SW3200903_020.218 Project ETARC Calcs_20210310

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
FOR

PROJECT ETARC
3707 W. NC HWY 10
CITY OF NEWTON/CATAWBA COUNTY, NC

BY

BURTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES
5950 FAIRVIEW ROAD, SUITE 100
CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
[phone]
09/24/2020

03/10/
2
0
2
1NLPSEAL
REINEE
NG
12557
O
N
S
RA
IS
O
T
ORE
H
RFO C
L
IAAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a. NARRATIVE

i. Introduction
ii. Existing Site Conditions
iii. Proposed Site Conditions
iv. Proposed BMP Design
v. Conclusions

b. MAPS AND FIGURES

i. HydroCAD Model Routing Diagram
ii. Drainage Area Maps
iii. NOAA Rainfall Data
iv. Soils Map
v. USGS Map
vi. FEMA FIRM Map

c. HYDROCAD MODEL OUTPUT
ii. Hydrocad: 1-yr 24-hr Storm Event
iii. Hydrocad: 10-yr 24-hr Storm Event
iv. Hydrocad: 50-yr 24-hr Storm Event
v. Hydrocad: 100-yr 24-hr Storm Event

d. WET POND DESIGN

e. EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS

i. Riprap Apron Design

INTRODUCTION
TKC CCXLIX, LLC is proposing the construction of a 736,560 SF warehouse with truck ducks and automobile
parking on parcel # 361903418379; 361903312117 near the intersection of NC HWY 10 and Stover Court. The
purpose of this report is to show that the proposed Stormwater Management design associated with these
improvements will meet or exceed NCDENR’s requirements.

EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
The is predominantly grassed and undeveloped. The entire area drains towards an unnamed tributary by several
shallow concentrated flows to the south east of the property.

The site is grassed with relatively steep topography; slopes range from 9% to 15%. Soils on the site are Lloyd
loams (LcB and LdC2) (HSG-B).

See the Maps & Figures section of this report for Drainage Area and Soils Maps.

PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS
The proposed improvements include the construction of a 736,560 SF warehouse with truck dock and 208 car
spaces. The warehouse is expandable by 133,920 SF in the future. These new improvements with drain to the
proposed Wet Pond south of the proposed building.
PROPOSED BMP DESIGN
The proposed wet pond is designed to treat 45.26 acres of drainage area. Per NC DEQ standards, the wet pond
will treat the first inch of runoff for water quality and detain the 10 year 24 hour peak storm event.

CONCLUSIONS
NC DEQ’s minimum design requirements are met in the proposed design.

MAPS & FIGURES
Drainage Area Maps
NOAA Rainfall Data
Soils Map
USGS Map
FEMA FIRM Map

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXXXXXXXXXSDSDSDWWWW
WTc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>>
>
>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>>
>
>
>P:\DWG\1PRELIMINARY\P-017 TKC NEWTON 800K (OLD RAWHIDE)\020.218 PROJECT ETARC.DWG PRE DA 9/9/2020 4:13:01 PM HP02.CTB CHASEPROJECT NUMBERTHIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OFBURTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES AND ISNOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR COPIED INWHOLE OR IN PART. IT IS NOT TO BE USEDON ANY OTHER PROJECT AND IS TO BERETURNED UPON REQUEST.5950 FAIRVIEW RD STE 100CHARLOTTE NC 28210(T) 704.553.8881burtonengineering.comDATE0 ft.( IN FEET )1 inch =20020050DAPROJECT NUMBER09.09.20PRE DA MAP
PROJECT ETARCPRE BYPASSDA: 6.53 ACTOTAL PRE DA51.36 ACPRE BYPASSDA: 9.83 AC300 LF SHEET FLOW21.9 MINS1,320 LF SHALLOW CONC. FLOW14.8 MINSANALYSISPOINT36.7 MINS tc
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXXXXXXXXXXSDSDSDWWWW FLOORDRAIN FLOOR "SINK"+-+10.0TS PSPSTS TSTSTSPSPSPS PSPS1/2" FUEL RETURNfuel level gauge4" outer shellVENT 4" inner tankVENT 2" fillfuel level switch 6"XH 10"TS EXHAUST FANTHRU ROOFXH
1,188'620' PROPOSED BUILDING736,560 SF620' X 1,188'216'EXPANSION
133,920 SF
216' X 620'
HIGHLOW
HIGHLOW
HIGHLOWUEUCWL Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>Tc>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>>
>
>
>DA: 0.38DA: 0.39DA: 0.14DA: 0.38DA: 2.6DA: 1.0DA: 0.88DA: 1.0DA: 1.0DA: 1.0DA: 0.88DA: 1.0DA: 1.0DA: 1.0DA: 1.2DA: 0.20DA: 0.28DA: 0.55DA: 0.49DA: 1.1DA: 0.39DA: 0.39DA: 0.14DA: 0.42DA: 1.60DA: 1.20DA: 1.20DA: 1.00DA: 1.20DA: 1.20DA: 1.20DA: 1.00DA: 1.20DA: 1.20DA: 1.20DA: 0.20DA: 0.17DA: 0.20DA: 0.27DA: 0.32DA: 0.42DA: 0.53DA: 1.1DA: 0.70P - Passenger Car
82
5
82
6
82
6P:\DWG\1PRELIMINARY\P-017 TKC NEWTON 800K (OLD RAWHIDE)\020.218 PROJECT ETARC.DWG POST DA 9/9/2020 4:03:30 PM HP02.CTB CHASEPROJECT NUMBERTHIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OFBURTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES AND ISNOT TO BE REPRODUCED OR COPIED INWHOLE OR IN PART. IT IS NOT TO BE USEDON ANY OTHER PROJECT AND IS TO BERETURNED UPON REQUEST.5950 FAIRVIEW RD STE 100CHARLOTTE NC 28210(T) 704.553.8881burtonengineering.comDATE0 ft.( IN FEET )1 inch =20020050DAPROJECT NUMBER09.09.20POST DA MAP
PROJECT ETARCPOST DEVELOPED DA: 45.261 ACPOST BYPASSDA: 16.10 ACTOTAL POST DA61.36 AC
9/24/2020 Precipitation Frequency Data Server
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=35.6309&lon=-81.3063&data=intensity&units=english&series=pds 1/4
NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3
Location name: Newton, North Carolina, USA*
Latitude: 35.6309°, Longitude: -81.3063°
Elevation: 904.64 ft**
* source: ESRI Maps
** source: USGS
POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES
G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley
NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland
PF_tabular | PF_graphical | Maps_&_aerials
PF tabular
PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches/hour)1
Duration Average recurrence interval (years)
1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000
5-min 4.50
(4.14‑4.91)
5.33
(4.90‑5.81)
6.29
(5.76‑6.86)
7.02
(6.41‑7.64)
7.91
(7.18‑8.63)
8.57
(7.72‑9.36)
9.22
(8.23‑10.1)
9.84
(8.70‑10.8)
10.6
(9.26‑11.8)
11.2
(9.66‑12.5)
10-min 3.59
(3.31‑3.92)
4.26
(3.92‑4.65)
5.03
(4.61‑5.50)
5.61
(5.12‑6.11)
6.30
(5.72‑6.88)
6.82
(6.14‑7.45)
7.32
(6.55‑8.02)
7.80
(6.90‑8.58)
8.41
(7.33‑9.32)
8.86
(7.61‑9.88)
15-min 3.00
(2.76‑3.26)
3.57
(3.28‑3.90)
4.25
(3.89‑4.64)
4.73
(4.32‑5.16)
5.32
(4.83‑5.81)
5.76
(5.19‑6.29)
6.17
(5.51‑6.76)
6.56
(5.80‑7.22)
7.06
(6.15‑7.82)
7.41
(6.37‑8.26)
30-min 2.05
(1.89‑2.24)
2.47
(2.27‑2.69)
3.02
(2.76‑3.29)
3.43
(3.13‑3.74)
3.94
(3.58‑4.30)
4.34
(3.91‑4.74)
4.72
(4.22‑5.17)
5.11
(4.52‑5.62)
5.62
(4.89‑6.22)
6.00
(5.16‑6.69)
60-min 1.28
(1.18‑1.40)
1.55
(1.42‑1.69)
1.93
(1.77‑2.11)
2.23
(2.04‑2.43)
2.63
(2.38‑2.86)
2.94
(2.65‑3.21)
3.25
(2.91‑3.56)
3.58
(3.17‑3.94)
4.03
(3.51‑4.46)
4.38
(3.76‑4.89)
2-hr 0.744
(0.682‑0.812)
0.902
(0.827‑0.988)
1.14
(1.04‑1.25)
1.32
(1.20‑1.45)
1.58
(1.43‑1.73)
1.78
(1.60‑1.95)
1.99
(1.77‑2.19)
2.22
(1.95‑2.45)
2.52
(2.18‑2.81)
2.77
(2.37‑3.11)
3-hr 0.530
(0.487‑0.583)
0.642
(0.588‑0.706)
0.810
(0.740‑0.891)
0.945
(0.859‑1.04)
1.14
(1.02‑1.25)
1.29
(1.16‑1.42)
1.46
(1.29‑1.61)
1.63
(1.43‑1.81)
1.88
(1.61‑2.10)
2.09
(1.76‑2.35)
6-hr 0.328
(0.302‑0.359)
0.395
(0.364‑0.433)
0.497
(0.455‑0.544)
0.578
(0.528‑0.632)
0.694
(0.629‑0.758)
0.789
(0.710‑0.863)
0.889
(0.791‑0.975)
0.995
(0.876‑1.10)
1.15
(0.991‑1.27)
1.27
(1.08‑1.42)
12-hr 0.200
(0.185‑0.218)
0.242
(0.223‑0.264)
0.303
(0.279‑0.330)
0.352
(0.323‑0.383)
0.420
(0.383‑0.458)
0.476
(0.430‑0.518)
0.534
(0.477‑0.581)
0.595
(0.526‑0.649)
0.680
(0.593‑0.745)
0.749
(0.644‑0.824)
24-hr 0.124
(0.115‑0.134)
0.150
(0.140‑0.162)
0.190
(0.176‑0.205)
0.222
(0.205‑0.239)
0.265
(0.244‑0.285)
0.299
(0.275‑0.322)
0.334
(0.306‑0.361)
0.371
(0.338‑0.401)
0.421
(0.382‑0.456)
0.461
(0.416‑0.500)
2-day 0.074
(0.068‑0.080)
0.089
(0.083‑0.097)
0.112
(0.104‑0.121)
0.130
(0.120‑0.140)
0.154
(0.142‑0.166)
0.172
(0.158‑0.186)
0.192
(0.176‑0.207)
0.212
(0.193‑0.229)
0.239
(0.217‑0.258)
0.260
(0.235‑0.282)
3-day 0.052
(0.049‑0.056)
0.063
(0.059‑0.068)
0.079
(0.073‑0.085)
0.091
(0.084‑0.098)
0.107
(0.099‑0.115)
0.120
(0.110‑0.129)
0.133
(0.122‑0.144)
0.147
(0.134‑0.158)
0.165
(0.150‑0.179)
0.180
(0.163‑0.195)
4-day 0.042
(0.039‑0.045)
0.050
(0.046‑0.054)
0.062
(0.058‑0.066)
0.071
(0.066‑0.076)
0.084
(0.077‑0.090)
0.094
(0.086‑0.101)
0.104
(0.095‑0.112)
0.114
(0.105‑0.123)
0.129
(0.117‑0.139)
0.140
(0.127‑0.151)
7-day 0.027
(0.026‑0.029)
0.033
(0.031‑0.035)
0.040
(0.037‑0.043)
0.045
(0.042‑0.049)
0.053
(0.049‑0.057)
0.059
(0.054‑0.063)
0.065
(0.060‑0.069)
0.071
(0.065‑0.076)
0.079
(0.072‑0.084)
0.085
(0.078‑0.091)
10-day 0.022
(0.021‑0.023)
0.026
(0.025‑0.028)
0.031
(0.030‑0.033)
0.035
(0.033‑0.038)
0.041
(0.038‑0.043)
0.045
(0.042‑0.048)
0.049
(0.046‑0.052)
0.053
(0.049‑0.057)
0.059
(0.054‑0.063)
0.063
(0.058‑0.067)
20-day 0.015
(0.014‑0.015)
0.017
(0.016‑0.018)
0.020
(0.019‑0.022)
0.023
(0.022‑0.024)
0.026
(0.025‑0.028)
0.029
(0.027‑0.030)
0.031
(0.029‑0.033)
0.034
(0.031‑0.036)
0.037
(0.034‑0.039)
0.040
(0.037‑0.042)
30-day 0.012
(0.011‑0.013)
0.014
(0.014‑0.015)
0.016
(0.016‑0.017)
0.018
(0.017‑0.019)
0.020
(0.019‑0.021)
0.022
(0.021‑0.023)
0.023
(0.022‑0.024)
0.025
(0.023‑0.026)
0.027
(0.025‑0.028)
0.028
(0.027‑0.030)
45-day 0.010
(0.010‑0.011)
0.012
(0.011‑0.012)
0.013
(0.013‑0.014)
0.015
(0.014‑0.015)
0.016
(0.015‑0.017)
0.017
(0.016‑0.018)
0.018
(0.017‑0.019)
0.019
(0.018‑0.020)
0.021
(0.020‑0.022)
0.022
(0.021‑0.023)
60-day 0.009
(0.009‑0.009)
0.011
(0.010‑0.011)
0.012
(0.011‑0.012)
0.013
(0.012‑0.013)
0.014
(0.013‑0.015)
0.015
(0.014‑0.016)
0.016
(0.015‑0.017)
0.017
(0.016‑0.017)
0.018
(0.017‑0.019)
0.019
(0.018‑0.020)
1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS).
Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a
given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not
checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values.
Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information.
Back to Top
PF graphical
Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2020
Page 1 of 439419003942200394250039428003943100394340039437003941900394220039425003942800394310039434003943700470900471200471500471800472100472400472700473000473300473600
470900 471200 471500 471800 472100 472400 472700 473000 473300 473600
35° 38' 13'' N 81° 19' 22'' W35° 38' 13'' N81° 17' 25'' W35° 37' 11'' N
81° 19' 22'' W35° 37' 11'' N
81° 17' 25'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Feet
0 150 300 600 900
Meters
Map Scale: 1:13,400 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:15,800.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Catawba County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 20, Jun 2, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 8, 2015—Nov 28,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2020
Page 2 of 4
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
BuB Buncombe loamy sand, 0 to 5
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
21.7 2.3%
CaB Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes
11.7 1.3%
CaD Cecil sandy loam, 10 to 15
percent slopes
7.1 0.8%
CeC2 Cecil clay loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
14.3 1.5%
ChA Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
89.5 9.7%
CoA Congaree loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
63.2 6.8%
CsA Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
26.7 2.9%
DaA Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
7.6 0.8%
FaE3 Fairview clay loam, 10 to 25
percent slopes, severely
eroded
17.4 1.9%
FdE2 Fairview soils, 10 to 25 percent
slopes, moderately eroded
0.1 0.0%
LcB Lloyd loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes
227.1 24.5%
LcC Lloyd loam, 6 to 10 percent
slopes
50.9 5.5%
LcD Lloyd loam, 10 to 15 percent
slopes
15.3 1.7%
LcE Lloyd loam, 15 to 25 percent
slopes
39.5 4.3%
LdB2 Lloyd clay loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes, moderately eroded
1.0 0.1%
LdC2 Lloyd clay loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
179.1 19.4%
MkF4 Madison-Udorthents complex,
25 to 45 percent slopes,
gullied
20.1 2.2%
PaE3 Pacolet clay loam, 10 to 25
percent slopes, severely
eroded
71.3 7.7%
PeE Pacolet soils, 10 to 25 percent
slopes
20.7 2.2%
PsF Pacolet-Saw complex, 25 to 45
percent slopes, stony
24.5 2.6%
Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2020
Page 3 of 4
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
RnB Ronda loamy sand, 0 to 5
percent slopes, frequently
flooded
0.7 0.1%
W Water 16.1 1.7%
Totals for Area of Interest 925.6 100.0%
Soil Map—Catawba County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2020
Page 4 of 4
―│―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│―│―│
―│
―│
―│
―│
―│―│
―│―│
―│
―│
!"
!"
&PO
!"
!"
!"
^
^▄n
▄n
▄n▄n▄n
▄n ▄n
▄n▄n
▄n ▄ÞÞ@TT
▄ÞÞ@TT
F F
F
F
F
F
F
H
H
1100
10
0
0
900
1000
1
0
0
0
90090011001000
10
0
01200 100090090090010009009009001
0
0
0 9001
0
0
0
9001000
9009
0
0
9
0
0100011009001000 1000
1000
1000
1000
10009001100
90010
0
0
9001000
900
9001100
1000100011
0
0
10001
1
0
0
9
0
0
1000
9
0
0
10001100
900
90010001000
9009001100
900900900900900
1000
9
0
0
900
900
1000 1000
1
1
0
0
90010001000
9001100
1000900
9001100900
900
1100
10
0
0
1000900
900
1
1
0
0 10001000
110
0 110010
0
0
10
0
0
900
900
1
0
0
0
1000
100011009001000900 1000
1000 100010009001200
10001000800900 1000100010
0
0
10
0
0
1100
900900
900100011001100
900900900900 10001000
900
900
900
1000
900
900
900
1100
1
0
0
0
1100
10001000
10
0
0 11001100900
1000
1100
1000
9009
0
0
10
0
0 1000100090010001000900
10009
0
0
1
1
0
0
900
Wilson'sAirport
WoodlandTrail£¤Bus3212ND ST NE12TH AVE SE£¤321 9TH AVE SE17TH ST SELAZENBY ST
BARRINGERCIRWORTHA HERMAN RD SW¬«10
SPE
N
C
E
R

R
D

N
E
ROLLING GREEN DR
DEBORAH HERM A N R D
BROOKSTONEDR£¤70
£¤702ND ST NW22NDSTNESIMMONS ST17THSTSWSENECADRMAIN AVE NW
DEVONSH I R E R D
PRIC
E

D
R DIETZ RDSAND PIT RD9TH ST NE9TH ST NW3RD ST SEROSEWOOD LNS CENTER STD AVE SE
ZIONCHURCHRD
BRICKFIEL
D

S
T 31STSTREETPLNE15TH AVE SE
T H O M P S O N S T
JAMESFARMRD¬«127 10TH ST NERIVE
R

R
D12THSTSW4THSTNW
£¤321
MAIN AVENUE DR NW
MARBLE ST
MAINAVESE
SNAKE CREEK DRQUAIL DR 27THSTREETDRSEF A V E N U E D R S E
§¨¦40
WESTOVERRD33RD STREET DR SE26THSTSEBLUE STAR RDWH
I
T
E
N
E
R

R
D HIGHLAND AVE SEL
E
N
O
I
R

R
H
Y
N
E

B
L
V
D

S
E
G E PLANT RDWOODRIDG E CIRFOREST RIDGE DR 1ST ST NWTAT
E

B
L
V
D
FISHER ST FAIRGROVE CHURCH RD31STSTREETPLSEDOV
E

S
T
£¤321
MAIN AVE SW
£¤70
15THAVENUEBLVD
SE
WILLO
W

C
R
E
E
K

D
R
7TH AVE SW
ROBINSON RD7TH AVE SE1 S T A V E S W
11TH AVE SE
ROBINWOOD RD7TH
A
V
E

N
E
9TH AVE N
E14TH STREET DR NEP
INOAK
DR
VALLEYARBORSDR
HIGHLANDAVENE
20TH AVE SE
SANDY FORD RD
¬«1213 15TH ST NE6TH ST SE§¨¦40
2ND AVE NW
LONGFOR D D R
§¨¦40
TATE BLVD12TH ST NE9TH AVE SE
S TA R B ROOKEDRSTARTOWNRD4TH ST SW22ND STREET PL NE8TH AV E N E10TH STREET
BLVD
NW
C AVE
S
E11TH ST
NW
4TH ST SW6THSTNW8TH AVE SE
HUIE STCENTERST1ST AVE NW 8TH ST NE12T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
D
R
NWSTONESTHROW DR
HUFFMAN FARM RD 21S T A V E SE7THSTSW 26TH ST NECH
R
I
S
T
O
P
H
E
R

D
R
C O U N T R Y V I E W L N
CONOVER BLVD W
£¤7027TH ST NESHUFORD RD¬«127
SAINTPAULSCHURC
H
R
D
9T
H

S
T

S
E
MCDONALD PKWYYODERFARMRDMCDONALD PKWY SEW
H
I
T
E

E
A
G
L
E

R
A
N
C
H

R
D
6TH AVE SW IDLEWOOD ACRES RD19TH ST NWLUTZBLVDHARPERLE
E
DR6TH ST NE4TH A
V
E
N
U
E

D
R

N
W
TOUCHSTONE C I R
CONOVER BLVD W23RDSTREETDRSE
FIREDEPART M E N T S T
1 0TH AVE NE
BETHELCHURCHRD 8THSTREETDRNECATAW B A V A L LEY BLVDSE
6THAVENUEDRNW
M
A
I
N

A
V
E

S
E
5TH

A
V
E

N
E
Z
I
O
N

C
H
U
R
C
H

R
D
HIDDENCREEKCIRPERRYWOO D D R
17THSTREETDRSES
A
I
N

R
D
TR
I
N
I
T
Y

C
H
U
R
C
H

R
D
OLDCONOVER-STARTOW NRD
SECTIONHOUSERD
PRIN C E ST FAIRGROVECHUR
C
H
R
D
SE
ADAM
ST
2ND AVE NE
K
E
NS
I
NGT
ON
C
I
R5TH ST NW20TH ST SEMOUNTAINVIEWRD¬«127 26THSTREETDRSE4TH AVE NW
14TH AVE SW
TATE BLVD SE
£¤321 WORKMANST11THA V E N U E D R S E
2ND
ST
R
E
ETDRSW3RD AVE NW
RUTHDR
ORCHARDPA RKDR
SETTLEMYREBRIDGERD10THSTSW30TH ST NEROLLIN
G
R
I
D
GE
DRWALLACEDAIRYRDSTATERD1007
1 9TH AVE SW N CENTER STB O W M A N R D
13TH AVENUEDRSE
OLDESCHOOLDR
SERENI
TY
D
R
ROBINSON RD
MAUSER DR
MATTI
N
G
L
Y

D
R11TH AVENUE
BL
V
D SE21ST ST NE10THAVENUEDRSE10 T H A V E SE1ST
S
T
S
EMENNONITECHURCHRDWOODLAND MHP18TH ST NWSHADYLNT
O
D
D
S
T32ND ST NEC L E M E N T B LVD NW
BROOKFORDBLVDOLDLATTERRD3RDSTNWPONDEROSARDR E N W ICKDR1ST ST SW11THSTSW16TH ST NEH
ARRIS
FARM
RD 3RD ST SWFRANKLINDR9TH TEEDR3RDSTREETPLSE4THSTREETPLSWFRYEAVE
CAUBLEDAIRY R D
1ST AVE SE
MILTON ST3RDAVENUEDRSE1STSTNE13TH ST SW5TH AVE SW
NBRUSH W O O D CIR
2N
D

S
T

S
E17TH ST NW14TH ST SW19TH ST SWWAGONWHEELRD
O
L
D
L
E
N
O
I
R
R
D
20TH ST NECHANDY ST21
S
T

S
T

S
E9TH ST SWWELLING T O N AV E DANIEL
ST
M
A
G
N
U
M

R
D 14TH ST SE1 2 T H A V E N E SPRINGSRD25THSTSE2
1
S
T

S
T

SW
F
I
N
G
E
R
B
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
V
A
LLEYFIELDRD
9 T H AVE NW
33RDSTREETLNNEHERBIECIR27THSTREETDRNESHORTRD9THSTREETLNSEW IN D IN G O A K D RVILLAGECIR 4THSTREETDRSWRAINBOWHILLSDRHIGHLANDAVENE
10THAVENUEDRNE
6TH AVE NW
3RD ST NE3R
D

A
V
E
N
U
E

D
R

N
W
15THSTSE35THSTREETPLNE5THSTSEELIZABETH
A
VE
COLON I AL L N7THSTNE
¬«10 TIMBERLANDHILLSDRM AINAVENE£¤Bus321
8THAVESE15TH ST SWOVERBROOKDR15TH AVE SE
14TH AVE NE
¬«10
W Y O M INGST12TH AVE NW
R IV ERRUNCIR£¤3218TH STREET DR SEMCDONALDPKWYNECENTUR
Y

P
L

S
E5TH ST
NE
ROCKY FORD RD28TH STREET PL NEZ
I
O
N
C
H
U
R
C
H
R
D7TH ST NWBLACKOAKRD4TH STREET DR NW§¨¦40
R
OB
I
NS
ONR
D12TH AVENUE DR NE
M
O
S
S
F
A
RMRD2ND AVE SE
2 N D A V E S W
FAIRWAY DRLOBLOL
L
Y
L
N
F
O
X
CHASEDR19TH ST SE2 0 T H AVE SW
7TH ST SE
BUTNERDRRHONEY
SCH
O
OL
RD
1ST AVENUE PL NW
15THAVENE
STA
R
T
O
W
N

R
D8THAVENUEDRSW14TH ST NWSANDY FORD RD
£¤70
ORCHARD ST
F Y N A T U R E DR
PITTSTOWN RD£¤321
11TH AV E N U E C IR N W
HARDWOODC IR
SI
G
M
A
N

S
T
B IL L IN G S D R
¬«10 1ST ST W
So
u
t
h

F
o
r
k

C
a
t
a
w
b
a

R
i
v
e
r
HermanBr
Ho
p

C
r Clark CrMillerBrFrye CrLy
l
e

C
r
Henry Fork
L
o
n
gviewCrHo
p
C
r Cline CrJac
o
b

F
o
r
k
Cr ipple Cr
B
a
r
g
e
r
B
r
Be
t
t
s
B
r
H e n r y F ork SnowCrClark CrM
u
d
d
y
C
r
L
yle
C
r
H
e
n
r
y
F
o
r
k
J a c o b F o r k
Clark
Cr
CatawbaMemorial Park
Fairview Cem
Oakwood Cem
Ridgeview Cem
OldRobinsonCem
Mountain View
HICKORY
NEWTON
Fairgrove
Startown
Long View
Brookford
Viewmont
CONOVER
Rhoney
Sweetwater
Longview
Fairbrook
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
43
3956 000mN
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
3943000mN
56
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 7667 477 000mE
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76467000mE 77
35.6250°
35.7500°
-81.3750°-81.2500°35.7500°
35.6250°-81.2500°-81.3750°
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
HICKORY QUADRANGLENORTH CAROLINA - CATAWBA COUNTY7.5-MINUTE SERIES
HICKORY, NC
2019
Expressway Local Connector
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
Ramp 4WD
Secondary Hwy Local Road
Interstate Route State RouteUS RouteWX./H
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

This map was produced to conform with the National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.18
CONTOUR INTERVAL 20 FEETNORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
SCALE 1:24 000
1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000
21KILOMETERS00.51
1 0.5 0
MILES
1
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000
FEET
×
Ø
GN
MN
0°11´
3 MILS
7°37´
135 MILS
UTM GRID AND 2019 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
MV
Grid Zone Designation
17S
U.S. National Grid100,000 - m Square ID
NORTHCAROLINA
1 Granite Falls
8 Maiden
2 Bethlehem3 Millersville4 Longview5 Newton6 Banoak7 Reepsville
ADJOINING QUADRANGLES
2 3
4
1
867
5
Imagery.....................................................NAIP, May 2016 - November 2016Roads......................................... U.S. Census Bureau, 2016Names............................................................................GNIS, 1980 - 2019Hydrography...............................National Hydrography Dataset, 1899 - 2018Contours............................................National Elevation Dataset, 2008Boundaries..............Multiple sources; see metadata file 2017 - 2018
Wetlands.................FWS National Wetlands Inventory 1984
North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and1 000-meter grid:Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17S
Produced by the United States Geological Survey
This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may begeneralized for this map scale. Private lands within governmentreservations may not be shown. Obtain permission beforeentering private lands.*7643016378835*NSN.7643016378835NGA REF NO.USGSX24K20300SITE
USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed April 2020
National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250
Feet
Ü
SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT
SPECIAL FLOOD
HAZARD AREAS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A, V, A99
With BFE or DepthZone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
Regulatory Floodway
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% annual chance flood with average
depth less than one foot or with drainage
areas of less than one square mileZone X
Future Conditions 1% Annual
Chance Flood HazardZone X
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to
Levee. See Notes.Zone X
Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D
NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X
Area of Undetermined Flood HazardZone D
Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
17.5 Water Surface Elevation
Coastal Transect
Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE)
Effective LOMRs
Limit of Study
Jurisdiction Boundary
Digital Data Available
No Digital Data Available
Unmapped
This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of
digital flood maps if it is not void as described below.
The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap
accuracy standards
The flood hazard information is derived directly from the
authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map
was exported on 9/24/2020 at 2:33 PM and does not
reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and
time. The NFHL and effective information may change or
become superseded by new data over time.
This map image is void if the one or more of the following map
elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,
legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,
FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for
unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for
regulatory purposes.
Legend
OTHER AREAS OF
FLOOD HAZARD
OTHER AREAS
GENERAL
STRUCTURES
OTHER
FEATURES
MAP PANELS
8
B 20.2
The pin displayed on the map is an approximate
point selected by the user and does not represent
an authoritative property location.
1:6,000
81°18'55"W 35°38'2"N
81°18'18"W 35°37'33"N

HYDROCAD OUTPUT
1yr-24hr Storm Event

1S
Pre
5R
Analysis Pont
3P
Wet Pond
Routing Diagram for ETARC
Prepared by {enter your company name here}, Printed 9/10/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Subcat Reach Pond Link
Type II 24-hr 1yr 24hr Rainfall=2.98"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Pre
Runoff = 7.97 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 1.530 af, Depth= 0.36"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24-hr 1yr 24hr Rainfall=2.98"
Area (ac) CN Description
51.360 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B
51.360 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
21.9 300 0.0530 0.23 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 3.61"
14.8 1,320 0.0454 1.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
36.7 1,620 Total
Subcatchment 1S: Pre
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
1451401351301251201151101051009590858075706560555045403530252015105Flow (cfs)8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Type II 24-hr
1yr 24hr Rainfall=2.98"
Runoff Area=51.360 ac
Runoff Volume=1.530 af
Runoff Depth=0.36"
Flow Length=1,620'
Tc=36.7 min
CN=61
7.97 cfs
Type II 24-hr 1yr 24hr Rainfall=2.98"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Reach 5R: Analysis Pont
[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)
Inflow Area = 61.361 ac, 66.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.94" for 1yr 24hr event
Inflow = 5.25 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 9.925 af
Outflow = 5.25 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 9.925 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Reach 5R: Analysis Pont
Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
140130120110100908070605040302010Flow (cfs)5
4
3
2
1
0
Inflow Area=61.361 ac
5.25 cfs
5.25 cfs
Type II 24-hr 1yr 24hr Rainfall=2.98"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Pond 3P: Wet Pond
Inflow Area = 45.261 ac, 89.58% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.53" for 1yr 24hr event
Inflow = 189.90 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 9.552 af
Outflow = 4.07 cfs @ 15.00 hrs, Volume= 9.445 af, Atten= 98%, Lag= 182.6 min
Primary = 4.07 cfs @ 15.00 hrs, Volume= 9.445 af
Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 833.13' @ 15.00 hrs Surf.Area= 119,112 sf Storage= 297,580 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 1,299.2 min calculated for 9.445 af (99% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 1,291.9 min ( 2,063.6 - 771.7 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 830.50' 930,449 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
830.50 105,905 0 0
831.00 110,069 53,994 53,994
832.00 114,290 112,180 166,173
833.00 118,566 116,428 282,601
834.00 122,900 120,733 403,334
835.00 127,290 125,095 528,429
836.00 131,736 129,513 657,942
837.00 136,239 133,988 791,930
838.00 140,799 138,519 930,449
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 826.33'36.0" Round Culvert
L= 30.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet / Outlet Invert= 826.33' / 826.18' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 7.07 sf
#2 Device 1 830.50'6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 2.00 C= 0.600
#3 Device 1 833.00'48.0" W x 8.0" H Vert. Weir X 2.00 C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 836.00'48.0" x 48.0" Horiz. Top of Box C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads
#5 Secondary 836.00'30.0' long Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00
Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31
3.30 3.31 3.32
Type II 24-hr 1yr 24hr Rainfall=2.98"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Primary OutFlow Max=4.06 cfs @ 15.00 hrs HW=833.13' (Free Discharge)
1=Culvert (Passes 4.06 cfs of 78.33 cfs potential flow)
2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 2.91 cfs @ 7.42 fps)
3=Weir (Orifice Controls 1.15 cfs @ 1.14 fps)
4=Top of Box ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=830.50' (Free Discharge)
5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Pond 3P: Wet Pond
Inflow
Outflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
140130120110100908070605040302010Flow (cfs)210
200
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Inflow Area=45.261 ac
Peak Elev=833.13'
Storage=297,580 cf
189.90 cfs
4.07 cfs
4.07 cfs
0.00 cfs

HYDROCAD OUTPUT
10-year, 24-hour Storm Event

1S
Pre
5R
Analysis Point
3P
Wet Pond
Routing Diagram for ETARC
Prepared by {enter your company name here}, Printed 9/10/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Subcat Reach Pond Link
Type II 24-hr 10yr 24hr Rainfall=5.33"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Pre
Runoff = 55.33 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 6.726 af, Depth= 1.57"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24-hr 10yr 24hr Rainfall=5.33"
Area (ac) CN Description
51.360 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B
51.360 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
21.9 300 0.0530 0.23 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 3.61"
14.8 1,320 0.0454 1.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
36.7 1,620 Total
Subcatchment 1S: Pre
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
1451401351301251201151101051009590858075706560555045403530252015105Flow (cfs)60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Type II 24-hr
10yr 24hr Rainfall=5.33"
Runoff Area=51.360 ac
Runoff Volume=6.726 af
Runoff Depth=1.57"
Flow Length=1,620'
Tc=36.7 min
CN=61
55.33 cfs
Type II 24-hr 10yr 24hr Rainfall=5.33"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Reach 5R: Analysis Point
[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)
Inflow Area = 61.361 ac, 66.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.98" for 10yr 24hr event
Inflow = 49.66 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 20.331 af
Outflow = 49.66 cfs @ 12.36 hrs, Volume= 20.331 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Reach 5R: Analysis Point
Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
140130120110100908070605040302010Flow (cfs)55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Inflow Area=61.361 ac
49.66 cfs
49.66 cfs
Type II 24-hr 10yr 24hr Rainfall=5.33"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Pond 3P: Wet Pond
Inflow Area = 45.261 ac, 89.58% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.86" for 10yr 24hr event
Inflow = 350.15 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 18.333 af
Outflow = 32.31 cfs @ 12.37 hrs, Volume= 18.223 af, Atten= 91%, Lag= 24.8 min
Primary = 32.31 cfs @ 12.37 hrs, Volume= 18.223 af
Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 834.58' @ 12.37 hrs Surf.Area= 125,458 sf Storage= 475,681 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 790.2 min calculated for 18.222 af (99% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 786.6 min ( 1,542.7 - 756.2 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 830.50' 930,449 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
830.50 105,905 0 0
831.00 110,069 53,994 53,994
832.00 114,290 112,180 166,173
833.00 118,566 116,428 282,601
834.00 122,900 120,733 403,334
835.00 127,290 125,095 528,429
836.00 131,736 129,513 657,942
837.00 136,239 133,988 791,930
838.00 140,799 138,519 930,449
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 826.33'36.0" Round Culvert
L= 30.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet / Outlet Invert= 826.33' / 826.18' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 7.07 sf
#2 Device 1 830.50'6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 2.00 C= 0.600
#3 Device 1 833.00'48.0" W x 8.0" H Vert. Weir X 2.00 C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 836.00'48.0" x 48.0" Horiz. Top of Box C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads
#5 Secondary 836.00'30.0' long Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00
Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31
3.30 3.31 3.32
Type II 24-hr 10yr 24hr Rainfall=5.33"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Primary OutFlow Max=32.32 cfs @ 12.37 hrs HW=834.58' (Free Discharge)
1=Culvert (Passes 32.32 cfs of 88.44 cfs potential flow)
2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 3.70 cfs @ 9.43 fps)
3=Weir (Orifice Controls 28.62 cfs @ 5.37 fps)
4=Top of Box ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=830.50' (Free Discharge)
5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Pond 3P: Wet Pond
Inflow
Outflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
140130120110100908070605040302010Flow (cfs)380
360
340
320
300
280
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Inflow Area=45.261 ac
Peak Elev=834.58'
Storage=475,681 cf
350.15 cfs
32.31 cfs
32.31 cfs
0.00 cfs

HYDROCAD OUTPUT
50yr-24hr Storm Event

1S
Pre
5R
Analysis Point
3P
Wet Pond
Routing Diagram for ETARC
Prepared by {enter your company name here}, Printed 9/10/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Subcat Reach Pond Link
Type II 24-hr 50yr 24hr Rainfall=7.19"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Pre
Runoff = 106.68 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 12.155 af, Depth= 2.84"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24-hr 50yr 24hr Rainfall=7.19"
Area (ac) CN Description
51.360 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B
51.360 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
21.9 300 0.0530 0.23 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 3.61"
14.8 1,320 0.0454 1.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
36.7 1,620 Total
Subcatchment 1S: Pre
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
1451401351301251201151101051009590858075706560555045403530252015105Flow (cfs)115
110
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Type II 24-hr
50yr 24hr Rainfall=7.19"
Runoff Area=51.360 ac
Runoff Volume=12.155 af
Runoff Depth=2.84"
Flow Length=1,620'
Tc=36.7 min
CN=61
106.68 cfs
Type II 24-hr 50yr 24hr Rainfall=7.19"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Reach 5R: Analysis Point
[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)
Inflow Area = 61.361 ac, 66.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.68" for 50yr 24hr event
Inflow = 79.17 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 29.019 af
Outflow = 79.17 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 29.019 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Reach 5R: Analysis Point
Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
140130120110100908070605040302010Flow (cfs)85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Inflow Area=61.361 ac
79.17 cfs
79.17 cfs
Type II 24-hr 50yr 24hr Rainfall=7.19"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Pond 3P: Wet Pond
Inflow Area = 45.261 ac, 89.58% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.71" for 50yr 24hr event
Inflow = 475.79 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 25.320 af
Outflow = 45.73 cfs @ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 25.209 af, Atten= 90%, Lag= 23.3 min
Primary = 45.73 cfs @ 12.34 hrs, Volume= 25.209 af
Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 835.94' @ 12.34 hrs Surf.Area= 131,464 sf Storage= 649,891 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 630.6 min calculated for 25.209 af (100% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 627.5 min ( 1,377.1 - 749.6 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 830.50' 930,449 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
830.50 105,905 0 0
831.00 110,069 53,994 53,994
832.00 114,290 112,180 166,173
833.00 118,566 116,428 282,601
834.00 122,900 120,733 403,334
835.00 127,290 125,095 528,429
836.00 131,736 129,513 657,942
837.00 136,239 133,988 791,930
838.00 140,799 138,519 930,449
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 826.33'36.0" Round Culvert
L= 30.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet / Outlet Invert= 826.33' / 826.18' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 7.07 sf
#2 Device 1 830.50'6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 2.00 C= 0.600
#3 Device 1 833.00'48.0" W x 8.0" H Vert. Weir X 2.00 C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 836.00'48.0" x 48.0" Horiz. Top of Box C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads
#5 Secondary 836.00'30.0' long Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00
Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31
3.30 3.31 3.32
Type II 24-hr 50yr 24hr Rainfall=7.19"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Primary OutFlow Max=45.73 cfs @ 12.34 hrs HW=835.94' (Free Discharge)
1=Culvert (Passes 45.73 cfs of 96.92 cfs potential flow)
2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 4.31 cfs @ 10.97 fps)
3=Weir (Orifice Controls 41.42 cfs @ 7.77 fps)
4=Top of Box ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=830.50' (Free Discharge)
5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
Pond 3P: Wet Pond
Inflow
Outflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
140130120110100908070605040302010Flow (cfs)500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Inflow Area=45.261 ac
Peak Elev=835.94'
Storage=649,891 cf
475.79 cfs
45.73 cfs
45.73 cfs
0.00 cfs

HYDROCAD OUTPUT
100yr-24hr Storm Event

1S
Pre
5R
Analysis Point
3P
Wet Pond
Routing Diagram for ETARC
Prepared by {enter your company name here}, Printed 9/10/2020
HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Subcat Reach Pond Link
Type II 24-hr 100yr 24hr Rainfall=8.04"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Pre
Runoff = 132.25 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 14.874 af, Depth= 3.48"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type II 24-hr 100yr 24hr Rainfall=8.04"
Area (ac) CN Description
51.360 61 Pasture/grassland/range, Good, HSG B
51.360 100.00% Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
21.9 300 0.0530 0.23 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 3.61"
14.8 1,320 0.0454 1.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
36.7 1,620 Total
Subcatchment 1S: Pre
Runoff
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
1451401351301251201151101051009590858075706560555045403530252015105Flow (cfs)140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Type II 24-hr
100yr 24hr Rainfall=8.04"
Runoff Area=51.360 ac
Runoff Volume=14.874 af
Runoff Depth=3.48"
Flow Length=1,620'
Tc=36.7 min
CN=61
132.25 cfs
Type II 24-hr 100yr 24hr Rainfall=8.04"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Reach 5R: Analysis Point
[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)
Inflow Area = 61.361 ac, 66.08% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 6.47" for 100yr 24hr event
Inflow = 116.60 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 33.068 af
Outflow = 116.60 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 33.068 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Reach 5R: Analysis Point
Inflow
Outflow
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
140130120110100908070605040302010Flow (cfs)130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Inflow Area=61.361 ac
116.60 cfs
116.60 cfs
Type II 24-hr 100yr 24hr Rainfall=8.04"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Summary for Pond 3P: Wet Pond
Inflow Area = 45.261 ac, 89.58% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 7.56" for 100yr 24hr event
Inflow = 533.03 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 28.517 af
Outflow = 83.75 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 28.405 af, Atten= 84%, Lag= 10.5 min
Primary = 62.85 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 27.709 af
Secondary = 20.89 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.696 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-148.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 836.40' @ 12.13 hrs Surf.Area= 133,548 sf Storage= 711,316 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 577.4 min calculated for 28.403 af (100% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 575.1 min ( 1,322.5 - 747.3 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 830.50' 930,449 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
830.50 105,905 0 0
831.00 110,069 53,994 53,994
832.00 114,290 112,180 166,173
833.00 118,566 116,428 282,601
834.00 122,900 120,733 403,334
835.00 127,290 125,095 528,429
836.00 131,736 129,513 657,942
837.00 136,239 133,988 791,930
838.00 140,799 138,519 930,449
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 826.33'36.0" Round Culvert
L= 30.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Inlet / Outlet Invert= 826.33' / 826.18' S= 0.0050 '/' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.011 Concrete pipe, straight & clean, Flow Area= 7.07 sf
#2 Device 1 830.50'6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 2.00 C= 0.600
#3 Device 1 833.00'48.0" W x 8.0" H Vert. Weir X 2.00 C= 0.600
#4 Device 1 836.00'48.0" x 48.0" Horiz. Top of Box C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads
#5 Secondary 836.00'30.0' long Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00
2.50 3.00
Coef. (English) 2.69 2.72 2.75 2.85 2.98 3.08 3.20 3.28 3.31
3.30 3.31 3.32
Type II 24-hr 100yr 24hr Rainfall=8.04"ETARC
Printed 9/10/2020Prepared by {enter your company name here}
Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 03513 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
Primary OutFlow Max=62.81 cfs @ 12.13 hrs HW=836.40' (Free Discharge)
1=Culvert (Passes 62.81 cfs of 99.65 cfs potential flow)
2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 4.50 cfs @ 11.45 fps)
3=Weir (Orifice Controls 44.97 cfs @ 8.43 fps)
4=Top of Box (Weir Controls 13.35 cfs @ 2.07 fps)
Secondary OutFlow Max=20.83 cfs @ 12.13 hrs HW=836.40' (Free Discharge)
5=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 20.83 cfs @ 1.73 fps)
Pond 3P: Wet Pond
Inflow
Outflow
Primary
Secondary
Hydrograph
Time (hours)
140130120110100908070605040302010Flow (cfs)550
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Inflow Area=45.261 ac
Peak Elev=836.40'
Storage=711,316 cf
533.03 cfs
83.75 cfs
62.85 cfs
20.89 cfs

WET POND DESIGN

Wet Pond NCDENR 2007 9/9/2020SHOPTON RIDGE BUSINESS PARK
CHARLOTTE, NC
WATER QUALITY BASIN DESIGN
Pond Volume Linked to Worksheet:Wet Pond Volume
85% Total Suspended Soilds
25% Total Nitrogen
40% total Phosphate
Mountain & Piedmont Regions
Table 10-1
SURFACE AREA REQ'D Design TSS% Removal Rate SA/DA RATIO CHART (for 85% TSS removal)
Drainage Area =45.3 ac 85 %% imp cover avg. permanent pool depth (ft)
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% Impervious = 90.00 %10 0.51 0.49 0.43 0.35 0.31 0.29 0.26
20 0.84 0.79 0.70 0.59 0.51 0.46 0.44
Try Perm. Pool Depth = 5.0 30 1.17 1.08 0.97 0.83 0.70 0.64 0.62
40 1.51 1.43 1.25 1.05 0.90 0.82 0.77
SA/DA= 2.66 50 1.79 1.73 1.50 1.30 1.09 1.00 0.92
60 2.09 2.03 1.71 1.51 1.29 1.18 1.10
Surface Area Req'd = 1.200 ac 52,272 sf 70 2.51 2.40 2.07 1.79 1.54 1.35 1.26
Area Provided = 2.431 ac 105,894 sf 80 2.92 2.78 2.38 2.10 1.86 1.60 1.42
at Elev = 830.50 90 3.25 3.10 2.66 2.34 2.11 1.83 1.67
VOL prov'd perm pool= 9.56 ac-ft (includes Fore-bay)
Avg Depth = 3.93 ft
Actual Ratio = 3.11 Mountain & Piedmont Regions
Actual Area Req'd = 1.408 ac Table 10-3
SA/DA RATIO CHART (for 90% TSS removal)
TEMP. DRAWDOWN % imp cover avg. permanent pool depth (ft)
DETERMINE 1" STORM VOLUME 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
10 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4
USE SIMPLE METHOD Rv=0.05+0.009(I)20 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7
Rv= 0.86 IN/IN 30 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9
P= 1.0 IN 40 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1
VOLUME=DESIGN RAINFALL(Rv)DA 50 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5
60 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7
VOLUME= 3.244 AC-FT 141,293 CF 70 4.0 3.7 3.3 3.1 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9
VOLprov= 6.490 AC-FT at elevation 831.14 80 4.5 4.1 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.0
90 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4
FORE-BAY SIZE
PRE-BAY VOL=20% OF PERM POOL VOLUME
PRE-BAY VOLreqd= 1.911 ac-ft
PRE-BAY VOLprov.= 1.845 ac-ft
Actual % Used =19.3 %
ORIFICE SIZING ORIFICE CALCULATIONS
orifice formula Q=cA(2gh)^.5 w/ c=.6
2 DAY DRAWDOWN Q2=1.64 cfs
DIA (in) 12.0
5 DAY DRAWDOWN=Q5=0.65 cfs Inv = 830.50
(cfs)
FROM ORIFICE CALC'S: USE 12.0 IN DIA ORIFICE Elev Q
Top 1" Stor = 831.14
Approx Draw Down Time = 3.2 days Perm. Pool = 830.50
78 hours Head = 0.21
Avg Q = 1.01 cfs
Average depth should be a minimum
of 3 feet.
Average depth, dav may be computed
by:
Option 1: dav = Vol Perm. pool
Area perm. pool
Option 2: ( see NCDENR Manual )
Driving Head = H/3
See Figure 3-3 NCDENR BMP
Manual
Includes Forebay &
Main Pond
Perm. pool elevation should be
within 6" +/- of the SHWT
(Seasonal High Water Table)
P:\DWG\1Preliminary\P-017 TKC Newton 800K (OLD Rawhide)\6. Calcs\SWM\Wet Pond-ETARC Page 1 of 2
BOUYANCY CALCULATIONS
Weight of Structure Type Box
Inside Width 5.0 FT
Inside Length 5.0
Wall Thickness 0.5
Concrete CY/FT of Height 0.41
Structure Height 10.00 FT
Total Structure 4.07
Pipe Deduction 0.178
Total Vol. of Concrete 3.90
Concrete LB/CY 145
Weight of Structure (Wstructure) 8,500
ANCHOR DIM'S
L= 8.0
W= 8.0 Bouyancy Calculations
W structure + W anchor
Wreq Treqd= 1.93 ft BF=VolRiser x DensityH2O LBS
23.19 in
Tprov'd= 36 in
Wt. Anchor Prov'd = 15859.20 lbs Wt. Conc.=145-62.4(LB/CF)=82.6LB/CF
Total Wt. of Outlet = 24358.88 lbs
SFprovided =1.30 SFreq=1.2
Total Wt. Required(W req)=LBS
VOL OF ANCH REQ'D= CF (Wreq - W structure) / 82.6
15,600.00
18,720
123.70
42 0.243
48 0.317
54 0.401
24 0.085
30 0.127
36 0.178
12 0.032
15 0.036
18 0.049
Pipe Deductions
per NCDOT 840.02
Dia. CY
N:\Excel Templates\WaterQuality\NCDENRWqcalcs.xls Page 2 of 2
Wet Pond Volume
Linked to Worksheet:
Elev Perm. Pool = 830.50
Vol Perm Pool = 9.555 ac-ft
Surface Area Perm. Pool 2.431 ac
1" Vol Storage Req'd = 3.257 ac-ft
Elev
Total Storage Req'd= 12.812 ac-ft #VALUE!
1" Vol Storage Prov'd = 6.490 ac-ft
Total Storage Prov'd= 16.045 833.00
Prebay Vol. Prov'd= 1.845 ac-ft
Total
Contour Area Avg. Area
Inc.
Volume
Total
Volume Area Avg. Area Inc. Volume Total Volume Cum. Volume
Elev (ac) (ac) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac) (ac) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft)
825 0.132 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
826 0.358 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.562 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
827 0.392 0.380 0.380 0.380 1.612 1.590 1.590 1.590 1.970
828 0.428 0.410 0.410 0.790 1.662 1.640 1.640 3.230 4.020
829 0.465 0.450 0.450 1.240 1.713 1.690 1.690 4.920 6.160
830 0.503 0.480 0.480 1.720 1.765 1.740 1.740 6.660 8.380
830.5 0.000 0.250 0.125 1.845 2.431 2.100 1.050 7.710 9.555
831 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.845 2.527 2.480 1.240 8.950 10.795
832 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.845 2.624 2.580 2.580 11.530 13.375
833 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.845 2.722 2.670 2.670 14.200 16.045
834 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.845 2.821 2.770 2.770 16.970 18.815
835 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.845 2.922 2.870 2.870 19.840 21.685
836 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.845 3.024 2.970 2.970 22.810 24.655
837 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.845 3.128 3.080 3.080 25.890 27.735
838 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.845 3.232 3.180 3.180 29.070 30.915
PreBay Main Pond
Wet Pond NCDENR 2007
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0Stage(ft)Volume
(ac-ft)
STAGE / STORAGE
Include 1.0 Ft for Sediment Storage

EROSION CONTROL DESIGN
Rip Rap Apron Design
Date:
Date:
Step 1.
15.6
54
0.7
Min TW (Fig. 8.06a)
101.9
8.8
Step 2.
Step 3.
Minimum TW Maximum TW
0.9 0.1
26 10
14 14
W = Do + La W = Do + .4La
31 9
Step 4.
Minimum TW Maximum TW
Max Stone Diameter, dmax (Inches): 16 2
Apron Thickness (Inches): 24 10
Step 5.
Rip Rap Apron Design
Determine the maximum Stone Diameter. Dmax = 1.5 X d50
Riprap d50, (ft.)
Minimum apron length, La (ft.) **
Apron width at pipe outlet (ft.)
Apron shape
Apron width at outlet end (ft.)
Project Name:
Drainage Specialist:
Checked By:
Based on the tailwater conditions determined in Step 1, enter Figure 8.06a or Figure 8.06b and
determine the d50 rip rap size and minimum apron length (La). The d50 size is the median
stone size in a well-graded rip rap apron.
Determine the apron width at the pipe outlet, the apron shape, and the apron width at the outlet
end from the same figure used in Step 2.
Tailwater depth (Feet)
Tailwater Method To Be Used
Discharge (cfs)
Velocity (ft./s)
** - Minimum Apron Length Is 10 Feet per CLDS 20.23
Determine the Apron Thickness, Ta = 1.5 X dmax
Fit the rip rap apron to the site by making it level for the minimum length La . Extend the
apron farther downstream and along the channel banks until stability is assured. Keep apron
as straight as possible and align it with the flow of the receiving stream. Make any necessary
alignment bends near the pipe outlet so that the entrance into the receiving stream is straight.
Some locations may require lining of the entire channel cross section to assure stability. It
may be necessary to increase the size of the rip rap where protection of the channel side slopes
is necessary. Where overfalls exist at pipe outlets or flows are excessive, a plunge pool should
be considered.
Total Drainage Area (Acres):
Determine the tailwater depth from the channel characteristics below the pipe outlet for the
design capacity of the pipe. If the tailwater depth is less than half the outlet pipe diameter, it is
classifies as minimum tailwater conditions. If the tailwater is greater than half the pipe
diameter, it is classified as maximum tailwater conditions. Pipes that outlet onto wide flat
areas with no defined channel are assumed to have a minimum tailwater condition unless
reliable flood stage elevations show otherwise.
Rational Method for Flow
Outlet pipe diameter, Do (in.)
** - Minimum Apron Thickness Is 10 Inches per CLDS 20.23
FES-A1
Date:
Date:
Step 1.
16.1
54
1.5
Min TW (Fig. 8.06a)
105.5
8.9
Step 2.
Step 3.
Minimum TW Maximum TW
0.9 0.1
26 10
14 14
W = Do + La W = Do + .4La
31 9
Step 4.
Minimum TW Maximum TW
Max Stone Diameter, dmax (Inches): 16 2
Apron Thickness (Inches): 24 10
Step 5.
** - Minimum Apron Length Is 10 Feet per CLDS 20.23
Determine the Apron Thickness, Ta = 1.5 X dmax
Fit the rip rap apron to the site by making it level for the minimum length La . Extend the
apron farther downstream and along the channel banks until stability is assured. Keep apron
as straight as possible and align it with the flow of the receiving stream. Make any necessary
alignment bends near the pipe outlet so that the entrance into the receiving stream is straight.
Some locations may require lining of the entire channel cross section to assure stability. It
may be necessary to increase the size of the rip rap where protection of the channel side slopes
is necessary. Where overfalls exist at pipe outlets or flows are excessive, a plunge pool should
be considered.
Total Drainage Area (Acres):
Determine the tailwater depth from the channel characteristics below the pipe outlet for the
design capacity of the pipe. If the tailwater depth is less than half the outlet pipe diameter, it is
classifies as minimum tailwater conditions. If the tailwater is greater than half the pipe
diameter, it is classified as maximum tailwater conditions. Pipes that outlet onto wide flat
areas with no defined channel are assumed to have a minimum tailwater condition unless
reliable flood stage elevations show otherwise.
Rational Method for Flow
Outlet pipe diameter, Do (in.)
** - Minimum Apron Thickness Is 10 Inches per CLDS 20.23
Rip Rap Apron Design
Determine the maximum Stone Diameter. Dmax = 1.5 X d50
Riprap d50, (ft.)
Minimum apron length, La (ft.) **
Apron width at pipe outlet (ft.)
Apron shape
Apron width at outlet end (ft.)
Project Name:
Drainage Specialist:
Checked By:
Based on the tailwater conditions determined in Step 1, enter Figure 8.06a or Figure 8.06b and
determine the d50 rip rap size and minimum apron length (La). The d50 size is the median
stone size in a well-graded rip rap apron.
Determine the apron width at the pipe outlet, the apron shape, and the apron width at the outlet
end from the same figure used in Step 2.
Tailwater depth (Feet)
Tailwater Method To Be Used
Discharge (cfs)
Velocity (ft./s)
FES-B1
Date:
Date:
Step 1.
pond
36
0.2
Min TW (Fig. 8.06a)
51.1
7.2
Step 2.
Step 3.
Minimum TW Maximum TW
0.6 0.1
20 10
9 9
W = Do + La W = Do + .4La
23 7
Step 4.
Minimum TW Maximum TW
Max Stone Diameter, dmax (Inches): 11 2
Apron Thickness (Inches): 16 10
Step 5.
** - Minimum Apron Length Is 10 Feet per CLDS 20.23
Determine the Apron Thickness, Ta = 1.5 X dmax
Fit the rip rap apron to the site by making it level for the minimum length La . Extend the
apron farther downstream and along the channel banks until stability is assured. Keep apron
as straight as possible and align it with the flow of the receiving stream. Make any necessary
alignment bends near the pipe outlet so that the entrance into the receiving stream is straight.
Some locations may require lining of the entire channel cross section to assure stability. It
may be necessary to increase the size of the rip rap where protection of the channel side slopes
is necessary. Where overfalls exist at pipe outlets or flows are excessive, a plunge pool should
be considered.
Total Drainage Area (Acres):
Determine the tailwater depth from the channel characteristics below the pipe outlet for the
design capacity of the pipe. If the tailwater depth is less than half the outlet pipe diameter, it is
classifies as minimum tailwater conditions. If the tailwater is greater than half the pipe
diameter, it is classified as maximum tailwater conditions. Pipes that outlet onto wide flat
areas with no defined channel are assumed to have a minimum tailwater condition unless
reliable flood stage elevations show otherwise.
Rational Method for Flow
Outlet pipe diameter, Do (in.)
** - Minimum Apron Thickness Is 10 Inches per CLDS 20.23
Rip Rap Apron Design
Determine the maximum Stone Diameter. Dmax = 1.5 X d50
Riprap d50, (ft.)
Minimum apron length, La (ft.) **
Apron width at pipe outlet (ft.)
Apron shape
Apron width at outlet end (ft.)
Project Name:
Drainage Specialist:
Checked By:
Based on the tailwater conditions determined in Step 1, enter Figure 8.06a or Figure 8.06b and
determine the d50 rip rap size and minimum apron length (La). The d50 size is the median
stone size in a well-graded rip rap apron.
Determine the apron width at the pipe outlet, the apron shape, and the apron width at the outlet
end from the same figure used in Step 2.
Tailwater depth (Feet)
Tailwater Method To Be Used
Discharge (cfs)
Velocity (ft./s)
FES-G1

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

NEWTON CORPORATE CENTER
NEWTON, NORTH CAROLINA

ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
PROJECT NUMBER 09.24080

PREPARED FOR
THE KEITH CORPORATION
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA

APRIL 2, 2014

April 2, 2014

Mr. Derek Salfia
The Keith Corporation
5395 Carnegie Blvd., Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28209

ECS Project No. 09.24080

Reference: Report of Preliminary Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical
Engineering Analysis
Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina

Dear Mr. Salfia:

ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) has completed a preliminary subsurface exploration for the
subject site as authorized by acceptance of our Proposal No. 09.21648-P, dated March
24, 2014. The purposes of this exploration were to explore the subsurface conditions at
the site and to develop geotechnical recommendations to guide design and construction of
the project. This report presents our evaluations and recommendations, the results of
our exploration, our scope of work, and our understanding of the project information.

This report is provided for the use of The Keith Corporation. This report is not intended
to be used or relied upon in connection with other projects or by other unidentified third
parties without the written permission of ECS. The unauthorized use of this report by
any undesignated third party or parties will be at such party’s sole risk and ECS
disclaims liability for any such unauthorized third party use or reliance.

ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide our professional services during this phase
of your project. Please contact us if you have questions concerning the following report.

Respectfully,

ECS CAROLINAS, LLP

Matthew D. Hartley, E.I. Reviewed by: David M. Cutter, P.E.
Project Manager Principal Engineer
Licensed NC 022089

Attachments

4811 Koger Boulevard, Greensboro, NC 27407 • T: 336-856-7150 • F: 336-856-7160 • www.ecslimited.com
ECS Carolinas, LLP • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Texas, LLP
Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

We request you read the entire contents of this report. Recommendations and
clarifications are contained in the body that are not in the report summary.

Project Information

We understand that the project is in the planning stage. The current preliminary site plan
indicates that construction will consist of a 769,500 square foot warehouse and
associated drives and parking. Structural loads were not available at this time. A grading
plan was also not available at this time, but we understand that cuts of up to 25 to 30
feet will be necessary along Highway 10. The proposed construction will cover portions
of Tract 1 (61.01 acres) and Tract 2 (7.75 acres). ECS was also requested to perform
borings across Tract 3 (41.91) to explore the subsurface conditions for possible future
construction.

Subsurface Conditions

The borings typically encountered 1 to 3.5 inches of organic-laden material (topsoil)
underlain by undisturbed and disturbed residual soils. The disturbed residual soils are
considered plow zone soils which are typically loose soil as a result of regular plowing.
Consequently, plow zone soils are often wetter than the more compact undisturbed
residual soils beneath them.

The encountered conditions are summarized on the Generalized Subsurface Profile in
Appendix A. Additional information is provided on the soil boring logs in Appendix A.

The undisturbed and disturbed residual soils generally consisted of silty clays, clayey
silts, sandy silts and silty sands. The residual soils typically had SPT resistance values
ranging from 6 to 18 blows per foot.

Partially weathered rock was encountered by borings B-2 and B-15 at depths of 23.5
and 19 feet below existing grades, respectively. Auger refusal materials were not
encountered by the borings.

Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

ii
Recommendation Summary

• The site is generally suitable for construction of the anticipated facility.

• We recommend the proposed structures be supported on shallow foundations
bearing on undisturbed residual soils and new compacted controlled fill. Site soils are
typically suitable for foundations sized for bearing pressures up to 3,000 psf.
Depending upon final grades, it may be necessary to extend footing excavations
through high plasticity soils to help mitigate shrink/swell issues with seasonal
moisture variations.

• Based on final elevations, there is potential for undercutting of high plasticity surficial
soils based on the borings. The necessity for undercut in proposed parking and drive
areas will be determined based on the performance of proofrolling.

• Plow zones were encountered across Tract 3. Plow zone soils are typically loose as
a result of regular plowing and consequently they are often wetter than the more
compact undisturbed soils beneath them. It is important to note that plow zone soils
are sometimes considered "topsoil" by contractors because they contain organic
materials as a result of their agricultural use. Our experience suggests these soils
usually do not contain an objectionable amount of fibrous organics and therefore we
believe they should generally be classified and utilized as any other inorganic soils.

• Partially weathered rock was encountered by borings B-2 and B-15 at depths of 23.5
and 19 feet below existing grades, respectively. It should be possible to excavate soils
above partially weathered rock using conventional equipment (scrapers, loaders and
bulldozers).

• Based on the borings, it does not appear that permanent groundwater control will be
necessary for this project.

• The encountered CH soils are not suitable for use as controlled fill. The encountered
surficial MH soils are generally suitable for use as controlled fill; however, we
recommend only placing MH soils at depths of at least 4 feet below finished grades.
The CH soils should be used for landscaping purposes outside of structure footprints
and concrete and pavement areas.

• Use of a base reinforcement/separation fabric beneath the stone base should be
considered to extend pavement lives if high plasticity soils are present at subgrade
elevations.

• We recommend a Seismic Site Classification D in accordance with the North
Carolina Building Code based on the encountered conditions.

Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

1

Exploration Procedures

Sixteen soil test borings, denoted B-1 through B-16, were performed on March 27, March 28
and March 29, 2014 at the approximate locations shown on the Boring Location Plans in
Appendix A. The boring locations were selected by ECS and were staked in the field by use
of hand-held GPS equipment. Boring elevations were interpolated from topographic
contours shown on the site sketch provided.

Drilling was performed by a Simco 2400 ATV drill rig using continuous-flight hollow stem
augers. Soil samples were obtained by means of the split-barrel sampling procedures in
accordance with ASTM Specification D-1586. In the split-barrel sampling procedure, a 2-
inch O.D., split-barrel sampler is driven into the soil a distance of 18 inches by means of a
140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler
through a 12-inch interval is termed the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) value and is
indicated for each sample on the boring logs. This value can be used to provide a
qualitative indication of the in-place relative density of cohesionless soils. In a less reliable
way, it also indicates the consistency of cohesive soils. This indication is qualitative, since
many factors can significantly affect the SPT value and prevent a direct correlation between
drill crews, drill rigs, drilling procedures, and hammer-rod-sampler assemblies.

Representative portions of each SPT sample were sealed in airtight containers and returned to
our laboratory for classification, testing, and storage. The soil samples were visually classified
in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The basic elements
of the USCS are described on a legend sheet attached in Appendix E and in ASTM D2487.
Additional information from each soil boring is provided on the individual soil test boring logs in
Appendix E.

Regional Geology

The site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic province of North Carolina. The Piedmont
extends generally from Alabama to southern Pennsylvania and extends from the Valley and
Ridge province in the west to the Coastal Plain province to the east. The soils in the
Piedmont were formed by in-place weathering of parent rock and are termed residual soils
(or saprolite). The typical residual profile consists of a clayey near surface horizon, where
weathering is most severe, transitioning to silts and sands with increasing depth. The
materials transition to partially weathered rock (PWR), which is designated for geotechnical
engineering purposes as residual material with a Standard Penetration Test resistance in
excess of 100 blows per foot. The degree of weathering typically decreases with depth until
solid bedrock is encountered. Due to differential weathering along seams and less resistant
materials, it is not uncommon to encounter seams and layers of harder materials within
partially weathered rock.

A review of the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985) indicates the site is underlain by
amphibolite and biotite gneiss of the Inner Piedmont Belt.

Alluvial (water-deposited) soils are typically encountered at the ground surface along
streams and their floodplains and near existing ponds or lakes. These soils can vary in
composition from sands to silts and clays depending on the surrounding soils types and the
proximity to the source of water that deposited the alluvial soil. Alluvial soils are typically wet
Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

2
to saturated and are generally loose, soft, and compressible because they have not been
subjected to pressures greater than their own self-weight.

Plow zone soils are typically loose as a result of regular plowing and consequently they are
often wetter than the more compact undisturbed soils beneath them. It is important to note
that plow zone soils are sometimes considered "topsoil" by contractors because they contain
organic materials as a result of their agricultural use. Our experience suggests these soils
usually do not contain an objectionable amount of fibrous organics and therefore we believe
they should generally be classified and utilized as any other inorganic soils.

Soil Conditions

The borings typically encountered 1 to 3.5 inches of organic-laden material (topsoil)
underlain by undisturbed and disturbed residual soils. The disturbed residual soils are
considered plow zone soils which are typically loose soil as a result of regular plowing.
Consequently, plow zone soils are often wetter than the more compact undisturbed residual
soils beneath them.

The encountered conditions are summarized on the Generalized Subsurface Profile in
Appendix A. Additional information is provided on the soil boring logs in Appendix A.

The undisturbed and disturbed residual soils generally consisted of silty clays, clayey silts,
sandy silts and silty sands. The residual soils typically had SPT resistance values ranging
from 6 to 18 blows per foot.

Partially weathered rock was encountered by borings B-2 and B-15. Partially weathered rock
was encountered in borings B-2 and B-15 at depths of 23.5 and 19 feet below existing
grades, respectively. Auger refusal materials were not encountered by the borings.

Groundwater Conditions

Groundwater control is not expected to be necessary for this project.

Water was encountered in borings B-4, B-6, B-7 and B-15. The depth to water was recorded
at 38 feet below existing grade in boring B-4, at 19.7 feet below existing grade in boring B-6,
at 15.7 feet below existing grade in boring B-7 and at 15.0 feet below existing grade in
boring B-15 after the completion of boring each hole. The borings caved-in at depths of 15.7
to 42.0 feet below existing grades. In this geology, the cave-in depth of a boring is often an
indication of the stabilized water level although the water level may be a few feet below the
cave-in depth and therefore cannot be directly observed.

In general, shallow unconfined groundwater movement within the soils overlying bedrock is
controlled largely by topographic gradients. Movement in this water table is generally from
higher to lower elevations. Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and
typically discharges into streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow
water table is transient and can vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation, surface
water runoff, and other factors. Normally, the highest groundwater levels occur in the late
winter and spring and the lowest groundwater levels occur in the late summer and fall.

Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

3
Subgrade Preparation

Site preparation should begin with stripping all vegetation, root-zone, and all other soft or
unsuitable material from the proposed building and pavement areas. We expect a stripping
depth of at least 3 inches based on the borings, however, deeper stripping depths are
typically required in wooded areas. Stripping depths will vary depending on the time of the
year. During the wet seasons stripping may be deeper due to saturated soils on the surface.

Portions of the site may be unstable due to the presence of surface CH and MH material.
Due to the nature of CH and MH soils, the site will likely rut easily during proofrolls. Limiting
construction vehicles to tracked equipment should limit the disturbance of surficial soils.

Following stripping and rough excavation, but prior to placing controlled fill, the exposed
subgrades should be proofrolled. Unstable areas identified by proofrolling should be
undercut to firm materials. If firm soils are not encountered within 3 feet below subgrade
elevation in grade slab and pavement areas, the deeper unstable materials should be
evaluated by the project geotechnical engineer to determine if these materials may remain
in place. Any undercut areas should be backfilled with controlled fill.

Appropriate proofrolling equipment typically consists of a dump truck having a single rear
axle with axle weight of at least 10 tons, or a dump truck having a tandem rear axle with axle
weight of at least 20 tons. Alternate equipment, such as a fully loaded pan scraper, may be
utilized with approval of the geotechnical engineer responsible for evaluating the subgrade
during construction.

Proofrolling consists of driving the appropriate equipment over the subgrade at a walking
pace. The proofrolling equipment should make overlapping passes across the subgrade in
the same direction, with the overlap not exceeding ½ the width of the equipment. A second
set of overlapping passes should then be made in a direction perpendicular to the first set of
passes.

Once fill placement has been completed and prior to stone base placement, the proposed
parking and drive areas should be proofrolled. Unstable areas should be remedied as
previously noted in this section. Areas observed to be stable but contain CH and MH soils
at the surface should be modified by placing a base reinforcing fabric prior to stone base
placement. The project geotechnical engineer will determine the type of reinforcing fabric at
the time of evaluation.

Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

4
Earthwork

We do anticipate potential undercutting of high plasticity site soils based on the borings. The
necessity of undercut for proposed parking and drive areas will be determined based on the
performance of proofrolling.

If earthwork is performed during winter or after appreciable rainfall then subgrades may be
unstable due to wet soil conditions, which could increase the amount of undercutting
required.

We anticipate that the ML and SM site soils can be adequately compacted without need for
special drying measures. Drying of wet soils, if encountered, may be accomplished by
spreading and discing or by other mechanical or chemical means. The ability to dry wet soils,
and therefore the ability to use them for fill, will be reduced if earthwork is performed during late
winter or spring.

When dry, the majority of the site soils should provide adequate subgrade support for fill
placement and construction operations. When wet, the soil may degrade quickly with
disturbance from construction traffic. Good site drainage should be maintained during
earthwork operations to prevent ponding water on exposed subgrades. Soil subgrades should
be protected from rain by “sealing” the subgrades prior to forecast precipitation. Sealing
subgrades can be performed by rolling with rubber-tired equipment, but ruts should not be
created, or by rolling with a smooth steel-drum roller without vibration. Subgrades that have
been sealed should be scarified prior to receiving additional fill.

If site soils are initially placed at planned subgrade elevations and are left exposed over a
period of time, the exposed soils may become soft and wet and may become holding areas
for trapped water. Even compacted fill soils left exposed for long periods of time will
degrade due to exposure. The lack of confinement at the surface and cycles of wetting and
drying through the seasons will soften and loosen the compacted fill, or in the case of cut
subgrades the removal of overburden pressure promotes rebound and can allow the
surficial soils to relax over time. The disturbance can extend as deep as 1 foot, or possibly
more depending on soil types and exposure conditions. Leaving site grades high allows for
a sacrificial layer of soil that can then be removed from the final subgrade at the time of
future construction to reduce the need for undercutting and replacement below planned
grades.

Placement of significant thickness of structural fill can produce elastic deformation
(settlement) of underlying residual soils. Additionally, measurable subsidence of compacted
fill material can take place when fill thickness exceeds 10 to 15 feet. The latter can be
mitigated to some degree by increasing the compaction specification from 95% to 98% or
100% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density. We also recommend installation of
surveyed settlement hubs in deep fill sections. The hubs should be monitored and
construction of buildings and structures with rigid connections, e.g. storm drains, should be
delayed until measurable movement of the hubs has ceased.

Controlled Fill

The encountered CH soils are not suitable for use as controlled fill. The encountered
surficial MH soils are generally suitable for use as controlled fill; however, we recommend
Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

5
only placing MH soils at depths of at least 4 feet below finished grades. The CH soils
should be used for landscaping purposes outside of structure footprints and concrete and
pavement areas. Alternatively, CH soils can be chemically stabilized with lime. Depending
upon the quantity of high plasticity soils encountered and their impact on balancing the site,
chemical stabilization may or may not be economically feasible.

Controlled fill should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density
obtained in accordance with ASTM Specification D-698, Standard Proctor Method.
Aggregate base course (ABC) stone should be compacted to 95 percent of standard Proctor
maximum dry density under building slabs and to at least 100 percent density under
pavements.

The maximum loose lift thickness depends upon the type of compaction equipment used:

EQUIPMENT MAXIMUM LOOSE LIFT
THICKNESS, IN.
Large, Self-Propelled Equipment (CAT 815, etc.) 8
Small, Self-Propelled or Remote Controlled
(Rammax, etc.)
6
Hand Operated (Plate Tamps, Jumping Jacks,
Wacker-Packers)
4
Trackhoe Mounted rollers/Smooth Drum rollers 6

The moisture content at the time of compaction should be within 5 percent of the optimum
moisture content determined by ASTM D698. Some soils will require a moisture content
closer to optimum to facilitate compaction, while other soils can be adequately compacted at
moisture contents even more than 5 percent away from optimum. For this reason, the
moisture content of the fill should not be the sole reason for failing a field density test. If the
density test indicates the fill is adequately compacted but the moisture content is more than
5 percent away from the optimum moisture content, the density results should be reviewed
by the geotechnical engineer who should then recommend whether the fill should be
accepted or rejected.

Controlled fill should be soil that has less than 5 percent fibrous organic content and a liquid
limit and plasticity index less than 50 and 30, respectively. Soils with Unified Soil
Classification System group symbols of SP, SW, SM, SC, and ML are suitable for use as
controlled fill. Soils with USCS group symbol of CL which meet the restrictions for liquid limit
and plasticity index are also suitable for use as controlled fill. Soils with a liquid limit less
than 70 and a plasticity index less than 35 can be used as fill deeper than 4 feet below final
grade, but only if the soil can be adequately compacted. Soils with a higher liquid limit or
plasticity index should not be used as controlled fill.

Controlled fill should be benched into the sides of slopes steeper than 4:1 (H:V) to improve
the bond between the fill and the undisturbed soils. Each bench cut into a slope should be
at least 12 inches but not more than 60 inches high. The benches should be wide enough
to allow operation of the compaction equipment within the benched area so that fill can be
placed on the bench and over the rest of the fill in continuous layers.

Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

6
We recommend that all fill operations be observed and tested by an engineering technician
to determine if compaction requirements are being met. The testing agency should perform
a sufficient number of tests to confirm that compaction is being achieved. For mass grading
operations we recommend a minimum of one density per 500 cubic yards of fill placed or
per 1 foot of fill thickness, whichever results in more tests. We recommend at least one test
per 1 foot thickness of fill for every 100 linear feet of utility trench backfill.

Density tests in the field should be performed using the Drive Tube Method (ASTM D2937),
the Sand Cone Method (ASTM D1556), or the Nuclear Method (ASTM D2922). If the
Nuclear Method is used, the moisture content determined by the nuclear density equipment
should be verified by performing one moisture content test per ASTM D2216 for every five
nuclear density tests.

Excavation Conditions

Partially weathered was encountered by borings B-2 and B-15 at depths of 23.5 and 19 feet
below existing grades, respectively. Auger refusal materials were not encountered by the
borings. It should be possible to excavate soils above partially weathered rock using
conventional equipment (scrapers, loaders and bulldozers).

Partially weathered rock with SPT values of 50/6” to 50/3” can often be excavated from open-
cut excavations by ripping with a Caterpillar D-8 bulldozer equipped with a single tooth ripper.
Although it may be possible to rip the top few feet of PWR with SPT values stronger than 50/3”,
or even auger refusal materials, we recommend the contractor should be prepared to use
pneumatic hammers or blasting to excavate these materials. We recommend using pneumatic
hammers or blasting to make confined excavations (footings or utility trenches) in any PWR.

The site soils are OSHA Type B and C soils for the purpose of excavation support.
Excavations should be constructed in compliance with current OSHA standards for
excavation and trenching safety. Excavations should be observed by a “competent person”,
as defined by OSHA, who should evaluate the specific soil type and other conditions, which
may control the excavation side slopes or the need for shoring or bracing.

Building Foundations

We recommend the proposed building be supported on shallow foundations bearing on
undisturbed residual soils and new compacted controlled fill. Shallow foundations may be
designed for an allowable net bearing pressure of up to 3,000 pounds per square foot. The
allowable net soil bearing pressure refers to that pressure which may be transmitted to the
foundation bearing soils in excess of the surrounding overburden pressure.

Seismic Conditions

We recommend a Seismic Site Classification D in accordance with the North Carolina
Building Code based on the encountered conditions. If this causes the design of the
structures to be controlled by seismic loads, it may be possible to reduce seismic design
loads by performing a site-specific analysis of ground motions in conjunction with additional
field exploration. Please contact us to discuss this further if the design of the buildings is
controlled by seismic loading as a result of the site class D.

Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

7
Pavement Construction

High plasticity site soils are generally not desirable at pavement subgrade duration because
of their loss of shear strength at elevated moisture contents. These soils can be chemically
stabilized using lime, or a base reinforcement/separation fabric such as Mirafi HP 270 can
be used between the stone base and soil subgrade to increase the service life of the
pavement.

Pavements for the project are likely to consist of light duty parking areas and heavy duty
pavements in driveway areas. Based on our experience with soils similar to those
encountered at the site, we recommend the following minimum pavement sections for the
project provided the subgrade can be successfully proofrolled during construction. Please
note that these sections are considered minimum sections.

Asphalt Pavements
Pavement
Type
Asphalt Surface
Course, in.
NCDOT SF9.5A
Asphalt Binder
Course, in.
NCDOT I19.0B
Aggregate Base
Course, in.
NCDOT ABC Stone
Heavy Duty 1 2.5 8
Light Duty 2 -- 6

Pavements
Pavement
Type
Concrete
(4,500 psi @ 28 days)
Aggregate Base
Course, in.
NCDOT ABC Stone
Heavy Duty 6 4

Once anticipated traffic is known, along with subgrade strength values, design pavement
sections can be provided. If applicable, local or state regulations may specify thicker
sections. The materials should be in accordance with NCDOT Standard Specifications for
Roads and Structures.

Site Drainage

Positive drainage should be provided around the perimeter of the building structure to
minimize the potential for moisture infiltration into the foundation and/or subgrade soils. We
recommend that landscaped areas adjacent to the structures be sloped away from the
construction and maintain a fall of at least 6 inches for the first 10 feet outward from the
structures. Similarly, all roof drains should drain a sufficient distance from the building
perimeter or discharge directly into below grade stormwater piping. The parking lots,
sidewalks and any other paved areas should also be sloped to divert surface water away
from the proposed building. These activities are particularly important since the on-site soils
consist of moisture-sensitive soils. Edge drains should be considered in landscape islands
and at the toes of cut slopes adjacent paved areas to help prevent surface infiltration from
reaching the stone base and affecting subgrade soils.

Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

8
Permanent Site Slopes

We recommend that permanent cut slopes less than 10 feet tall through undisturbed
residual soils be constructed at 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) or flatter. Permanent fill slopes less
than 20 feet tall may be constructed using controlled fill at a slope of 2.5:1 or flatter. A slope
of 3:1 or flatter may be desirable to permit establishment of vegetation, safe mowing, and
maintenance. The surface of all cut and fill slopes should be adequately compacted. All
permanent slopes should be protected using vegetation or other means to prevent erosion.

The outside face of building foundations and the edges of pavements placed near slopes
should be located an appropriate distance from the slope. The North Carolina Building Code
lists the following requirements:

• Buildings or pavements placed at the top of fill slopes should be placed at distance
equal to at least 1/3 of the height of the slope behind the crest of the slope, but that
distance need not be more than 40 feet.

• Buildings or pavements near the bottom of a slope should be located at least ½ of
the height of the slope from the toe of the slope, but the distance need not be more
than 15 feet.

• Slopes with structures located closer than these limits or slopes taller than the height
limits indicated, should be specifically evaluated by the geotechnical engineer and
may require approval from the building code official.

Fill slopes should be constructed by placing controlled fill in horizontal lifts which extend to
or slightly beyond the slope face. Each lift of fill should be compacted to the specified
minimum density before placing the subsequent lift. The compaction equipment should
travel parallel to the slope face to ensure that fill at the face of the slope is compacted to the
same level as the fill farther back from the face. If needed, tracked equipment or
compaction equipment can roll up and down the slope face to compact loose surficial soils
to reduce erosion, but this method should not be used to construct the slope. In some
cases it may be advantageous to overbuild the fill slope (place fill beyond the limits of the
slope face) and then cut back into the fill to leave a clean, compacted slope face exposed.

Fill slopes and fill pads should not be constructed by placing fill against berms. If not
prohibited by plan and specification, the grading contractor will sometimes construct berms
out of site strippings or unsuitable soil along the limits of fill slopes and then will place
controlled fill in horizontal lifts against the berms. This practice will produce a slope
constructed of uncompacted materials adjacent to a zone of compacted fill with a nearly
vertical interface between the two zones of fill. Over time, sometimes after appreciable
rainfall, the uncompacted slope material will settle or slough away which removes the
confining pressure holding the compacted fill in place. Without the confining pressure from
the slope material, the compacted fill will become unstable and will slough, slide, or push out
laterally. This can create problems for pavements and structures located close to the crest
of the slope.

Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

9
Closing

This report has been prepared in order to aid in the evaluation of this site and to assist the
Owner and Engineer in the feasibility study of the project. The report scope is limited to the
specific project and location described, and the project description represents our
understanding of the significant aspects relevant to soil and foundation characteristics.

The recommendations in this report have been developed using generalized subsurface
conditions based on the soil test borings performed. Subsurface conditions can vary
laterally and with depth, and significantly different conditions may exist at locations between
the borings. Conditions different from those encountered by the borings and described in
this report may require modifications to the geotechnical recommendations for the project.

The recommendations in this report were developed based on assumptions made by ECS
regarding the likely foundation, floor slab, and pavement loads for the facility and the likely
site earthwork. While we believe our assumptions to be reasonable based on our
experience with similar projects, it is possible that specific project information may lead us to
alter or modify our recommendations. We strongly recommend that we be given an
opportunity to review design and construction information related to the project as soon as it
becomes available so we can assess whether additional exploration or analyses may be
warranted.

We recommend that the construction activities be monitored by a qualified geotechnical
engineering firm to provide the necessary overview and to check the suitability of the
subgrade soils for support of slabs, pavements, and footings. We would be pleased to
provide these services.
Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

10
APPENDICES

Appendix A – Illustrations

Site Location Map
Boring Location Plan
Generalized Subsurface Profile
Legend Sheet and Unified Soil Classification System
Soil Test Boring Logs

Newton Corporate Center
Newton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09.24080
April 2, 2014

11
APPENDIX A – ILLUSTRATIONS

B-1
10
5
7
29
7
9
11
16
END OF BORING
@ 30'
MH
ML
SM
B-2
9
11
8
11
11
13
50/3
END OF BORING
@ 25'
MH
ML
SM
WR
B-3
10
6
8
9
7
11
11
10
21
END OF BORING
@ 35'
MH
SM
900
890
880
870
860
850
840Elevation in Feet900
890
880
870
860
850
840 Elevation in FeetGENERALIZED SUBSURFACE SOIL PROFILE
NOTES:
1 SEE INDIVIDUAL BORING LOG AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
2 PENETRATION TEST RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT (ASTM D1586).
3 HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE NOT TO SCALE.
TKC Newton Corp Center
The Keith Corporation
Newton, NCPROJECT NO.: 24080 DATE: 4/2/2014 VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=10'
B-4
12
18
11
10
10
12
10
9
8
12
13
13
END OF BORING
@ 50'
MH
ML
SM
B-5
9
9
8
7
7
8
10
END OF BORING
@ 25'
MH
ML
SM
890
880
870
860
850
840
830Elevation in Feet890
880
870
860
850
840
830 Elevation in FeetGENERALIZED SUBSURFACE SOIL PROFILE
NOTES:
1 SEE INDIVIDUAL BORING LOG AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
2 PENETRATION TEST RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT (ASTM D1586).
3 HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE NOT TO SCALE.
TKC Newton Corp Center
The Keith Corporation
Newton, NCPROJECT NO.: 24080 DATE: 4/2/2014 VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=10'
B-6
6
13
16
14
10
4
10
END OF BORING
@ 25'
ML
CH
MH
SM
B-7
12
10
7
6
4
3
6
END OF BORING
@ 25'
MH
ML
SM
860
850
840
830
820
810
800Elevation in Feet860
850
840
830
820
810
800 Elevation in FeetGENERALIZED SUBSURFACE SOIL PROFILE
NOTES:
1 SEE INDIVIDUAL BORING LOG AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
2 PENETRATION TEST RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT (ASTM D1586).
3 HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE NOT TO SCALE.
TKC Newton Corp Center
The Keith Corporation
Newton, NCPROJECT NO.: 24080 DATE: 4/2/2014 VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=10'
B-8
6
5
7
5
5
14
10
10
END OF BORING
@ 30'
MH
ML
SM
B-9
7
7
4
9
8
9
18
END OF BORING
@ 25'
SM
B-10
13
18
9
6
18
11
6
7
END OF BORING
@ 30'
MH
ML
SM
B-11
9
14
9
6
6
4
END OF BORING
@ 20'
CH
ML
SM
900
890
880
870
860
850
840Elevation in Feet900
890
880
870
860
850
840 Elevation in FeetGENERALIZED SUBSURFACE SOIL PROFILE
NOTES:
1 SEE INDIVIDUAL BORING LOG AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
2 PENETRATION TEST RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT (ASTM D1586).
3 HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE NOT TO SCALE.
TKC Newton Corp Center
The Keith Corporation
Newton, NCPROJECT NO.: 24080 DATE: 4/2/2014 VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=10'
B-12
5
15
14
13
11
10
9
END OF BORING
@ 25'
MH
ML
SM
B-13
6
13
9
11
6
9
7
10
END OF BORING
@ 30'
SM
MH
ML
SM
B-14
8
12
12
8
10
5
END OF BORING
@ 20'
SM
MH
ML
SM
B-15
9
15
8
9
7
50/4
END OF BORING
@ 20'
ML
MH
ML
SM
WR
B-16
6
10
8
10
10
9
END OF BORING
@ 20'
ML
MH
ML
SM
910
900
890
880
870
860
850Elevation in Feet910
900
890
880
870
860
850 Elevation in FeetGENERALIZED SUBSURFACE SOIL PROFILE
NOTES:
1 SEE INDIVIDUAL BORING LOG AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
2 PENETRATION TEST RESISTANCE IN BLOWS PER FOOT (ASTM D1586).
3 HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE NOT TO SCALE.
TKC Newton Corp Center
The Keith Corporation
Newton, NCPROJECT NO.: 24080 DATE: 4/2/2014 VERTICAL SCALE: 1"=10'

1
REFERENCE NOTES FOR BORING LOGS

I. Drilling Sampling Symbols

SS Split Spoon Sampler ST Shelby Tube Sampler
RC Rock Core, NX, BX, AX PM Pressuremeter
DC Dutch Cone Penetrometer RD Rock Bit Drilling
BS Bulk Sample of Cuttings PA Power Auger (no sample)
HSA Hollow Stem Auger WS Wash sample
REC Rock Sample Recovery % RQD Rock Quality Designation %

II. Correlation of Penetration Resistances to Soil Properties
Standard Penetration (blows/ft) refers to the blows per foot of a 140 lb. hammer falling 30
inches on a 2-inch OD split-spoon sampler, as specified in ASTM D 1586. The blow count is
commonly referred to as the N-value.
A. Non-Cohesive Soils (Silt, Sand, Gravel and Combinations)
Density Relative Properties
Under 4 blows/ft Very Loose Adjective Form 12% to 49%
5 to 10 blows/ft Loose With 5% to 12%
11 to 30 blows/ft Medium Dense
31 to 50 blows/ft Dense
Over 51 blows/ft Very Dense

Particle Size Identification
Boulders 8 inches or larger
Cobbles 3 to 8 inches
Gravel Coarse 1 to 3 inches
Medium ½ to 1 inch
Fine ¼ to ½ inch
Sand Coarse 2.00 mm to ¼ inch (dia. of lead pencil)
Medium 0.42 to 2.00 mm (dia. of broom straw)
Fine 0.074 to 0.42 mm (dia. of human hair)
Silt and Clay 0.0 to 0.074 mm (particles cannot be seen)

B. Cohesive Soils (Clay, Silt, and Combinations)
Blows/ft Consistency
Unconfined
Comp. Strength
Qp (tsf)
Degree of
Plasticity
Plasticity
Index
Under 2 Very Soft Under 0.25 None to slight 0 – 4
3 to 4 Soft 0.25-0.49 Slight 5 – 7
5 to 8 Medium Stiff 0.50-0.99 Medium 8 – 22
9 to 15 Stiff 1.00-1.99 High to Very High Over 22
16 to 30 Very Stiff 2.00-3.00
31 to 50 Hard 4.00–8.00
Over 51 Very Hard Over 8.00

III. Water Level Measurement Symbols

WL Water Level BCR Before Casing Removal DCI Dry Cave-In
WS While Sampling ACR After Casing Removal WCI Wet Cave-In
WD While Drilling Est. Groundwater Level Est. Seasonal High GWT

The water levels are those levels actually measured in the borehole at the times indicated by the
symbol. The measurements are relatively reliable when augering, without adding fluids, in a granular
soil. In clay and plastic silts, the accurate determination of water levels may require several days for
the water level to stabilize. In such cases, additional methods of measurement are generally applied.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
895
890
885
880
875
870
865
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
16
16
18
18
16
16
18
16
Topsoil Depth [1"]
Residual: Clayey SILT, With Fine Sand,
Reddish Brown, Wet, Stiff (MH)
Clayey SILT, With Fine to Medium Sand, Trace
Mica, Orangish Brown, Black and White, Wet,
Medium Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Dark Orangish
Brown and White, Wet, Very Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine SAND, Mica, Orangish Brown to
Tannish Gray, Wet, Loose to Medium Dense
(SM)
END OF BORING @ 30.00'
4
4
6
2
3
2
3
4
3
9
13
16
4
3
4
5
5
4
4
5
6
9
6
10
10
5
7
29
7
9
11
16
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-1
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/27/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/27/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 24.80'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT895
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
880
875
870
865
860
855
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
9
14
18
16
14
16
14
8
Topsoil Depth [3"]
Residual: Clayey SILT, With Fine Sand,
Reddish Brown, Wet, Stiff (MH)
Clayey SILT, With Fine to Medium Sand, Trace
Mica, Orangish Brown, Wet, Stiff to Medium
Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Tannish Brown,
Wet, Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine to Medium SAND, Trace Mica,
Orangish Brown, Tan and White, Moist to Wet,
Medium Dense (SM)
Partially Weathered Rock: Silty Fine to Medium
SAND, Trace Mica, Grayish Brown, Moist (WR)
END OF BORING @ 25.00'
3
4
5
4
6
5
3
3
5
4
5
6
3
5
6
7
6
7
28
50/3
9
11
8
11
11
13
50/3
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-2
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/29/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/29/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 21.00'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT883
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
895
890
885
880
875
870
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
16
18
16
16
14
14
16
16
Topsoil Depth [2"]
Residual: Clayey SILT, With Fine Sand,
Reddish Brown, Wet, Stiff (MH)
Silty Fine SAND, Trace Mica, Orangish Brown,
Moist, Loose (SM)
Silty Fine to Medium SAND, Orangish Brown,
White, Black and Tan, Moist to Wet, Loose to
Medium Dense (SM)
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
4
3
4
6
6
5
4
5
6
4
4
6
10
6
8
9
7
11
11
10
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-3
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/27/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/27/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 28.30'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT896
1 OF 2
35
40
45
50
55
60
865
860
855
850
845
840
835
S-9 SS 18 14
Silty Fine to Medium SAND, Orangish Brown,
White, Black and Tan, Moist to Wet, Loose to
Medium Dense (SM)
END OF BORING @ 35.00'
8
9
12
21
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-3
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/27/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/27/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 28.30'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT896
2 OF 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
880
875
870
865
860
855
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
12
18
14
7
12
16
14
16
Topsoil Depth [3"]
Residual: Clayey SILT, With Fine Sand,
Reddish Brown, Wet, Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Dark Orangish
Brown, Wet, Very Stiff to Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine SAND, Trace Mica, Tan, Brown,
White, Black and Gray, Wet, Loose to Medium
Dense (SM)
4
5
7
6
8
10
4
5
6
7
5
5
3
4
6
6
5
7
4
5
5
3
4
5
12
18
11
10
10
12
10
9
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-4
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL 40.00 WS WD BORING STARTED 03/27/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) 38.00 BORING COMPLETED 03/27/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 42.00'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT883
1 OF 2
35
40
45
50
55
60
850
845
840
835
830
825
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-12
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
14
14
Silty Fine SAND, Trace Mica, Tan, Brown,
White, Black and Gray, Wet, Loose to Medium
Dense (SM)
END OF BORING @ 50.00'
3
4
4
3
5
7
4
5
8
4
5
8
8
12
13
13
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-4
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL 40.00 WS WD BORING STARTED 03/27/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) 38.00 BORING COMPLETED 03/27/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 42.00'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT883
2 OF 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
885
880
875
870
865
860
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
12
18
16
16
16
16
16
Topsoil Depth [3"]
Residual: Clayey SILT, With Fine Sand,
Reddish Brown, Wet, Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Orangish Brown
to Dark Orangish Brown, Wet, Stiff to Medium
Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine SAND, Mica, Dark Orangish Brown to
Orangish Brown, Moist to Wet, Loose (SM)
END OF BORING @ 25.00'
3
3
6
4
4
5
3
3
5
4
4
3
2
3
4
2
3
5
4
5
5
9
9
8
7
7
8
10
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-5
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/28/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/28/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 20.70'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT887
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
850
845
840
835
830
825
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
14
18
18
18
18
16
18
Topsoil Depth [3"]
Residual: Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica,
Reddish Brown, Wet, Medium Stiff (ML)
Silty CLAY, With Fine Sand, Red, Wet, Stiff to
Very Stiff (CH)
Clayey SILT, With Fine Sand, Reddish Brown,
Wet, Stiff (MH)
Silty Fine SAND, Mica, Tannish Orange to
Orangish Brown, Moist to Wet, Loose (SM)
END OF BORING @ 25.00'
2
3
3
4
6
7
4
7
9
4
6
8
4
5
5
2
1
3
4
5
5
6
13
16
14
10
4
10
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-6
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL 19.50 WS WD BORING STARTED 03/28/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) 19.70 BORING COMPLETED 03/28/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 20.80'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT854
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
845
840
835
830
825
820
815
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
16
15
18
0
14
Topsoil Depth [3"]
Residual: Clayey SILT, With Fine Sand,
Orangish Brown, Wet, Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Orangish Brown,
Wet, Stiff to Medium Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine SAND, Mica, Orangish Brown, Black
and White, Wet, Loose (SM)
END OF BORING @ 25.00'
3
5
7
6
5
5
3
3
4
2
3
3
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
4
12
10
7
6
4
3
6
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-7
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL 15.00 WS WD BORING STARTED 03/28/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) 15.70 BORING COMPLETED 03/28/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 19.80'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT845
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
895
890
885
880
875
870
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
12
18
14
18
18
16
12
18
Topsoil Depth [3"]
Residual: Clayey SILT, With Fine Sand,
Reddish Brown, Wet, Medium Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Orangish Brown
and Black, Wet, Medium Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine SAND, Mica, Orangish Brown, Tan
and White, Wet, Loose to Med. Dense (SM)
END OF BORING @ 30.00'
2
3
3
2
2
3
2
3
4
2
3
2
2
2
3
4
7
7
6
5
5
6
5
5
6
5
7
5
5
14
10
10
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-8
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/28/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/28/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 23.80'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT898
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
890
885
880
875
870
865
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
12
6
10
14
16
16
16
Topsoil Depth [1"]
Residual: Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica,
Tannish Brown, Wet, Medium Stiff ML (SM)
Silty Fine to Medium SAND, Dark Orangish
Brown to Dark Grayish Brown, Moist to Wet,
Loose to Medium Dense (SM)
END OF BORING @ 25.00'
4
3
4
4
3
4
3
2
2
3
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
5
8
8
10
7
7
4
9
8
9
18
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-9
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/27/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/27/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 20.50'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT892
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
895
890
885
880
875
870
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
16
12
18
14
16
Topsoil Depth [3"]
Clayey SILT, With Fine Sand, Reddish Brown,
Wet, Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Orangish Brown
to Light Orangish Brown, Wet to Moist, Very
Stiff to Medium Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine to Medium SAND, Trace Mica,
Orangish Brown to Grayish Brown, Moist to
Wet, Medium Dense to Loose (SM)
END OF BORING @ 30.00'
5
6
7
6
8
10
3
4
5
4
3
3
7
8
10
9
5
6
3
3
3
3
3
4
13
18
9
6
18
11
6
7
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-10
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/28/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/28/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 24.80'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT896
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
880
875
870
865
860
855
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
16
18
18
Topsoil Depth [3"]
Residual: Silty CLAY, With Fine Sand, Reddish
Brown, Wet, Stiff (CH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Tannish Brown,
Wet, Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine SAND, Tan to Grayish Brown, Wet
Loose (SM)
END OF BORING @ 20.00'
3
4
5
4
7
7
3
4
5
2
3
3
3
2
4
2
2
2
9
14
9
6
6
4
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-11
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/28/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/28/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 16.30'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT882
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
890
885
880
875
870
865
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
16
12
14
16
18
Topsoil Depth [2"]
Disturbed Residual: Clayey SILT, Reddish
Brown (MH)
Residual: Clayey SILT With Fine Sand, Reddish
Brown, Wet, Med. Stiff to Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Orangish Brown,
Wet, Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine to Medium SAND, Trace Mica,
Orangish Brown to Light Grayish Brown, Moist
to Wet, Medium Dense to Loose (SM)
END OF BORING @ 25.00'
2
2
3
6
7
8
5
7
7
5
6
7
4
4
7
3
4
6
4
3
6
5
15
14
13
11
10
9
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-12
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/28/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/28/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 21.30'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT893
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
905
900
895
890
885
880
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-8
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
16
16
18
18
18
Topsoil Depth [1"]
Disturbed Residual: Silty SAND, Reddish Brown
(SM)
Clayey SILT with Fine Sand, Reddish Brown,
Wet, Med. Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Orangish Brown
to Reddish Brown, Moist, Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine to Medium SAND, Trace Mica,
Orangish Brown to Light Red, Moist to Wet,
Med. Dense to Loose (SM)
END OF BORING @ 30.00'
3
2
4
4
5
8
4
4
5
4
5
6
2
2
4
3
3
6
2
3
4
3
4
6
6
13
9
11
6
9
7
10
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-13
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/26/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/26/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 25.10'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT908
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
890
885
880
875
870
865
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
16
14
14
Topsoil Depth [1"]
Disturbed Residual: Sandy SILT, Reddish
Brown (SM)
Residual: Clayey SILT with Fine Sand, Reddish
Brown, Wet, Med. Stiff (MH)
Fine to Medium Sandy SILT, Trace Mica,
Reddish Brown to Orangish Brown, Wet, Stiff to
Med. Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine SAND, Orangish Brown and Black,
Wet, Loose, (SM)
END OF BORING @ 20.00'
2
3
5
5
5
7
4
5
7
3
3
5
3
4
6
2
2
3
8
12
12
8
10
5
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-14
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/29/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/29/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 15.8'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT891
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
865
860
855
850
845
840
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
16
18
18
16
16
18
11
Topsoil Depth [1"]
Disturbed Residual: Sandy SILT, Reddish
Brown (ML)
Residual: Clayey SILT with Fine Sand, Reddish
Brown, Wet, Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Orangish Brown,
Moist, Stiff to Med. Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine to Medium SAND, Mica, Dark
Orangish Brown, Wet, Loose (SM)
PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK: Silty Fine to
Medium SAND, Grey, Wet (WR)
END OF BORING @ 20.00'
4
4
5
5
7
8
4
4
4
4
4
5
3
3
4
18
28
50/4
9
15
8
9
7
50/4
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-15
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL 18.50 WS WD BORING STARTED 03/29/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) 15.00 BORING COMPLETED 03/29/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 15.70'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT867
1 OF 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
875
870
865
860
855
850
S-1
S-2
S-3
S-4
S-5
S-6
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
12
16
16
17
18
Topsoil Depth [2"]
Disturbed Residual: Sandy SILT, Reddish
Brown (ML)
Residual: Clayey SILT with Fine Sand, Trace
Mica, Orangish Brown, Wet, Med. Stiff (MH)
Fine Sandy SILT, Trace Mica, Dark Orangish
Brown to Orangish Brown, Wet to Moist, Stiff to
Med. Stiff (ML)
Silty Fine to Medium SAND, Mica, Tannish
Brown to Greyish Brown, Wet, Loose (SM)
END OF BORING @ 20.00'
2
3
3
3
4
6
3
4
4
4
4
6
3
4
6
3
4
5
6
10
8
10
10
9
CLIENT
The Keith Corporation
JOB #
24080
BORING #
B-16
SHEET
PROJECT NAME
TKC Newton Corp Center
ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
SITE LOCATION
Newton, NC
NORTHING EASTING STATION
THE STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. IN-SITU THE TRANSITION MAY BE GRADUAL.
WL DRY WS WD BORING STARTED 03/29/14
WL(BCR)WL(ACR) DRY BORING COMPLETED 03/29/14 CAVE IN DEPTH @ 15.80'
WL RIG Simco 2400 FOREMAN Cody Presley DRILLING METHOD HSADEPTH (FT)SAMPLE NO.SAMPLE TYPESAMPLE DIST. (IN)RECOVERY (IN)SURFACE ELEVATION
DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
WATER LEVELSELEVATION (FT)BLOWS/6"10 20 30 40 50+
20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12345+
ENGLISH UNITS
BOTTOM OF CASING LOSS OF CIRCULATION
CALIBRATED PENETROMETER TONS/FT2
PLASTIC
LIMIT %
WATER
CONTENT %
LIQUID
LIMIT %
ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION & RECOVERY
RQD%REC.%
STANDARD PENETRATION
BLOWS/FT876
1 OF 1