspondence or your permit renewal, ple
7343.
= m
Sincerely,
.ate
190
_
�c rc t
Linda Willis
v
Environmental Engineer I
Surface Water Protection Section
CC: Edward Beck, Regional Supervisor, SWPS, WiRO
Central Files K_
eIly Johnson, Central Off ce, Stormwater Peririitting Unit'",
WiRO NPDES-Permit File NCS000222, Brunswick County
Should you have any questions
sitate to contact me at 910-796-
N�p�r nCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Fax [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer - 50% Recydedl10% Post Consumer Paper

of
axe Cares about People, Products and Practices
October 2, 2007
Mr. Edward Beck
Surface Water Protection Section
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Dear Mr. Beck:
DECEIVED
O C T 0 5 2007
BY:
RE: Carolina Pale Leland (Formerly General Wood)
Leland, NC —Brunswick County
Storm Water Permit # NCS000222
Compliance Evaluation Inspection, August 8, 2007
This letter is sent, with attachments, to submit our Surface Water Protection Section Permit Ownership
change Farm. A form was submitted in 2006 when Leland Land purchased the site, but during the
August 8`h inspection by Linda Willis, it was discovered that the wrong form had been completed.
If you have any questions, or require more information, please feel free to contact myself at (803) 928-
5046 or Mike Rouse at [phone],
Sincerely,
LINA POLE LELAND, INC.
ie4M
rporate Safety, Health, and Environmental
CC' R. Michael Johnson, President, Leland Land, LLC
Mike Rouse, Facility Manager, Carolina Pole Leland
Enclosure
ax® INDUSTRIES, INC. • P.O. Box 1124.Orangeburg, SC 29116 • Phone [phone] or 800.476.4401

SO
'r
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION'SECTIQN '
PERMIT NAME/OWNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
I. Please eater the permit number for which the change is requested.
NPDES Permit
(or) Certificate of Coverage
N C$ 0 0 0 2
I N I.0 I G
II. Permit status gtLor to status change.
a. Permit issued to (company name):
rz�n
(�
b. Person legally responsible for permit:
14-d-4 A . lkxxta l
First 1 MI / Last
Title
^ }Permit Holder Addttss. �41 S
J f , ]
C_ (G1ifZip
G, iitt State
y
�� o) _,K) 1 - -11 3) QIAO) 1- �131
Phone Fax
G
c. Facility name (discharge):
d. Facility address:
�, yA►dddrress
�
C. Facility contact person:
L�.�C�.+s/YL a< V �
City G State Zip
� ��}
A
A
First / / Last Phone
III. Please provide the.following for the requested change (revised permit).
a. Request for change is a result of:
Change in ownership of the facility
❑ Name change of the facility or owner
If other please explain:
b. Permit issued to (company name):
rj,_,L,C.
c. Person legally responsible for permit:
a Y-t-)1 t NKTNS' an
First / MI I Last
PR-",Le�) 2
Title
PC) V 91a
Permit Holder ad' g Address
Q uV_Q1 .
City State Zip
bSo:* 4A 6- W
Phone E-mail Address
d. Facility name (discharge): ti �
e. Facility address: `T' `i—
Address
�-� 0) C
city state Zip
f. Facility contact person:�+L�,,��
First / Ml / Last
�'a)3S 3131 rf-AAASE A
Phone E-mail Address
Revised 712005

PERMIT NAME/OWNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
Page 2 of 2
IV. Permit contact information: (if different from the person legally responsible for the permit)
Permit contact:
rhone h-mail Address
V. Will the permitted facility continue to conduct the same industrial activities conducted prior to
this ownership or name change?
Yes
❑ No (please explain)
VI. Required Items: THIS APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED UNPROCESSED IF ITEMS ARE
INCOMPLETE OR MISSING:
❑ This completed application is required for both name change and/or ownership change requests.
❑ Legal documentation of the transfer of ownership (such as relevant pages of a contract deed, or a bill
of sale) is required for an ownership change request. Articles of incorporation are not sufficient for
an ownership change.
The certifications below must be completed and signed by both the permit holder prior to the change,,and the new
applicant in the case of an ownership change request. For a name change request, the signed Applicant's Certification
is sufficient,
PERMITTEE CERTIFICATION (Permit holder prior to ownership change):
1, 0 j( L A. O&A !(X t {*- 0fi • attest that this application for a name/ownership
change has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required
parts of this application -are not completed and that if all required supporting information is not included, this
application package will be returned as incomplete.
signature Date
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION:
1, attest that this application for a name/ownership
change has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that if all required
parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information is not included, this
application,package wiIl)c�i}fned as incomplete.
...................
SEND THE COMPLETE APPLICATION PACKAGE TO:
Division of Water Quality.
Surface Water Protection Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Revised 7/2005

I hereby certify that -this is a
True and Accurate Copy of.the
North -Carolina Warranty -Deed
recorded.with the Brunswick County
Register of Deeds..
Recorded May 3, 2006
Book-13$3, Page 165,
Brunswick County Registry
Excise Tax: +
Tax Lot No. Tax Account Number
Verified by County on the day of 2006 by
After recording hold for: Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, 3737 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 400, Raleigh, .NC 27612
This Instrument was prepared by: Kilpatrick Stockton LLP (JAB)
Brief description for the Index
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED made this Cn�\ day of0.�.i_ , 2006, by and between
GRANTOR
General Wood Preserving Company, Inc.,
a North Carolina corporation
Leland Land LLC,
a North Carolina limited liability company
P. O. Box 1124
Orangeburg, SC 29116
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns,
and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as rewired by context.
WTI'NESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, in all
that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the County of Brunswick, North Carolina and more particularly
described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by deed recorded in Book , Page ,
Brunswick County Registry.
!M0$30. i

TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto
belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to
convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will
warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions
hereinafter stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
1. Pro-rata share of the 2006 ad valorem taxes.
2. Easement to Brunswick County recorded in Book 643, Page 16, Brunswick County Registry.
3. Easement to Tide Water Power Company recorded in Book 59, Page 108, Brunswick County Registry.
4. Easements to Carolina Power & Light. Company recorded in Book 207, Page 249 and Book 403, Page
939, Brunswick County Registry.
5. Right of way easements to Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company recorded. in Book 698, Page
841 and Book 698, Page 845, Brunswick County Registry.
6. Public Notice of Hazardous Waste Disposal Units recorded in Book 908, Page 1066, Brunswick County
Registry.
7. Easement to Carolina Power & Light Company recorded in Boob 117, Page 103,ok 205, page 736
and Book 207, Page 249, Brunswick County Registry (as to access easement).
8. Easement to State Highway Commission recorded in Book 201, Page 762, Brunswick County Registry
(as to access easement).
9. Easement to Brunswick County recorded in Book 643, Page 1, Brunswick County Registry (as to access
easement).
10. Deed to Seaboard Air Line Railroad recorded in Book 108, Page 455, Brunswick County Registry (as to
access easement).
11. Memo of Action recorded in Book 202, Page 405, Brunswick County Registry (as to access easement).
12. Title to that portion of the land, if any lying within the railroad right of way and rights of the railroad in and
to railroad right of way, switch tracks, spur tracks, railway facilities and other related easements, if any, on
and across the land
13. Rights of others, if any, in and to the sixty (00) foot wide access easement affecting the insured land and
the old dirt road formerly know as Wilmington -Fayetteville Road.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set her hand, the day and year first above written.
GENERAL WOOD PRESERVING COMPANY, INC.
By: A'p
Karl A. Boatright, President
9210830.1

County, North Carolina
1 certify that the following person(s) personally appeared before me this day, and
0] I have personal knowledge of the identity of the principal(s)
[] I have seen satisfactory evidence of the principal's identity, by a current state or federal
identification with the principal's photograph in the form of a
❑ A credible witness has sworn to the identity of the principal(s);
each acknowledging to me -that he or she voluntarily signed the foregoing document for the purpose stated
therein and in the capacity indicated: KAr i A . 1?7oc3.:tr 15 hi—,. esj 2n f Of Gle herCLI W 0 o d.
re ser V MS Co n►po-vi
Date: �J _
1 tpl e- ii?af+h e s Notary Public
(print name)
(official seal) My commission expires: I_k • ;� ` a 009
oF F c�wu
�P6a "MM RMMW
all' In
MATTHM
GMYr.Ifl ton 004:
9210930.1

1 =113IT A
Property Description
General Wood Preserving Company, Inc.
129.65 Acre Tract
That certain Tract of land being in Northwest Township, Brunswick County, North Carolina, said Tract
being the Tract described in Deed Book 572 Page 949 of the Brunswick County Register of Deeds and being
more fully described as follows:
Commencing from a concrete monument found, NCGS Monument "Crossover", said monument having
North Carolina NAD 83 grid coordinates of N. 188860.751 E. 2272592.302, South 63° 16'34" East, a distance of
5164.13 feet to a concrete monument found, NCGS Monument "Culvert", said monument having North
Carolina NAD 83 grid coordinates of N. 186538.587 E. 2277204.812; thence South 59040'38" East, a distance
of 1740.62 feet to an iron rod set in the center of the Motsu Railroad 130 foot right of way, the Point of
Beginning.
Thence from the Point of Beginning along the centerline of Motsu Railroad the following Eighteen (18)
courses and distances: (1) South 63°26'54" East, a distance of 1082.74 feet to a point; (2) South 26°33'06" West,
a distance of 14.94 feet to a point; (3) South 63*2615411 East, a distance of 33.16 feet to a point; (4) South
62058'54" East, a distance of 64.10 feet to a point; (5) South 61°14'54" East, a distance of 100.80 feet to a point;
(6) South 57°49'54" East, a distance of 101.50 feet to a point; (7) South 53°27'54" East, a distance of 101.00
feet to a point; (8) South 49°20'54" East, a distance of 100.60 feet to a point; (9) South 45°28'54" East, a
distance of 100.80 feet to a point; (10) South 41°27'54" East, a distance of 101.00 feet to a point; (11) South
37019'54" East, a distance of 100.40 feet to a point; (12) South 33°14'54" East, a distance of 100.90 feet to a
point; (13) South 29°30'54" East, a distance of 100.30 feet to a point; (14) South 25022'54" East, a distance of
100.60 feet to a point; (15) South 21°19'54" East, a distance of 100.10 feet to a point; (16) South 17°13'54"
East, a distance of 101.00 feet to a point; (17) South 13°56'54" East, a distance of 134.53 feet to a point; and
(18) South 12°53'54" East, a distance of 2326.10 feet to an iron rod set; thence South 77009'061" West, a distance
of 100.00 feet to an iron rod set; thence South 77°09'06" West, a distance of 147.70 feet to a concrete monument
found; thence South 62°09'06" West, a distance of 113.40 feet to an iron rod set; thence North 67018'54" West,
a distance of 134.41 feet to an iron rod set; thence North 6511454" West, a distance of 249.05 feet to an iron
rod set; thence North 559654" West, a distance of 189.79 feet to an iron rod set; thence North 41 *3T54" West,
a distance of 229.62 feet to an iron rod set; thence North 53023"54" West, a distance of 119.00 feet to an iron rod
set; thence North 60'4654" West, a distance of 288.25 feet to an iron rod set; thence North 52050'54" West, a
distance of 373.85 feet to an iron rod set; thence North 56"49'54" West, a distance of 421.54 feet to an iron rod
set; thence North 49°26'30" West, a distance of 777.32 feet to an iron rod found; thence North 28010106" East, a
distance of 18.08 feet to an iron rod found; thence North 28° 1906" East, a distance of 590.90 feet to a concrete
monument found; thence North 01°23'31" West, a distance of 1809.06 feet to the Point of Beginning,
containing 128.65 acres, more or less as shown on a plat prepared by McKim & Creed, PA. entitled
""Recombination Survey of General Wood Preserving Company, Inc. for Leland Land LLC" and dated October
15, 2005 and recorded in Map Book 3.5 , Page q3 "4 ntnswick County Registry.
TOGETHER with an easement, 60 feet wide, for ingress and egress from U.S. Highway 74-76 to the property
hereinabove conveyed, being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the southern right of way line of U.S.Highway 74-76 and the western
line of Oak Street as appears on the map of Brunswick Village recorded in Map Book 7, at Page 20, Bnuswick
County Registry, if said western line of Oak Street was extended northwardly to said highway, running thence
from said beginning point southwardly and along the western line of Oak Street extended to the centerline of the
Seaboard Coastline Railroad right of way and the northern line of the property herein conveyed; thence
southwestwardly along the northern line of the property hereinabove conveyed and the centerline of the
971US70.1

S'vaboard Coastline Railroad to the eastern line of Oak Street if said eastern line were extended southwardly;
running thence northwardly along the eastern line of Oak Street, if said line were extended northwardly, to its
intersection with the southern right of way line of U.S. Highway 74-76, thence westwardly along the southern
right of way of U.S. Highway 74-76 to the point of beginning, subject to the right of way of the Seaboard
Coastline Railroad right of way.
9310870.1