Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW4240101_Supplement-EZ Form_20240129 SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE FORMS LOADED PROJECT INFORMATION 1 Project Name Lakeside Subd.Phase One Forsyth County 2 Project Area(ac) 18.318 3 Coastal Wetland Area(ac) N/A 4 Surface Water Area(ac) N/A 5 Is this project High or Low Density? Low _ 6 Does this project use an off-site SCM? No COMPLIANCE WITH 02H.1003(4) 1 7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided(feet) N/A 8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? N/A 9 If BUA is proposed in the setback,does it meet NCAC 02H.1003(4)(c-d)? N/A 10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? No [NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs: 11 Infiltration System 0 12 Bioretention Cell 0 13 Wet Pond 0 14 Stormwater Wetland { 0 15 Permeable Pavement 0 16 Sand Filter i 0 17 Rainwater Harvesting(RWH) ' 0 18 Green Roof 0 19 Level Spreader-Filter Strip(LS-FS)_ 0 20 Disconnected Impervious Surface(DIS) 0 21 Treatment Swale 0 22 Dry Pond 0 _ 23 StormFilter 0 ' 24 Silva Cell 25 Bayfilter 0 26 Filterra 0 FORMS LOADED DESIGNER CERTIFICATION 27 Name and Title: Norris Z.Clayton,P.E. 28 Organization: j Hugh Creed Associates,Inc., P.A. 29 Street address: 1306 W.Wendover Ave 30 'City,State,Zip: Greensboro,NC 27408 31 Phone number(s): 336-275-9826 - 32 Email: ! hca@hughcreedassociates.com Certification Statement: I certify,under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision;that the information provided in the form is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate,and complete;and that the engineering plans, specifications,operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here. Designer ,-/G,i /5 7; GAG/-71 E- et€ee¢rrat�(q� ;.a 4l FARO 4,� . 8T� ;r�,s� °� ®u "4L1Desig) C 3 F ° 1' ", a it 2 Seal Date DRAINAGE AREAS 1 Is this a high density project? No 2 If so,number of drainage areas/SCMs 0 3 Does this project have low density areas? Yes 4 If so,number of low density drainage areas 1 Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule 5 versions? No FORMS LOADED DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION Entire Site LD 1 4 1 Type of SCM N/A N/A i 5 Total drainage area(sq ft) N/A N/A P 6 Onsite drainage area(sq ft) 797,941 797,941 a 7 !Offsite drainage area(sq ft) N/A N/A 8 ;Total BUA in project(sq ft) 112989 sf 112989 sf _ !New BUA on subdivided lots(subject to permitting) 9 i(sq ft) 90000 sf 90000 sf t INew BUA not on subdivided lots(subject to 10 i Reim ittirig)(sf) 22989 sf 22989 sf 11 lOffsite BUA(sq ft) 12 Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots: -Parking(sq ft) -Sidewalk(sq ft) -Roof(sq ft) Roadway(sq ft)-Future(sq ft) 22989 sf 22989 sf -Other,please specify in the comment box below(sq ft) . New infiltrating permeable pavement on�� 13 subdivided lots(sq ft) k 0 sf 0 sf New infiltrating permeable pavement not on i 14 subdivided lots s ft 1 0 sf 0 sf ,Existing BUA that will remain(not subject to 15 1permitting)(sq ft) 1 0 sf 0 sf 16 Existing BUA that is already permitted(sq ft) 0 sf 0 sf 17 Existing BUA that will be removed(sq ft) 0 sf r 0 sf 18 Percent BUA 14% 14% 19 Design storm(inches) 1N/A N/A 20 Design volume of SCM(cu ft) - 1 N/A N/A 21 Calculation method for design volume N/A N/A ,ADDITIONAL INFORMATION t _ Please use this space to provide any additional information about the 22 ldrainage area(s): k F LOW DENSITY ri,.NRE• *ill LOW D 1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes 3 Has the use of piping been minimized per.1003(2)(c)? Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances(H:V) sf 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 5 6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? No 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s)(%) 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s)(feet) 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s)(H:V) 10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s)(feet) 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? _ 12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? No 13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes 14 ;Are variations to rule.1003 proposed? No �. - --,..- 'ADDITIONAL INFORMATION _ 15 Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: Project uses ribbon pavement with roadside swales with 3:1 side slopes Swale Drainage BUA Pervious Q Slope V.', V,n,,,, Flow depth Area area C # (ac) (ac) (ac) ..-.._- (cfs) (%) I (fps) I (fps) I (ft) 1 ---4 _ - 5 + 6 i 10 I 11 I 1 -12 J 13 ' I [r 14 15 � 0.45 0.10 I 0.35 0.40 1.17 8.00 ) 5.00 4.20 0.04 16 0.68 0.20 0.48 0.40 1.77 8.00 I 5.00 I 4.60 0.40 17 18 19 0.46 0.14 0.32 0.40 1.20 6.00 5.00 3.70 0.35 20 0.15 0.70 0,80 0.40 0.39 6.00 5.00 2.90 0.25 21 .� 22 23 24 25 26 27 2829 30