SW6110808_COMPLIANCE_20110906

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
❑ HISTORICAL FILE
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATEG`D�'�
YYYYMMDD

Lowther, Brian
From: Jarrod Hilliard [[e-mail]
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 12:33 PM
To: Lowther, Brian
Cc: Tom Wanko
Subject: SW6110808 - Paraclete Stormwater management plan review
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Brian,
Pursuant to our telephone conversation:
With respect to future commercial areas, although we anticipate medical office and similar facilities at these
locations, we cannot be certain what types of uses will be incorporated into the future commercial areas. We
do, however, anticipate that those uses will have their own storm water treatment facilities and will be required
to follow the Phase II storm water regulations like this project.
Pursuant to the September 1, 2011 comment letter:
• The flow within the pond will not short circuit the required treatment area/flow rate. The pond is meeting the
length to width flow path ratio as shown on the supplment form and as discussed over the telephone. The extra
storage to the left of the flow path/pond outlet is to assist in pre/post discharge mitigation to satisfy the more
stringent NCDOT design storm requirements and to supplment earthwork balance. We can create a .pdf sketch
of the flow path and send via e-mail if required.
• The deeper excavation for this pond is being performed to concurrenity satisfy earthwork requirements for the
project. We have considered revising the pool depth but determined that 18" additional depth should not have
a significant negative influence on the performance of the pond but provides the positive quantity of soils
necessary to help supplment earthwork balance.
If you have any questions, or need any additional information in order to proceed with the review of the submitted
information, please feel free to contact me at this office, otherwise we look forward to a continued review and approval
of the submittal. o!,:ioigh
apes ur uses,.`
Respectfully,
Jarrod E. Hilliard, PE, CFM - Project Manager
IOf Hobbs Upchurch Associates
300 SW Broad Street I Southern Pines, NC 28387
P: 910.692.5616
F: 910.692.7342
C: 910.639.7724
E: mailto:ihilliard(a),hobbsupchurch.com
LEGAL DISCLAIMER(S):
Distribution:
This a -mail shall not be forwarded, copied. distributed or disclosed in any way without the express written aoproval of Jarred E. Hilliard. PE, CFM. Hobbs, Upchurch 8
Associates. PA., except whete required by law ' I ' : ' ,
Federal/State/CountwTown Unified Development Ordinance or Laws L]tefprnagekbif.): i.ec
Privately -employed Professional Engineers are NOT licensed to Inorpot federal. State. County or Town laws or ordinances, or to give advice concerning laws or
ordinances. Such advice should be directed to the experts of the ordh4aldes,'the Federal Government, Slates. Counties or Towns themsehes. or reviewed by an attorney in
order to determine compliance aeing a Professional' does not make a Privately -employed Engineer responsible for Interpretation of a I-'edetal. State. County or Town
ordinance. rule, regulation or other such law. 'A professional is a member of a vocation founded upon specialized educational training. 'The word professional traditionally

means a person Who has obtained a degree in a pfotosslonal tield.The form 'Piofc si6nar does not rnean That the person is responsible* for Ini eglrollng rules, regulations a
;,try
ordinances of y kind unless that person is either employed by the organization whose ossponsibihiy it is to interpret and ensure compliance with the rules, regulations or
ordinances, or unless the person is a licensed attorney. Professional Fog lneers are profeisionais whose lob It is to protect trip hynith, safety and welfare of the public.
Privately-employeb Professional Engineers are not necessarily attorneys or employees of organizations whose job it is to interpret and ensure compliance with rules,
regulations or ordinances.
'Sentence from Wikipedia. Wikipedia© is a registered trademark of the Wih media Foundation, Inc„ a nonprofit organization.

USDA
United States
Department of
Agriculture
o
MRCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Hoke County,
North Carolina
WET POND SOILS DATA
i
fNC _
4
May 11, 2011

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about
the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many
different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners,
community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties
that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases.
Examples include soil quality assessments (http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/) and certain
conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact
your local USDA Service Center (http://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?
agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (hftp://soils.usda.gov/contact/
state offices/).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil
Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Soil Data Mart Web site or the NRCS Web Soil Survey. The Soil
Data Mart is the data storage site for the official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an
individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means

for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call [phone]
(voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.

Contents
Preface.---..---,..---,.----`----.---,.---.----.--2
SoilMap ....................................................................................................
............. 5
SoilMap ................................................... ........... ....... ...................
............. —']}
Legend............................................ .....................................................................
7
MapUnit Legend ......................................................................................
... ....... 0
MapUnit Descriptions ..................................................... ....................................
8
Hoke County, North Carolina .......................................................................
]0
FaA—Fuc*vUoloamy sand, 0to 2percent slopes ............... .....................
10
FaD--Facov||oloamy sand, 21o0percent slopes .....................................
10
NuA—'Norfo|kloamy sand, 0to2percent slopes ........................................
11
Ra--Rainosandy loam ...... .........................................................................
12
VYu ram|oumyoand.0tu0parcont slopes ..............................
...... 4
Ruferences.---..---`..--,,~---.^--..----..---.---10
4

Soil Ma
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

Custom Soil Resource Report
35 2' 12"
3S 1' 5T
Soil Map
Zn
ON,
cJ° `
.1111Uaimw o1l66u marl
r.
67W0 6731Z
Vic..
Map Sale: 1:3.670 it plhlled on A she (8.5e x it') sheet
to
N Meters
N
/, 0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 200 a00 800 7,200
35- 2' 12"
3 VW

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0 very Stony Spot
Map Scale: 1:3,670 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet.
a
Area of Interest(AOI)
V Wet Spot
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Soils
A Other
Soil Map Units
Special Line Features
Please rely on the bar scale on each ma sheet for accurate ma
Y P p
Special
Point Features
L, Gully
measurements.
V
Blowout
� Short Sleep Slope
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
®
Borrow Pit
I= other
Web Soil Survey URL: http:/IwebsoilsuNey.nres.usda.gov
X
Clay Spot
m
Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17N NAD83
Political Features
♦
Closed Depression
O Cities
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
X
Gravel Pit
Water Features
the version dale(s) listed below.
Gravelly Spot
Q Oceans
Soil Survey Area: Hoke County, North Carolina
®
Landfill
�.., Streams and Canals
Survey Area Data: Version 8, Nov 2, 2007
Lava Flow
Transportation
Rails
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 6/22/2006
,,j&
Marsh or swamp
. .
sc
Mine or Quarry
N Interstate Highways
The orthopholo or other base map on which the soil lines were
US Routes
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
po
Miscellaneous Water
N
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
O.
Perennial Water
m Major Roads
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
.�
Rock Outcrop
o Local Roads
}
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
g
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Q
Stony Spot

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Hoke County, North Carolina (NC093)
Map Unit Symbol
I Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
I Percent of AOI
FaA _I
Faceville loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
5.91
15.5%
FaB Faceville loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
0.0
0.0%
NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
5.6
14.8%
Ra Rains sandy loam
5.3
14.0%
WaB Wagram loamy sand 0 to 6 percent slopes
21.2
55.6%
Totals for Area of Interest
38.0
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that itwas impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments

Custom Soil Resource Report
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hoke County, North Carolina
FaA—Faceville loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Faceville and similar soils: 80 percent
Description of Faceville
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces, broad interstream
divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 1
Typical profile
0 to 7 inches: Loamy sand
7 to 17 inches: Loamy sand
17 to 80 inches: Clay
FaB—Faceville loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Faceville and similar soils: 80 percent
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Faceville
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2e
Typical profile
0 to 7 inches: Loamy sand
7 to 17 inches: Loamy sand
17 to 80 inches: Clay
NoA—Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 1
Typical profile
0 to 9 inches: Loamy sand
9 to 14 inches: Loamy sand
14 to 70 inches: Sandy clay loam
70 to 100 inches: Sandy clay loam
Minor Components
Rains, undrained
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Ra—Rains sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Rains, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
IPA

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of Flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity. High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3w
Typical profile
0 to 7 inches: Sandy loam
7 to 12 inches: Fine sandy loam
12 to 20 inches: Sandy loam
20 to 62 inches: Sandy clay loam
62 to 85 inches: Sandy clay loam
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4w
Typical profile
0 to 7 inches: Sandy loam
7 to 12 inches: Fine sandy loam
12 to 20 inches: Sandy loam
20 to 62 inches: Sandy clay loam
62 to 85 inches: Sandy clay loam
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
WaB—Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Map Unit Composition
Wagram and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Description of Wagram
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 60 to 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2s
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Loamy sand
8 to 24 inches: Loamy sand
24 to 75 inches: Sandy clay loam
75 to 83 inches: Sandy loam
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: linear
15

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and
testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils
in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S.
Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://soils.usda.gov/
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making
and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://soils.usda.gov/
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://soils.usda.gov/
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://soils.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.giti.nres.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://soils.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the
Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http://soils.usda.gov/
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210.
17

SUNITED STATES
Ems. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
lee
f/( / t l / 1 //-t�
CLIFDALE QUADRANLL
UNITED STATES
NoP rH uaoux. / ,
R OF TN[ nRNY
?b NI, VTE SCRIES ROPCIPAPHICI P
CORPSM OF OP ENLINEE0.5
C
tl. cuvv.., �i ov.vuvvu
-h7�t
`Ilt�l",- f,'-�J y-.-. J��yfi, �� �. 14,.�- �� i I m
Ilk ',ai t. ' J .
NdnM Wuv Wmui4xvi ..gym... etvvo. K. n.. uru. i �.➢.n `—
uvapuYA.xmMu.a
77
d •J• x CLIFDALE, N. C.
nYZ '/AWaa M
4f\*A io01 orwMN�4ewoff: Cveck k ITS