SW6170301 (5)

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC),
Steven Ball, 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Raleigh, NC 27615 = Agent for 4D Site Solutions, Inc.
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The property is located just southwest of the
intersection of Thrower Road and NC -87.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Cumberland City: Hope Mills
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 34.9006360 Long.: -78.859367°
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Longs Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): February 01, 2017
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
Number
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
review area (acreage
wetland vs. non-
"may be" subject (i.e.,
and linear feet, if
wetland waters)
Section 404 or Section
applicable
10/404)
Ditch 1
34.900904
-78.862299
450 LF
Ditch
Section 404
Wl
34.900146
-78.860808
2.93 Acres
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NAT or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Wetland Sketch Man
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit RUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: NC 2016 Cedar Creek Quadrangle
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Cumberland County Soil Survey Sheet 18
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Thrower Rd
City, State: Hope Mills, NC
County: Cumberland
Directions: The property is located just southwest of the intersection of Thrower Road and NC -87.
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: S&EC - Steven Ball
Mailing Address: 8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address t: [e-mail]
Select one:
F-1 I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: See Agent Authorization Form Attached
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address3:
✓❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION'
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
See Agent Authorization Form Attached
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
Date
W71 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
F] I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
F-1 I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WOUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
F] I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
F1I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
0 Size of Property or Project Area +1- 48 acres
nI verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
Project Coordinates: 34.900636 Latitude -78.859367 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
7 Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
F-1 Aerial Photography of the project area
FVI USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑✓ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
1-1 USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
1-1 Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
F-1 Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
F-1 USGS Topographic Map
1-1 Soil Survey Map
F-1 Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.miI/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg supe asm
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http: /www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pd
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

THRO WE16 RD
4
ext
;9
3 � A k I �'�d
rc)
Project Number: Map Title: N
13097 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: Figure 1 - USGS Map I I I I I I
SB James Place Property Feet
Scale: Cumberland County, NC
1 11= 1000' u
Source:Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
date: NC Cedar Creek M12 l+..1%py R-0.S.j.I"R.06�.\C2%15. 17eon.:(919) U6.590(-F—(919)fif 96
01/27/17 2016 Quadrangle

�y
��13
orf a_
NOA Goo
JOE
GnA 7
oA
N OA
A
NUB
NoAi rya
t
Tek all
zea
X11{4 ii `" I'TF (3 f
a� B
Project Number: Map Title: N
13097 0 1,000 2,000
Project Manager: Figure 2 - Soil Survey Map I I I I I I
SB James Place Property Feet
Scale: 1 1000' Cumberland County, NC
" =
Source: Soil & Etn-iroiiniental Consultants, PA
Date: Cumberland County %317 h'a1,.urN—Riled.\W.104,Rw.p).\C2MI5-PI.—.(919)Ai6.590(+ F— (919)
01/27/17 Soil Survey Sheet 18 ..—

ftcl
dyfzli 31c1�
�\\ •ditch -Ttol
`♦` ditch �ft-e l
\\\\ ditch 4ft clime=
��Co�ec Rd
\ ' F"
i
I I
/
I
I \ 1 1 I \\ \\
\ A \ \
39
33 '\ \ '\ `\ i
\ \1
\ \ \\ I\
�.3231\\
S
30
o29
• 28/-
/2625
24
\\ 1
\\ \\\ �iZ.2221 \ \\ �\ \\\ \\\ - ♦ Io -11 i
X18
I I \\ �\ ♦\ 93.10 -��o
\�\p6
05
\ A4 \ \ \
SIP' \\\ \\\ \ \\\\\ I \\ `

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: James Place Property City/County: Hope Mills / Wake Sampling Date: 2/01/17
Applicant/Owner: 4D Site Solutions, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): S&EC - Steven Ball Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 137 Lat: 34.900114 Long: -78.860875 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: NoB - Norfolk Loamy Sand NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes J v l No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes = No 0
Are Vegetation 0, Soil �, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
L] Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑✓ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches): N/A
Saturation Present? Yes Q No ❑ Depth (inches): 0"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1
50% of total cover: 40%
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
5.
6.
80% = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16%
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1 Arundinaria gigantea 80% Yes FACW
3.
4.
ou 70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40% 20% of total cover: 16%
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax laurifolia 40% Yes FAC
4.
5.
40% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% 20% of total cover: 8%
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Pinus taeda
50%
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2. Acer rubrum
30%
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
50% of total cover: 40%
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
5.
6.
80% = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16%
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1 Arundinaria gigantea 80% Yes FACW
3.
4.
ou 70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40% 20% of total cover: 16%
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax laurifolia 40% Yes FAC
4.
5.
40% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% 20% of total cover: 8%
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
ED2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes LZI No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-20" 2.5Y 3/1 90
2.5Y 4/6 10 D PL SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑✓ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑✓ El
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: James Place Property City/County: Hope Mills / Wake Sampling Date: 2/01/17
Applicant/Owner: 4D Site Solutions, Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): S&EC - Steven Ball Section, Township, Range: N/A
Hillslo e Concave °
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): p Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (/o): �
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 137 Lat: Long: Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: None
J v l
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil ❑, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes = No 0
Are Vegetation 0, Soil �, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
L] Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No 0 Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No= Depth (inches): N/A
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No i ' Depth (inches): N/A
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2
50% of total cover: 45%
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
5.
6.
90% = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18%
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1 Ilex opaca 20% Yes FACU
3.
4.
/U_/0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10% 20% of total cover: 4%
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 30% Yes FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Pinus taeda
30%
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
40%
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5
Acer rubrum 20% Yes FAC
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
50% of total cover: 45%
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
5.
6.
90% = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 18%
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1 Ilex opaca 20% Yes FACU
3.
4.
/U_/0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10% 20% of total cover: 4%
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' Radius )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 30% Yes FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
30%
= Total Cover Vegetation
0 o/o Present? Yes � No�
50% of total cover: 15 /0 20% of total cover: 6
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-20" 10YR 4/4 100%
SCL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced
Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑ ❑✓
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Environmental Consultants,
841-1 Palls of Neuse Road, Suitc 104, Raleigh, NC 2761-5 • I'htme: (919) 8I6 -59W • I -ax: ()19) 840-9467
sandec.com
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION I AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: James Place Site S&EC Project 9 13097
Date: 03-13-17
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: Emily Greer Field Office: Wilmin ton Regulatory Field Office
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and Soil &
Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff, as my agent, to enter upon the property herein described
for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with 'Waters of
the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This document also authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf
and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of permit or certification and
any and all associated standard and special conditions. This notification supersedes any previous
correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site
meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0441-18-8740 0441-29-5123 & 0441-28-7514
Site Address: 3544 Thrower Road
City, County, State: Grays Creek NC
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: JHS Grays Creek Properties. LLC
Mailing Address: 918 Cedar Creek Road Fayetteville, NC 28312
Telephone Number: 910-483-3266
Email: 'smith smithint.com
Property Owner (please print) Date
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.