SW8110906_HISTORICAL FILE_20120430

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SW8 L W _qj0g
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
® HISTORICAL FILE
❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
20120y30
YYYYMMDD

pA
MC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
April 30, 2012
Commanding Officer
USMCB Camp Legeune
c/o Carl Baker, Deputy Public Works Officer
Building 1005 Michael Road
Camp Lejeune, NC 28457-2539
Subject: State Stormwater Management Permit No. SW8 110906
2D Anglico and 2N BN OPS Complexes
High Density Commercial Wet Detention Pond Project
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Baker:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The Wilmington Regional Office received a complete Stormwater Management Permit
Application for 2D Anglico and 2N OPS Complexes on April 23, 2012. Staff review of the plans
and specifications has determined that the project, as proposed, will comply with the
Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC 2H.1000 and Session Law 2008-211. We
are forwarding Permit No. SW8 110906 dated April 30, 2012, for the construction, operation and
maintenance of the BMP's and built -upon areas associated with the subject project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2020, and shall be subject
to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. Please pay special attention to the
conditions listed in this permit regarding the Operation and Maintenance of the BMP(s),
recordation of deed restrictions, procedures for changes of ownership, transferring the permit,
and renewing the permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for operation and
maintenance of the stormwater management system, to record deed restrictions, to transfer the
permit, or to renew the permit, will result in future compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an adjudicatory, hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150E of the North
Carolina General Statutes, and must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of receipt of
this permit. You should contact the OAH with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing fee
is required) and/or the details of the filing process at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC
27699-6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000, or visit their website at www.NCOAH.com.
Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact
Linda Lewis at [phone].
Sinc ely, c y
C C �C/
Pat Charles aki�, Director
Division of Water Quality
GDS/ arl: S:\WQS\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\201 1\1 10906 HS\2012 04 permit 110906
cc: Howard Resnik, P.E., Coastal Site Design
LWilm ington-Reg Iona I-Office-Stormwater_Eile
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
One
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ DENR Assistance: 1-877-623-6748
NorthCarolina
Internet: wxw.ncwaterquality.org
uraly
Naturally
An Equal Opponuniry 1 AKrmatme Action EmpWyer

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 110906
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
HIGH DENSITY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North
Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Commanding Officer USMCB Camp Lejeune
2D Anglico and 2N OPS Complexes
Off Holcomb Boulevard, Camp Lejeune, Onslow County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of four (4) wet detention ponds in compliance with
the provisions of 15A NCAC 2H .1000 and Session Law 2008-211 (hereafter collectively
referred to as the "stormwater rules') the approved stormwater management plans and
specifications and other supporting data as attached and on file with and approved by the
Division of Water Quality and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2020, and shall be
subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of stormwater
described in the application and other supporting data.
2. The overall density within the 150.74 acre project area is limited to 24%. The 150.74
acre project area is limited to a maximum of 1,575,885 squpre feet of impervious
area. This2project currently proposes a total of 1,350,245 ft of built -upon area and 2
225,640 ft of future impervious area. Within the 150.74 acre project area, 193,284 ft
of impervious area is not being picked up or treated. The runoff from the remainder of
the project's built -upon area must be collected and treated in one of the four wet
detention ponds covered by this permit.
3. This stormwater system has been approved for the management of stormwater runoff
as described in Section 1.8 of this permit. The stormwater cgntrols labelppd A, B, C azpd
D have been dosigned to handle the runoff from 601,894 ft , 252,148 ft , 133,601 ft ,
and 394,958 ft of built -upon area, respectively.
4. A 50' wide vegetative buffer must be provided and maintained adjacent surface
waters, measured horizontally from and perpendicular to the normal pool of
impounded structures, the top of bank of both sides of streams and rivers and the
mean high water line of tidal waters.
5. The tract will be limited to the amount of built -upon area indicated in this permit, and
per approved plans. The built -upon area for the future development to BMP A, B, C
and D is limited to 90,000 ft , 10,000 ft , 10,000 ft and 10,000 ft , respectively.
Page 2 of 7

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 110906
All stormwater collection and treatment systems must be located in either dedicated
common areas or recorded easements. The final plats for the project will be recorded
showing all such required easements, in accordance with the approved plans.
The runoff from all built -upon area within the permitted drainage areas of this project
must be directed into the appropriate permitted stormwater control system.
The following design criteria have been provided in the four wet detention ponds and
must be maintained at design condition:
El
7.1
C.
d.
e.
f.
9.
h.
k.
I.
m
o.
P.
q.
r.
Drainage Area, acres:
Onsite, ft2:
Offsite, ft2:
Total Impervious Surfaces, ft2:
Onsite, ft2:
Offsite, ft2:
Design Storm, inches:
Average Pond Design Depth, feet:
TSS removal efficiency:
Permanent Pool Elevation, FMSL:
Permanent Pool Surface Area, ft2:
Permitted Storage Volume, ft3:
Temporary Storage Elevation, FMSL:
Pre-dev. 1 yr-24 hr. discharge rate, cfs:
Controlling Orifice, 0 pipe, inches:
Orifice flowrate, cfs:
Permanent Pool Volume, ft3:
Permitted Forebay Volume, ft3:
Fountain Horsepower
Receiving Stream/River Basin:
Stream Index Number:
Classification of Water Body:
II. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
Pond A Pond B Pond C Pond D
22.48
11.42
5.25
18.52
979,361
497,272
228,797
806,844
0
0
0
0
601,894
252,148
133,601
394,958
601,894
252,148
133,601
394,958
0
0
0
0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
4.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
90%
90%
90%
90%
13.0
12.0
12.0
10.0
57,953
29,496
22,626
48,499
76,991
35,871
19,797
54,145
14.2
13.1
12.8
11.0
0.89
0.45
0.21
0.73
4.0
2.75
2.50
3.50
0.26
0.12
0.09
0.18
219,464
93,377
70,586
145,008
42,721
18,946
14,325
31,154
%
1/3
'%
1/2
Wallace Creek
/ WOK02
19-20
"SB NSW"
The stormwater management system shall be constructed in its entirety, vegetated
and operational for its intended use prior to the construction of any built -upon surface.
2. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of the
system will be repaired immediately.
3. The permittee shall, at all times, provide the operation and maintenance necessary to
assure the permitted stormwater system functions at optimum efficiency. The signed
and approved Operation and Maintenance Agreement must be followed in its entirety
and maintenance must occur at the scheduled intervals.
4. Records of maintenance activities must be kept and made available upon request to
authorized personnel of DWQ. The records will indicate the date, activity, name of
person performing the work and what actions were taken.
Upon completion of construction, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, and
prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification must be received from an
appropriate designer for the system installed certifying that the permitted facility has
been installed in accordance with this permit, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting documentation. Any deviations from the approved plans and
specifications must be noted on the Certification. A modification may be required for
those deviations.
Page 3 of 7

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 110906
6. Decorative spray fountains will be allowed in the stormwater treatment system,
subject to the following criteria:
a. The fountain must draw its water from less than 2' below the permanent pool
surface.
b. Separated units, where the nozzle, pump and intake are connected by tubing,
may be used only if they draw water from the surface in the deepest part of the
pond.
c. The fountain must not be placed into the forebay.
d. The falling water from the fountain must be centered in the main pond, away
from the shoreline.
e. The maximum horsepower for a fountain in any of these ponds is as listed in
Section 1.8 (o) of this permit.
7. The facilities shall be constructed as shown on the approved plans. This permit shall
become void unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with the conditions of
this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting data.
8. If the stormwater system was used as an Erosion Control device, it must be restored
to design condition prior to operation as a stormwater treatment device, and prior to
occupancy of the facility.
9. Access to the stormwater facilities for inspection and maintenance shall be
maintained via appropriate recorded easements at all times.
10. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for
revised plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, for any
modification to the approved plans, including, but not limited to, those listed below:
a. Any revision to any item shown on the approved plans, including the
stormwater management measures, built -upon area, details, etc.
b. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area or to the
drainage area.
C. Further development, subdivision, acquisition, lease or sale of any, all or part of
the project area. The project area is defined as all property owned by the
permittee, for which Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval or a
CAMA Major permit was sought.
d. Filling in, altering, or piping of any vegetative conveyance shown on the
approved plan.
11. Prior to the construction of any permitted future areas shown on the approved plans,
the permittee shall submit final site layout and grading plans to the Division for
approval.
12. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one or
more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame specified in
the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the Director for
modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide copies
of revised plans and certification in writing to the Director that the changes have been
made.
13. Approved plans and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference and
are enforceable parts of the permit. A copy of the approved plans and specifications
shall be maintained on file by the Permittee at all times.
Page 4 of 7

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 110906
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and
approval by the Director. At least 30 days prior to a change of ownership, or a name
change of the permittee or of the project, or a mailing address change, the permittee
must submit a completed and signed Name/Ownership Change Form to the Division
of Water Quality, accompanied by the supporting documentation as listed on the form.
The approval of this request will be considered on its merits and may or may not be
approved.
2. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all permit conditions until such time
as the Division approves the transfer request. Neither the sale of the project in whole
or in part, nor the conveyance of common area to a third party constitutes an
approved transfer of the stormwater permit.
3. Any individual or entity found to be in noncompliance with the provisions of this
storrmwater management permit or the requirements of the Stormwater rules is
subject to enforcement procedures as set forth in G.S. 143 Article 21.
4. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with any
and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by other
government agencies (local, state, and federal) having jurisdiction.
5. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, the Permittee shall take
immediate corrective action, including those as may be required by this Division, such
as the construction of additional or replacement stormwater management systems.
6. The permittee grants DENR Staff permission to enter the property during normal
business hours for the purpose of inspecting all components of the permitted
stormwater management facility.
7. The permit remains in force and effect until modified, revoked, terminated or renewed.
The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The filing
of a request for a permit modification, revocation and re -issuance or termination does
not stay any permit condition.
8. Unless specified elsewhere, permanent seeding requirements for the stormwater
control must follow the guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and
Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
9. The permittee shall submit a permit renewal request at least 180 days prior to the
expiration date of this permit. The renewal request must include the appropriate
documentation and the processing fee.
Permit issued this the 30th day of April 2012.
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
ivision of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 5 of 7

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 110906
2D Anglico and 2N OPS Complexes
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 110906
Onslow Countv
Designer's Certification
I, , as a duly registered in the State
of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically/ weekly/ full time) the
construction of the project,
(Project)
for (Project Owner) hereby state that, to the best
of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the project construction
such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent
of the approved plans and specifications.
The checklist of items on page 2 of this form is included in the Certification.
Noted deviations from approved plans and specifications:
Signature
Registration Number
Date
SEAL
Page 6 of 7

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 110906
Certification Requirements:
1. The drainage area to the system contains approximately the permitted
acreage.
2. The drainage area to the system contains no more than the permitted amount
of built -upon area.
3. All the built -upon area associated with the project is graded such that the runoff
drains to the system.
4. All roof drains are located such that the runoff is directed into the system.
5. The outlet structure elevations are per the approved plan.
6. The outlet structure is located per the approved plans.
7. Trash rack is provided on the outlet structure.
8. All slopes are grassed with permanent vegetation.
9. Vegetated slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
10. The inlets are located per the approved plans and do not cause short-circuiting
of the system.
11. The permitted amounts of surface area and/or volume have been provided.
12. Required drawdown devices are correctly sized and located per the approved
plans.
13. All required design depths are provided.
14. All required parts of the system are provided, such as a vegetated shelf, and a
forebay.
15. The required system dimensions are provided per the approved plans.
16. All components of the stormwater BMP are located in either recorded common
areas, or recorded easements.
cc: NCDENR-DWQ Regional Office
Page 7 of 7

r'DWQ.USEaJNLi'
Date Rece'ved
Fee Paid
Permit Number
o
OvO,-51�yll
Iv �oG
Applicable Rules:
(select all that apply)
❑ Coastal SW —1995 ❑ Coastal SW — 2008 ❑ Ph II - Post Construction
❑ Non -Coastal SW- HQW/ORW Waters ❑ Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Other WQ M mt Plan:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
2D ANGLICO AND 2N BN OPS COMPLEXES
2. Location of Project (street address):
off Holcomb Blvd
City:Camp Lejeune County:Onlsow Zip:28547-2539
3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
Intersection of US 17 and NC 24. Take NC 24 East to Holcomb Blvd. Turn right onto Holcomb Blvd. Travel
approximately 2.8 miles Tum right onto gravel road that's located approximatley 0.28 miles past the bridge
4. Latitude:34° 41' 28" N Longitude:77° 19' 53" W of the main entrance to the project.
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): ®New ❑Modification
b.If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit number , its issue date (if known) , and the status of construction: ❑Not Started
❑Partially Completed* ❑ Completed* *provide a designer's certification
2. Specify the type of project (check one):
®Low Density ❑High Density ❑Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System ❑Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from DWQ
requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the stormwater project number, if
assigned, and the previous name of the project, if different than currently
proposed,
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748):
❑CAMA Major ❑Sedimentation/Erosion Control: _
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater ❑404/401 Permit: Proposed Impacts
ac of Disturbed Area
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/Permit Number,
issue date and the type of each permit:
Form SWU-101 Version 07July2009
APR u 9 Z01Z
Page 1 of 6 -- — —"

III. CONTACT INFORMATION
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the project):
Applicant/Organization:MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEI EUNE
Signing Official & Title:Carl Baker,Deputy Public Works Officer
b.Contact information for person listed in item la above:
Street Address:BLDG 1005 MICHAEL ROAD
City:MCB CAMP LEIEUNE State:NC Zip:28542
Mailing Address (if applicable):
Phone: (910 ) 451-2213
Email:[e-mail]
Zip:
Fax: (910 ) 451-2927
c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is:
® The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item 3a)
❑ Lessee* (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below)
❑ Purchaser* (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and
2b below)
❑ Developer* (Complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property
Signing Official &
b.Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:
City:
Mailing Address (if
City:
Phone: ( )
Email:
State: Zip:
Fax: ( )
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact Person/Organization:#####
Signing Official & Title:
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:
City: State: Zip:
Phone: ( ) Fax: ( )
Email:
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: MCAS Camp Lejeune
Point of Contact: Phone #: ( )
i APR U 9 2012
Form SWU-101 Version 07July2009 Page 2 of 6

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated.
The low density areas will sheet flow and areas of high density will be treated with wet ponds designed for
2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
❑ Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date:
❑ Valid Building Permit Issued Date:
❑ Other: Date:
b.Identify the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with:
❑ Coastal SW -1995 ❑ Ph II - Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the White Oak River basin.
4. Total Property Area: 150.74 acres 5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: n/a acres
6. Total Surface Water Area: 0 acres
7. Total Property Area (4) - Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) - Total Surface Water Area (6) = Total Project
Area*:150.74 acres
Total project urea shall be calculated to exclude the following the normal pool of im ounded structures, the area
bekueen the banks of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal High Water (N line or Mean High Water
(MHW) line, and coastal wetlands landward from the NHW (or MHW) line. The resultant project area is used to
calculate overall percent built upon area (BUA). Non -coastal wetlands landward of the NHW (or MHW) line cony
be included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100 = 24
9. How many drainage areas does the project have?1 (For high density, count 1 for each proposed engineered
stormwater BMP. For low density and other projects, use 1 for the whole property area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area
provided in the same format as below.
Basin Information
Drainage Area
Drainage Area
Drainage Area
Drainage Area
Receiving Stream Name
Stream Class *
Stream Index Number
Total Drainage Area (so
On -site Drainage Area (sf)
Off -site Drainage Area (sf)
Proposed Impervious Area** s
% Impervious Area** total
Impervious' Surface Area
Drainage Area
Drainage Area
Draina e Area ,
Draina e Area _
On -site Buildings/ Lots (so
On -site Streets (so
On -site Parkin (so
On -site Sidewalks (so
Other on -site (so
Future (so
Off -site (so
Existing BUA*** (so
Total (so:
Stream Class and Index Number can be determined at: http://712o.enr.state.nc.uslbims/reportslreportsVIB.litniI
Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas, t -�
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc. _
Form SWU-101 Version 07Ju1y2009 Page 3 of 6 APR 0 9 2012

2D ANGLICO AND 2N EIN OPS COMPLEXES
Receiving Stream Class
Stream Index Number
Drainage area
Existing Impervious` Area
Proposed Impervious' Area
% Impervious' Area (total)
Area
Total Drains
311ace Creek
SB NSW
19-20
6,566,187 sf or 150.74 acres
- sf or - acres
1,575,885 sf or 36.18 acres
24.0 %
On -site Buildings/Driveways
230,263
sf or
5.29
acres
On -site Streets & Curbing
254,473
sf or
5.84
acres
On -site Parking
823,644
st or
18.91
acres
On -site Sidewalks
41,865
sf or
0.96
acres
Other on -site (future impervious)
225,640
sf or
5.18
acres
Off -site
Existing BUA
-
-
Total:
1,575,885
sf or
36.18
acres
Untreated Area Outside
of Pond DA's
SB NSW
19-20
4,053,913 sf or 93.06 acres
0 sf or - acres
193,284 sf or 4.44 acres
4.8 %
o
sf or
-
acres
58,546
sf or
1.34
acres
8,818
sf or
0.20
acres
20,280
sf or
0.47
acres
105,640
sf or
-
acres
193,284 sf or 4.44 acres
Drainage Area A
Dnun a
211Qy�c^
SBNSW
19-20
979,361
sf or
22.48 acres
0
sf or
0.00 acres
601,894
sf or
13.82 acres
61.5 %
89,378
st or
2.Ub
acres
130,913
sf or
3.01
acres
280,810
sf or
6.45
acres
10,793
sf or
0.25
acres
90,000
sf or
-
acres
601,894 sf or 13.82 acres
Drainage Area B Drainage Area C Drainage Area D
Basin Information POND B I POND C I POND D
Receiving Stream Class
Stream Index Number
'Drainage area
-Existing Impervious' Area
Proposed Impervious' Area
% Impervious' Area (total)
Surface Area
On -site Streets & Curbing
On -site Parking
On -site Sidewalks
Other on -site (future impervious)
Off -site
Existing BUA
Total:
APR 0-9 2012 I1,
_� J
illace Creek
Wallace Creek
SB NSW
SB NSW
19-20
19-20
497,272 sf or 11.42 acres
228,797 sf or 5.25 acres
0 sf or - acres
0 sf or - acres
252,148 sf or 5.79 acres
-
133,601 sf or 3.07 acres
50.7%
58.4%
113,512
sf or
2.61
acres
65,014
sf or
1.49
acres
52,830
sf or
1.21
acres
10,792
sf or
0.25
acres
10,000
sf or
0.23
acres
252,148 sf or 5.79 acres
6,278
st or
U.14 acres
sf or
- acres
117,323
sf or
2.69 acres
sf or
- acres
10,000
sf or
- acres
133,601 sf or 3.07 acres
SS NSW V
19-20
806,844 sf or 18.52 acres
0 sf or 0.00 acres
394,958 sf or 9.07 acres.
49.0%
21,U9b
51 or
U.46
acres
0
sf or
0.00
acres
363,863
sf or
8.35
acres
0
sf or
0.00
acres
10,000
sf or
-
acres
394,958 sf or 9.07 acres
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
-POBOX 4041 --
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

'Report only that amount of existing BUA that will remain after development. Do not report ally existing BUA that
is to be removed and which will be replaced by new BUA.
11. How was the off -site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation.
Projects in Union County: Contact DWQ Central Office staff to check if the project is located within a Threatened &
Endangered Species watershed that may be subject to more stringent stormwater requirements as per NCAC 0213.0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O&M) forms
must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
fromhttp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmD forms.htm.
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application instruction sheet and BMP
checklists are available from http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp forms.htm. The complete application
package should be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Office. (The appropriate office may be found by
locating project on the interactive online map at http://b2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/msi maps.htm.)
Please indicate that the following required information have been provided by initialing in the space provided
for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions
for each submitted application package from httl2://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp forms.htm.
Initials
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form. /I,1.
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants`
Form. (if required as per Part VII below)
3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (_sealed, signed and dated) and O&M RnQ.
agreement(s) for each BMP.
4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable to NCDENR. (For an Express review, refer to µIn.
http://www.envhelp.org/pages/onestopexpress.html for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for
additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.)
5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/management for
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the n R,
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within'/z mile of the site boundary, include the 1/2
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations.
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including:
a. Development/Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend. -
e. North arrow.
f. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal
waters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines.
• Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tidal waters.
i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances.
j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations.
1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures.
in. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who
made the determination on the plans.
n. Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations.
o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate document).
p. Vegetated buffers (where required).
rt,n.
APR 0 9 2012
FormSWU-101 Version07July2009 Page 4of6

9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify
elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5"xll" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DWQ to venfij the SHWP prior
to submittal, [phone].)
10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book: Page No: 9 C 9,
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC g,g,
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item la, 2a, and/or 3a per NCAC 2H.1003(e). The
corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
httl2://www.secretary.state.nc.us/Corporations/CSearch.aspx
VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built -upon area must be
provided as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed
restrictions and protective covenants forms can be downloaded from
htty://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bml2 forms.htmtideed restrictions. Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(s) certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DWQ and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineer:Howard Resnik, PE
Consulting Firm: Coastal Site Design, PC
Mailing Address:Po BOX 4041
City: Wilmington State:NC Zip:28406
Phone: (910 ) 791-4441
Email:[e-mail]
Fax: (910 ) 791-1501
IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this
section)
I, (print or hype name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2a) certify that I
own the property identified in this permit application, and thus give permission to (print or hjpe name of person
listed in Contact Information, item la) with (print or type name of organization listed in
Contact Information, item lb) to develop the project as currently proposed. A copy of
the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided with the submittal, which indicates the
party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.
APR U 9 Z01Z
Form SWU-101 Version 071u1y2009 Page 5 of __

As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that if my designated
agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DWQ Stormwater permit reverts back to
me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DWQ immediately and submit a
completed Name/Ownership Change Form within 30 days; otherwise I will be operating a stormwater treatment
facility without a valid permit. 1 understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility without a valid
permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement action including
the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day, pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6.
Date:
a Notary Public for the State of County of
do hereby certify that
before me this _ day of
personally appeared
and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
SEAL
My commission
X. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or hype name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2) (fwrl
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable stormw^r rules under 15A >19AC 2H .1000, SL 2006-246 (Ph. II - Post Construction) or SL 2008-211.
Date:-%�� 7
a Notary Publl'icII for the State of!Ya(' &rJ 111R) , County of
N S 10 VJ do hereby certify that C&F 1 T � !�(A Q personally appeared
before me this L day of Mai: G� DI and acl owledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
ti
IMY
SYLVIA NORRIS
NOTARY PUBLIC
ONSLOW COUNTYCOMMISSIONEXPIRES� �'
Form SWU-101 Version 07July2009
SEAL
My commission expires at"
APR U 9 NIZ
Page 6 of 6 r — _

COASTAL SITE DESI
Wilmington, NC 28406
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
License # C-2710
April 19, 2012
Linda Lewis
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Express Storm Water
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Re: Express Storm Water
2D ANGLICO AND 2N BN OPS COMPLEXES
Onslow County
CSD Project No. 11 -025 3 .
Dear Linda:
PC
Thank you for your comments on the 2D ANGLICO AND 2N BN OPS COMPLEXES submittal. I've noted below our response or
actions regarding your comments for the referenced project. Enclosed please find the following items.
- two (2) copies of the stormwater plan CE102-105, and CE501,CE503
- revised supplement for Pond A
- two (2) copies of the impervious dimension and drainage area map
Items
added SHWT elevation to supplement
added callout for 4" hole to be drilled in the outlet structure detail.
changed 3" to 4" in plan view detail of outlet structure.
changed shelf area to 2,150 sf
added additional structure data to sheet CE 105
a 6" high curb is called out on revised sheets for the edge of concrete where inlets 16A - C are being proposed.
added spot shots to edges of BUA where impervious is draining to wet basins.
impervious dimension are shown on the "IMP. DIMS & DRAINAGE AREA" map enclosed.
downloaded new supplemental sheet and error message has been corrected.
Please call if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
Rodney right
Encl.: As noted above
cc: HNTB
APR 2 3 Zo

Lewis,Linda
From: Lewis, Linda
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 4:14 PM
To: 'Howard Resnik'
Cc: Rodney Wright; Russell, Janet; 'Towler CIV David W'
Subject: SW8 110906 Review Comments (2D Anglico and 2N BN Ops Complexes)
I've completed my review of this project, and have the following comments:
✓1. Please add the SHWT elevation to the supplement for Pond A. It was left blank.
,/2. The outlet structure section view details for Pond A are missing a statement regarding the 4" hole that
needs to be drilled into the 6" cap on the orifice assembly. All of the other outlet structure details include
this statement above the note about the skimmer.
✓3. The plan view for Pond A's outlet structure incorrectly refers to a 3" orifice. Please correct.
V/ 4. The vegetated shelf area for Pond C incorrectly refers to 12,150 square feet of underwater shelf area
when it should be 2,150 sf.
v�UJ% 5. There are a few missing numbers on the structure data chart on sheet CE 106. We appear to be
missing everything after 12.
/6. The concrete slab area draining to Pond D has inlets on one side, 16-A, 16-13, and 16-C. If there is no
curbing behind those inlets, how can the Division be assured that all of the runoff is being collected?
There is no collection ditch or swale behind those inlets.
✓7. Please add spot elevations to the outer corners of the proposed BUA. Contours can only convey a
general grading scheme, but spot elevations provide specific elevations that the area will be graded to.
✓' 8. Please provide a layout plan with the dimensions of the proposed built -upon area, including buildings,
roads, parking, sidewalks, jogging trail, etc.
Please submit the requested information by April 24, 2012.
p.s. I am looking into the "Insufficient Minimum Volume" error message that you received on the Pond A
supplement. I have two possible explanations as to why it happened on that one and not on the others. The
spreadsheet might must be doing its own volume calculation in the background (Simple Method) and
comparing that to what you enter. If that isn't it, then I think the difference could be in rounding. You should
carry over at least 4 significant figures throughout the calculation, and round only the final answer. The
spreadsheet uses 4 significant figures for Rv — I actually calculated a required volume for Pond A that was a
few hundred cubic feet more than what you reported, just by using Rv of .6014 instead of .60. I'm waiting to
hear back from Raleigh on my suggestion to just get rid of that error message altogether. The more important
comparison is whether or not you have provided sufficient volume in the pond vs. what's required.
S:\wqs\stormwater\permits & projects\2011\110906 HD\2012 04 addinfo 110906
Linda Lewis
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7215
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may
be disclosed to third parties.

COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
Wilmington, NC 28406
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
License R C-2710
April 9, 2012
Linda Lewis
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Express Storm Water
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Re: Express Storm Water
21) ANGLICO AND 2N BN OPS COMPLEXES
Onslow County
CSD Project No. 11-0253
Dear Linda:
Enclosed please find:
two (2) copies of the stormwater plans
one (1) copy of the stormwater calculations
stormwater application
O&M for wet ponds
Pond supplements
$4,000 check
Project limits map
impervious dimension and drainage area map
Please call if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
14UAO
Rodney Wright
Encl.: As noted above
cc: HNTB
APR G 9 Z01Z

GET PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BN OPS Complexes
ISi£f
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Leteune NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
�^-�•�'��•-•w'�. BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 15 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions, Inc. LOGGED BY: gwh
BORING LOG
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-23-11
BMP-1 DEPTH TO WATER - INITIAL•: s 8 AFTER 24 HOURS: ; CAVING> L
m n s" .2 m m 2 m y, $ TEST RESULTS
m cn o d o Description m E i E> E e O m a Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
to E in 9 m a z v Moisture Content -•
s o 0 N-Value -
Tan and brown, moist, Poody Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) 110 2.0 3.04 0 5.0 6 . 0 7
with trace Silt, VeryLoose ;' �''; 1 24 ss s 3
9
.. .. E 4.7
Brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace x
Silt, Loose 2 24 ss 3s .................:...:. '.:
Estimated SHWT Q 5 feet below site grade s
?�. t Y .............................
3 a s
g
Light gray, moist to wet, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM) with trace a 24 as
i ....... .................: ...
o s Clay, Loose 4
B a 24 ss ; 7 ......Z. i...:,..
m
4
q :. ..:...:...:.. .: ...:...:...
g 5 24 ss 3 6
................
Po ;[[ r :...:
c Light gray, wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with ??:rl: s
trace Silt, Medium Dense 7! t t 6 24 ss 12 .:...:...:
a fl
e ......................:...
� istf
e t4ir:
� 7:crt a ...... ................. t...
r3 t?[f!. 7 24 ss
s 11
n0g ............. .... ..........
Boring terminated at 15 ft. —
9
9 �
i
A '
.. :...:...:. ..:...:...:...:...
0
r
i
-10 25
-15 30
Sc>��s r ......
APR U 9 2012 _.;...;...
Notes:
Ss = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA = Hand Auger Sample
-M!Iff�un&ater madinn may not he indicative of the qta undwater level, as = Bulk Sample
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586.

PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Lejeune NC PROJECT NO.: - JX11-113G
-..�.u.«--.w.,d.. BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 15 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions Inc. LOGGED BY: pwh
BORING LOG
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-23-11
BMP-2 DEPTH TO WATER - INITIAL•: 4 8 AFTER 24 HOURS: S _ CAVING> L
a u m m d v o 12
TEST RESULTS
o° o Description E Z E$ E Plast c Limit H Liquid Limit
w E c9 rn t- m a i iE Moisture Content - •
N-Value -,
Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with
Silt, Very Loose
Fan, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace Sili
Very Loose
Brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace
Silt, Very Loose
Estimated SHWT @ 5 feet below site grade
,_fight gray, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) will
trace Silt, Loose
Light gray, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM) with little Clay,
Loose
tc
Light gray, wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with
trace Silt, Loose
at
APR U 9 2012
I Notes:
1 124 I ss I t 12
2 124 1 ss 4
3124I SS 2 I4
1141241ss1 31 15
5
24
ss
2
4
4
7
6 I24IssI i I9
7I24IssI 4 I7
ss =
ST =
HA =
BS =
wnu
/-A V t 7 or 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586.

PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Leieune, NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
•r+�—+5Wr BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: . 15 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions, Inc. LOGGED BY: gwh
BORING LOG
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-23-11
BMP-3 DEPTH TO WATER - INITIAL': i 8 AFTER 24 HOURS: a _ CAVING> L
S a n d L g TEST RESULTS
Cl E o m Description r@ N z° y —�° n Z MlostlurelContent mit Liqu it
N-Value -
5 II n
I an, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace Silt, ' :: ;: 1
VeryLoose 1 24 as s 3 ..............:. .I...[
. .
2 24 ss s 3 ..:...:...:...:...:...:...:...
Brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace ' : z
i::
Silt Very Loose .. z .........................:...
Yellowish brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) 3 24 ss z 4 ..:...:.. .
'::::
with trace Silt Very Loose a d
3
Estimated SHWT Q 5 feet below site grade 4 24 ss 6
:::::
..... 3
............. ...............
rangish brown, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM) with trace i t L i 3
Clay, Loose rity 5 24 as a 7 :...:...:...:...
3 :
Orangish brown, moist to wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND Lr. n. z ...
a:cLr (SP-SM) with trace Silt 3 . . . .
Loose t:{ E i 6 24 ss a 7 ...: . ........ .
n: u: 5
........... .. ...............
i:CL i
n]L1' 7 24 ss 2 6
.rtl ... ................ ..........
e
Boring terminated at 15 ft.
APR u 9 2012 _................
I Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA = Hand Auger Sample
BS = Bulk Sample
rnvc r Or 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586,

'
r
a•-�W r+e
BORING LOG
BMP-4
PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Lejeune NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 13 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions Inc. LOGGED BY: gwh
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-22-11
DEPTH TO WATER - INITIAL': 4� 6 AFTER 24 HOURS: W _ CAVING> S
a
m' y
to f
$
o E
16
0,2
Description
3
m
0
Z
rn
0
E$
0
E
rn
0 0 1O
m n
o�
m
Z
v
TEST RESULTS
Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
Moisture Content - •
N-Value -
4 7
3
3
2
12
19
10
2.4
Brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace Silt, Very Loose
Estimated SHWT @ 3 feet below site grade
....
i i � i'.
24
as
2
..:...:...:...:...:...:...:
..I ...:...:...:.......:
.......... ........ '
......................:...:...
..:...:...:...:...:...[
..:. _ :... t ... f ...
....:...:...:.......:
..:...:...:...:...:...
...... ..................
...:...:...:...: 1..:...I ...
....."`--—-
...:...:...:...:...:...:...:...
...t..,t...:...:...i...i...i...
... c... t...:...:...:...:....
...:...:...:...:...:...:...:...
...i...i...i...i...i...i...i...
..:...:...:...:...
m
•10
2
24
ss
+
s
1a
£
e
3
Grayish brown, moist to wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND
(SP) with trace Silt, Very Loose
Organics from 6 to 6 feet
8
Light gray, wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with
trace Silt, Loose to Medium Dense
:...
"" `
.....
::::.:
...:::
':.
MCI:
i:4r{
tr.ii.
1?t+
r.cr
u: u.
r1,L1.•
::
2
3
24
as
+
2
2
5
24
ss
2
a
6
a
c
m
1
EL
4
6
24
ss
a
10
c
�0
7
24
ss
4
6
4
o
M
0
Boring terminated at 15 R.
I
APR 0 9 1012
8
0
i
n
3
i -+
z
-1
30
Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA = Hand Auger Sample
*Tbe iniffal groundwater re,;Q�v not be indicative of th"tatic groundwater level BS = Bulk Sampinf
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586.

v GET PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BN OPS Complexes
!� CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Leleune NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION:' 18 MSL
BORING LOG DRILLER: GET Solutions, Inc. LOGGED BY: qwh
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-22-11
BMP-5 DEPTH TO WATER - INITIAL-: Y 11 AFTER 24 HOURS: CAVING> L
o=
m n d n v t m m m o TEST RESULTS
E o Description �; E z E$ E `D m uc' Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
ut '� in y m a z ° Moisture Content - •
N-Value-
rown and tan, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) will ' : 1 1
trace Silt, Very Loose '';' 1 24 ss 2 :...:...:..::...:... ...
......................:...:...
S 5 Tan, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace Silt, :::: 1
Very Loose to Loose
' 2 - 24 ss 2 4 t
i z
L 2
1.6
3 24 ss 2 5
2 Estimated SHWT Q B feet below site grade a
............................
a 2
c
'0
4 24 ss a 6 :...:...:...:...:...:...:...
6
S Light gray, moist to wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP- 04rt: e
SM) with trace Silt, Medium Dense ix i L 5 2a ss 7 13 . : . . . . ... ...:
1 ]L1
1��11' ..:...: ......:...: .. .:.
3 1L! 5
e t:k t 1: 6 24 ss 6 11
5
ir... ... ..............
13
3 ..:.. .:
� Tan and orangish brown, wet, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM) with
2 q
trace Clay, Very Loose "' 7 24 ss 2
15
e
a ... :...:...: ...:
i ..:...:...:...:...:...:...:.
20
i
L ..,:...:...f...:...f...:
,
i
I
25
-10
30
.. .:...:...:.. .:...:...:.. .:...
-05 —
............... .......: .. .: ...
APR U 9 NIZ
35
-20
Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA = Hand Auger Sample
BS = Bulk Samweqghtple
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586.

I
c,..a+�.l •c..`.,�.nu�mxQ
BORING LOG
CC
BMP-V
PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BIN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Leleune, NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 20 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions, Inc. LOGGED BY: qwh
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-22-11
DEPTH TO WATER -INITIAL*: Y 13 AFTER 24 HOURS: i _ CAVING> L
'm u!
w
£
0
E£ .-
d o d
E
Description
o
m
m
E Z
2
m
'a
r� �
m
-a
E
9
`D
m n
m
m
z
o
'
v
TEST RESULTS
Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
Moisture Content - •
N-Value -
4 7
2
a
5
1010
12
8
4.8
Tan and brown, moist, Poody Graded fine to medium SAND (SP)
with trace Silt, Very Loose
2
an, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace Silt,
Very Loose
;7; ;';'
•::::
.; :.
•:i::
eii':'
....
1
2
24
22
as
as
!
2
x
2
2
-' ...:...:...
: : :
.:...:...:...:...:...:...:
�:...........:...:...:...:
.:...:...:...:...::..:...:...
. .. ..................... .: ...
'
..............:...:...:...
" ...:...:...:...
:...:...:...:...:...:...:..
............................
1' '
--'
...:. ..:...:...:...:..'.:...:...
...:...:.. .:...:... :...:...:...
...............................
.,.I ...:.. .:...:...:...: .. .:...
m
6
S
o
is
5
Brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace
Silt, Loose
..
,.::.,
3'
22
as
2
i
�
e
C
Tan, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with trace
Silt, Loose
Estimated SHWT Q 10 feet below site grade
:,:
::::;
"" '
4
24
as
3
36"�..:...:...
4
S
5
24
as
n...............:..:.:..
5
5
10
i
y
?
g
Tan and light gray, moist to wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium 1
SAND (SP-SM) with trace Silt, Loose to Medium Dense
L
Trace Clay from 13 to 15 feet
i:liE i
'• L L
!«F:
I:krL
J p;rr
6
24
ss
a
s
7
24
ss
5
c
n
°
e
Boring terminated at l5 fl.
'
APR U 9 Z012
1
1
1
I
I
1
l
5
-10
30
-15
3
Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA = Hand Auger Sample
readino may not hLilUgiJUL�W of the static groundwater lawit BS = Bulk Sample
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586,

' VE
..,r.1ww
BORING LOG
BMP-7
PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Leieune NC PROJECT NO.:. JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 15 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions, Inc. LOGGED BY: gwh
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-10-11
DEPTH TO WATER -INITIAL': 4 8 AFTER 24 HOURS: i CAVING> -L
C�
m
m
m
n
p
d n
E p
m
E Description
t
m
m
EZ
m
E
m m
E
m
m
o
TEST RESULTS
Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
Moisture Content - •
N-Value-
1
2
5
5
7
7
17
19
2.9
Tan and brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP)
with trace Silt, Very Loose
Tan, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace Silt
Loose
Estimated SHWT @ 5 feet below site grade
;':�:•
•::::
.:'::.
:::::
......
'
::
....
.....
1+t f
r 4.r 1
�.. ..
u; rl.
ixr
1?:Ei
qt:u r
!0:[1:
I:Iar
1
2
22
22
as
as
1
1,
3
2
..:...:...:...:...:...:.
............................
.......:...:...:...:...:...
.............
:
.:...:...:...:...:...:.
:...:...:...:...:...:...:...
.
.. ...:.:.:. _ ...
..................... .
'...:... �...: _.:... �...
f f f
....................:...
i 'i
a
:...:...:. ..:..1
...:... :... :...:...:... :...... .
...:...:...:...:...:...:...:...
...:...:...:. ..:...:...:...:...
E
m
10
s
3
22
as
z
z
a
Light gray, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with
trace Silt, Loose
8
Light gray, wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with
trace Silt, Loose to Medium Dense
4
5
18
24
as
as
a
n
6
s
3
6
$ s
m
LL
m
6
24
ss
s
10
10
c
2
7
24
as
6
11
12
q
co
Bodng terminated at l5 ft.
LAPR U 9 2012
6
4
i
I
I
1
I
L
I
-10
2
30
10
-z
Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA =Hand Auger Sample-
UT�Jnitial amunMatar reading may not he in=t�va "a static amundwater level BS = Bulk Sample
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586,

•
BORING LOG
BMP-8 I
PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BIN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Leleune NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 15 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions Inc. LOGGED BY: gwh
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-9-11
DEPTH TO WATER - INITIAL': V 8 AFTER 24 HOURS: a CAVING>
m
m in
w
a
o
n
E o=
y
Description
a
(D
o
E
rn
uJ
Z E'
y
m
E>
rn
o
m
m
m
a i
o
v
TEST RESULTS
—Plastic
Limit H Liquid Limit
Moisture Content -•
N-Value -
2
3
s
4
4
4
4.4
Light brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with
trace Silt, Very Loose
Estimated SHWT @ 5 feet below site grade
.....
'•}
....
1
24
ss
t
z
"'"
t ....
..................:...:...:..
.f..
.............................
..[...1... t...l... I...;. '
....................
i i
_ .. ......:...:...:...:
..�-:...:...
...:...:...:...:...:. .. :.. .:...
.... ................... .. ..
...:...:...:...:...:...:...:...
2
24
ss
t
t
2
0
2
o
10
3
24
ss
z..............
t
z
3
—
Tan and light gray, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-
SM) with trace Silt, Very Loose
•' •
"x i f
c
lrli
'i j
4
24
ss
2::...:...:_L:..
i
a
Light gray, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with
trace Silt, Loose
m
{ff
66:
''`• r• I
lf: tJ.
tcfi
r.ft:
i.rfj
aa:u
na tf
5
24
$s
2
s
3
'
Grayish, wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with
trace Silt, Very Loose
E
s
24
ss
2
t
—
g
e
o
7
24
as
2
p
3
m0
°c
R
Boring terminated at 15 ft.
APR u 9 'L012
D
p
3
w -
9
1
-
z
i
to
-20
Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
-The initial nroundwater reading may not he-indigtim of the static oroundwatar 1..1 HA = Hand Auger Sample
BS = Bulk Sample
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586.

va®
GoYd..kJ •O�s�,rN � yiq
BORING LOG
BMP-9
14
Notes:
PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd An lico BN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION. Camp Leteune NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 15 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions, Inc. LOGGED BY: qwh
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-9-11
DEPTH TO WATER -INITIAL•: Y 8 AFTER 24 HOURS: 3 CAVING> -L
m m m m TEST RESULTS
Description m E Z E$ E m o m m a Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
tj in io X0 rn m n i \ Moisture Content - •
N-Value -
and brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium
with trace Silt, Very Loose
moist, Poody Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with trace
Very Loose
Estimated SHWT @ 5 feet below site grade
Light gray, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP) with
trace Silt, Very Loose
Light gray, wet, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM) with trace Clay,
Very Loose
Light gray, wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with
trace Silt, Medium Dense
Boring terminated at 15
APR U 9 2012
1 124I as 1 ; 12
2 I24I as Y I3
3 118I as 1 z 13
4
5124IssI a I13
B 124 I ss I s 115
7 I24I ssI s I11
..............
2,9
= Split Spoon Sample
= Shelby Tube Sample
= Hand Auger Sample
= aulk Samnl>
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in General accordance with ASTM D 1586,

' VL 1
--'^d•—•W.,�
BORING LOG
BMP-10
PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Angiico BN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION. Camp Leleune NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 17 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions, Inc. LOGGED BY: gwry
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling - DATE: 11-g-11
DEPTH TO WATER -INITIAL': i 10 AFTER 24 HOURS: ; CAVING> J
sq
e
Z
O1
$_
L
c
e
a
g
8
m
0
C
b
z................
o�
m
m
w
z n
p
n
E o
m -
Description
.2
E
t7
0
Ez
rn
m
E$
Z
2 y
E
'
y
m o
~ m
n z
m
"
v
o TEST RESULTS
u Plastic Limit H --Liquid
Moisture Content - •
N-Value -
2
3
8
g
7
5
8
8
7.
.
Brown, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM), Very Loose
1
18
as
1
2
,
"
....................:...:...
:...:...:...:...:...:...:...
:...:...:...:...:...:...:
............................
................:. .:...:...
— � — � � � � ........ ........ .
...:.,. t..,:...�...:...t...:...
...............:...:...:...:...
. .. ....... ...
Orangish brown and tan, moist, Clayey fine to medium SAND (SC),
Loose
''
2
24
as
1
1
a
5
Orangish brown and tan, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM),
Loose
Estimated
3
24
as
3
4
5
..
4
24
as
5'"
4
a
4
Light gray, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM) with trace Clay,
Loose*tl
rr.tr
+:r r [
�r rJ.
Axel.
rift:
4:?;
a:lr l'
raa t:
1.rfi
5
24
as
2
I
s
s
10
Light gray, wat, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with
trace Silt, Loose
6
24
as
2
s
9
7
24
as
4
4
t
Boring terminated at 15 R.
LAPR U 9 2012
'
6
-10
30
10
35
Notes:
SS = Split Spann Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
*ThA initial amllodgiater rsaaa may not he indicative of the start, pro HA = Hand Auger Sample
undwateirlavol BS = Bulk Sample
PAGE 10(1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586.

. QF
m°-"^a• —•+� nm
BORING LOG
BMP-11
PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anclico BN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Le)eune INC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 17 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions, Inc. LOGGED BY: qwh
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-9-11
DEPTH TO WATER ..INITIAL*: Y 10 AFTER 24 HOURS: 4 CAVING L
- -
C�
'+=m
w
m o
E o
Description
m
0
Ezd
U)
E$
E
'� i—
m o d
m
>
a z
r,
a
TEST RESULTS
Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
Moisture Content - •
N-Value-
0
0
4
7
12
10
12
5
6
3.1
Brown, moist, Siltyfine to medium SAND SM with trace —Clay, Very4
Loose to Loose
1
24
ss
z
s
:...:...:...:...:...: ...:.
... ... ...:...:' ..:. ..
..........:...:...:...:...
......................
............... .... .... ......
——.
..: ...:...:...:... L ..:.,.:.,.
"..f...:...:...:...:...:...:.
..:.......:...:...:.... L.:...
...:...:...: ...:...:...:...f,..
...........
1
m
m
2
12
as
z
4
3
5
•
2
Brown, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM), Medium Dense
Estimated SHWT Q 7 feet below site grade
... ..
3
24
ss
s
9
5
c
a10
` `
" '
' �: r)
i i r
....
tktV
Ixrt
? 4 ti•
t
❑: in al
......
li,rr
......
a:�:tr
..
4
24
ss
5
5
s
'
E
Light gray and orangish brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium
SAND (SP-SM) with trace Silt, Loose to Medium Dense
Light gray, wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with
trace Silt, Loose
m
5
6
24
24
ss
as
s
5
r
5
a'
a
5
.,
m
0
E
EL
E
g
m
7
24
ss
P
4
e+Oi
m
a
Boring terminated at 15 ft.
APR 0 9 2012
.�.
4
A
9
I
20
r
I
•
L
1
25
I
.t
30
10
-15
zb
Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA = Hand Auger Sample
BS = Bulk Sample
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM 0 1586.

GET
PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BIN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Leieune NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
G^a•+�•+�+---war. BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 15 MSL
BORING LOG DRILLER: GET Solutions Inc. LOGGED BY: qwh
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-9-11
BMP-12 DEPTH TO WATER - INITIAL*: Y 8 AFTER 24 HOURS: d _ CAVING> S
c
m n d a v t m m m m m o TEST RESULTS
> Ff.m m m m Description m E d E' E to m Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
w— E C im Z m� a f- Z o Moisture Content - •
15
N-Value-
Tan, moist, Poody Graded fine to medium SAND (SIP-SM) with trace t+E i 1 40 50 60
70
Silt, Very Loose rr.L1: 1 24 as 1 2 '
.Yr1
..:...i...i...i.
$Brown, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM), Very Loose to Loose :::::
2 20 ss 2 a ..............:...:...:...
`o x
m 3 8 .�...:...:.. .
= Estimated SHWT @ 5 feet below site grade 2
3 5 as 5 .:...:...:...:...:...
5 Light gray and orangish brown, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND
Z (SM), Medium Dense i 3
4 24 ss a 11
Light gray and brown to light gray and orangish brown, moist to wet, f
a ................ _J.
Poody Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with trace Silt, rr.L1: 5 24 as a 12 .. .........
:ii...:... ...
@ s Medium Dense ''` r t e
. 3
EE ;I:CL r
...................
6 24 as y 16 .:_ .:.,.t...t...�...[..
8 rnar s
4
.........................
c
LY.tI.
O i:4L1
r.r.L l: 7 24 ss 9 15
u� REtt ] ... .....................
g Boring terminated at 15 ft.
...:...:...............:...:
t:
N
r '
9
a
1
-10 2 ...:...:...:...:. ..:...::..:. .
-15 30
1 ..I ...:...:.. .:...:...: .'..:...
-20 35
APR U 9 201Z
Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA = Hand Auger Sample
BS = Bulk Sample
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM 0 1586.

GET
Gww°^+�r^�^+—•W�s
BORING LOG
BMP-1 .3
PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BIN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Leleune NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION- 13 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions, Inc. LOGGED BY:gwh
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling 11-22-11
DATE:
ATE:
DEPTH TO WATER - INITIAL': 4 6 AFTER 24 HOURS: a J
o
m
w-
v o
m oJ
E
Description
m
0
E
in
d E'
Z N(wx
E
rn t-
m
5
m
D m
z
o
u
v
TEST RESULTS
Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
Moisture Content -•
N-Value -
1 2 4
4
6
6
75:...�...:...
17
23
23
7.
.
Tan, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with trace
Silt, Very Loose to Loose
Estimated SHWT Q 3 feet below site grade
i r I
..
...:
r 1.r1-
i:er i
r 1
24
as
1
z
2
.........................
.....:. .:...:...:. .....
:. 0:.................... �..
:...:...:...:...:...i..,i...
.
............
: :...:...:
..:...:...:...:...:...
................. .....
........... .. ........
...:. ..:...:...:...:...:...:...
...:. ..:...:.......:.. .: ...: ...
..:.. .:.. .:...:...:...:...:...
8
m
1
2
24
as
s
3
3
a
£
5
2
Brown, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM), Loose
3 :�.: �:
m
2
«5
a
.....
3
24
as
3
s
Grayish brown and brown, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM),
Medium Dense
1
Light gray, moist to wet, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-
SM) with trace Silt, Medium Dense
"
4
24
as
s
7
e
a
a 5
m
ci'
y:ris
7:c r r
a, n
rya P
1411•
1:r.rr
igri
+:tr
5
6
24
24
as
as
s
70
a
a
1s
1
LL
S
4tlar
`-
g
C
�0
0
p
7
24
as
10
11
1Y
c
m
co
s
Boring terminated at 15 ft.
APR U 9 Z01Z
r.
a
a
A
A
1
0
i
L -1
r
• i
2
i
1
-20
35
Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA = Hand We,Auger Sample
ity not he tndlcatig at the static am,ndwa BS = Bulk Sample
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in penerel accordance with ASTM D 1586.

VE
r
e+•�•+--•tia�+,
BORING LOG
BMP-1 5
PROJECT: P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Leteune NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 15 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions Inc. LOGGED BY: gwh `
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: . 11-22-11
DEPTH TO WATER -INITIAL*: 4 8 AFTER 24 HOURS: a _ CAVING> L
BE
m
to
N o
—
E 0
S Description
°
m
tj
Ez°
JE8>
m
E
'�
m o m
di �'
m
i
'
v
TEST RESULTS
Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
Moisture Content - •
N-Value -
10 0 30 40 50 60 7
5
7
e
6
16
23
22
s.
Yellowish brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-
SM) with trace Silt, Loose
Tan and brown, moist, PoorlyGraded fine to medium SAND (SP-2
SM) with trace Silt, Loose
•,;; F i
r M t tr
:..F
' Itji
i r• f L'
...F
1
2
24
24
ss
ss
1
3
4
3
e
3
:...........:...:...:...:...
...:...:...:. .
...................
. . . . ...:. ...............
....................:...:...
:...:...: - .:.. :, ..: .
................
..:...:...:...:...:...
..:...:...:...:...: ....
..: ...:. ..:...:...:...
————
. .. :. ..:...:. ..:...:. ..:...: ...
...:...:... :.. .:...:...:...:...
.... .:...:...I... �...:.. .:...
$
c
p
Orangish brown, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM) with trace
Clay, Loose
Estimated SHWT @ 5 feet below site grade
[::
"
3
za
ss
3
e
3
e
r
a
4
24
ss
P
a
8
Mottled light grayorangish brown moist, Sandy Lean CLAY (CL),
Medium Stiff
C
1i:Fi
r F
5
24
ss
s
r
s
a
10
Light gray and tan, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-
SM) with trace Silt, Medium Dense
8
:f FI
":t t.
1tr
.
6
24
ss
r
13
13
c
c
id
Light gray and orangish brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium
SAND (SP-SM) with trace Silt, Medium Dense
13
Light gray, moist to wet, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM) with trace
Clay, Medium Dense
.....
` `'
iiiii.
7
24
ss
13
tz
to
e0
15
e
Boring terminated at 15 ft.
I
APR u 9 201Z
1
)
0
i
f
I
L
1
I
-10
2
10
20
35
Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA = Hand Auger Sample
--!The initial Groundwater magWa may -not be ingUtiva of the static groundwater /eye/ BS = Bulk Sample
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586,

QEIPROJECT:
BORING LOG
BMP-14
P1034 & P1240 2nd Intel and 2nd Anglico BN OPS Complexes
CLIENT: Turner Construction Company - Mid -Atlantic
PROJECT LOCATION: Camp Leisure NC PROJECT NO.: JX11-113G
BORING LOCATION: See attached Boring Location Plan SURFACE ELEVATION: 15 MSL
DRILLER: GET Solutions, Inc. LOGGED BY: qwh
DRILL METHOD: Rotary Wash Mud Drilling DATE: 11-22-11
DEPTH TO WATER - INITIAL-: Y 8 AFTER 24 HOURS: 3 CAVING> f_
C-
m
m
w
m Cl
E 0
Description
N
E
m
c E$
E
in
m `p
m iri
m
z
TEST RESULTS
Plastic Limit H Liquid Limit
Moisture Content - •
N-Value -
4 7
15
0
3
6
9
8
12—....i.,.i.:.i...
25
13
1.
...i...;...i...:...i...i...:...
Brown, moist, Poorly Graded fine to medium SAND (SP-SM) with
trace Silt, Very Loose
•)-;: H
rzo:
1
24
ss
1
'
Z
........... .. ... .........
:...:...:...
.f...l...[...:...:... L..I ..
...•'
.:...:...:...:...:...:...:...
..................:...
.:...:...:...:..
...........:...:.:.:...
..:...:...:...:.. :... I ...
...:...:...:...:...:...:.:.:...
...: ...:...:...:...:...: ...:...
.. f... f... i...i... l...l... i...
...:... :.. .:...:...:.. .: ...:...
0}if
S§'
Brown and orangish brown, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM),
Loose
Estimated SHWT @ 5 feet below site grade
iiiii
2
24
as
2
y
4
m
2 10
5
.:
`:'
3
24
ss
2
4
4
g
Slightly mottled light grayorangish brown, moist, Sandy Lean CLAY
(CL),Medium Stiff
6
Light gray, moist, Silty fine to medium SAND (SM) with trace Clay,
Medium Dense
4
�
5
24
24
ss
as
3--"-
7
4
4
a
10
$
@
10
L1
4
6
24
ss
��
13
8
c
�
Light gray, moist to wet, Clayey fine to medium SAND (SC), Medium':
':��;�
......'
7
24
ss
r
6
mDense
m
Boling terminated at 15 ft.
APR u 9 101L
m
c
p
J
w -20
9
9
-10
25
1
Notes:
SS = Split Spoon Sample
ST = Shelby Tube Sample
HA = Hand Auger Sample
L*The initial 0001inflwater-mading may not he indicsijy�ofthe static groundwater level BS = Bulk Sample
PAGE 1 of 1 Standard Penetration Tests were performed in the field in general accordance with ASTM D 1586.

Symbol, Description
Strata symbols
Poorly graded Sand
Silty Sand
Poorly graded Sand
with Silt
Clayey Sand
® Lean Clay
Misc. Symbols
s Water table during
drilling
Notes:
I. Exploratory borings were drilled on 11-22-11 using a
4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger.
2. No free water was encountered at the time of drilling or
when re -checked the following day.
Boring locations were taped from existing features and
elevations extrapolated from the final design schematic plan.
These logs are subject to the limitations, conclusions, and
recommendations in this report.
Results of tests conducted on samples recovered are reported
on the logs.
APR U 9 2012

Tumer

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
For
2D ANGLICO AND 2N BN OPS COMPLEXES
PREPARED FOR
Deputy Public Works Officer
1005 Michael Road
MCB Camp Lejeune 28547
Prepared by:
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO Box 4041
Wilmington, NC 26405
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
License H C.2710
A:�Ni
���2: •off=�r)S�°y ••�.�
aSEAL�
=11':
,'013483�I7:
ai
Howard Resnik, P.E.
,VED
APR 0 9 2012

COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO Box 4041
Wilmington, NC 28406
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
License # C-2710
FOR STORMWATER EXPRESS REVIEW
April 4, 2012
PROJECT NAME: 2D ANGLICO AND 2N BN OPS COMPLEXES
FY' 11 P-1034 & P-1240
MCB Camp Lejeune, NC
Onslow County
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project area for this development is 150.74 acres with 66.00 acres of disturbance. There are 48.42 ac
of wetlands within the project limits. This project is for the construction of two headquarters, an operation and control center (SCIF),
supply warehouse, Motor T, parking garage, various support structures and all related amenities and site infrastructure. Water and
sewer utilities will be provided by the BASE.
Stormwater from the site will drain to SB, NSW waters located in the White Oak River Basin (Index # 19-20). The project will be
low density with areas of high density. The areas of high density will utilize underground conveyance pipe and open channels to
discharge stormwater into 4 wet basins designed for 90% TSS removal and management of the I yr 24 hour storm event. Pan of this
project includes the installation of ajogging trail and improving an existing gravel road from 10 ft to 24 feet in width. Proposed
impervious for the site is 24%. There are no buffer requirements for the development. No offsite runoff will be entering the site. The
site will have access to the new BASE entry road that is currently under design on a separate contract and access from the existing
gravel road off Holcomb Blvd. SHWT determinations for the site have been done and will be utilized in design of the ponds.
PROJECT BMP: low density with areas of high density
STORMWATER ENGINEER/CONSULTANT: Coastal Site Design, PC
PO Box 4041
Wilmington, NC 2840@
Rodney Wright
[e-mail]
910 791 4441 office
910 791 1501 fax
APR U 91 ZOIZ

DWO LOW DENSITY CALCULATIONS
Allowable Impervious
6,566,187 sf x 0.24 = 1,575,885 sf
Proposed Impervious
1,575,885 sf
1,575,885 / 6,566,187 = 0.240 or 24%
PROJECT DATA:
Total Site
Existing Site Data (areas within project limits):
wetland area
upland area
Total site area
Proposed Site Data:
Proposed building
proposed streets
proposed parking
proposed sidewalks
future
Total proposed impervious area
2,109,279 sf (48.42 acres)
4,456,908 sf (102.32 acres)
6,566,187 sf (150.74 acres)
230,263 sf (5.29 acres)
254,473 sf (5.84 acres)
823,644 sf (18.91 acres)
41,865 sf (0.96 acres)
225,640 sf (5.18 acres)
1,575,885 sf (36.18 acres)
-r-
� ♦ J
APR u 9 w12
BY:—

WET DETENTION BASIN CALCULATIONS
POND A
DETERMINE IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE
area to basin = 979,361 sf
22.48
acres
buildings = 89,378 sf
2.05
acres
paved parking areas = 280,810 sf
6.45
acres
sidewalks = 10,793 at
0.25
acres
road = 130,913 sf
3.01
acres
future = 90,000 sf
2.07
acres
rac = - sf
acres
total impervious surface = 601,894 sf
13.82
acres
total non -impervious surface = 377,467 sf
8.67
acres
percent imp. = 61.5 %
DETERMINE REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
from 90%TSS Removal Chan:
0 depth = 4 ft
imp %
SA/DA
60
5.3
61.5
x
70
6
x = 5.41
minimum surface area = 0.0541 x
979,361
sf
= 52,983 of
surface area provided = 57,953 of 0 elevation 13.0
1.5" VOLUME DETERMINATION:
DETERMINE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (Rv)
I = 61.5 percent impervious
Rv = ? (runoff coefficient, inches per inch)
i
Rv= 0.05 + 0.009 (1)
Rv = 0.60 in/in
DETERMINE VOLUME
design storm = 1.5 inch
Rv = 0.60 in/in
C r r„-. -
drainage area = 22.48 acres
volume= ?
I APR U 9 2012
volume = (design storm)(Rv)(drainage area)
volume= 1.7 acre-ftY.
volume = 73,442 cf of required storage volume
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

WET DETENTION BASIN STAGE -STORAGE TABLE:
INCREMENTAL
ELEVATION AREA
VOLUME
STORAGE
(FT) (SF)
(cf)
(cf)
8 34,242
-
9 37,944
36,093
10 41,699
39,822
-
11 45,510
43,605
-
12 49,378
47.444
Bottom Shelf 12.5 51,333
25,178
-
PP 13 57,953
27,322
-
Top Shelf 13.5 64,729
30,671
30,671
14 66,792
32,880
63,551
State Storage 14.2 67,603
13.440
76,991
15 70,958
55,424
132,415
16 75,179
73,069
205,484
17 79,457
77,318
282,802
18 83,784
81,621
364,423
volume at permanent pool (elev. 13.0) =
218,484
cf
1.5" storage volume provided (elev. 14.2) =
76,991
cf
total volume of basin =
424,948
cf
surface area at bottom of 10:1 shelf (12.5) =
51,333
sf
volume at bottom of 10:1 shelf =
192,142
cf
surface area at top of 10:1 shelf (13.5) = 64,729 of
volume at top of 10:1 shelf = 283,015 cf
minimum forebay volume = 43,893 cf
AVERAGE POND DEPTH
AREA BOTTOM SHELF (ABS) =
51,333 SF
AREA PP (APP) =
57,953 SF
AREA BOTTOM POND (ABP) =
34.242 SF
DEPTH =
12.5-8 4.5 ft
[0.25 X (1 + (ABS/APP))]+[((ABS+ABP)/2) X (DEPTH/ABS)]
AVERAGE DEPTH = 4.22 I<
FOREBAY A STAGE -STORAGE TABLE:
INCREMENTAL
ELEVATION
AREA
VOLUME
STORAGE
(FT)
(SF)
(cf)
(cf)
8
2,012
9
2,631
2,322
2,322
10
3,307
2,969
5,291
11
4,039
3,673
8,964
12
4,828
4,434
13,398
13
6,731
5,780
19,178
forebay volume provided = 19,178 cf
APR U 9 Z01Z
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

FOREBAY B STAGE -STORAGE TABLE:
INCREMENTAL
ELEVATION AREA VOLUME
STORAGE
(FT) (SF) (c0
(cf)
8 2,493
9 3,262 2,878
2,878
10 4,088 3,675
6,553
11 4,970 4,529
11,082
12 5,908 5,439
16,521
13 8,135 _ 7.022
23,543
forebay volume provided =
23,543 cf
Total forebay volume =
42,721 cf
STAGE - DISCHARGE TABLE:
size of orifice (in) = 4.00 elevation of orifice = 13.00
crest length of weir cut (it) = 0.00 elevation of weir cut = -
crest length of grates (so = 4.0 elevation of grates = 14.2
crest length of spillway (ft) = 30.0 elevation of spillway = 17.5
ELEVATION 3.0" PVC WEIR GRATES
SPILLWAY TOTAL
(ft) (cfa) (cfe) (cfa)
(cfa) (cfe)
13 0.00
-
14 0.42 - -
- 0.42
15 0.59 no weir cut 9.45 -
10.04
16 0.73 no weir cut 31.88 -
32.61
17 0.84 no weir cut 61.85 -
62.69
18 0.94 no weir cut 97.78
31.82 130.54
PVC DRAW DOWN
Orifice size = 4.00 in
Normal Pool Storage Elev. = 13.00
1.5' storage Elev. = 14.2
Orifice coefficient (C) = 0.6
Average head from 1.5' storage to orifice (h) = (14.2 - 13) /3 =
0.40 it
Orifice cross sectional area (A) = pi x r^2 = 3.14 x (r/12)^2 =
0.08722 sf
Acceleration due to gravity (g) =
32.2 tt/s^2
O=CA (2gh)^7/2 = 0.6 x 0.08722 x (2x32.2x0.40)^7/2 =
0.26561 cis
76,991 / 0.26561 = 289,865 seconds =
3.35 days
APR u 9 Z01Z
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28466

Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCADO Civil 3DO 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9 Wednesday, 00 4, 2012
Pond No. 1 - Pond A
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 13.00 it
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) Incr. Storage (cuft) Total storage (cuft)
0.00
13.00
57,953
0
0
0.50
13.50
62,729
30,160
30,160
1.00
14.00
66,792
32,372
62,531
1.20
14.20
67,603
13,438
75,969
2.00
15.00
70,958
55,413
131,383
3.00
16.00
75,179
73,051
204,434
4.00
17.00
79,457
77,301
281,734
5.00
18.00
83,784
81,603
363,337
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A]
[B]
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A]
[Bl
[C]
ID]
Rise (in)
= 24.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 4.00
0.00
30.00
0.00
Span (In)
= 24.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 14.20
0.00
17.50
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1
1
0
0
Weir Coeff.
= 3:33
3.33
2.60
3,33
Invert El. (ft)
= 13.00
13.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= 1
Rect
Broad
-
Length (ft)
= 68.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
Multistage
= Yes
Yes
No
No
Slope (%)
= 0.30
0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value
= .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeft.
= 0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfil.(innhr)
= 0.000 (by Contour)
Multi -Stage
= n/a
Yes
No
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Stage (it)
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00 1
0.00
Note: CulverVOrilce outflows are analyzed antler inlet(1c) aM=let(m) control. Weir risen chockW for once conditions(ic) arM submergence(e)
Stage / Discharge
6.00 12.00 18.00 24.00
Total Q
30.00 36.00 r 42.00--- -48.00--54A0
APR 0 9 1012
Elev (ft)
18.00
17.00
16.00
15.00
14.00
1 13.00
60.00
Discharge (cfs)

WET DETENTION BASIN CALCULATIONS
POND B
DETERMINE IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE
area to basin =
497,272
sf
11.42
acres
buildings =
113,512
sf
2.61
acres
paved parking areas =
52,830
sf
1.21
acres ,
sidewalks =
10,792
sf
0.25
acres
road =
65,014
sf
1.49
acres
future =
10,000
sf
0.23
acres
rec =
sf
-
acres
total impervious surface =
252,148
sf
5.79
acres
total non -impervious surface =
245,124
sf
5.63
acres
percent imp. = 50.7 %
DETERMINE REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
from 90% TSS Removal Chart:
® depth = 3.5 it
imp %
SA/DA
50
5
50.7
x
60
6
x =
5.07
minimum surface area =
0.0507 x
=
25,212 sf
surface area provided = 29,496 sf ® elevation 12.0
1.5" VOLUME DETERMINATION:
DETERMINE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (Rv)
I = 50.7 percent impervious
Rv = ? (runoff coefficient, inches per inch)
Rv= 0.05+0.009(I)
Rv = 0.51 inln
DETERMINE VOLUME
design storm =
1.5
Rv =
0.51
drainage area =
11.42
volume=
?
inch
in/in
acres
volume = (design storm)(Rv)(drainage area)
volume= 0.7 acre-ft
volume = 31,713 ct of required storage volume
497,272 sf
o _i. --, -
APR U 9 ZU1Z
i
- I
1 COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

WET DETENTION BASIN STAGE -STORAGE TABLE:
INCREMENTAL
ELEVATION AREA
VOLUME
STORAGE
(F) (SF)
(d)
(cf)
8 19,441
-
9 21,268
20,355
-
10 23,151
22,210
-
11 25,090
24,121
-
Bottom Shelf 11.5 26,088
12,795
-
PP 12 29,496
13,896
-
Top Shelf 12.5 33,061
15,639
15,639
13 34,157
16,805
32,444
State Storage 13.1 34,379
3,427
35,871
14 36,389
31,846
67,717
15 38,673
37,531
105,248
16 41,021
39,847
145,095
volume at permanent pool (elev. 12.0) =
93,377
d
1.5" storage volume provided (elev. 13.1) =
35,871
cf
total volume of basin =
198,625
cf
surface area at bottom of 10:1 shelf (11.5) =
26,088
sf
- volume at bottom of 10:1 shelf =
79,481
of
surface area at top of 10:1 shelf (12.5) =
33,061
sf
volume at top of 10:1 shelf =
125,821
ct
minimum forebay volume =
18,675
cf
AVERAGE POND DEPTH
AREA BOTTOM SHELF (ABS) =
26,088 SF
AREA PP (APP) =
29,496 SF
AREA BOTTOM POND (ABP) =
19,441 SF
- DEPTH =
11.5-8 3.5 it
[0.25 X (1. + (ABS/APP))]+[((ABS+ABP)/2) X (DEPTH/ABS)]
AVERAGE DEPTH =
3.53 It
FOREBAY A STAGE -STORAGE TABLE:
INCREMENTAL
ELEVATION AREA
VOLUME
STORAGE
(FT) (SF)
(cf)
(cf)
8 2,743
9 3,578
3,161
3,161
10 4,516
4,047
71208
11 5,526
5,021
12,229
12 7,908
6,717
18,946
forebay volume provided =
18,946 of
F' -- --
APR u 9 Z01Z
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

STAGE - DISCHARGE TABLE:
size of orifice (in) = 2.75
crest length of weir cut (ft) = 0.00
crest length of grates (sf) = 4.0
crest length of spillway (ft) = 20.0
elevation of orifice = 12.00
elevation of weir cut = -
elevation of grates = 13.1
elevation of spillway = 15.5
ELEVATION
2.75" PVC
WEIR
GRATES
SPILLWAY TOTAL
(n)
(c+e)
(cfe)
(ClfS)
(c+e) We)
. 12
0.00
-
-
-
13
0.20
-
- 0.20
14
0.28
no weir cut
11.27
0.00 11.55
15
0.34
no weir cut
34.57
34.91
16
0.40
no weir cut
65.19
21.21 86.80
PVC DRAW DOWN
Orifice size = 2.75 in
Normal Pool Storage Elev. = 12.00
1.5' storage Elev. = 13.1
Orifice coefficient (C) = 0.6
Average head from 1.5' storage to orifice (h) = (13.1 - 12) /3 =
0.37 ft
Orifice cross sectional area (A) = pi x rA2 = 3.14 x (r/12)A2 =
0.04123 sf
Acceleration due to gravity (g) =
32.2 ft/sA2
Q=CA (2gh)A1/2 = 0.6 x 0.04906 x (242.24.37)A1/2 =
0.12076 cfs
35,871 / 0.14369 = 297,044 seconds =
3.44 days
APR u 9 Z01Z
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9 Wednesday, 00 4, 2012
Pond No. 1 - Pond B
Pond Data
Contours -User -defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 12.00 ft
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sqft) Incr. Storage (cuft) Total storage (cuft)
0.00
12.00
29,496
0
0
0.50
12.50
33,061
15,629
15,629
1.00
13.00
34,157
16,802
32,431
1.10
13.10
34,379
3,426
35,856
2.00
14.00
36,389
31,838
67,696
3.00
15.00
38,673
37.521
105,217
4.00
16.00
41,021
39,837
145,055
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A]
[B]
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A]
[B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in)
= 24.00
2.75
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 4.00
0.00
30.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 24.00
2.75
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 13.10
0.00
15.50
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1
1
0
0
Welr Coeff.
= 3.33
3.33
2.60
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
= 12.00
12.00
0.00
0.00
Welr Type
= Red
Red
Broad
--
Length (ft)
= 100.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
Multi -Stage
= Yes
Yes
No
No
Slope (%)
= 0.30
0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value
= .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
= 0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfll.(in/hr)
= 0.000 (by Contour)
Multistage
= n/a
Yes
No
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Stage (it)
4.00
c rr
2.00
1.00
0.00 1
0.00
Note: Culvert/Oribca outflows are analyzed under inlet (ic) erM outlet (m) control. Weir risers dwkW for onlim mnditiona (ic) and submergence (a)
Stage / Discharge
5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
Total 0
30.00 35.00 40.00
Elev (R)
16.00
15.00
14.00
13.00
12.00
45.00 _ 50.00 - 155.00
- ._ Discharge (cfs)
APR 0 9 Z01Z

WET DETENTION BASIN CALCULATIONS
POND C
DETERMINE IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE
area to basin =
228,797
sf
5.25
acres
buildings =
6,278
sf
0.14
acres
paved parking areas =
117,323
sf
2.69
acres
sidewalks =
-
sf
-
acres
fire road =
-
sf
-
acres
future =
10,000
sf
0.23
acres
rec =
-
sf
-
acres
total impervious surface =
133,601
sf
3.07
acres
total non -impervious surface =
95,196
sf
2.19
acres
percent imp. =
58.4
%
DETERMINE REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
from 900/6TSS Removal Chart:
0 depth = 3.5 it
imp %
SA/DA
50
5
58.4
x
60
6
x =
5.84
minimum surface area =
0,0584 x
=
13,362 of
surface area provided = 22,626 of ® elevation 12.0
1.5" VOLUME DETERMINATION:
DETERMINE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (Rv)
I =
58.4 percent impervious
Rv =
? (runoff coefficient, inches per inch)
Rv=
0.05 + 0.009 (1)
Rv=
0.58 inln
DETERMINE VOLUME
design storm = 1.5 inch
Rv = 0.58 in/in
drainage area = 5.25 acres
volume = ?
volume =
(design storm)(Rv)(drainage area)
volume =
0.4 acre-ft
volume =
16,580 cf of required storage volume
228,797 sf
APR U 9 1012
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

WET DETENTION BASIN STAGE -STORAGE TABLE:
ELEVATION AREA
(F) (SF)
8 14,526
9 15,976
10 17,482
11 19,045
Bottom Shelf 11.5 19,848
pp 12 22,626
Top Shelf 12.5 25,561
State Storage 12.8 26,106
13 26,473
14 28,337
15 30,259
16 32,236
volume at permanent pool (elev. 12.0) =
1.5" storage volume provided (elev. 12.8) =
total volume of basin =
surface area at bottom of 10:1 shelf (11.5) =
volume at bottom of 10:1 shelf =
surface area at top of 10:1 shelf (12.5) =
volume at top of 10:1 shelf =
minimum forebay volume =
AVERAGE POND DEPTH
INCREMENTAL
VOLUME STORAGE
(cf) (cf)
15,251
16,729
18,264
9,723
10,619
12,047
7,750
5,258
27,405
29,298
31,248
70,586 ct
19,797 cf
152,344 cf
19,848 of
59,967 cf
25,561 sf
90,363 Cf
14,117 cf
12,047
19,797
25,055
52,460
81,758
113,006
AREA BOTTOM SHELF (ABS) =
19,848 SF
AREA PP (APP) =
22,626 SF
AREA BOTTOM POND (ABP) =
14,526 SF
DEPTH =
11.5-8 3.5 ft
[0.25 X (1 + (ABS/APP)))+[((ABS+ABP)/2) X (DEPTH/ABS))
AVERAGE DEPTH =
3.50 It
FOREBAY A STAGE -STORAGE TABLE:
INCREMENTAL
ELEVATION AREA
VOLUME
STORAGE
(FT) (SF)
(cf)
(cf)
8 2,043
9 2,697
2,370
2,370
10 3,410
3,054
5,424
11 4,178
3,794
9,218
APR U 9 2012
12 6,036
5,107
14,325
forebay volume provided =
14,325 of
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

0
STAGE - DISCHARGE TABLE:
size of orifice (in) =
2.50
elevation of orifice =
12.00
crest length of weir cut (ft) =
0.00
elevation of weir cut =
-
crest length of grates (sf) =
4.0
elevation of grates =
12.8
crest length of spillway (ft) =
30.0
elevation of spillway =
15.5
ELEVATION 2.5" PVC
WEIR
GRATES SPILLWAY
TOTAL
(ft) (cfs)
(cfs)
(fie) (cfs)
(CIS)
12 0.00
-
-
13 0.16
-
1.18
1.34
14 0.23
no weir cut
17.35
17.58
15 0.28
no weir cut
43.07 -
43.35
16 0.33
no weir cut
75.56 31.82
107.71
PVC DRAW DOWN
Orifice size = 2.50 in
Normal Pool Storage Elev. = 12.00
1.5' storage Elev. = 12.8
Orifice coefficient (C) = 0.6
Average head from 1.5' storage to orifice (h) = (12.8 - 12) /3 = 0.27 ft
Orifice cross sectional area (A) = pi x r^2 = 3.14 x (r/12)A2 = 0.03407 sf
Acceleration due to gravity (g) = 32.2 ft/s^2
O=CA (2gh)A1/2 = 0.6 x 0.04906 x (2x32.2x0.27)A1/2 = 0.08524 cfs
19,797 / 0.12274 = 232,250 seconds = 2.69 days
APR 0 9 Z012
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

Pond Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCADS Civil 3DO 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Pond No. 1 - Pond C
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 12.00 ft
Stage / Storage Table ,
Stage (ft) Elevation (ft)
0.00
12.00
0.50
12.50
0.80
12.80
1.00
13.00
2.00
14.00
3.00
15.00
4.00
16.00
Contour area (sqft)
22,626
25,561
26,106
26,473
28,337
30,259
32,236
Incr. Storage (cult)
0
12,038
7,749
5,257
27,397
29,290
31,239
Total storage (cuft)
0
12,038
19,787
25,045
52,442
81,731
112,971
Wednesday, 00 4, 2012
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A]
181
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A]
11211
[C]
[D]
Rise (In)
= 24.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
Crest Len (ft)
= 4.00
0.00
30.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 24.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 12.80
0.00
15.50
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1
1
0
0
Weir Coeff.
= 3.33
3.33
2.60
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
= 12.00
12.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= Rect
Rect
Broad
--
Length (ft)
= 40.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
Multistage
= Yes
Yes
No
No
Slope (%)
= 0.50
0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value
= .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
= 0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfll.(In/hr)
= 0.000 (by Contour)
Multistage
= n/a
Yes
No
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Stage (ft)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00 1-
0.00
Nate:Culvert/Onfm outflows am walyzecl uMw inlet(ic) ar Outlet(w) camml. Weir nears Ui adfn ice 00M1&0n3(ic) aM wbmergeme(a)
Stage / Discharge
5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
Total Q
30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00
IAPR U. 9 2012
Elev (ft)
16.00
15.00
14.00
13.00
1 12.00
55.00
Discharge (cfs)

WET DETENTION BASIN CALCULATIONS
POND D
DETERMINE IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE
area to basin =
806,844
sf
18.52
acres -
buildings =
21,095
sf
0.48
acres
paved parking areas =
363,863
sf
8.35
acres
sidewalks =
-
at
-
acres
fire road =
-
sf
-
acres
' future =
10,000
sf
0.23
acres
rec =
sf
-
acres
total impervious surface =
394,958
sf
9.07
acres
total non -impervious surface =
411,886
sf
9.46
acres
percent imp. = 49.0 %
DETERMINE REQUIRED SURFACE AREA
from 90%TSS Removal Chart:
® depth =
3.5 ft
imp %, SA/DA
40
4
49.0
x
50
5
x =
4.90
minimum surface area =
0.0490 x 806,844 sf
39,536 sf
surface area provided = 48,499 sf ® elevation 10.0
1.5" VOLUME DETERMINATION:
DETERMINE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (Rv)
I =
49.0 percent impervious
Rv =
? (runoff coefficient, inches per inch)
Rv=
0.05 + 0.009 (1)
Rv =
0.49 intiin
DETERMINE VOLUME
design storm= 1.5 inch
Rv= 0.49 inln
APR U 9 ZO1Z
drainage area = 18.52 acres -
volume = ?
volume =
(design storm)(Rv)(drainage area)
volume =
1.1 acre-ft
volume =
49,412 d of required storage volume
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

I
WET DETENTION BASIN STAGE -STORAGE TABLE:
INCREMENTAL
ELEVATION AREA
VOLUME
STORAGE
(FT) (SF)
(cf)
(cf)
6 28,129
-
7 32,090
30,110
8 35,937
34,014
-
9 39,840
37,889
Bottom Shelf 9.5 41,819
20,415
-
PP 10 48,499
22,580
-
Top Shelf 10.5 55,336
25,959
25,959
State Storage 11 57,407
28,186
54,145
12 61,612
5,951
60,096
13 65,873
57,368
117,464
14 70,191
34,016
151,480
volume at permanent pool (elev. 10.0) =
145,008
d
1.5" storage volume provided (elev. 11.0) =
54,146
d
total volume of basin =
296,488
d
surface area at bottom of 10:1 shelf (9.5) =
41,819
at
volume at bottom of 10:1 shelf =
122,428
d
surface area at top of 10:1 shelf (10.5) =
55,336
of
volume at top of 10:1 shelf =
199,153
d
minimum forebay volume =
29,002
cf
AVERAGE POND DEPTH
AREA BOTTOM SHELF (ABS) =
41,619 SF
AREA PP (APP) =
48,499 SF
AREA BOTTOM POND (ABP) =
28,129 SF
DEPTH=
9.5-6 3.5ft
[0.25 X (1 + (ASS/APP))]+[((ABS+ABP)/2) X (DEPTH/ABS)]
AVERAGE DEPTH =
3.39 It
FOREBAY A STAGE -STORAGE TABLE:
INCREMENTAL
ELEVATION AREA
VOLUME
STORAGE
(FT) (SF)
(cn
(d)
6 5,403
7 6,453
5,928
5,928
- - - -'- -- -"'-_
8 7,559
7,006
12,934
- --
9 8,722
10 11,435
8,141
10,079
21,075
31,154
APR U 9 Z012
forebay volume provided =
31,154 ct
-
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

STAGE - DISCHARGE TABLE:
size of orifice (in) =
3.50
crest length of weir cut (ft) =
0.00
crest length of grates (sf) =
4.0
crest length of spillway (ft) =
30.0
ELEVATION 3.5" PVC
WEIR
(n) (cfs)
(cfs)
10 0.00
11 0.32
12 0.45
no weir cut
13 0.56
no weir cut
14 0.64
no weir cut
PVC DRAW DOWN
Orifice size = 3.50
in
Normal Pool Storage Elev. = 10.00
1.5" storage Elev. = 11.0
elevation of orifice = 10.00
elevation of weir cut = -
elevation of grates = 11.0
elevation of spillway = 13.5
GRATES SPILLWAY TOTAL
(cfs) (cfs) (cfe)
0.00
13.20
37.34
68.59
Orifice coefficient (C) = 0.6
Average head from 1.5" storage to orifice (h) = (11 - 10) /3 =
Orifice cross sectional area (A) = pi x r^2 = 3.14 x (r/12)A2 =
Acceleration due to gravity (g) _
Q=CA (2gh)A1/2 = 0.6 x 0.04906 x (2x32.2x0.33)A1/2 =
54,145 / 0.13570 = 293,135 seconds =
s
0.32
0.00 13.65
37.90
31.82 101.05
0.33 ft
0.06678 sf
32.2 f /s^2
0.18471 cfs
3.39 days
APR 0 9 2012
COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO BOX 4041
WILMINGTON, NC 28406

. ;Pbnd Report
Hydraflow Hydrographs Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3DO 2012 by Autodesk, Inc. v9
Wednesday, 00 4, 2012
Pond No. 1 - Pond D
Pond Data
Contours -User-defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 10.00 it
Stage / Storage Table
Stage (ft) Elevation (fill
Contour area (sgft)
Incr. Storage (cult)
Total storage (cuft)
0.00 10.00
48.499
0
0
0.50 10.50
55,336
25,937
25,937
1.00 11.00
57,407
28,181
54,119
2.00 12.00
61,612
59,491
113,610
3.00 13.00
65,873
63,724
177,334
4.00 14.00
70,191
68,014
245,348 -
5.00 15.00
74,567
72,361
317,709
Culvert / Orifice Structures
Weir Structures
[A]
[B]
[C]
[PrfRsr]
[A]
[B]
[C]
[D]
Rise (in)
= 24.00
3.50
0.00
0.00
Crest Lan (ft)
= 4.00
0.00
30.00
0.00
Span (in)
= 24.00
3.50
0.00
0.00
Crest El. (ft)
= 11.00
0.00
14.50
0.00
No. Barrels
= 1
1
0
0
Weir Coetf.
= 3.33
3.33
2.60
3.33
Invert El. (ft)
= 10.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
Weir Type
= Red
Red
Broad
-
Length (ft)
= 40.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
Multistage
= Yes
Yes
No
No
Slope (%)
= 5.00
0.00
0.00
n/a
N-Value
= .013
.013
.013
n/a
Orifice Coeff.
= 0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
Exfll.(In/hr)
= 0.000 (by Contour)
Multistage
= n/a
Yes
No
No
TW Elev. (ft)
= 0.00
Stage (ft)
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
0.00 6.00
Total Q
Note: CuNert/Onfice outno" are analyzed under inlet(ic) and outlet loci control Weir risers checked for orifice conditions(ic) and submerpence(a).
Stage / Discharge
12.00 18.00 24.00 30.00 36.00
Elev (ft)
15.00
14.00
13.00
12.00
11.00
10.00
42.00 48.00 54.00 60.00
-- Discharge (cfs)
APR 0 9 2012
.7.

For DENR Use ONLY
Reviewer: L—t_
PIMA North Carolina Department of Environment and 4-5
Natural Resources submit
`
NCDENR Request for Express Permit Review Time:
Confine:
FILL-IN all the information below and CHECK the Permit(s) you are requesting for express review. FAX or Email the completed form to Express
Coordinator along with a completed DETAILED narrative, site plan IPDF (le) and vicinity map (same items expected in the application package
of the project location. Please include this form in the application package.
Enter Related SW L
• Asheville Region -Alison Davidson 828-296-4698;alison.davidsonna ncmail.net permits of request �2 �e-lo SCdr'e
• Fayetteville or Raleigh Region -David Lee 919-791.4203; david.lee(&_ncmail.net SW ��} f
• Mooresville & -Patrick Grogan 704-663-3772 or patrick.progan(ad)ncmail.net
• SW
Washington Region -Lyn Hardison 252-946.9215 or Iyn.hardison(dncmail.net
• Wilmington Region -Janet Russell 910-350.2004 or janet.russelliiDncmail.net SW o r �0 l
NOTE: Project application received after 12 noon will be stamped in the following work day. SW
'1 n L}/z-5
Project Name: FY11 P-1034 & P-1240 County: ONSLOW 2 -1> }��� $ I� r�TS i C o M
Applicant: CARL BAKER Company: MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE
Address: BLDG 1005 MICHAEL ROAD City: MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, State: NC Zip: 28547-_
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone], Email: [e-mail] O C'<:—::, P(,
Physical Location:4.0 MILES SOUTH ON HOLCOMB FROM INTERSECTION OFNC 24
Project Drains into SBASW waters — Water classification 1919=20 (for classification see-http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/)ims/reports/reportsWE.html)
Project Located in WHITE OAK River Basin. Is project draining to class ORW waters? N , within'h mile and draining to class SA waters N or within 1 mile
and draining to class HOW waters? N
Engineer/Consultant: HOWARD RESNIK Company: COASTAL SITE DESIGN PC i "-, fv :siVEDAddress: PO BOX4041 City: WILMINGTON, State: NC Zip: 28406-LL01LPhone: 910-791-4441, Fax: [phone], Email: [e-mail] MAR
SECTION ONE: REQUESTING A SCOPING MEETING ONLY
❑ Scoping Meeting ONLY ❑ DWQ, ❑ DCM, ElDLR, ❑ OTHER: _ Y '�_
SECTION TWO: CHECK ONLY THE PROGRAM (S) YOU ARE REQUESTING FOR EXPRESS PERMITTING
❑ 401 Unit ❑ Stream Origin Determination: _ # of stream calls — Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination: _ # of stream calls — Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification ❑ Isolated Wetland (_linear fl or _acres)
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization ❑ Minor Variance ❑ Major General Variance
® State Stormwater ❑ General ❑ SFR, ❑ SFR < 1 ac. ❑Bkhd & Bt Rmp, ❑ Clear & Grub, ❑ Utility ❑ Other
® Low Density ❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter _ # Curb Outlet Swales ❑ Off -site [SW _ (Provide permit #)]
[—]High Density -Detention Pond 0 # Treatment Systems ❑ High Density -Infiltration _ #Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Bio-Retention _ # Treatment Systems ❑ High Density —SW Wetlands _ # Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Other _ # Treatment Systems /❑ MOD:❑ Major ❑ Minor ❑ Plan Revision ❑ Redev. Exclusion SW (Provide permit #)
❑ Coastal Management ❑ Excavation & Fill ❑ Bridges & Culverts ❑ Structures Information
❑ Upland Development ❑ Marina Development ❑ Urban Waterfront
❑ Land Quality ❑ Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with - acres to be disturbed.(CK # (for DENR use))
SECTION THREE — PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT IS APPLICABLE TO YOUR PROJECT (for both scoping and express meeting request)
Wetlands on Site ® Yes ❑ No Buffer Impacts: ❑ No ❑ YES: _acre(s)
Wetlands Delineation has been completed: ® Yes ❑ No Isolated wetland on Property ❑ Yes ❑ No
US ACOE Approval of Delineation completed: ® Yes ❑ No 404 Application in Process w/ US ACOE: ❑ Yes ❑ No Permit
Received from US ACOE ® Yes ❑ No
rrrrraararraarrraarrrrrrurrrrrrrarraaa• raararraraaarra*For DENR use onlyrraaaaaaaararrrrrrrrrrnrrrrrrrruarr+aaaaururrrrruurnr
Fees lit for multiplepermits: Check# I Total Fee Amount 5
SUBMITTAL DATES
Fee
SUBMITTAL DATES
Fee
LAMA
$
Variance (❑ Maj; El Min)
$
SW (❑ ND, ❑ LD, ❑ Gen)
$
401:
$
LQS
$
Stream Deter,_
$
NCDENR EXPRESS March 2009

CE-102
�� �----\
.......
WETLWDS LLIE 1� �\�'': ...`- \.. _ . .
CE-103
. 1 I
. � NERMRYSLWE
1
D ON ANY AREA OF A SITE WHERE LAND -
DACCORDINGTOTHEFOLLOWING
IMETER SLOPES AND ALL SLOPES .. V 1 ,- w ✓ r ...rJu. ,) I
I TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT
S SOON AS PRACTICABLE BUT IN MY T I wEnANm uNE
I LAST LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY. / 1
_BE PROVIDED TEMPORARY OR
A)ND COVER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE WElLAN0.4 uNE
i DAYS FROM LAST LANPDISTURBING
ED ONLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE * �_ FI •+� "
2G PART OF THIS CE-104 i i®
- III l; r�—��\�. �,rt� i`kw +yJ 'y �. •�I i. �(\ � ) 1`I �1 i % i� ®� i
STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM. '71�IIIII
/
T CAMP IEJEUNE
,o I YA fL. e )�\, \, ,� f _ s\ \ \� f_ ©; NOR7
i• `� 1 � � + � 1 '
LBEANOTHER APPROVED
WY SURPLUSURPLUS CUT MATERIAL WILL BE
N THE USMC BASE CAMP LEJEUNE.
RT RING OR EQUIVALENT. Di-02 17-
.OUGH GRADING
GRADES PNEESTABLISMED `\\ { I� '� -`%`• >"�"
TOUGH GRADING PLAN HAVE BEEN 1 /��I���� ��� �� y ' / -�A- r��:.L ) / � •,�'�
JJILIZED THEN TRAPS MAY BE REMOVED. ,', \V �' 1✓ 1 ,' .. "/ �1' -V.'Y ��� CE-106
V�
IEC
OR TO COMMENCING AND HOLD A \/ `\�`�J ���// _ _
OR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. CE-103 , 1'\�� �J-i'� r- _ _�----'-- /-� '• II'
)ADS AND STORM DRAINAGE d f TIANDs uNE " " i I
LNG�, F9
. /rr \�
�� IEMPOFMVWMPERVIDUS \
LANCES. �� Tom RFAIED WITHIN ]]MV9 - \
I` AF-EREMREICM
TRAPS, DIVERSION SWALES ( �' •� 1 I i
M ON PLAN PRIOR TO CLEARING AND
AND ANY OTHER SEDIMENT CONTROL
GRADING ROADWAYS. SITEAND'�
VG LOT, ESTABLISH FINAL GRADES "" /\ \ =F(((•_
'H STONE BASE COURSE
UTILITIES AS NEEDED, AND + - �I '• �" / - ----
it
E BUILDING CONSTRUCTION IS NOT 1 \
IV _ - .... ..... ..
-PRACTICES ARE TO BE INSPECTED T " " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D REPAIRED AS NECESSARY. �-✓
A. THE ROADWAVNARKING LOT 15 TO BE V•��� J / - -
VEGETATIVELY STABILIZED WITH
MON. TEMPORARY MEASURES ARE TO -
CE-105 �wE'rIiuios UNE ...� ....................... f.
:KLY AND AFTER ANY RAINFALL
MEDIATELY. .... ...... .......... . . .... -

COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
Wilmington, NC 28406
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
License # C-2710
FOR STORMWATER EXPRESS REVIEW
March 22, 2012
PROJECT NAME: 2D Intel BN and Anglico Maintenance
FY'II P-1034 & P-1240
MCB Camp Lejeune, NC
Onslow County
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project area for this development is 69.15 acres with 66.00 acres of disturbance. There are 0.04 ac
of wetlands within the project limits. This project is for the construction of two headquarters, an operation and control center (SCIF),
supply warehouse, Motor T, parking garage, various support structures and all related amenities and site infrastructure. Water and
sewer utilities will be provided by the BASE.
Stormwater from the site will drain to SB, NSW waters located in the White Oak River Basin (Index # 19-20). The project will be
low density with areas of high density. The areas of high density will utilize underground conveyance pipe and open channels to
discharge stormwater into 4 wet basins designed for 90% TSS removal and management of the I yr 24 hour storm event. Part of this
project includes the installation of a jogging trail and improving an existing gravel road from 10 ft to 24 feet in width. Proposed
impervious for the site is 24%. There are no buffer requirements for the development. No offsite runoff will be entering the site. The
site will have access to the new BASE entry road that is currently under design on a separate contract and access from the existing
gravel road off Holcomb Blvd. SH WT determinations for the site have been done and will be utilized in design of the ponds.
PROJECT BMP: low density with areas of high density
STORMWATER ENGINEER/CONSULTANT: Coastal Site Design, PC
PO Box 4041
Wilmington, NC 28406
Rodney Wright
[e-mail]
910 7914441 office
910 791 1501 fax
. VED
MAR 2 L LU1Z

For DENR Use ONLY
Reviewer. LL_
Am, .0� North Carolina Department of Environment and Suem.r
Natural Resources
NCDENR Request for Express Permit Review Time_ .�
comirm:
FILL-IN all the information below and CHECK the Permit(s) you are requesting for express review. FAX or Email the completed form to Express
Coordinator along with a completed DETAILED narrative, site plan (PDF (le) and vicinity map (same items expected in the application package
of the project location. Please include this form in the application package.
• Asheville Region -Alison Davidson 828-296-4698;alison.davidson(olncmail.net
• Fayetteville or Raleigh Region -David Lee 919-7914203; david.lee(cbncmail.net
• Mooresville 8 -Patrick Grogan 704-663-3772 or paMck.groaan((Dncmai . t
• Washington Region -Lyn Hardison 252-946-9215 or Ivn.hardison(50cmail.net
• Wilmington Region -Janet Russell 910-350.2004 or ianeLrussell(dncmai1.net
NOTE: Project application received after 12 noon will be stamped in the following work day.
Project Name: FY11 P-1034 & P-1240 County: ONSLOW Al 1 \'1 C-O
Applicant: CARL BAKER Company: MARINE CORPS BASE, C LEJEUNE
Address: BLDG 1005 MICHAEL ROAD City: MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, State: NC Zip: 28547-_
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone], Email: [e-mail]
Physical Location:4.0 MILES SOUTH ON HOLCOMB FROM INTERSECTION OFNC 24
Project Drains into SBNSW waters - Water classification 19_20 (for classification see-http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/reports/reportsWB.html)
Project Located in WHITE OAK River Basin. Is project draining to class ORW waters? N , within Y: mile and draining to class SA waters N or within 1 mile
and draining to class HQW waters? N
Engineer/Consultant: HOWARD RESNIK Company: COASTAL SITE DESIGN. PC
Address: PO BOX 4041 City: WILMINGTON. State: NC Zip: 28406-_
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone], Email: [e-mail] FEB 2 7 1012
SECTION ONE: REQUESTING A SCOPING MEETING ONLY
® Scoping Meeting ONLY ® DWQ, ❑ DCM, ❑ DLR, ❑ OTHER: _ Y:
SECTION TWO: CHECK ONLY THE PROGRAM IS) YOU ARE REQUESTING FOR EXPRESS PERMITTING
Permits of request
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
❑ 401 Unit ❑ Stream Origin Determination: _ # of stream calls - Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ IntermittentlPerennial Determination: _ # of stream calls
- Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification
❑ Isolated Wetland (_linear ft or _acres)
El Riparian Buffer Authorization
El Minor Variance [-IMajorGeneral Variance
❑ State Stormwater ❑ General ❑ SFR, ❑ SFR < 1 ac. ❑Bkhd & Bt Rmp, ❑ Clear & Grub, ❑ Utility ❑ Other
❑ Low Density ❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter _
# Curb Outlet Swales ❑ Off -site [SW (Provide permit #)]
❑ High Density -Detention Pond 0 # Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Infiltration _ #Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Bio-Retention _ # Treatment Systems
ElHigh Density -SW Wetlands _ # Treatment Systems
[IHigh Density -Other _ # Treatment Systems / ❑ MOD:❑
Major ❑ Minor ❑ Plan Revision ❑ Redev. Exclusion SW (Provide permit #)
❑ Coastal Management ❑ Excavation & Fill
❑ Bridges & Culverts ❑ Structures Information
❑ Upland Development
❑ Marina Development ❑ Urban Waterfront
❑ Land Quality ❑ Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with - acres to be disturbed.(CK # (for DENR use))
SECTION THREE - PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT IS APPLICABLE TO YOUR PROJECT (for both scoi3ina and exoress meetina reauest
Wetlands on Site ® Yes ❑ No Buffer Impacts: ❑ No ❑ YES: _acre(s)
Wetlands Delineation has been completed: ® Yes ❑ No Isolated wetland on Property El Yes ❑ No
US ACOE Approval of Delineation completed: ® Yes ❑ No 404 Application in Process w/ US ACOE: ❑ Yes ❑ No Permit
Received from US ACOE ® Yes ❑ No
rrrurr•rrr rrurrr rsrrrrrrrrrrr rrr r««««««r««rrr««r««'"'For DENR use onlyr«rrrrurr rrrrrrrrr«u rrrrrrrrrr rrr rr rrr rrr rrr rr rrr rr rrrrrrr
Fee Solilformultioleoennits: (Check# 1 Total Fee Amount $
SUBMITTALDATES
Fee
SUBMITTAL DATES
Fee
CAMA
$
Variance ( Maj; Min)
$
SW (❑ HD, ❑ LD, ❑ Gen)
$
1 401:
$
LDS
$ I
Stream Deter—
$
NCDENR EXPRESS March 2009

COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
Wilmington, NC 28406
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
License # C-2710
FOR STORMWATER EXPRESS REVIEW
February 27, 2012
PROJECT NAME: 2D Intel BN and Anglico Maintenance
FY'l I P-1034 & P-1240
MCB Camp Lejeune, NC
Onslow County
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project area for this development is 69.15 acres with 66.00 acres of disturbance. There are 0.04 ac
of wetlands within the project limits. This project is for the construction of two headquarters, an operation and control center (SCIF),
supply warehouse, Motor T, parking garage, various support structures and all related amenities and site infrastructure. Water and
sewer utilities will be provided by the BASE.
Stormwater from the site will drain to SB, NSW waters located in the White Oak River Basin (Index # 19-20). The project will be
high density utilizing underground conveyance pipe and open channels to discharge stormwater into 4 wet basins designed for 90%
TSS removal and management of the 1 yr 24 hour storm event. Part of this project includes the installation of ajogging trail and
improving an existing gravel road from 10 ft to 24 feet in width. Currently onsite there is approximately 52,864 sf of untreated
impervious. We are proposing swapping the existing untreated impervious for the jogging trail and improvements to the existing
access road. Proposed impervious for the site is 42%. There are no buffer requirements for the development. No offsite runoff will
be entering the site. The site will have access to the new BASE entry road that is currently under design on a separate contract and
access from the existing gravel road off Holcomb Blvd. SIIWT determinations for the site have been done and will be utilized in
design of the ponds.
PROJECT BMP: high density/ wet basin.
STORMWATER ENGINEER/CONSULTANT: Coastal Site Design, PC
PO Box 4041
Wilmington, NC 28406
Rodney Wright
[e-mail]
910 791 4441 office
910 791 1501 fax
FEB 2 7 Z012

Sa I Moq o
Lewls,Linda
From: Howard Resnik [[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:45 AM
To: Lewis, Linda
Cc: 'Rodney Wright Contact; Nelson, Christine; 'Towler CIV David W', 'Bradshaw CIV Thomas C';
Russell, Janet
Subject: RE: Lejeune Intel/ANGLICO Question
Attachments: EXHIBIT_SWAP-2.pdf
Linda,
Thanks for the response. I apologize for my misunderstanding of this. Let's focus on the SWAP, or redevelopment, as I
think that is the direction we must go.
Again, we are trying to avoid another scoping meeting. If you think that it is inappropriate for you to provide advice on
whether or not the SWAP is able to be permitted VIA email (a definitive call on if we can use a swap for this project),
then we probably just need to terminate this email discussion & set up another scoping meeting ASAP. Otherwise,
please reference the attached PDF. In the PDF, I have pointed out the existing BUA's, and some areas which will not
have a stormwater BMP. There is a small parking area on the left side of the attached PDF labeled as "Proposed
Untreated BUA." Additionally, I have labeled the "Existing BUA" we are proposing to use in the swap, as well as the
proposed Jogging Trail and proposed Utility Access Road (a gravel road which will provide access to the pump station).
We are proposing to treat new impervious which will be installed in the locations of the existing BUA in exchange for
non -treatment of BUA for the Jogging Trail, Utility Access Road & Pump Station, and the parking area labeled "Proposed
Untreated BUA." The numbers are such that the amount of existing impervious is equal to or greater than the proposed
untreated (Jogging Trail, Utility Access Road, & Parking Area). All other impervious areas will be treated with high
density stormwater BMP's.
My main hesitation is concerning the location of the Jogging Trail & Utility Access Road in relation to the main portion of
the site and the existing BUA. Could you please comment on this?
Thanks.
Howard Resnik, PE, LEED® AP
Coastal Site Design, PC
3805 Cherry Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
910 791 4441 office
910 791 1501 fax
www.coastalsitedesign.com
It is the professional opinion of Coastal Site Design, PC that this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It
is the responsibility of the receiver of this document to examine it and determine whether it is the information requested. In the deliverance of this file we
make no promise as to the usability or compatibility of this file. This file shall not be considered a certified document.
From: Lewis,Linda [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 3:57 PM
To: Howard Resnik
Cc: Nelson, Christine
Subject: RE: Lejeune Intel/ANGLICO Question

`IIIIIIm�I
`' i ��
ACCESS
kD TO BE

For DENR Use ONLY-O ` eJ
EW A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Request for Express Permit Review
FILL-IN all the information below and CHECK the Permit(s) you are requesting for express
Coordinator along with a completed DETAILED narrative, site plan (PDF file) and vicinity
of the project location. Please include this form in the application package.
• Asheville Region -Alison Davidson 828-296.4698;alison.davidson(@,ncmail.net
• Fayetteville or Raleigh Region -David Lee 919-791.4203; david.lee([e-mail]
• Mooresville & -Patrick Grogan 704-663-3772 or patrick.gropan(a.ncmail.net
• Washington Region -Lyn Hardison 252-946-9215 or Ivn.hardison(d)ncmail.net
• Wilmington Region -Janet Russell 910-350-2004 or janet.russell(ancmail.net
NOTE: Project application received after 12 noon will be stamped in the following work day.
Reviewer:
See — k e�iY�csd� �l
o I
ime: I. 31
confirm: �L
review. FAX or Email the completed form to Express
SW 100201
SW
SW
SW
SW
Project Name: FY11 P-1034 & P-1240 County: ONSLOW ap, -t- `�\ O h
Applicant: CARL BAKER Company: MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE C
Address: BLDG 1005 MICHAEL ROAD City: MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, State: NC Zip: 28547-_
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone], Email: [e-mail]
Physical Localion:4.0 MILES SOUTH ON HOLCOMB FROM INTERSECTION OFNC 24
Project Drains into SB:NSW waters — Water classification 1919=20 (for classification see-http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/reports/rei)ortsWB.html)
Project Located in WHITE OAK River Basin. Is project draining to class ORW waters? N , within''/2 mile and draining to class SA waters N or within 1 mile
and draining to class HQW waters? N
Engineer/Consultant: HOWARD RESNIK Company: COASTAL SITE DESIGN. PC
Address: PO BOX4041 City: WILMINGTON, State: NC Zip: 28406-_ R CF-IVF_D
Phone:[phone], Fax:[phone], Email: [e-mail] SEP 0 7 2011
SECTION ONE: REQUESTING A SCOPING MEETING ONLY
® Scoping Meeting ONLY ® DWQ, ❑ DCM, ❑ DLR, ❑ OTHER:
BY:_
SECTION TWO: CHECK ONLY THE PROGRAM (S) YOU ARE REQUESTING FOR EXPRESS PERMITTING
❑ 401 Unit ❑ Stream Origin Determination: _ # of stream calls — Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination: _ # of stream calls — Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification ❑ Isolated Wetland (_linear ft or _acres)
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization ❑ Minor Variance ❑ Major General Variance
❑ State Stormwater ❑ General ❑ SFR, ❑ SFR < 1 ac. ❑Bkhd & Bt Rmp, ❑ Clear & Grub, ❑ Utility ❑ Other
❑ Low Density ❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter _ # Curb Outlet Swales ❑ Off -site [SW _ (Provide permit #)]
[:]High Density -Detention Pond 0 # Treatment Systems ❑ High Density -Infiltration _ #Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Bio-Retention _ # Treatment Systems ElHigh Density —SW Wetlands _ # Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Other _ # Treatment Systems /❑ MOD:[] Major El Minor El Plan Revision ❑ Redev. Exclusion SW (Provide permit#)
❑ Coastal Management ❑ Excavation & Fill ❑ Bridges & Culverts ❑ Structures Information
❑ Upland Development ❑ Marina Development ❑ Urban Waterfront
❑ Land Quality ❑ Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with - acres to be disturbed.(CK # (for DENR use))
SECTION THREE — PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT IS APPLICABLE TO YOUR PROJECT (for both scooina and express meetino reauest
Wetlands on Site ® Yes ❑ No Buffer Impacts: ❑ No ❑ YES: _acre(s)
Wetlands Delineation has been completed: ® Yes ❑ No Isolated wetland on Property ❑ Yes ❑ No
US ACOE Approval of Delineation completed: ® Yes ❑ No 404 Application in Process w/ US ACOE: ❑ Yes ❑ No Permit
Received from US ACOE ® Yes ❑ No
++++rt++++rtrt+++++rt+rrtrtrtrrrrtrtrrrrrtrrtrrrrr+rrrrrrrrr++++rt++FOf DENR use
Fee Solitfor Multiple oermits: (Check# 1 Total Fee Amount t
SUBMITTAL DATES
Fee
SUBMITTAL DATES
I Fee
CAMA
CA
$
Variance (❑ Maj; El Min)
$
(❑ HD, ❑ LID, ❑ Gen)
$
401:
$
LQS
$
Stream Deter,_
$
weT
NCDENR EXPRESS March 2009
dcA'_e
Pig
q%vy
Pl;&fJ 4(0

g
E�
Ei
2
tl
�5
2
5
CAG
d

COASTAL SITE DESIGN, PC
PO Box 4041
Wilmington, NC 28406
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
License # C-2710
FOR STORMWATER EXPRESS REVIEW
September 2011
PROJECT NAME: 2D Intel BN and Anglico Maintenance
FY'I1 P-1034 & P-1240
MCB Camp Lejeune, NC
Onslow County
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project area for this development is 69.15 acres with 66.00 acres of disturbance. There are 0.04 ac
of wetlands within the project limits. This project is for the construction of two headquarters, an operation and control center (SCIF),
supply warehouse, Motor T, parking garage, various support structures and all related amenities and site infrastructure. Water and
sewer utilities will be provided by the BASE.
Stormwater from the site will drain to SB, NSW waters located in the White Oak River Basin (Index # 19-20). The project will be
high density utilizing underground conveyance 2i2c and o en channels to discharge stormwater into 4 wet basins designed for 90%
TSS removal and management of the 1 yr 24 hour storm event Part of this project includes the installation of ajogging trail which
will be hard to capture and send to the BMP so it might require permitting the jogging trail as low density and using sheet Flow to
handle the runoff. Proposed impervious for the site is 42%. There are no buffer requirements for the development. No offsite runoff
will be entering the site. The site will have access to the new BASE entry road that is currently under design on a separate contract.
SHWT determinations for the site have been done and will be utilized in design of the ponds.
PROJECT BMP: high density/ wet basin.
STORMWATER ENGINEER/CONSULTANT: Coastal Site Design, PC
PO Box 4041
Wilmington, NC 28406
Rodney Wright
[e-mail]
910 791 4441 office
910 791 1501 fax
c- T:;TV-ED
Str U 7 LUII
r.

2D INTEL BN AND 2D ANGLICO OPS/MAINTENANCE COMPLEXES 11P1034 & 11P1240
MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA EPROJECTS W.O. NO's 58748 & 796527
Section 5 Room Requirements cross references the "Room Type" numbers from the Space Tabulation
Sheets (previously identified) with an identified room requirement sheet. The Room Requirement Sheets
are organized by Functional Groups. Spaces of any given room type may occur in more than one facility.
Unless noted on the Space Tabulation sheets, or on the RFP Drawings (in Part Six- Attachments), each
space sharing a room type designation will have similar requirements. It is on these sheets that the level
of specifics for every space in the project is identified. Specific items are noted and UNIFORMAT
numbers are cross referenced with the ESRs and PTSs in the RFP. As with the previous sections,
Section 5 is prefaced by an Index of Room Requirements for reference.
Section 6 Engineering System Requirements (ESRs) utilizes the UNIFORMAT Numbering System to
organize the requirements of each item within the RFP. The ESRs provide more detailed information
regarding the project requirements.
Part Four- Performance Technical Specifications again edits Technical Specifications appropriate to
the project. It is cross referenced with the ESRs and Section 5, Room Requirements. The PTSs define
more detailed technical requirements and quality standards for construction.
Part Five- Prescriptive Technical Specifications identifies, when used, the Special Construction items
that will require a higher level of conformance to requirements. In the case of this RFP, a section on
Telecommunications Infrastructure Standards has been provided to specify the technical requirements of
this unique element of the project.
Part Six- Attachments are reference documents, drawings, reports, surveys, standards, etc. that are
requirements of this RFP, and cross referenced with the other five parts. It is the intent of the RFP to
identify every item in Part Six as relevant, appropriate, and necessary, to insure a complete and
successful project.
The Project Program and RFP Documents endeavor to be as comprehensive as possible in delineating
all project requirements. No document can fully capture all detailed requirements for a project of this
magnitude and complexity. The Design -Build Contractor Team is reminded of its obligation under this
contract to design and construct "complete and useable" facilities, site work and utilities regardless of the
level of information provided in the RFP documents.
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project includes all the facilities and infrastructure necessary to support the 2D Intel Battalion
Headquarters Group and the 2D ANGLICO Company within II MEF area being developed at North
Wallace Creek area of MCB Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. This is the first step toward developing
comprehensive design/build documents. The plan also includes provisions for the future addition of the
Radio Battalion and the MHG support facilities.
This Contract will design and build two new Headquarters, Operation Control Center (SCIF), Supply
Warehouse, Motor T, an add alternate parking garage, various support structures and all related
amenities, site infrastructure and utilities. These facilities will be used by the 2D Intel BN and 2D
ANGLICO as Operations and Maintenance Complexes.
Funding for these projects is contained in two FY'11 MCON projects, P-1034 & P-1240, consisting of
seven (7) new structures comprising approximate 254,889 square feet. These projects will construct the
necessary administrative/headquarters, operational, maintenance, mission support, and training facilities
to support the 2D Intel Battalion and the ANGLICO Company. These projects will also construct the
necessary infrastructure, including site clearing, roads, .sidewalks, paths and other site improvements;
grading and drainage; and utilities necessary to support the Intel and ANGLICO missions. Upgrade of
local utilities includes potable water, sanitary sewer, natural gas, electrical power and
Project Program Page 4
SEP U 7 ZU11
BY:- ----

2D INTEL BN AND 20 ANGLICO OPS/MAINTENANCE COMPLEXES 11P1034 & 11 P1240
MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA EPROJECTS W.O. NO's 58748 & 796527
telecommunications. Demolition of Building 445 on "L" Street will be accomplished as a part of this
program.
Project
eProfect Work
Nos:
Order Nos:
Proiect Description:
P-1034
58748
BN Headquarters
Ops Control Center/SCIF
Supply Warehouse
Motor Transport Maintenance Shop
HAZMAT
P-1240
796527
BN Headquarters with Applied Instruction
General Purpose Warehouse
With ElecUCom Maintenance
Motor Transport Maintenance Shop
HAZMAT
The facilities have been arranged in such a manner that each battalion/company forms a compound, co -
locating their Supply, Elec./Comm Maintenance, and Headquarters buildings. The motor transport
maintenance shops for Intel and Anglico will be constructed as one building with common utility rooms
and toilet rooms but separate work and storage areas. The HAZMAT Storage facility will also be
constructed as one building with separate areas for Intel and for ANGLICO.
A 600 +/- car ramp garage will be included as a bid option #1 and funded from remaining funds from P-
1034 and/or P-1240. This garage will be expandable to accommodate future parking requirements for the
Radio BN. (This could potentially be an additional 400 to 600 cars, dependent upon the final Radio BN
program requirements.
A one (1) Megawatt Photo Voltaic system to be included as bid option #2 and shall include the
construction of a concrete roof deck on the ramp garage to support the PV array.
The barracks, armory and a parking garage to support Intel and ANGLICO is being funded and developed
as a stand-alone project under FY 2011 projects P-1249, P-1322, and P-1323.
The site is located near the Wallace Creek Regimental Complex, currently under construction under
separate contracts. Wallace Creek Road shall be extended in the site as part of Wallace Creek
Regimental Complex Phase II under a separate contract. Wallace Creek Road will terminate before the
capped landfill as delineated on the drawings in Part 6 of this RFP. The Wallace Creek Road extension is
currently in the design phase. Wallace Creek Road construction is scheduled to begin construction
before 2D Intel BN and 2D ANGLICO Ops/Maintenance Complex construction begins. The fully -
constructed vision of this project and the overall Wallace Creek Regimental Complex is illustrated on the
RFP Drawings included under Part 6: Attachments.
A base entry road is currently under design under a separate contract. This base entry road is located to
the south and southwest sides of the site. The portion of the base entry road adjacent to the site is
scheduled to begin construction after 2D Intel BN and 2D ANGLICO Ops/Maintenance Complex
construction is complete. The location of the base entry road is illustrated on the drawings in Part 6 of
this RFP.
The proposed layout for the site is configured to avoid wetlands and embankments. New facilities and
pavement areas are configured in conformance with UFC 4-010-01, DoD Minimum Antiterrorism
Standards for Buildings. The capped landfill area, as illustrated on the drawings in Part 6 of this RFP, is a
no build zone.
Design and construction under this contract includes all clearing and grubbing, grading, drainage,
stormwater management, erosion control, security fencing and gates, road construction, utilities and other
Project Program Page 5

2D INTEL BN AND 2D ANGLICO OPS/MAINTENANCE COMPLEXES 11P1034 & 11P1240
MCB CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA EPROJECTS W.O. NO's 58748 & 796527
site improvements to support the new facilities. Saleable timber on the site shall be harvested by the
Base prior to the Contractor commencing operations.
Design and Construction under this contract also includes the following new facilities (all structures are
single -story unless otherwise noted):
FY 2011-funded facilities:
Intel - Battalion/Company Headquarters, (2 story)
with Battalion Aid Station
- Operations Control Center (SCIF) (2 story)
- Supply Warehouse
- Motor Transport Maint. Shop (connected with ANGLICO)
- HAZMAT Storage (duplexed with ANGLICO)
ANGLICO - Company Headquarters Building (2 story)
- including Communication Analysis area
- and Applied Instruction Area
- Motor Transport Maint. Shop. (connected with Intel)
- HAZMAT Storage (duplexed with Intel)
- General Purpose Warehouse
- with Electronic/Comm Maintenance area
General - Bid Option #1: 3 OR 4-Story Parking Structure
Bid Option #2: Photovoltaic Array(s) and Concrete Roof deck on garage
to support the array.
Related amenities and site work includes various site improvements, Marine Corps Martial Arts Program
Warrior Pits, earthwork, grading, landscaping, drainage, stormwaler management, parking lot and paved
roadways, pedestrian sidewalks, jogging trail, landscaping, sodding, wash racks, wash pad, pump house
for stormwater reuse at wash rack and wash pads, free standing permanent concrete loading dock and
ramp, sanitary sewer system with pump station, domestic water system, water distribution for fire
protection, natural gas distribution system, fire pumps and hydrants, electrical utilities, site lighting,
telecommunication utilities, security systems, Mass Notification Systems (MNS), Local Area Network
(LAN), and emergency/standby power systems.
Stormwater management shall be accomplished by utilizing Low Impact Development techniques in
accordance with UFC 3-210-10N, Low Impact Development. Stormwater management design shall also
be in compliance with North Carolina Department of Environmental Resources (NCDENR) requirements.
Existing soils appear favorable for infiltration, but geotechnical analysis will be required to make final
determination.
Utilities include natural gas to support heating requirements at new facilities using gas -fired boilers or
direct -fired equipment. Air-conditioning shall be accomplished by air-cooled chillers at larger facilities,
and heat pumps at smaller facilities. The local gas company has tentatively agreed to extend service to
all new facilities from the existing main along the Utility Right of Way, based on the anticipated demand.
Utilities also include Mass Notification Systems (MNS), Local Area Network (LAN), and
emergency/standby power systems.
A base wide Potable Water study is underway at the present time to evaluate. the potential need for
additional water towers or modifications to existing towers. Water for fire suppression shall be distributed
to fire hydrants and to sprinkler systems inside of buildings. Local fire pumps at multi -story buildings and
high water -demand facilities may be required.
Project Program Page 6

NAVFAC MIDATLANTIC
STATEMENT OF ARCHITECT -ENGINEER SERVICES (SAES) FOR
DESIGN -BUILD CONSTRUCTION SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS
(November2012 Version)
Date: 11 AUG 14
SAES OUTLINE: This Document is comprised of the following sections:
1. Contract Identification Information
2. List of Attachments and References, including additional NAVFAC & Regional References
3. Definitions, including Roles and Terminologies
4. Contract Scope and General Information
5. Design and Engineering Services, including Special Requirements
6. Schedule of Fees
TASK ORDER INFORMATION.
Contract N40085-14-D-8006 Task Order: TBD
A/E Firm Name: Maune, Belangia, Faulkenberry Architects
Address: New Bern, North Carolina
FY-16 MCON Project P1280
Title: 2nd Radio Bn Complex Operations Consolidation
Location: MCB Camp Lejeune, North Carolina
eProjects Work Order No.: 862878
Job Order No.: TBD
The scope of work shall be as outlined below and as described elsewhere in this Contract. Naval Facilities
Engineering Command Mid -Atlantic (NAVFAC MIDLANT) Marine Corp IPT.
2. ATTACHMENTS AND REFERENCES.
2.A. ATTACHMENTS. The following documents include references that are not available via Internet search.
The other documents are guidance that detail MIDLANT business practices, or provide examples for information.
(1) P1280 2nd Radio Bn Complex Operations Consolidation - MCB Camp Lejeune Form
DD 1391 dated 08JUL14
(2)
P1280 Site Plan
(3)
P1280 Submittal Table
(4)
ICD/ICS Area Data
(5)
IC TECHSCOPE 705 V 1.2
(6)
CNSSAM TEMPEST 01 131
2.13. REFERENCES.
(I) Contract Award Appendices N40085-14-D-8006, including all attachments and
references thereto.
DEFINITIONS.
3.A. PROJECT POINTS OF CONTACT (POC)
NAVFAC MIDLANT
Contracting Officer (KO): Michael Brice, Code OPQAI, Phone [phone], entail,
michael.brice n navy.mil.
Page 1 of 18

Project Manager: Carl Tarkenton, Code OPQC15, Phone [phone], eMail
earl. tarkenton n navy.mil.
Design Manager: Marshall Crow, Code OPQC 11, Phone [phone], eMail
marshall.crownnavy. mil.
FEAD/ROICC Construction Manager (CM): Ken Lacy, Supv ROICC, Phone [phone]
EXT5254, eMail kenneth.h.lacyrunavy.mil.
NAVFAC LANT
ICD/ICS Area SME: Richard Cofer, P.E., Phone [phone], eMail richard.cofernnavv.mil.
MCB CAMP LEJEUNE
Planner/ Activity Representative/Point of Contact (POC): Peter McWilliams, IDD, Phone (910)
451-4746, eMail: [e-mail].
THE ACTIVITY POC DOES NOT HAVE ANY AUTHORITY TO MODIFY THE TERMS OR
CONDITIONS OF A TASK ORDER.
Real Property Accounting Officer (RPAO): TBD
SPAWAR
Marine Corps Lejeune/New River ESS Project Engineer SPAWAR Systems Center:
Nick Ringwall, Code 52150, Phone [phone], entail uicholas.rinewall e navv.mil
3.13. PROJECT SCOPE AND FUNDING.
3.13.1. Project Scope: Quantities and Units of Measure vary. See DD Form 1391.
3.13.2. Project Budget:
$52,843,000.00
3.B.2.a. "Design to" Construction Cost Limitation (CCL): $46,825,000.00
3.B.2.b. Base Bid Goal: $44,500,000.00
During the conceptual development with the Activity, discuss design alternatives and identify potential bid
items which would establish a base bid for a functionally complete and usable facility in the event that designing to
the entire project Scope would exceed the Project Budget. This may be accomplished via a Base Bid Item at less
than 100% of CCL with Additive or Option items. The target Scope percentage for the Base Bid will be 95%. As
part of the 35% Design Submittal, identify proposed bid items and any design alternatives to reduce costs; indicate
which ones have Activity concurrence.
The A-E shall be required to analyze "excessively high" bids received during the construction
contract award phase of projects covered under this contract. The A-E shall provide design alternatives, revisions,
and/or redesign at no additional cost to the Government if it is determined that the A-E's Government Estimate was
in error.
3.13.3. Fund Type. MCON
3.0 CLASSIFICATION OF WORK. Construction
4. CONTRACT SCOPE AND GENERAL INFORMATION.
Page 2 of 18

4.A. SCOPE DESCRIPTION / DESIGN STRATEGY. Provide the solicitation documents for a Design -Build
construction contract. The Description of Work below and the Project Data attached, including the project DD1391
are the best available information prepared to date. Provide services in accordance with this scope.
4.13. TASK ORDER REQUIREMENTS. Description of Work.
This project constructs a low rise steel frame, reinforced concrete masonry unit 2nd Radio Bn
Operations Complex with reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete floors
and standing seam metal roofs. The Complex will include an Operations Control Center/ ICD/ICS Areas,
Battalion (BN) Company Headquarters, Battalion Aid Station, personnel support areas and administrative areas. The
overall site of the project will be designed to accommodate additional facilities for storage, vehicle, boat
and parachute maintenance, and electric/communications shop.
See attachments ICD/ICS Area Document, IC TECHSCOPE 705 V 1.2, and CNSSAM TEMPEST 01 131
for further information regarding ICD/ICS Area requirements. ICD/ICS Area requirements shall be in accordance
with UFC 4-010-05, ICS/ICD 705 Series, and TEMPEST CNSSAM.
Information systems will include basic telephone, unclassified but sensitive internet
protocol router network (NIPRNET), secret internet protocol router networks (SIPRNET), TS networks (up to 5
networks), computer networks, fiber optic, security and fire alarm systems and infrastructure.
This project will provide Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) features and comply with
AT/FP regulations, and physical security mitigation in accordance with DoD Minimum Anti -
Terrorism Standards for Buildings.
Built-in equipment includes access control system rough -in, under floor fire detection
system, vault doors for secured storage, passenger/freight combination elevator, emergency generator, fire
pump with back-up generator, raised computer access floor, air handling and chilled water systems for ICD/ICS
Areas, intercom and lighting control system, secure ground/reference system, tempest requirements, uninterruptable
power supply system, and antenna support mast.
Building architecture shall be Georgian or Colonial Revival in classification, as defined by the Base Exterior
Architecture Plan (BEAP) for Hadnot Point.
Operations and Maintenance Support Information (OMSI) is included in this project.
Sustainable design principles will be included in the design and construction of the
project in accordance with Executive Order 13423 and other laws and Executive Orders. Facilities will meet a
LEED `Silver' USGBC Certification. This project will include a third -party Commissioning Authority (CxA) entity
hired separately by the Government. This project will comply with the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007. Low Impact Development will be included in the design and construction
of this project as appropriate.
Special construction features includes classified communication information systems
and heavy floor slab construction.
Site preparation includes site clearing and grubbing, grading, borrow/fill material,
topsoil, excavation, preparation for construction and erosion control measures.
Special foundation features include pile supported foundation system.
Paving and site improvements include surface parking facilities for approximately 500
personally owned vehicles and 80 tactical vehicles, roadways, curbs, sidewalks, trail with
pedestrian bridges crossing wetlands to connect with other existing facilities,
landscaping, approximately 1,400m of 8 foot high chain link and decorative fencing,
roadway signs, a dumpster enclosure, subsurface sand filter system, pervious pavements,
Page 3 of 18

and storm water retention pond, piping and structures. This project will also provide
improvements to existing roadways that feed the facility.
Electrical systems include primary and secondary distribution systems, interior and site
lighting, transformers, and telecommunications infrastructure.
Mechanical systems include heating, ventilation and air conditioning, water lines,
plumbing and plumbing fixtures, sanitary sewer lines, vapor intrusion mitigation system,
fire protection systems and supply lines.
Environmental mitigation includes wetland mitigation and vapor intrusion system beneath
floor slabs. The vapor intrusion system shall include an under -slab membrane barrier over a uniform layer of stone
with a network of perforated pipe that is mechanically exhausted. Monitoring devices measuring indoor air quality
will be required inside the building.
Demolition includes demolition and site restoration to landscaped greenspace of the following facilities:
FC364A PR# 214701 Admin Trailer (228 m2), FC364B PR# 214702 Admin Trailer (228 m2), FC364C PR#
214703 Admin Trailer (228 m2), FC364D PR# 214704 Admin Trailer (228 m2), FC364E PR# 214706
Admin Trailer (228 m2), FC364F PR# 214707 Classroom Trailer (114 m2). Facilities will be
demolished upon completion of the project as functions they currently support will be
relocated.
Facilities will be designed to meet or exceed the useful service life specified in DoD
Unified Facility Criteria. Facilities will incorporate features that provide the lowest
practical life cycle costs solutions satisfying the facility requirements with the goal of
maximizing energy efficiency.
4.B.1. Security Requirements of Design Contract. Standard and document control measures are
required.
4.B.2. Security Requirements of Construction Contract. Standard and document control measures
are required. Require the DB Construction Contractor to provide a Construction Security Plan (CSP).
4.13.3. Submittals. Provide the following information on the cover sheet of all documents and
reports: the Work Order Number, Project number (if assigned), title, location, design contract number with T.O.
number, and date submitted. Include a vicinity reference map for all drawing packages and any report, in addition to
a project site -specific map. Include a graphic scale on each drawing sheet See attached submittal table indicating the
format (paper and/or CD), names and addresses of Government POCs to receive copies, and quantities of submittals
required. NOTE: Incomplete submittal packages will not be accepted and will be returned without review. All items
for each stage of project development must be submitted concurrently.
4.B.3.a. Submittal Types
- Kick-off/Charette Documents (To be presented at the Kick-off/Charette Meeting)
- Kick-off/Charette Report
- 65% RFP Submittal
- Prefinal RFP Submittal
- Final RFP Submittal
- Post Final Submittal (Souce Files — See Submittal Table)
4.13.4. RFP Reviews. DrChecks shall be used for collecting MIDLANT and client comments
for design reviews. RFP Submittals and Reviews include 65%, Prefinal, and Final.
Page 4 of 18

4.C. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION REQUIRED BY DESIGNER WITH LOCAL,
STATE OR FEDERAL AGENCIES OUTSIDE OF DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY. As required for permitting.
Agencies include DoD, SPAWAR, NSA (Navy SSO), Physical Security, and G-6.
4.D. CONTRACTOR LAY DOWN AREA AND HAUL ROUTE DESIGNATION. Coordinate with
the ROICC to identify the appropriate temporary locations for materials and administrative functions, as well as haul
routes to avoid overhead or other obstructions.
4.E. DEMOLITION. As indicated herein. Provide investigation for hazardous materials and
preparation of hazardous materials demolition drawings.
4.17. CONSTRUCTION PROCUREMENT STRATEGIES.
41.1. Number of Construction Contracts: One.
4.17.2. Method of Procurement:
Competitive Negotiation; Best Value Source Selection, Two -Step.
4.F.3. Construction Duration. 754 Calendar Days
4.H.4. Construction Phasing. As required.
5. SERVICES.
S.A. DESIGN SERVICES. All listed services are required unless otherwise noted.
5.A.1. The A-E shall utilize an ICD/ICS Area Consultant to assist in the
RFP development of the ICD/ICS areas. The Consultant shall have a minimum of three (3) years of experience with
SCIF design for projects of similar complexity, size, and scope.
S.A.La The A-E shall incorporate language into the RFP that will require the Construction
Contractor's DOR to utilize an ICD/ICS Area Consultant to assist in the design and construction of the ICD/ICS
areas. The Consultant shall have a minimum of three (3) years of experience with SCIF design for projects of similar
complexity, size, and scope.
5.A.2. Drawings/Plans. Verify the drawing size with the Design Manager.
5.A.3. Basis of Design.
5.A.4. Cost Estimate.
Provide the cost estimate in accordance with UFC 1-300-09N. Prepare all detailed cost estimates in the NAVFAC
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) to the Assembly level using the SuccessEstimatorTM (SUCCESS) estimating
program. Use the latest SUCCESS version and submit both hard and electronic copies of cost estimates with each
submittal. Use of the latest Tri-Service database or commercially available data for use with SUCCESS is highly
recommended. Updated cost estimates shall be provided with each phase of project development. The detail for
each cost estimate submittal shall be commensurate with the level of design required for that submittal.
5.A.5. Calculations.
5.A.6. Performance Technical Specifications
5.A.7. Special Building and Infrastructure Systems. As required and as listed below.
Audio -Visual Integrated System Components
Page 5 of 18

Elevators
Emergency Power (may include Uninterruptable Power Systems (UPS)
Radio Frequency (R.F.) Shielding
Security Requirements
5.A.8. Antiterrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP).
Facility must meet the requirements for critical infrastructure asset vulnerabilities. Critical facilities may warrant
design to higher levels of protection than provided in UFC 4-010-01. Direct DOR to perform a detailed risk and
threat assessment executed per UFC 4-020-01 to establish adequate AT/FP requirements. Direct DOR to provide an
ATFP Compliance Plan in their preliminary submittal and all subsequent submittals. This overview sheet shall
include a site plan showing all required setbacks and text outlining each standard (1-22) and how it is addressed in
the design.
5.A.9. Progressive Collapse Mitigation (if required).
5.A.10. Fire Pump with backup generator.
5.A.11. Fire Protection.
Fire protection design and engineering services shall be in accordance with UFC 3-600-01, as well as all other
applicable National Fire Protection Association codes/standards not covered by the UFC. Specifically, NAVFAC
MIDLANT requires all Fire Protection Engineers to be registered in that particular discipline. The fire protection
work may include, but is not limited to, building code analysis, life safety code analysis, water flow tests, fire
protection design analysis of automatic detection and suppression systems, and verification of the adequacy of water
supply (i.e., preliminary sprinkler layout with supporting hydraulic calculations). For assistance with this item,
consult with the NAVFAC MIDLANT Fire Protection.
5.A.12. Elevator Design. Elevator design shall follow the latest revision of the "NAVFAC
Elevator Design Guide" and requires approval by the NAVFAC Elevator Program Manager. The elevator shall be a
passenger/freight combination elevator. The A-E shall provide a separate elevator package that contains the
necessary elevator specifications with each design submittal. Prior to developing the elevator requirements, the A-E
shall discuss these requirements with NAVFAC LANT's VTE, Kevin Morse / (757) 3224653 and secure a copy of
the latest revision of the "NAVFAC Elevator Design Guide".
5.A.13. Energy Conservation and Sustainable Development.
5.A.13.a. Energy Conservation and Sustainable Design Strategies. LEED Silver is required.
Mechanical system shall be designed in accordance with UFC 1-200-02 (2013) High Performance and Sustainable
Building Requirements. Provide 30% reduction from ASHRA.E 90.1-2010 criteria.
The selection of sustainable features toward LEED certification shall focus on the credits that reduce life
cycle costs, increase operational efficiency, and increase worker productivity.
The goal for MIDLANT projects is to achieve 30% reduction in Energy Consumption below ASHRAE
90.1 criteria. At the start of a project, define the energy goals and renewable energy goals, determine the baseline
cost estimate, determine the Life Cycle Cost baseline and goals, and prepare design alternatives to meet the goals. At
each design process submission, update the Life Cycle Cost analysis and cost estimates and compare with the goals
and baselines. Refer to the MIDLANT Betterments guidance for suggested approaches. Provide a Life Cycle Cost
Analysis for the renewable energy selection for each project.
Process: Establish and agree upon project energy and sustainability goals and a course of action to meet
those goals.
Identify potential design problems and determine the baseline criteria.
Identify potential operation and maintenance concerns and/or safety hazards and determine mitigating
controls.
Prioritize and resolve building -design issues regarding energy use, occupant comfort, maintenance,
building and system life expectancy.
Project team shall include: Government and A/E Design Teams, Project Manager, Operation and
Maintenance and Construction Specialists, and Design Office Liaison when applicable.
Page 6 of 18

The Energy Conservation Measures (ECM) tool includes worksheets for seven facility types common to
the Department of Defense. Each facility worksheet recommends ECMs for building components and systems for
specific climate zones.
Perform Facility modeling in addition to the mechanical system selection model at least four times to
determine energy usage, energy savings, cost estimate, and life cycle cost to justify and refine the design decisions
used to determine the project cost and LCCA.
Incorporate green specifications as applicable to the level of LEED certification sought.
The Contractor shall register the project for LEED certification with USGBC (or equivalent). Provide proof
of project registration no later than the 35% design submittal, as directed in UFGS Design -Build Model RFP
Standard Template Design Submittal Procedures (http://ndbm.wbde.or2/systera/html/6/3881). A minimum rating of
LEED Silver is required for all Navy projects for new and replacement buildings. Use the latest version of LEED
guidance from USGBC.
5.A.I3.b. Registration with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) website for Energy Star and
Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Buildings
Database. Include in the specifications the requirement that the Designer of Record shall register the project at at
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) website for Energy Star and Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP),
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Buildings Database.
5.A.14. Moisture Control Plan. Include in the specifications the requirement that the Designer of
Record shall provide a written Moisture Control Plan as part of the design. The government organization/agency
responsible for enforcing and monitoring the mold and mildew warranty during the warranty period is NAVFAC
ROICC.
The Moisture Control Plan is an organized plan for good design practice. The prevention of mold and moisture
problems is always part of complete design detailing and specifications. The WBDG web link at
htto://wNvw.wbdg.org/resources/moisturedynamics.nho?r--fhosb new provides detailed requirements.
At a minimum, the Moisture Control Plan shall also address
(1) Moisture control through design details for the envelope and for HVAC humidity
controls;
(2) Specified plan for construction materials storage and protection from mold and
moisture infiltration;
(3) Specified humidity control during construction;
(4) Operations and Maintenance plan (to include warranty and follow-on maintenance
contracts) for building maintenance to control moisture after building occupancy
5.A.15. Landscape Architectural Design. Include the requirement for the DOR to provide the
Landscape Design in accordance with the following:
Landscape Architectural design, site planning, and detailed site design and layout shall be shall be
designed and developed by a licensed Landscape Architect. Site design shall be in accordance with UFC 3-201-02
and the current Base Exterior Architecture Plan (BEAP). Other UFC's and Government codes and regulations may
be applicable. Additional assistance is available from the NAVFAC MIDLANT Landscape Architect, Mike Lewis,
RLA, ASLA at 757-341-2023.
- Landscape Architectural site design is an integral part of site planning, design, and layout of
landscape architectural elements for this project. Scope of work for Landscape Architectural design includes but is
not limited to: site programming, site analysis, building orientation and placement including major entries to
buildings, vehicular and pedestrian circulation including development of major entries to the project site, landform,
water quality features and low impact development (LID) practices, LEED requirements/analysis/incorporation,
Page 7 of 18

sustainable design methods, incorporation of Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) requirements, and site features to
reinforce Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection.
- Landscape Architectural detailed designs shall include but are not limited to: design and
development of hardscape areas such as plazas and patios, steps and ramps, walls, fire lanes, shade structures, site
furnishings, signage and wayfinding, lighting, bioretention cells, planting, and irrigation, where applicable. Utilize
plant materials that are native or naturalized to the specific project location based on sustainment via available
rainfall. In general, irrigation from potable water sources is not desirable. An irrigation system is not required for
this project.
- Landscape Architectural design considers tactful location and coordination of surface
improvements that are utilitarian in nature including but not limited to: trash enclosures, mechanical units or yards,
electrical transformers and utility lines, geothermal and rainwater harvesting elements, fire hydrants and water
backflow devices.
- Other areas of design focus include but are not limited to: project or user specific activities or
elements described elsewhere in this document.
- Landscape Architect shall be included in all meetings involving site design and site work
coordination with other disciplines. Landscape Architect Designer of Record shall attend meetings including but not
limited to: Project Kick-off Meeting, Charrette, coordination meetings, design comment review meetings, and other
meetings needed to accomplish a high quality, complete design and associated documents.
- The referenced document "White House Council on Environmental Quality Guidance for Federal
Agencies on Sustainable Practices for Designed Landscapes" provides guidance for Landscape Architecture design.
- The referenced document "Environmental Protection Agency Technical Guidance on
Implementing the Stormwater Runoff Requirements for Federal Projects under Section 438 of the Energy
Independence and Security Act (EISA)" also provides approaches for meeting water quality goals associated with
Landscape Architectural Design.
- Special elements and activities may be requested by the Installation, Government Reviewing Landscape Architect,
or Users during the design programming, conceptual development, and plan refinement process. All Landscape
Architectural site design and other special elements and activities shall be shown on a Landscape Concept Plan that
is in addition to the Conceptual Site Plan required with the Civil drawings at the Concept Design Submittals (10%-
15%) required in UFC 1-300-09N. Sufficient detail will be provided with the Landscape Concept Plan and the Basis
of Design to describe all site improvements to those reviewing this submittal.
5.A.16. Stormwater Management/Low Impact Development (LID). Review of project for storm -
water impacts is required. LID features and associated costs should be addressed in a separate report and submitted
with each submittal.. Items addressed shall include:
Actual Change to Land Cover in Sq Ft (increased or decreased)
% Increase in Runoff
EISA Technical Constraint(s)
List LID features
Cost estimates for LID features updated for each design submittal.
5.A.17. Interior Design.
The A-E shall utilize an Interior Designer (ID) or an Architect who has completed a Council for
Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA) recognized program of academic training in Interior Design, is certified by the
Page 8 of 18

National Council for Interior Design Qualification (NCIDQ) and has attained certification, registration, or licensure
as required by the locality or district where the project work will occur. The A-E's ID or Architect who meets the
qualifications of this document shall be referred to hereinafter as the A-E's ID.
The A-E's ID, and equipment specialist consultant, as required, shall attend and participate, in entirety; all design
meetings, to include but not limited to, kick-off, site visit(s), Charette and review meetings to prepare all interior
finish (C30) and furnishings (E20) and contribute to Room Requirements, Interior Construction (C10), Equipment
(E 10) and other inter -related portions of the RFP. Develop the appropriate interior finish type performance technical
specifications and built-in interior fixtures/furniture specifications.
5.A.17.a. Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment (FF&E) Package Development: Develop the list
of probable FF&E and their estimated cost for this project. Identify list of all existing FF&E to be reused,
responsible parties, tasks, and logistics, as required. Include a separate line item in the Bid Schedule for the
contractor's proposed Handling and Administrative Rate (HAR) to procure and supervise the installation of the
FF&E.
5.A.18. Audio -Visual Design
The A-E shall utilize a Certified Technology Specialist -Design (CTS-D) whose certification is ANSI
accreditedunder the International Organization of Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC) ISO/IEC 17024 certification of personnel. The A-E's CTS-D who meets the qualifications of
this document shall be referred to hereinafter as the A-E's CTS-D.
The A-E's CTS-D, as required, shall attend and participate, in entirety; all design meetings, to include but not limited
to, kick-off, site visit(s), Charette and review meetings to prepare all Equipment (El0) A/V related requirements and
identify A/V requirements in Room Requirements and other inter -related portions of the RFP.
5.A.18.a. Audio -Visual Integrated System Components Package Development. Prepare the
requirements for this project. Develop the list of equipment and estimated cost for this project. Include a separate
line item in the Bid Schedule for the contractor's proposed Handling and Administrative Rate (HAR) to procure and
supervise the installation of the FF&E.
5.A.19. Physical Security Equipment (PSE). Components. Prepare the requirements for this
project. Develop the list of equipment and estimated cost for this project.
PSE is limited to the funded MILCON portion as described below: MILCON funds provide for the interior
infrastructure (comprised of conduits, communications/security cables, junction boxes, electronic door strikes, door
hardware, mounting hardware, power connections, CCTV, etc.) and exterior infrastructure (exterior duct banks,
manholes, utility poles, exterior communication/security cabling, power connections, etc.) For assistance refer to
MIL-HDBK-1012/1 and UFC 4-020-01.
S.B. ENGINEERING SERVICES. All listed services are required unless otherwise noted.
5.B.1. Field Investigation.
Perform field investigation to survey and review site conditions, develop thorough understanding of project scope,
and prepare for Kick-off Meeting.
S.B. La. A-E Site Visit Requests. This installation requires routine access request notification as
provided in Commander, Navy Installations Command (CNIC) Notice 5530 Implementation of Navy Commercial
Access Control System (NCACS), included in the basic award documents, and at this website with specific
guidance for the MIDLANT AOR provided by Commander, Navy Region Mid -Atlantic (CNRMA) available at
httn://www.cnic.navv.mil/cnrma/Re2ionODerationsandServices/Ot)erationsandManauement/ContractorV erificationS
stem/index.htm
5.13.1.b. Occupational Safety and Health Policy.
Page 9 of 18

5.13.I.b.(I) Accident Prevention Plan (APP). Provide a site -specific Accident Prevention Plan
(APP) for the team to follow during site visits and investigations. For subsequent visits, update the form if there are
changes in the personnel who shall be attending, and/or the tasks to be performed.
- Submit the APP and site investigation methods for review and approval by the ROICC at least
ten working days before the site investigation and/or subsurface work will be authorized.
5.13.1.b.(I)i. Contents of the APP. Each APP shall include, but are not limited to:
- The identified hazards involved;
- The control measures to be taken;
- Procedures for fall protection;
- Procedures to be followed prior to and during access to confined spaces such as
manholes, vaults and attics;
- Emergency planning, such as:
- Localemergency telephone numbers
- Emergency contact telephone numbers for each of the team members;
- Emergency procedures to be followed if injuries occur;
- If the T.O. scope includes borings or other subsurface investigations, as part of the APP
identify the type of field investigation and verification techniques, such as visual, Miss Utilities scanning and third
party/subcontractor scanning, potholing, and/or hand digging within two feet of a known utility. Mark underground
utilities before starting any ground -disturbing actions.
5.13.I.b.(1)ii. Qualifications. Provide the names of Competent and/or Qualified persons and proof
of competency/qualification to meet specific OSHA Competent/Qualified person requirements.
S.B. Lb.(1)iii. Distribution. Provide one copy of the APP to each of the following:
- Site work team;
- ROICC
5.13.1.b.(2) NAVFAC MIDLANT Systems Safety Checklist and Fall Protection
ComplianceChecklist. Prepare a NAVFAC MIDLANT Systems Safety Checklist and Fall Protection
Compliance Checklist as part of the first submittal for this project. Provide updated checklists, identifying
any changes, with each subsequent submittal. Include the NAVFAC MIDLANT Systems Safety Checklist
in the construction solicitation package and identify it as one of the required submittals to be provided by
the DOR.
5.13.2. Surveys. Note all wetlands, other environmental features, monitoring wells, or other
environmental monitoring devices located within the project's site on a survey.
5.13.3. Utilities Investigations. Provide an analysis of all required utilities to determine whether
existing capacities are adequate to support the new facility. Identify points of connection to existing utility
distribution systems on the topographic; if the points of connection are outside the projecthoundaries, provide
additional survey that shows their locations. Identify scope for upgrading existing utility systems, if existing
systems are inadequate to support the new facility.
5.13.4. Geotechnical Services. Provide a geotechnical evaluation of the soils in the proposed
building areas, parking/service drive and roadway areas, and storm water management areas. In -situ soil shear wave
velocity testing shall be performed at the site to determine the seismic Site Class as required per UFC 1-200-01. In
addition to soil borings, in -situ testing (i.e. dilatometer, cone penetrometer, etc.) shall be utilized to develop
parameters for geotechnical design. The subsurface exploration program shall also include the collection of
undisturbed (Shelby tube) samples in soft cohesive near surface soil strata and laboratory consolidation testing when
deemed appropriate by the geotechnical engineer overseeing the work.
The geotechnical engineer shall be currently licensed in the State where the project is located and have previous
experience in this geographic region. The geotechnical drilling and in -situ testing shall be conducted by firms with
at least three years of previous experience in the geographic region of the project. The in -situ testing and data
Page 10 of 18

reduction shall be conducted under the supervision of a professional engineer with at least three years of
demonstrated experience with the in -situ test method.
Use of a private subsurface utility locator will be required to verify existing buried utility lines in the vicinity of the
proposed exploration locations in addition to coordination with applicable Base/Facility personnel. All proposed
exploration locations shall be reviewed with applicable Base/Facility personnel prior to conducting the work. A
"Digging Permit" shall be obtained prior to conducting the work, if applicable.
North Carolina state law requires anyone performing excavation to first call the statewide notification center's
number before digging. Callers must then wait two working days while utilities locate and mark their underground
facilities. Before excavating, dial North Carolina "One Call" at 1-800-632-4949. Notification should be no less than
two -- but no more than 10 -- working days before commencing excavation. The markings are valid for 15 working
days from the date of the call to the notification center. Providing the correct spelling of the street name, pavement
type, nearest cross -street and the area to be marked will assist the locators in marking the location of underground
facilities within the required 48-hour time period. Tickets can be submitted online by contacting the notification
center at 1-800-632-4949 or visiting One Call online for details.
The contractor shall also conform to The Virginia Professional Excavators Manual, and any North Carolina
underground utility marking standards. The contractor shall notify proper authorities of any planned excavation on
Navy property (and its easements) and obtain clearance with the notification center prior to excavation. Also, the use
of a private subsurface utility locator will be required to verify existing buried utility lines in the vicinity of the
proposed exploration locations. All proposed exploration locations shall be reviewed with applicable Base/Facility
personnel prior to conducting the work. A "Digging Permit' shall be obtained prior to conducting the work, if
applicable. No subsurface explorations shall be performed within 5 feet (horizontal distance) of existing buried
utility lines.
Trees larger than eight inches in diameter shall not be cut when site access to field exploration locations requires the
clearing of existing trees and brush. All brush and trees that are cut for drill rig access shall be windrowed on the
edges of the cleared areas. Clearing shall not be performed with a dozer. Only hand clearing is permitted. Soil
boring and in -situ testing shall be performed with track -mounted equipment. The use of planks or matting is
required where the existing ground surface may be very soft and wet to facilitate equipment. Any ruts created by the
drill rig shall be backfilled and covered over with straw or existing surface vegetation.
Historic topographic maps, aerial photographs, and survey data shall be researched to aid in evaluating if areas of
man-made land or other subsurface anomalies are present at the site which would impact the proposed project. In
addition, existing boring and geotechnical data shall be reviewed and evaluated as part of the study, if available.
The findings of the research shall be published in the Geotechnical Report.
Complete a Stormwater Management Infiltration Study for the proposed stormwater management areas. The study
shall be performed by a soil scientist licensed in the state of North Carolina and at a minimum shall include the
following:
1). Geologic mapping of the soils present at the site;
2). Determination of the relic and contemporary seasonal high water table elevations as required by
NCDENR; and
3). Infiltration testing
Infiltration testing, using a constant head permeameter, shall be performed in the proposed storm water management
areas. The testing shall be performed in the zone approximately two to three feet above the anticipated seasonal
high groundwater level. The stabilized groundwater level shall be measured in temporary monitoring wells (i.e.
piezometers). The geotechnical study shall address anticipated seasonal high groundwater levels and any potential
perched water or confined aquifer conditions.
All boreholes shall be backfilled with auger cuttings and cement grout. Any CBR and test pit excavations shall be
backfilled with compacted soil.
Page 11 of 18

Boring logs shall be shown to an appropriate scale and shall include a description of each soil type encountered
(including Unified Soil Classification). For each boring, include ground surface elevation. For each soil type,
include strata depth and thickness, depth to ground water table, standard penetration test blow counts, pocket
penetrometer penetration resistance, natural moisture content, unit weights, percent fines, and Atterberg limits. Each
boring log shall also include boring identification, date of boring, the name of the person who performed the boring
and the name of the company that performed the test. Provide graphic scales, abbreviations, and legends that clearly
define all symbols used. The boring logs shall indicate whether the Standard Penetration testing was performed with
a manual or automatic hammer and whether the N-values reported are corrected or uncorrected. Subsurface
profile(s) delineating designated stratagraphy (i.e. surficial soil or pavement layers, soil strata), groundwater depths,
N-values and other pertinent geotechnical data shall be provided. The Y-axis of the profile should be elevation
based when possible.
Geotechnical Evaluations shall include, but not be limited to, the following item(s): shallow foundation design,
ground improvement/replacement measures to permit the use of shallow foundation systems or intermediate
foundation systems, deep foundation design, pavement design, seismic site classification, liquefaction potential,
groundwater control/impacts, recommendations to support LID design, recommendations for buried utility pipe and
structure bedding material type and thickness requirements, expansive soil, reuse of excavated onsite soils as
structural fill, soil corrosion potential for buried pipes and concrete structures below grade, foundation and
earthwork construction recommendations, a geotechnical constructability review/assessment of the preliminary
design concepts, and contingency recommendations for undercut and replacement of unsuitable soil including
anticipated quantities.
Provide a report on the results of the analyses. The report shall be sealed by the registered professional engineer
directly responsible for overseeing the work. The Report and all recommendations shall be noted as preliminary, and
shall reflect that the study is being performed for a Design Build project. Calculations supporting the
recommendations outlined in the report shall also be provided.
Provide testing to establish the nature of the underground gas emanating from the near -by landfill; test results will
be used to determine the design of the vapor intrusion mitigation system required under the building's Floor slab.
- Perform soil borings to 20 feet below the ground surface or to the water table, whichever is less. Soil
screening using an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) should be conducted along with notation of soil lithology,
including but not limited to oil staining, odors, debris, etc. Based on field screening and observations, collect
soil samples for laboratory analysis. A minimum of three soil samples should be collected from the proposed
building footprint.
- Collect up to three groundwater samples in the area of the building footprint.
- Collect up to three soil gas samples to evaluate the potential for vapor intrusion at the proposed building
footprint.
- For all samples, excluding soil vapor samples, perform full suite laboratory analysis including analysis for
VOC's (including BTEX), SVOCs (including PAHs), PCBs, pesticides and metals, unless evidence from
historical record review indicates other sampling parameters are appropriate based on soil and groundwater
testing.
- Provide a Tech Memo Summary Report which shall include conclusions and recommendations.
5.13.5. System Safety. The A-E shall meet with representative(s) of the installation Safety
Office and the NAVFAC Site Safety Manager (SSM) to discuss the project safety requirements prior to beginning
the design process. Include in the solicitation documents the requirement for the DOR to incorporate personnel
safety measures, such as fall protection features, in the facility design. Include information on any potential impacts
to Maintenance personnel after the facility is occupied, and how such impacts will be mitigated.
5.13.6. Unexploded Ordinance (UXO) Monitoring and Clearance, Munitions and Explosives of
Concern (MEC).
Page 12 of 18

Include the requirement in the solicitation documents that the Construction Contractor shall employ qualified UXO
personnel to coordinate with a Government representative or Government -provided third -party MEC Contractor, to
provide continuous or on -call UXO/MEC monitoring of all clearing/grubbing and excavation activities. UXO/MEC
monitoring will be required for all excavations down to a minimum of 10 feet below existing grade or until hard and
continuous bedrock/limestone/coral layer is encountered.
- Submit a MEC Soil Excavation and Removal Work Plan (SERWP) to the Contracting Officer
for approval prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity. The MEC SERWP shall include,
as a minimum, a description of the overall approach to manage and execute the MEC-related work,
a description of the Construction Contractor's MEC personnel organization, the site specific
logistical requirements, a traffic control plan, and a community outreach plan.
- All excavations shall be accomplished with 18-inch maximum lifts (i.e., UXO/MEC
monitoring/detection must be done for every 18-inch increment of the excavation).
- If any material or object believed to be a UXO/MEC or discarded military material (DMM) is
encountered during construction, the Construction Contractor shall stop all work immediately and
notify the Contracting Officer. The Government's Explosive Ordinance Demolition (EOD) team
or MEC Contractor will determine the disposition of all UXO/MEC and DMM that may be
discovered.
- If a surface UXO/MEC or DMM is encountered during construction, the Construction
Contractor shall haul off all vegetation that is/may be cleared by the UXO/MEC/DMM disposal
team to an area designated by the Contracting Officer for vegetation processing or storage.
- If a subsurface UXO/MEC or DMM is encountered during construction, the Construction
Contractor shall clear and grub vegetation with UXO Technician or MEC Contractor support
following removal of the UXO/MEC/DMM. The Construction Contractor shall haul off all
vegetation that is/may be cleared by the UXO/MEC/DMM disposal team to an area designated by
the Contracting Officer for vegetation processing or storage.
- Trees greater than four inches in diameter measured at 12 inches above grade shall be uprooted ,
and the rootballs shall be inspected by for UXO/MEC by the UXO Technician or MEC Contractor
Excavated soil to be reused shall be certified as "cleared of UXO/MEC" by the UXO Technician
or MEC Contractor prior to reuse.
- Heavy construction equipment shall only be allowed on areas that have been cleared of surface
UXO/MEC. All heavy equipment shall be armored with frontal shielding for operator protection
from 60 mm mortars (by 69 min thick Plexiglas -type material), except for graders (which shall use
29 mm thick Plexiglas -type material for protection from 20 mm projectiles).
- Include the requirement in the construction documents that heavy equipment operators shall wear
hearing protection that provides minimum 9 decibel attenuation.
5.13.7. Site Environmental Considerations
5.13.7.a. Environmental Remediation. Coordinate with the Government Environmental POC to
confirm the remedial requirements. Identify and submit environmental permits in conjunction with the RFP
development effort.
5.13.8. Hazardous Materials Survey and Testing.
- If hazardous material is encountered, prepare removal plans for the hazardous material in
accordance with all applicable local, state and federal codes and regulations. The initial hazardous material survey
shall be conducted under the basic services of this Task Order during the design stage.
Page 13 of 18

- If contamination by hazardous substances such as PCB, tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene),
chlordane, asbestos, lead paint, silica sand, etc. is discovered during project design and/or construction, specific
legal and/or DoD requirements apply.
5.13.8.a. Destructive Testing. Repair of areas being tested shall be provided by the agent
performing the testing, matching the original surface to the greatest extent feasible.
5.13.8.b. Hazardous Material Report. Provide in accordance with UFC.
5.13.8.c. Hazardous Material Demolition Drawings. Provide drawings indicating the type of
hazardous materials and the extent where found.
5.13.9. Economic Analysis.
5.B.9.a Economic Analysis: Cost Estimate
- Life Cycle Cost Analysis
5.13.10. Value Engineering/Cost Control.
5.13.11. Photographs.
5.13.11.a. Site Photographs.
5.13.11.b. Interior Photographs.
5.13.11.c. Final Construction Photographs.
5.13.12. Reference Drawings.
5.13.13. Environmental Permit Submittals. Identify the probable permits for which the
Contractor's DOR will be required to develop submission packages. Permits may include, but are not limited to, the
following; the names and descriptions are general and the exact title may vary:
PERMIT GENERAL DESCRIPTION
AIR QUALITY: New or modified emission sources such as generators; Volatile Organic Compounds use
and storage facilities; dry cleaning facilities; incinerators; boilers; extensive earthwork;
and any other source of atmospheric emissions
NO DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE: Extension to wastewater collection lines
NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI): Discharge of hydro -test water
NPDES: State versions where applicable (includes stormwater management impacts)
SEWER SYSTEM APPROVAL: New, upgraded, or expanded system
WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: Dredging and filling; marine structures; Stormwater and/or
Low Impact Development; and underwater utility crossings
WATER SYSTEMS APPROVAL: Potable water
WORK IN THE VICINITY OF WETLANDS: USACE permit for construction in or near wetlands
(regional, state and/or local agencies may also require permits)
5.13.13.a. Environmental Compliance of Designs.
Complete the Regional Environmental Planning Checklist (attached) and include with the preliminary submittal and
update in subsequent submittals.
Page 14 of 18

5.13.13.b. Permit Record of Decision Report (PROD). Include the requirement for the DOR to
develop the PROD.
5.13.14. Meetings. The AE is responsible for facilitation, organization, securing locations, and
attendance at the following meetings (provide minutes for all meetings, including the Action Item List):
I) Kick-off/Charette Meeting (4 Days Plus Travel) Location: MCB Camp Lejeune
Kick-off/Charette meeting with Client and Government representatives. Attendance by
all AE design team members is required. Prepare and provide Kick-off/Charette Meeting
Report documenting project discussions, issues, and resolutions. Report shall include
meeting minutes and Action Item List.
The Kick-off/Charette Meeting shall be facilitated by the A-E and shall be in
accordance with all Government A-E Guidance and UFC and shall include
contract administration discussions, design presentations, cost discussions, and
scheduling.
The meeting outcomes are:
- A-E and all User(s) and Customer representatives integrated into the project
team.
- Achieve consensus from the project team on any issues and concerns. The
User(s) will make a presentation of their functional requirements. Achieve
consensus that User's functional requirements are understood and will be
implemented into the project design.
- Establish and explain policies and procedures for completion of a successful
project.
- Establish clear lines of communication and points of contact for Government
and Contractor team members.
- Develop an acceptable conceptual design including Diagram Layout Plans and
Preliminary Site Layout plans, signed by the client, Contractor and other key
team members.
Design Presentation/Development:
- The A-E shall provide at least 2 Diagram Layout Plans at the meeting
for discussion with the team. Layout plans shall include Preliminary Site
Layout plans as well as Architectural Layout Plans which indicate relationship
and sizes of the various required spaces. The A-E will present these schemes
discussing pros and cons of each. Phasing concerns shall be discussed for each
option. Spaces shall meet max allowable square footage per the DD1391. Site
concerns shall be discussed and resolved. All design challenges and issues shall
be reviewed and agreement reached on the resolutions discussed.
- The A-E shall lead discussions to develop an understanding
of the accepted technical proposal and conduct a working session to develop the
approved Conceptual Site and Diagram Layout Plan. The A-E shall anticipate
that Users represented at the Design Presentation will provide additional
functional information. At the end of the Design Presentation the A-E shall
provide either assurance that the updated design can be built with -in the budget
or identify potential cost modification items.
Page 15 of 18

2) 65% On Board Review Meeting (2 Day Plus Travel). Location: MCB Camp
Lejeune
65% On Board Review Meeting with Client and Government representatives. Attendance
by all AE design team members is required.
3) Prefinal TELCON Review Meeting (1 Day)
Prefinal TELCON Review Meeting with Client and Government representatives.
Attendance by all AE design team members is required.
-. Meeting Minutes. The A-E shall prepare minutes after each meeting. Provide one (1) copy of the
meeting minutes to each Attendee, Project Manager, Client and Activity representative within five working days of
the meeting date. Electronic distribution is preferred.
- Action Item List - As a part of the meeting minutes, the A-E shall maintain a formal "living"
action item list containing as a minimum the following information:
- Action Item Number
- Date Identified
Complete Description
Name of person and organization responsible for its resolution.
Date the item is due to be resolved.
- Final resolution and actual date resolved.
The Action Item List shall be specifically addressed at the beginning of each meeting.
5.13.15. DD Form 1354 Preparation (DD1354). Prepare and provide the Updated Draft DD1354
with the Pre -Final Design submittal for government review. Contact the Base Planner and RPAO for information
regarding the DD1354. Include the requirement for the construction contractor's DOR to prepare the Preliminary
Interim DD1354 based on the final design, to be submitted at 60 days prior to Beneficial Occupancy for government
review; and to submit an Updated Interim DD 1354 with any corrections in conjunction with the final invoice.
5.B.15.a. NAVFAC Sustainability & Energy Data Record Card (NSEDRC). Prepare and provide
the draft NSEDRC with the Pre -Final Design submittal for government review. Make corrections if needed and
provide with the final submittal. Include the requirement for the construction contractor's DOR to update the draft
NSEDRC and include it with the Pre -Final Design submittal for government review. Include the requirement for the
DB construction contractors DOR to prepare the final NSEDRC based on the final design, to be submitted 60 days
prior to Beneficial Occupancy for government review; and to submit the updated form with any corrections in
conjunction with the final invoice. Instructions and a blank editable Adobe PDF form are available in on the Whole
Building Design Guide at the following web address: http://www.wbde.org/references/oa dod sust contract.1hp .
5.13.16. Rendering. Include the requirement for the DOR to develop as bird's eye view. Provide 4
full sized and 4 small versions. Provide copies as indicated on the Submittal Table and as directed by the Project
Manager. Submit a sample of the rendering for approval at the pre -final design stage prior to proceeding with color
rendering. Provide the completed rendering with the final submittal.
S.C. POST CONSTRUCTION AWARD SERVICES (PCAS).
5.C.1. Acceptance Testing of Critical Systems. Include in the scope of work in the solicitation
package for the Construction Contractor's DOR to provide.
5.C.2. Shop Drawing Review. Include the scope of work in the solicitation package for the the
Construction Contractor's DOR to provide.
5.C.3. Record Drawing Preparation. Include the scope of work in the solicitation package for
the the Construction Contractor's DOR to provide.
Page 16 of 18

5.C.4. Operation and Maintenance Support Information (OMSI). Include UFGS 01 78 24.00
20, Facility electronic OMSI (eOMSI) in the solicitation package for the DOR to provide.
5.C.5. Post -Construction Award Meetings.
5.C.5.a. Partnering, as described in the UFC.
5.C.5.b. Post -Construction Award Kick -Off Meeting (PAK).
5.C.5.c. Design Validation. Actively participate in the project's (CDW). At the beginning of the
workshop, provide a discipline by discipline overview of the project's RFP requirements, highlighting all issues
unique to the project. Throughout the workshop, answer questions, provide clarifications, and provide
recommendations to assist in the development of the project. Attendees to the workshop shall include the
engineer/architect from each technical discipline that developed the project's RFP package, to the extent possible.
Assume three full work days for the CDW. Review the construction contractor's Preliminary, Prefinal, and, Final
design submittals for conformance to the performance requirements contained in the design -build RFP. For the
Final design submittal, review the submittal to verify that all comments on the previous design submittal(s) have
been adequately addressed and incorporated. Provide documentation of RFP package submittal reviews (i.e., review
comments) to the Project Manager via e-mail within 10 working days of receipt of each DOR package submittal.
S.D. TASK ORDER SCHEDULE AND SUBMITTAL DUE DATES. The following is the initial draft
for the design schedule. NOTE: Incomplete submittal packages will not be accepted and will be returned without
review. All items for each stage of project development must be submitted concurrently.
TASK DATE GOVT REVIEW (Calendar Days)
Kick-off/Charette Meeting 17-20NOV 14 n/a
Kick-off Meeting Report 28NOV 14 14
65% RFP Submittal 9FEB 15 21
65% On Board Review 34MAR15 n/a
Prefinal RFP Submittal 19MAY15 21
Prefinal TELCON Review I OJUN15 n/a
Final RFP Submttal 14AUG15 21
SCHEDULE OF FEES.
6.A. FEES. The fees will be negotiated at the time of issue, based on the prices negotiated for the various
standard services.
AWARD OPTIONS
Direct Design $
Engineering Services $
Travel and Subsistence $
Post -Construction Award Services:
Post Construction Award Meetings $
Design Validation $
BASIC CONTRACT AMOUNT:
Page 17 of 18

TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE: $ $ $
6.C. SEPARATELY PRICED LINE ITEMS TO BE EXERCISED DURING DESIGN.
Unit prices for additional quantities of the following services are requested
Unit Cost Additional Soil Borings
_ LM/LF:
$
Unit Cost Additional PLM/DS Analysis - Asbestos
Tests:
$
Unit Cost Additional TEM Analysis - Asbestos
_ Tests:
$
Unit Cost Additional AAS Analysis — Lead
_ Tests:
$
Unit Cost Additional TCLP Analysis Lead
Tests:
$
6D. A-E FEE PROPOSAL FORMAT. The AE must provide their Fee Proposal in the format
mandated by the Contract Specialist, without exception. Coordinate Fee Proposal Format with Mike Brice, CS, and
Marshall Crow, DM.
(End of Document)
Page 18 of I8

REQUEST FOR PROJECT SITE APPROVAL
`NAVMC 11069
(REV. 5-95) (EF) (PREVIOUS EDITIONS WILL NOT BE USED)
TO: COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS (CODE LFL)
PROJECT NUMBER ACTIVITY UIC SPECIAL AREA
1280 7001
FROM
w
Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune
N
CATEGORY CODE AND PROJECT TITLE
TYPE OF FUNDING
COST (000) 1PROGRAM
YEAR
a ui
14365 2nd Radio BN Complex, Wallace Creek
MJLCON
$73,130.00
2014
z Of
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
REMARKS
o X
2nd Radio BN Complex, includes Elec/Comm, Ops
C)) m
Control Center/SCIF, BN CO HQ, Vehicle Maint. Facility,
w
m W
Supply warehouse, Parachute Maintenance, HAZMAT
REQUESTED BY (Typed name and signature) DATE
Storageand Parkin Facili
O
TYPE OF MAP DATE
MCBCL - Peter McWilliams
LL
PDF 2011-06-29
MC NLUMIS PE ER J.1]BIi0I5605-,y`; PM= -
2011-06-30
ANALYSIS DATE
RECEIVED -
(Place a check in box opposite each Item. Y=Yes; N=No; NA=Not Applicable)
Y
N
NA
PROJECT SITING CONSIDERATION
Y N
NA
PROJECT SITING
CONSIDERATION
X
a. COMPATIBLE WITH ACTIVITY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
�"V-s`.�;.
j
e. COMPLIES WITH THE
X
b. DEMONSTRATES SOUND PLANNING PRINCIPLES
X
(1) AMMUNITION AND
X
c. MEETS MINIMUM PLANNING AND SITING CRITERIA
X
(2) ELECTROMAGNETIC
X
d. REVISES PRIOR SITE APPROVAL
X
(3) AIRFIELD SAFETY
NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX)
X
(4) NOISE INTENSITY
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DECISION MEMORANDUM
X
(5) LASER SAFETY
X
(6) RADIOACTIVES MATERIALS
EA FONSI
X
(7) NATURAL RESOURCES
❑X EIS RECORD OF DECISION
X
(8) CULTURALIHISTORICAL
X
(9) INSTALLATION
REFERENCE
IS - JAN 2010
u
}
CRITERIA CERTIFICATION(S) REQUESTED (Check)
DATE
m G
z
❑ DDESB ❑ NAVORDCTR ❑ SPAWAR ❑ NAVAIR ❑ OTHER:
0
U Q
DATE CERTIFICATION(S) RECEIVED
w
Z
y CL
w
DDESB NAVORDCTR SPAWAR NAVAIR OTHER
o:
APPROVAL
nACTIO
APPROVED DISAPPROVED ❑ DEFERRED
HQMC LOCAL
REMARKS
APPROVING OFFICIAL (Typed name and si nature
OTHER APPROVAL REQUIRED
AIRFIELD SAFETY WAIVER F7FINAL EXPLOSIVES SAFETY REVIEW F—] STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
SECTION 7 CONSULATION FICORPS OF ENGINEERS
*Requires approval of a major change to the master plan prior to site approval. Adobe Designer 6.0

J1-t'/_0llii()y 0
TENTATIVE SITE APPROVAL:
I
REVIEWER'S RECOMMENDATION:
II `II FORWARD FOR APPROVAL
�❑
FORWARD RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL
❑ FORWARD RECOMMENDING DEFERRAL
REVIEWER'S COMMENTS:
REVIEWER'S NAME/POSITION: /
DATE
E. M. SYLVESTER, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, IDD
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW:
I
EIWG RECOMMENDATION:
❑ CATEGORIC EXCLUSION /
❑ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
/
ENVIRONMENTAL JMPACT STATEMENT 7,0
L�I i � i
DECISION MEMORANDUM NO
REVIEWER'S COMMENTS:
REVIEWER'S NAME/POSITION:
�Su
DATE
TALL STRUCTURES WORKING GROUP TSWG) REVIEW:
C I I
TSWG RECOMMENDATION:
.p
❑ CONCUR WITH SITE SELECTION
v
x
❑u CONCUR WITH CONDITION
y,
U
NON CONCUR WITH SITE SELECTION
ti
❑
y
REVEEWER'S COMMENTS:
N
H
a
REVIEWER'S NAME/POSITION:
DATE
4
IV
REVIEW BY OTHERS:
REVIEWER'S COMMENTS:
ro
N Y❑
H U
H
�
a w
REVIEWER'S NAME/POSITION:
DATE
FINAL SITE APPROVAL:
V
SITE REQUEST STATUS:
APPROVED
❑ DISAPPROVED
❑ DEFERRED
APPROVING OFFICIALS COMMENTS:
f
APPROVING OFFICIALS NAME/POSITION '��'
DATE
F. E. CONE, DEPUTY AC/S, ME

�I v
`,,-:� \�� ♦�� �\ \\� ♦ F".'."_r:y ..'unln+
♦ ♦ d
1\,- Y.M •.I R VT
ItIII�IpG1TV'��
U jJ`
Motor
Par'Ur king Garage
l
ti'••.\y
BN Headquarters
:,
,
SCIF
it
rrs,,',;,tic. ii. .\I '.: i II `ry;:s`" i44 I• X.
I e�
�W4
k�,45.9 I � PIAP� 1 .Ir'TI' I, 'I j} , � •, Y
` J
,.\?yl ' °'may' ♦ t �.\\ ', ,, �
n�z
\ 1, I .� • : \� i
PROPOSED SITE FOR
P12802nd Radio BN Corip dex
4- 9 -,-)a -
(Approving Officer signature) (Date)