HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW6110406_HISTORICAL FILE_20110621STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SWlB/�DiO
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
HISTORICAL FILE
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
�OG�DI�I
YYYYMMDD
Architecture & Engineering
4000 Westchase Boulevard, Suite 280
Raleigh, NC 27607
P. 919.828.1876
F. 919.828.1877
www.clarknexsen.com
transmittal
JUN 2 1 2011
ME
APR % 6 2011
DENR- WATER QUALITY
WEXMDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
DATE:
We transmit the following:
April 25, 2011
PROJECT:
®
Drawings
❑
Specifications
Code T Adapt Build for Vehicle
❑
Change Order
❑
Shop Drawings
Maintenance Shop
TO:
❑
Computer File(s)
❑
Samples
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Division of Water Quality
❑
Product Literature
®
Calculations
NC Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street, Copies Description
9°M1 Floor,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 1 Stormwater Calculations
919/807-6300 2 Construction Plans
FROM:
K. Joshua Hurst, PE 2 Stormwater Permit Application
SUBJECT:
Post -construction Stormwater 1 Infiltration Trench Supplement
Permit Application 1 Infiltration Trench O&M Agreement
COMMISSION NUMBER:
3417 1 Stormwater Permit Application Fee ($505)
VIA:
Remarks:
Attached are the Stormwater Calculations, Plans, Application, Supplement,
O&M Agreement, and Application Fee for the Code T Adapt Build Vehicle
Maintenance Shop project (PN 73947) at Fort Bragg, for review.
Please contact me via email (ihurst(&clarknexsen.com) or at 919/576-
2120 if you have questions or need anything else regarding this submittal.
CC:
Page 1 of 1
Architecture & Engineering
4000 Westchase Boulevard, Suite 280
Raleigh, NC 27607
P. 919.828.1876
F. 919.828.1877
www.clarknexsen.com
transmittal
DATE:
We transmit the following:
May 18, 2011
PROJECT:
®
Drawings'
NCDENR DWQ #SW6110406
❑
Change Order
Code T Adapt Build for Vehicle
Maintenance Shop
❑
Computer File(s)
TO:
Mr. Robert Patterson, PE
❑
Product Literature
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Division of Water Quality
NC Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
❑ Specifications
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Samples
® Calculations,._
MAY t 9 2011
512 N. Salisbury Street,Copies Description NR831 �w UAI
91h Floor, 1 Revised Stormwater Calculations mer Branch
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
919/807-6300 2 Construction Plans
FROM:
K. Joshua Hurst, PE 1 Revised Infiltration Trench Supplement
SUBJECT: 1 Response to Comments Letter
Post -Construction Stormwater
Permit - Response to Comments
COMMISSION NUMBER:
3417
Remarks:
VIA: Attached are the revised Stormwater Calculations, Plans, and Supplement
for the Code T Adapt Build Vehicle Maintenance Shop project (DWQ
Project SW6110406) at Fort Bragg. A Response to Comments letter is
also attached, providing responses to comments from DWQ.
ROUTE TO:
CC:
Please contact me via email (jhurst(cbclarknexsen.com) or at 919/576-
2120 if you have questions or need anything else regarding this submittal.
Page 1 of 1
Architecture & Engineering
May 18, 2011
Mr. Robert D. Patterson, PE
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR I DWQ I Stonnwater Permitting
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9°i Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: NCDENR DWQ Project Number SW61 10406
Fort Bragg PN 73947 1" TSC VMS - Response to Comments
Clark Nexsen Project 3417
Dear Mr. Patterson,
Below are the NCDENR DWQ continents on the l" TSC Vehicle Maintenace Shop (DWQ
Project SW6110406), followed by Clark Nexsen's responses in bold and italics.
1) Supporting calculations need to be provided for showing the minimum
required treatment volume using the Simple Method; and the infiltration trench
volume provided and drawdown time.
RESPONSE: The Simple Method is used to calculate the required infiltration
trench volume and can be seen, along with the drawdown time, on the Drainage
Area Design Sheet- Infiltration Basin- Post Development Drainage Area.
2) The existing vs. proposed BUA is confusing as presented. Please provide a
table showing existing BUA, existing BUA to be removed, existing BUA to remain,
new BUA added, and the total post -construction BUA. Also, the table in Section
1V.10 of SWU-101 appears to incorrectly show that there is zero existing BUA.
RESPONSE: The existing BUA is provided on the Drainage Area Design Sheet -
Infiltration Basin- Pre Development Drainage Area. The existing BUA is 1.68
acres impervious. All 2.68 acres of the existing BUA is to be removed, with zero
acres BUA remaining. The new added BUA is provided on the Drainage Area
Design Sheet- Infiltration Basin- Post Development Drainage Area, which is 5.16
acres. Per the footnote on Section IV 10 of SWU-101, there is zero existing BUA to
remain.
3) The narrative states the volume provided in the infiltration trench is 18,541cf,
but the supplement form states it is 17,141cf. Please make these consistent.
RESPONSE: The supplement has been revised to show a provided volume of
18,541.
4000 Westchase Blvd, Suite 280, Raleigh, NC 27007 9191828-1876 Fax 9191828-1877 Gttp:llwww clarknexsen. coin
A Professional Corporation Offices in Norfolk, Richmond, Alexandria, Roanoke, Washington, D.C, Chandotte and Raleigh
Architecture & Engineering
Robert Patterson
NCDENR DWQ Stormwater Permitting
May 18, 2011
Page 2 of 2
4) The overflow elevation is shown on the plans and calculations to be 319.5.
However, this elevation appears to be incorrectly stated as 319.0 on the supplement
form.
RESPONSE: The supplement has been revised to show an elevation of 319.50.
5) We typically require the infiltration rate be determined using a method like a
double -ring infiltrometer or Amoozemeter. These constant head methods yield more
accurate infiltration rates.
RESPONSE: Per the Army Corps of Engineers Geotechnical Engineer on this
project, all soil infiltration tests were conducted in substantial accordance with the
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation "Field Permeability Test in Boreholes ", Designation
E-18, (Earth Manual, 1974). The Caps acknowledges that performing these tests
at constant heads would provide more accurate infiltration rates. However, based
on the very high infiltration rates calculated from these tests, additional accuracy
was not necessary to substantiate that these soils are adequate for storm water
infiltration purposes. The infiltration rates provided were calculated directly from
the head differential over the elapsed time of the test. Using the equation for
permeability from E-18, the infiltration rates are calculated as 45 in/hour, 135
in/hour, and 22 in/hour for infiltration tests 1, 2, and 3 respectively.
6) Regarding Al/C-508: The full plan view layout detail of the infiltration
trench needs to be provided so that the contractor knows the number of pipes, pipe
lengths, and the total length and width. Note 2 needs to be revised or removed. Any
modification to the infiltration trench on the plans will require approval by DWQ
prior to installation. Also, the note talks about providing the same required volume in
any alternative design, but does not state what that volume is on the plans.
RESPONSE: Dimensions have been added to C-508, to provide actual quantities
and lengths. Note 2 has been revised, to require DWQ approval for all
modifications. Note 3 has been added to provide the required volume.
Please contact us if you have questions or want to discuss anything on these responses.
Sincerely,
K. J ua Hurst, P , LEED AP
Associate, Civil Engineer
lz,F,-r w o 70 go6Ge i i',s-TTzc,2 r o/J
A-r"'rf'e-- iz e t id T q K� d �rh c s[7 uP
Application Completeness Review
W Flrst Submittal ❑ Re -submittal Date Received:
Development/Project Name: CODE 7 4nap7-i
Receiving stream name C/Q oSQ cRLE,e (E
Date Reviewed:42: By Bill Diuguid —
W5-a_1(a; CA
CRL chpic -,ci
For post -construction requirements, a program will be deemed compliant for the areas where it is
implementing any of the following programs: WS=I,',WS-ll, WS-III, WS-IV, HQW, ORW, Neuse River Basin
NSW, Tar -Pamlico River Basin NSW, and the R'aildjemaii Lake Water Supply Watershed Nutrient
Management Strategy.
High Density Projects that require a 401/404 within an NSW require 85% TSS, 30% TN and 30% TP removal.
T&E Species (Goose Creek, Waxhaw Creek or Six Mile Creek Water Sheds):
Latitude and Longitude:36 D8 55 AI —79 A-7 "?,. t✓ Jurisdicton Kopf SR�GG
Project Address: ,jrOR�Fpc-/- ce,wc._ dF PLAr-KSheK %T-rArLihir_ Roao ^-(--
Engineer name and firm: K. SosNu,A 1.1 ipya; P.B. etARx nf61[ sBn/'
❑ Low Density (no curb and gutter) ❑ Low Density with curb and gutter outlets i h Deor ❑ Other
�}aJ401/404 impacts to surface waters, wetlands, and buffers (add language to cover letter and or addinfo letter)
:d UA 9�. zf % r% 5 s Ac¢cs (!o. t/ Ac.-b"Trw+a<i
r _Check for $505.00 included
�f original signature (not photocopy) on application
m/Legal signature (Corporation-VP/higher, Partnership -General Partner/higher, LLC-member/manager, Agent).
Check spelling capitalization, punctuation: http://www.secretary.state.nc,us/corporations/thepage,aspx
If an agent signs the application, a signed letter of authorization from the applicant must be provided which
includes the name title mailing address and phone number of the person signing the letter.
❑ �r subdivided projects, a signed and notarized.;deed Sestriction statement
W Sealed, signed & dated calculations
all'�Correct supplement and O&M provided for each BMP on site (check all that were provided & number of each)
❑ Bioretention
❑ Dry Detention Basin
❑ Filter Strip
❑ Grass Swale
❑ Infiltration Basin
ur� Infiltration Trench
❑ Level Spreader
❑ Permeable Pavement
❑ Restored Riparian Buffer
❑ Rooftop Runoff Management
❑ Sand Filter
❑ Stormwater Wetland
❑ Wet Detention Basin
❑ Low Density
❑ Curb Outlet
❑ Off -Site
❑ NCDOT Linear Road
W Two sets of sealed, signed & dated layout & finish grading plans with appropriate details
R' Narrative Description of stormwater management provided
a9 Soils report provided
2r Wetlands delineated or a note on the plans that none exist on site and/or adjacent property
W" Details for the roads, parking area, cul-de-sac radii, sidewalk widths, curb and gutter;
e'_ Dimensions & slopes provided
H Drainage areas delineated ❑ Pervious and impervious reported for each ❑ Areas of high density
Inspection and maintenance agreements provided
Application complete ❑ Application, Incomplete a urned: (Date)
;i,;, • �e-neV�c oPrn¢aT tmPFlcVtows VY S 3-
Comments 96 It°U .4 aYLeetu s Oro
i-�
February 9, 2009 Revision ¢ A`� ✓� 'T'3 /d