SW8961209_COMPLIANCE_20031008

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO. SW(�
DOC TYPE ❑CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
❑ HISTORICAL FILE
�DCOMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
YYYYMMDD

Inspection Date f0 -5-03 Project Name Aif{. GCCx�p
Type of System Wet Detention ❑ Infiltration Basin T
1 ❑ Infiltration Trench ❑ Alternative
❑ Curb Outlet Swale ❑ Low Density
Project Number
I. Drainage Area e
a. Buildings, roads, parking, walks, consistent withklans? NIA U
b. Any additional impervious area not shown? U
C. All runoff from the impervious areas drain to the system? N U
d. Are outparcels (if any) draining to the system? NIA Y N U
e. Home/project does not exceed the maximum BUA? Y N U
II. System
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
9
h
k
Size of the system close to the approved minimums?
Swale or outlet/bypass structure in right place?
Orifice in place, correctly sized, and not clogged? NIA
Trash rack?
Slopes vegetated, and stable and 3:1 (5:1) or flatter? NIA
Is the relative difference between PP and DP provided? NIA
i. What is the difference in elevation from PP to DP per plans?
Inlets located per approved plans to avoid short-circuiting?
Design depth available?
Are the forebays and berms in place? NIA
Is the vegetated filter in place and in good condition? NIA
i. Flow spreader? Y N
ii. Grass? Y N
Slope on 6:1 vegetated shelf and vegetated? NIA
III. Documentation
a. Recorded deed restrictions, if required, received?
b. Is the facility being routinely and properly maintained?
C. Has ownership of the facility changed?
d. Has the name of the facility changed?
New name
e. Has the Engineer's Certification been received?
IV Comments:
dcae . %w)d e_,,
Y N U
Y N
Y N U
Y N
Y N
Y N U
Y N
Y N U
Y N U
Y N U
Y N U
NIA Y N U
NIA Y N U
Y N U
Y N
NIA N
or
s�
U
us pol .
e.

Y
N
U
' t
❑
❑
❑
The drainage area (including offsite) and built -upon area to the permitted system are
per the approved plan. No unpermitted offsite drainage enters the system.
❑
❑
❑
All the built -upon area associated with the project is'graded such that the runoff drains
to the system.
❑
❑
❑
For ponds/infiltration, the outlet/bypass structure relative elevations are per the
approved plan. (Must be verified via as -built survey if in question).
❑
❑
❑
The inlets and outlet structure are located per the approved plans and do not cause
short-circuiting.
❑
❑
❑
A trash rack is provided over the outlet weir and orifice.
❑
❑
❑
All slopes are grassed with permanent vegetation and are not eroding.
❑
❑
❑
Vegetated slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
❑
❑
❑
The approximate amount of permitted surface area has been provided. (Must be
verified via as -built survey or designer's certification.)
❑
❑
❑
Required drawdown devices are correctly sized per the approved plans.
❑
❑
❑
All required design depths are provided.
❑
❑
❑
All required parts of the system are provided, such as a vegetated shelf, and a forebay.
❑
❑
❑
The designer's certification has been submitted.
❑
❑
❑
The required deed restrictions are -correctly recorded and submitted.
❑
❑
❑
The number of lots or outparcels is per the permitted amount.
❑
❑
❑
The built -upon area on the lots or outparcels does not appear to exceed the maximum
amount (must be verified via as -built survey if in question)
❑
❑
❑
The road, cul-de-sac, parking lot and sidewalk widths are per the approved plan.
❑
❑
❑
Required maintenance is being performed.
❑
❑
❑
Outparcels have their own offsite permit.
❑
❑
❑
Curb outlet swales are constructed, located properly, are 100' long and have dense
vegetated cover.
❑
❑
❑
For low density projects, roadside swales are 3:1, vegetated and stable.
❑
❑
❑
For low density projects, there are no unpermitted pipes on the project.
❑
Other
Comments