NCG020798_MONITORING INFO_20141002

PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
DOC DATE
STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
❑ HISTORICAL FILE
MONITORING REPORTS
L) o c�
YYYYMMDD

ANNUAL, SUMMARY DMR - WASTEWATER
•................. - - -.
PROCESS MINEIDEWATERING _WASTEWATER
GENERAL PERMIT No.:NCGO20000
"�. Rcp4�tY f111:;Vmtrt utrr titt h trge ttiuititoTing duty nn 1hi fvrrn {ttlCludtn N�` F, la1s -and Nv.Diis'l;urge astd Primsf I iraaii Vsvfr,ltu ,) by ibfARGI f -of e7tc h ye ss ff
iiuve l3¢rut.ti tolatioris, you inusf ilid haye:turned iii a: Llhiit diijl6tiurt i]1fIt,tii. oiti local Re o,ritt! Ufiicv'ivithrri b:drt� e,of:iectiyii ,An1{Ile_rc cult5'fzutn a,l.ub
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCGO20 Z G SAMPLE C©Li.ECTION YEAR: •Z�ilk ^
FACILITYNAME: i- jm7n.5 rz --- COUNTY: ra t r rat
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPL'..Sl A 2�Lt PHONF: NO. (�l
CERTIFIIi l)1:A16ORATOItY: I ACF =GA7. Lab it '7 ADD TO LISTSERVIE7 YE.4 ❑ CIO❑ EMAIL.
LA&ZOAJ tJ LHb 0 -_—
LINUT VIOLATIONS? YES ElNO ❑ �TDUSTRIAL SAND'? ❑ DISCHARGING TO SA WATEiLSR? 0
-Sample".. .... '., toie4l Saspr }c3etl 'ftithlci ty.
U►tt1a11 iVo.�'Cnlleetecll ..... ' ..'.�'4tal Flow :: ... �' ='-$slide`.. SeEtleulsleSc►Jitis pH..: ;: F'ecnl.l.,olsYorrtt�
rntldd/yr :.: MG tugli ; ;' TU Writs >, Sttindard collml,
.. .
I NPfl ci :.0t 1 No atS t ZO I Lt I I 1 11
I iNVM3 •-ai 1 =3 / .7 / i 4 1 0."72,doz_'0 I N 9 I 1 i: 13 1 io, ci 1 7. --3/. I I
lNF;J-"7•-at i P /iIV IH 1 017it ,IVLA 1 Gz, 3 1 r K `i' i t ri.n t 1 -- &435 i i
0.--? £ /Vv; 0 1 1/5. c>
All mines must monitor WW discharues for TSS. Only imlustrial sand mine discharges are subiect to TSS limits
' If an effluent limit is exceeded, the permittee is required to institute monthly mollltoring for that parameter for the reinttining permit term.
The discharge shall not cause: an instftntnneous measurentent of the twhidity of the receiving water to exceed: 10 NTU for frv-shwater streams, lakes. and reservoirs
de;.cignated as trout waters; 25 ILTU for all Jake; and reservoirs. and all suit waters; 50 NTU for all other stmarns and surface waters. Turbidity may be monitored at the
Stormwater I]iwhargc Outfail. Alternatively, the pcmiittec may choosc to monitor turbidity in the receiving water, directly upstream and downstream or the discharge.
3 Only facilities discharging to SA waters are required to monitor for Fecal coliforms.
Permit Date: 1f1/201t1-12r3112014 last Revised 01-21-11
Page 1 of')

'art A Continued: Wastewater Monitoring Re uirements
1? ate Sample 7 utti#blow fatal Si apendc�d Purb;d�ty9
(Jutlall No ('oltected� :: `,'.So lidsSettleable tio#ids pH Fecat:Colllorniti
;'.mr-ii/dd/yr . a4EG . rngfl '::. NTI! ml/l . Standard cnl/mt
MAR ORIGINA 1, AND ONE. COPY.OF THIS ANNUAL SUMMARY (INCLUDING ALL "NO FLOW", "NO DISCHARGE" & LIMIT
VIOLATIONS) BY MARCH I OF EACH YEAR TO:
Division of 'Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[phone]
YpU :f UT' $IG,YI TAIL} CERTIFICATION FOR ANY L) FORMATION S PO TED.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all umichments were prepared under sty direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
I aim aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the pcwslbility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permittee)
Permit hate: 1/l/2010-12/31f2014
(Elate)
Last Revised 01-21-11
Page 2 of 2

ANNUAL SUMMARY DMR - WASTEWATER
SEND TO CENTRAL OFFICE
PROCESS MINFUDEIVATERING WASTEWATER
GENERAL PERMIT No. NCG020000
r* Report All Wasrrwaier discharge monitoring data tin this form (including No Flow and A'o Discharge and Permit Limit Violations) by MARCH I of each year. If
"Ou have limit Violations, you must also have turned in a Limit Violation DMR to your local Regional Office wilhin .30 dayv of receiving sample results from a lab.
CERTIFI(;ATI; OF CQ1'ERAGE NO. NCG02_Q7 `t L
FACILITY NAMi E: h7wrZt- WOOD5 :5(� 69T
PERSON COLLECTING SANIPLLS: ,lflt'tfc�- �--
CERTIFIED LABORATORY: OkcZ Lab # _ AQ -7
I.ab #
LIMTT VIOLATIONS? YES ❑ NO C✓
Part A- 'A'aslewater Monitoring Requirements
SANTf'LE COLLECTION.YEAR: —� _--
COUNTY- 3QAr4 15fl-10 All
KJONE NO, (5 M ) 43,j -O 1 15
Ann TO LISTSERNIE? VES ❑ NO❑ EMAIL: -.
INDUSTRIAL SAND'? ❑ nItiCNARC:ING 7'O SA NA'A'I'i3RS'? ❑
()utfall Nu.
Date Sample
t
Collected
Total, Flow
TOM Suspended
,
solids
Turliidil►'3
Setlleablc Solids
PH
Fecal Cul;l'urrns
mm/dcU?r
N1C
mglli~
Iti'1U 2,3nil/1
Standard
cu1/ml"
IJ D>;3-D t
1a 1
`7$ r>rtr7b
Zia. J 'n y
UP•'3z,� 30.{o
e- C. 1
7. SG
Npom-a t
07F117 c
me
/ . -5
U- 1(r.8 b I .L)
Np4?ii- t
07 /3
0 17d_�+�_
':Sj,S
v. ZY.7 b. T.7
0 ,'ZCi
-7. 75
i�iQ 1
C4 �cvt IN Z
VVZ7
ZQ i 3
i All mines mast monitor Wyk discharges for TSS. Only industrial sand mine discharges arc subject to'TSS limits.
'` If an effluent limit is exceeded, the p: rmiuce is -required to institute monthly monitoring for that parameter for the remainin€ permit tern.
'The discharge shall not cause air instantaneous measurcuiem of the turbidity of the receiving water to exceed: 10 NTU foi freshwater streams; lakes, and reservoirs
designated as trout waters; 25 NTIJ for all lakes and reservoirs, and all salt waters; 50 NTL] for all other streams and surface waters. Turbidity may be monitored at the
Starmwater T)iachargc Outfall- Altemwively, the pernrittce may chonse to monitor tut-bidiiv in the receiving walei, dircetly upstreani and downstream of the discharge
: Only facilities discharging to SA .raters are required to monitor 1m Fecal coliforrns.
Permit Dote: 1/112010-12/3112014 Last Revised 01-21-11
Page I of 2

Part A Continued; 'Wastewater Monitorine Requirements
Outfall No.Collectedl
I1ate Sample
Total Flom
Total Suspended
Solids
Turbidifv'
Settleable Solids
PH
p
I
Fecal Ca1il'nrms
inFrddd/yr
MG
mg/1 '
N 1 U '`
n102
Slandnrcl`
coUml ' —
MAIL ORIGINAL- AND ONE COPY OF THIS ANNUAL SUMMARY (INCLUDING ALL "NO FLOW", "NO DISCHARGE" & LI1 I IT
VIOLATIONS) BY MARCH I OF EACH YEAR TO:
Division of Waler Quality
Altn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
lZaleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
(919) 907-63'79
1-011,Af UST SIGN Tllf.� C ERTIFICATION FOR tIAT INFOXIIATION REPORTED:
1.1 certify, under penalty or law, that this dncument and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather acid evaluate ttte information submittal. Based on my inquiry or the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the informatioiy the information submitled is. to the best of my knowledge and relief, true, accurate, find complete.
I an3A-q•:ire that there are significant periallies for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment fur knowing violations."
(Signature. of Permittee)
Pc.nnit rate: 111/2010-121i112(114
/ r-1y
(Dale)
Last Revised 0 1 -2 1 -11
Page 2(if 2

aceAnalytical
www.peoelabsmvn
J
May 12, 2014
Mr. James Izzelc
Carolina Geological Services, Inc
P.O. Box 429
Garner, NC 27529
RE: Project: 05/07/14 WASTEWATER
Pace Project No.: 92200254
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, W 27607
[phone]
Dear Mr. Izzelc:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on May 07, 2014, This
report is a summary of the results based upon our under standing of your data quality objectives.
Please contact us if itemized quality control results are needed. These results relate only to the
samples included in this report.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kelly Dillon
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shali not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 1 of 8

0
aceAnalyiical
wwwPscefabsmrri
i
i
Project? 05/07/14 WASTEWATER
Pace Project No.: 92200254
Raleigh Certification IDs
6701 Conference Drive Raleigh, NC 27607
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 67
CERTIFICATIONS
North Carolina Bioassay Certification #: 16
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37731
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This repori shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written Consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Page 2 of 8

aceAnaIXical
wwwpacebbs.cw
t
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project: 05/D7/14 WASTEWATER
Pace Project No.: 922D0254
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Analytes
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analysts
Reported
laboratory
92200254001 HW - 1 EPA 180.1
EPJ
1
PASI-R
SM 2540D
RC
1
PAS1-R
SM 2540F
EPJ
1
PAS!-R
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Th;s report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 3 of 8

aceArralytical
wwwpacelaas cam
f
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: 05/07/14 WASTEWATER
Pace Project No.: 92200254
Sample: HW -1 Lab ID: 9220D254001 Collected:`05107114110:00
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Qualifiers
Turbidity 11.3 NTU 1.0 1
Total Suspended Solids 10.9 mg/L 2.5 1
Total Settleable Solids ND mLltlhr 0.10 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not 5e reproduced, except in full,
Date: 05/12/2014 03:33 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Paco Analytical Services, Inc.
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
(9189k3 -4984
Page 4 of 8

acmnalytical
Nwwpacelabs,com
QUALIFIERS
Project: 05/07/14 WASTEWATER
Pace Project No.: 92200254
DEFINITIONS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
6701 Conference Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PRL- Pace Reporting Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes toAzobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenyiamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride.
LABORATORIES
PASI-R Pace Analytical Services - Raleigh
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 05/12/2014 03:33 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 5 of 8

aceAnalXical
www.pacelabs.com
6701 Conference Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607
ph: (919) 834-49B4, tax: [phone]
NCWW Cert#67, NCDW Ce #37731
Chain of Custody W.O.#% K) —0-c6 H
Report Results To: Bill To:
Company: i7DLrOE ��dCQ;1C'gL S rr1
Address:
Attn: Y
Phone:
�SiY•
W
Project Reference:
Project Number:
Purchase Order #:
❑ Standard Report Delivery
❑ Rush Report Delivery (w/surcharge)
Relin ed by (signature)
R ived (s
atu )
D e
Time
Reli uished by (sign e)
Received by (sktna e)
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature)
Received by (signature)
Date
Time
Receipt Conditions (L U e Oniy)
❑ 4t0C ❑Temp: °C
Res. Chlorine:
❑ Absent ❑ Present ❑ n/a
Asti pfeserv. <2?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ n!a
Base preserv. >127
0 Yes ❑ WaUaV aof 8

Document Name: Sample Condition Upon Document Revised: April 04, 2013
it�c?CBflllc�iyl`ICal Receipt (SCUR). PaRe i oft
? ....• f tµvw.Pnewrnnr ,Document No.; Issuing Authorities;
F-RAL-CS-001-rev.02 Pace Asheville Quality Office
Client Name: -)W..
Where Received: - [] Huntersville Asheville [] Eden Raleigh
Courier (Circle): Fed Ex UPS USPS Cl€ent Commercial Pace - Other
Custody Seal on CoolerlSox Present: yes no Seats Intact., 'yes no.
Packing Material: Bubble Wrap Ie Bags V None M. Other
Circle Thermometer Used: IR Gun S .122055387T of tee: Wet Blue Norte samples on ice, 000ling "process has hegun
IR Gun B : 22065371
Temp Correction Factor: Ad ubtract
C.
Date'and Initials of person examintng
co tart 1 Pros at1 n
Corrected CoolerTem C .
p '
Biological
Tissue is Frozen: Yea. VNo( Ntg1
`�
check
Tamp should be above freezing to B°C
Comments: .
Chain of Custody Present .
Yes': ❑No
- ❑NIA
Chain.of Custody Filled Otit:
Y¢8 FiNo'
E IMA
2. '
Chain -of Custody Relinquished:,
Yee .:owo.
i3wA
3. .
Sampler Name & Signature on COC:
IRLyes :ONo
_0NIA
4,
Samptes Arrived within Hold Time:
Yus -ONO
OVA
5..
Short'Hold Tim Aral ysis {72hr);
es EINo
EltwA
6.
Rush.Turn Around Time Requested:
Oyes pNo
❑NIA
7:
Stiff€dent V01ume:
Yes CINo
❑NIA
8. '
Correct Containers Used:
XYe6 ' ONo
ONIA
9.
-Pace Containers. Used:
Yes ONO
Qwa
Containers Iritact
ley. ONO
❑wA
10,
FlItered volume -received tor(7issolved tests
©Yes Ono
XNIA
M
Sample Labels match COC: --
❑N� A
12.
-Includes dateltlrne/ID1Analysis . Matr€x:
RY-Q7jo
All containers needing preservation have been checked.
rl�Yea ❑Ne
�p
❑wa
13:
All containers neadinrg preservation are found to bo in
j"Yea ❑Na
❑M1UA
compliance with EPA recommendation.
axceptions: VOA, Golltonn, TOC, 06G, WI.ORO (water)
Yes ©No
Samples chacked for decNorination:
Yes ©No
❑wA
14:
Headspace in VOA VialsA >5mrn):
❑Yos ONO
N/A
15,
Trip Blank Present:
Ores ONO
NIA
16.
Trip Blank Custody Seals Present
❑Yes '❑No
1VwA
Pace Trip Blank Lot # if purchased),.
Client Notification! Resolution: Field Data Required?' Y :1 N
Person Contacted:- Daterrime:
Comments/ Res600n:
SCURF ISRF / p Date: �`1`� Place label here n
Rh : wo# : 92200254
Note:: WWhenenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance
samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR
Certification Of Ece (i.e out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of ternp, 'JJ1jJJ�lfJ1JJ jI
incorrect containers) 92200234
Page.7 of 8

,,'r
` _ ,.
•.
'.
t :.i;�. ,
,'t�,
t
' ��
i

a
Document Name: Sample Condition Upon
Document Revised: April 04, 2013
,� C8Afi8J'Jt1C8j
Recel t SCUR
Page 2 of 2
Document No.:
-Issujng Authorities:
"•~ "'°'
F-RAL-CS 001-ravA2
y Office
Pace Ashevjiie Qualit
r
•
��®�®�■®■�®®moo®�o���e�®®o■
Client Sara le ID s
Sample Discre anc
pH Adjustment Log for Preserved Samples,
Sample tD
Type of
Preservative
pal upon
recelpt
Date preserratlon
Adjusted
Time Preservation
Adjusted
Amount of
Preservative added
l ot#F of
Preservative
Bottle Cade Key
125. ml Plastic Unp: BP4U
250 ml Plastic Unp: BP3U
500 tnl Plastic Unp: BP2U
1 Liter Plastic Unp: BP1 U
250 ml Plastic H2SO4: BP33
250 ml Plastic HNO3: 8P3N
250 ml Plastic ZN Acetate: BP3Z
250 ml Plastic NaOH: BP3C
Wide mouthed glass jar unp: WGFU
r- ..
I Liter. Amber Unp: AGIU
40 ml VOA H2SO4: DG9S
I Liter Amber HCI: AGIH
5035 Kit VOAK
500 ml ArOar-Unp: AG2U
VPH I Gas Kit: VIGK
1 Liter Amber kSO4: AG1S
125 ml Sterile Plastic:.SP5T
250 ml Amber H2SO4: AG3S
250 ml Sterile Plastic: SP2T
250 ml Amber NH4CL: AG3A
40 ml VOA HCI: DG9H
,
40 rnl VOA Na2S203: VG9T
40 ml VOA Unp: VG9U
Page 8 of 8

219 S. Steele Sir. Cameron TestingServices, Inc. Chain of Custody
Sanford, NC 27330
Phone: [phone] NC WWIGW Cert. #654 NC PHHS Cert # 37799 US EPA NC01918 Page of
Company: G am` �JA CRF6wa tcA-
te -
Email:
W GGEO LOa% fa.YM-00. �G..�
- —
CTS lab use only
- - - -
---
.Contact: S�V ��� t �`
Phone:
.- -- �I�i 7-7q,:do r7-
•-
Sample Temp pro, .
+ 412 3 $
Address (City, Po t�f
Fax:
— - -- . -
Arrive:
y C
State, Zip)
NC Z7 � Z�
---- -
Notes:
---- —
.
Due:
i
Project:
Regulatory Rush
(YIN) (YIN)
Collected: !Name:
Signature:
Sample Information
Number of bottles
'T N N
CTS Lab
m W a-0 x
?
o E a N
Requested Analysis
ID
Sample ID
w
E_ a L @
�-
� Ln N Q J J O
Co
O
2
Preservatives: (U)npresery H(C)I H2(S)04
(Na)Thiosulfate Na(0)H (X)Other, indicate
C'TZ PAP-
-- - -
W-244A rZ'_oa G a-0
- - --
—` - - - -
i �t ee So�taS, i�+3��47�
to . a�r. 5 �J I c N Qc� So t.. t � S
01
C Z AN _ e
+o-z I+� C
t`
01
bow - t
10
03
Relin ished:
Received:
Date/Time
Rush work will regt,ire oriof approval. Additional charges will apply

Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Laboratory Report NC DENR #MA
NC PHHS #37799
'-1
Clier
- w:;:.:.:. US BRA #NC0191 S
Carolina Geological Services, Inc. CTS 141238
CRMPIHW R gula#`ory
Sample Information
1 ,$ampla�d
J. hell a te. 10/02/14 iReceirred I. Cameron Date, 10I02114
Analyses and Results
141238 41 CRMP-S — c�
02 CRMP-C ww Gr
.03 HW-1 WW Gr
SS
<0.1
mLIL
0.1
1a102114
2540 F- SS
Turbidity
1.12
NTu
0.02
1 OM2114
2130 B - Turb
TSS
— <4.17
mglL
417
10/10/14
254017 - TSS
SS
<0.1
mL -
0.1
10/02/14
2540 F - SS
Turbidity
1.31
NTu
0.02
10/02/14
2130 B - Turb
TSS
<4.17
m071-
2.5
10/10/14
2540 D - TSS
SS
<0.01
mtR
e_ 1
10/02/14
2540 F - SS
Turbidity
18.9
NTu
0.02
10/02114
2130 B - Turb
TSS
28.3
MoiL
25
10/10114
2540 D - TSS
Data
Review
Lab Technician
Report
Review
Lab Director
19 S. Stecic Str,
Sanford NC 27330
---to_//V`". ry
Date ,
a1W-
Date�._-......_..--
919-208-4240
[e-mail]

219 S. S;ee'e S.r.
Sanford, NC 2733C
ai101e. 919-208-4240
Cameron Testing Services: Inc.
NC WWI.;W Ce;t. #654 NC ?NHS Cer! M 37795 US EPA NC015!8
Chain of Custody
Page of
Company_ 5- c> jE4L
a
CiS lab use only
,Contact:
p�aee.
a©_ t7
Sampfe Temp Pre
M 0.2 4�i0984
Address (City, �Q �a�cZ�}
Fax:
T
Arrive:
State: Zip)
N Z7.5 z p :Notes
Due:
Project:
Regulatory Rush
(YIN) {Yliv}
.Collected: Name:
Signature:
Sample Infortnation
dumber of bottles
T
o 6
y ro
� n a �
`m
CTS Lab
" W a: a s,
0 o t
E O a ,;
t
°
Regyested Analysis
ID
Sample ID
@
}
r co
r
4 U
CD
Preserva'ives: (U)npresery H(C)I H2(S)O4
(Na)TNasafa:e Na(O;H (=thee, indicate
Stt1.v-(6+ff
Z
%C�:elJ
Scer33ei: Sat.r75, `ivR3��•=L
al
—%�—_
-- - --
-
--
roc SvJ Soy
CLI FIE -D
if iiq .y N
0 Z
00
t
Relinquished:
Received:
Datetrime
Rush work will require prior approval. Additional &.arges will apply

r

Cameron Testing Services, Inc. Laboratory Report
NC DENR #854
NC PHHS #37799
US EPA #NC01918
Cllent: _
Carolina Geological Services, Inc. 140989
,r
P.ry ect�
Stormwater guiatory,
Sample Information
1"Samptetrf>;
J. IzzellI. Cameron
Date 08/18/14
du
Analyses and Results
s 012,
L€a fb` S{, Sam la ID• L, a ,��q`naiyte 11y,",df�,Rfe{t a1c,1.�a E imp' Std Methods ':
nk;1?dfY�� x a.,�1!i1�Gti,IReferrenCe rt
140989 01 Severn sw Gr
02 Cofield $VV Gr
03 HW-1 Sw Gr
SS
<01
mUt_
01
08/19114
DPK
2540 F - SS
Turbidity
1.91
NTu
0.02
08/19/14
DPK
2130 B - Turb
TSS
- <12,5
rnVL
125
08/22/14
NMF
2540 D - TSS
SS
<0.1
rnuL
0.1
08119A4
DPK
254C F - SS
Turbidity
2.3
NTu
Dal
08I19114
DPK
2130B-Turb
TSS
<12.5
mgn.
12 E
08/22/14
NMF
2540 D - TSS
SS
0.1
mUL
0,1
C8119/14
DPK
2540 F - SS
Turbidity
35.5
NTU
002
08119/14
DPK
2130 B -Tirb
TSS
45-0
mgn
12.5
08/22/14
NMF
2540 D - TSS
Data
Review
an d—
Lab Technician —
Report
Review
'
Lab Dire
219 S. Swele Str.
Sanford NC 27330
Date 1
Date
919-209-4240
Lhris rcarncrunlcstin�.cnm

WATER WITHDRAWAL AND Division oNfWWater ater
r a e Resources
1611 Mali Service Canter
TRANSFER REGISTRATION R�Teigh,el:{9" 9)733-40CA
NWER_, F 33-3558
": „,....., Web: hltpJAvww.ncwater.org
1-A.
Facility Name:
1-B.
Owner Namw
t•C.
Address:
Citv:
1-0.
County:
i-F.
Contact Person:
1-R
Tetephone:
1-J.
Email: _ELT
Registration if:
State: �r�FL DID Codw
1-E. River Sub -Basin: TfItZ1.S
1•G. Title: Dk?_F�Z24=rdt;+ cs"�-.kxmu S
t-L Fax:
C0 U
;-tC 4tfatar Use YPe..Sselact one); --,.._.....................................
❑
Aflrlcultur"quaculture
❑
Industriat.metaVptastirJfibergiess mmufacaufng
❑
Agriculture -row -crop tarmirg and research
❑
IndusUial-animal processing
©
Agricuture-land drasnageM+aterfawl impoundments
❑
InduiWal-toxtae manufacturing
d
Agriculture -plant nursery
❑
industrial wuad/paper products
❑
Agrlcuitura•sod and turf production
©
Industrial -environmental ramedlation
a
Agriculture -Christmas tree production
[ Mining-minerai extraction
❑
Agriculturo-animal Production
❑
PWS-drinking water (ID#
0
Energy hydropower
❑
RecaeafKxrtemporary filing of ponds
©
Energy-pipefine testing (temporary)
❑
Recreation -golf course
©
Energy -thermal -electric (steam-electrle power, nuclear,
©
Rocreatiarsnow mating
turbine generator)
©
lndustriai•chemical and pharmaceutical
©
Recreatiorr.waWr sports
manufactunn rocessrry
ERi:;. ys j' `
.�..^:�...�. „,�'L�Y:i;
t .>; ° :' "< ix v"�� TS"F silo:
�3 Ja h:d . M`rYi<�.5
2-A. Average daity withdrawal and maximum day withdrawal by month in miUn gallons per day (MGD).
Month
# of Days
Used
Average Daily
Wlthdrawal
AAGi7
Maximum Day
Wfthdrawai
1v1G0
Month
# of Days
Average Daily
Withdrawal
MGD
Maximum Day
Withdrawal
MGD
Jan
Q
July
Feb
O
Aug
Mar
Sep
Apr
za
ao
opt
May
za
0.-18
Nov
Jun
. `7$
Dec
Q, 7
J
2-B. Ground Water information — Please complete a row for each around water withdrawal source used in 2009.
Well or Sump
Idertiifter
Latitude
(35,123456)
i
Longitude
(•77.123456)
well
Depth
{Feet)
Pump
Intake
Depth
Feet
Screen Depth
well
Diameter
{Inches)
Average
Daily
Withdrawal
MGD
# of
days
used
Purrping
Capacity
(apacli
T oP
(Feet)
Bat
(Feet)
" -22- 2.15
" - ifs
75
1
rJ A
f,1 I A
79 A{.
0.20
&
I
2-C. Surface Water Information — Please com ate a row for each surface water withdrawal source used in 2009.
` Source
Source Iderntffier
Type
Latitude Longitude
{3b.f2345&) (-77.12345fi)
Average Davy
Withdrawal
MGD
# of
days Sub -Basin
used I
Pumping .
Capacity
MGD
I
f
I
{
` Source Type — Choose one of the foliowing: lake, Pond, Quarry, Reservoir, River, or Stream.

3-A. Enter the avaraae daily amaurn of water c0scharnad each month in million nallans nor day iM GD1.
Month
# of Days
Discharged
Average Daily
Discharge
MGD
Maximum Day
Discharge
(MOD)MGID
I Month
# of Days
Discharged
Average Daily
Discharge
Maximum Day
Discharge
(MOD)
Jan
0
6
©
July
D
Qw � $
d, 7 o
Feb
Q
Aug
2,0
Mar
(�
Q
Sep
Ali
`��
d, 7
Apr
1i0
; 7�
. 7
Z0
7
may
12A
J, 77
& A
NOv
77�1
.tun
If
Del
/'. ��
�� 77J
3-8. Please complete a row for each discharae method.
Identifier or
Permit Number
' Discharget
Type
alltude
(35.123456)
i pngitude
(-77,12345E)
f Average Dally
I Discharge MGD)
# of
Days
Used
Sub Sarin
Permitted
Capacity
Mt3p
Di,Y,fiA
' . 77_- s
.7� - c? - 4G
' Discharge Type - Choose one of the following: Discharge, Hydropower, Land Application, Subsurface, or To Mother System.
SAgNTRANs£ER
Complete this sWIon it you withdraw at purchase water that is aM returned to the riwsr sub-t a In from which It waa wirithdratton,
o-a mease compete a row Tor earn transter oT surface water
rrom one su"asin to anotner.
Description of Transfer
Sour" Sub -Basin
Receiving Suit -Basin
Daily Transfer
Capacity
MGf3
i t
4-B. Enter the averaoa deity and maximum rtau surface water transfer amnunts by month in miltinn nallahs ner claw 1MGfW
Transferred # of Days
Average Dally
Average
Transfer
MGD
Maximum Day
Transfer
hIGD
Month
# of Days Transferred
Average i7aify
Transfer
MGD
Maximum Day
Transfer
MGD
Jan
Juty
Feb
Aug
i
Mar
Sep
Apr
fjpt
May
Noy
Jun
Dec
li latitude and longitude are unknown terr any water wlthdrawa4 or discharge focatlon Rated above please submit a map clearly
madang and labeling all water wfthdrawd and discharge locations on an appropriate US GeolooW Survey topographic map or a
comparable map.
Do you have any comments?
PRINTITYP£ Name of Person Registering signature Data

Print this form to PDF Return PDF of this form to DLR CO by email. cc DLR RO and DWO SPU
MINING PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
for the
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
THIS SECTION TO BE FILLED OUT BY DLR;
Project Name: Howell Woods Sand Mine DLR Permit #: 51-35 County: Johnston Address:_
ncgeologY(c�hotmail.com
YES NO Date Commencin�lc
Is this mine a new mine? f . r 2001
Have land disturbing activities
started? Date? r 2001
Latitude:35.3792 Longitude:-78,2861
Please return comments to (at DLR CO): Judy Wehner
Comments due b : 715111
SECTION BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY DWQ:
Is the RO concerned that the operation, as proposed, would violate standards of water quality? yes
Comments: A site visit was conducted by DWQ for this facility. This mine is currently discharging into
wetlands which requires a NCG020000 permit. An NOV will be issued for discharge without a permit.
Watershed/Stream Name & Classification: Mill Creek - Neuse River
DWQ Compliance Status of Mine: Not Compiant
1 YES NO
I NPDES permit existing? 11771 - (Permit # ) I r
r.
Should permittee contact DWQ RO
immediately? (e.g. to schedule a site visit if n - RO Contact Name: r
mine has already begun digging or is Contact Reason:
dewatering without DWQ permit)
401 Wetland Cert, required? 1J
401 Wetland Cert. existing? 17 Permit # r
Does DWQ RO currently have enough r t urrentl, no 40r1 is re aired but
information #o determine if a 401 road improvements andlmine expansion CJ
ertifcation is required? would.most.lilcel re uiETaI40�1.
Rev September 2010

Print this form to PDF
Return PDF of this form to DLR CO by email. cc DLR RO and DWQ SPU
YES NO
Are wetlands disturbed at this site? ` ` �
inor.sediment de osition:at the
I"i �
a ° a
outlet. r
Does DWQ RO suspect or know of nearby
I—,
wetlands to the site?
`Is a wetland'delineation required prior to
�i , r� , r� ,
By: 0JD or onsultant
�' .2
elineation
complete
DWQ issuing' permit?
nsite? Or ffsit-
accordina to DLR
Stream Determination Needed?
r'
Stream Determination Completed? •
r+ • r V
r Y
Does DWQ RO need a statement that no
wetlands/streams are disturbed
for this project from applicant?
-Determination Needed?
,Buffer
Buffer Determination Completed?
7,
Recycle systerffiermit.ezisting?*` -
Permit's#- ' -.: " °° a. ,
9
"'" - T
New Recycle System permit required?*
r,
17
Enough information to determine?
„. tfb n -., ,. � -
Non-disch rge'permit eXistittg7* : . , °;°it
�i Perm
Will wastewaters discharge to HOW waters
n
7Q10
Unknown (permittee determine): I"
with a 7Q10=0? **
Flow:
b�'• 00 'btC,VC wT�C $•-0�4 G6°e a"A1m On'W,p 4i0 0�0-oe
rC O'ft'"•' �-O cV'. moe oro .��p ApO
�. C i'+ Cr e'IaA`
,�,q ,6 Qo �
r ' O&M Requirementsg
_y[VRee'
r`Oges vWQskiclluir'e-QUI ., _1h6lL�-'illy>FGrni2iPw'°
e a+ m ?'
¢���
8 °c 6-&. o ff' i & �,.
. r' i �g�nQ*r{)?isoFiGErrl59 �+
o :
md?^, 8 .
° s °
,(e g.tso DW,Q,canGievlew-rrtirfurthervoray a.
of ,.
rJ ;Others) -Reason
-r
because"DWQ,r�quires more'��i�formation)?�,*
`t0 cantact:'��` �a� m '' '� ° °d°"°
'�0� p ° .
e r3�pr�' bar &�eo ea
hS - 'SCE �°`�9� �tv 'b au
s *O
Sn
�a-C�-r`ep--ctE�.
7 £ �-
opYld Until NCGOQ00permit t_s°g�sf�
seW6 m��e am o
a.• a
al•e .fie �[
ine
Mine must wait to dewater until an 08M
rt
r
plan is approved?
"The NPDES S Wand WW permit NCG020000 covers closed -loop recycle systems, designed to exclude all stormwater run-off from
the system and o erate at or below two -feet of freeboard. Theses stems Tay be permitted by a Non -discharge Recycle System
Permit from the A uifer Protection Section LAPS), OR may instead be permitted under NCGO20000 to eliminate an additional Vermit.
Recvcle systems that do not meet those criteria are considered discharaina systems, and are subiect to the NCG020000 discharge
permit.
"To obtain 7Q10 flows, permittees must contact the DWQ Stormwater Permitting Unit. if DWQ does not have a flow estimate for a
specific strearn, permittees will be asked to obtain one. Permittees should contact J. Curtis Weaver at the USGS: 919-571-4043, for
more information on obtaining a 7Q10 flow. USGS will not determine a 7Q10 flow for tidally influenced water bodies.
Reviewed by:
DWQ RO Surface Water: Lauren Witherspoon Regional Office: RRO Date: 717111
RO Aquifer Protection Section: Regional Office: Date:
SPU DWQ Central Office Reviewer (if applicable):
Rev September 2010

�J
CLOSE OUT REPORT
HOWELL WOODS
WETLAND RES'rORATION
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 183)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department. of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by/Monitoring Performer:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
20 Enterprise St. Suite 7
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Design Firm:
EcoScience Corporation
101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27592
Os stern
Ei l ement
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
September 2010

•
•
•
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction..........................................................
2.0 Project Goals ........................................................
3.0 Project Structures and Objectives ..........................
4.0 Groundwater Wetland Degradation Model ............
5.0 Vegetation............................................................
Background Information ................................................
Success Criteria.............................................................
Results..........................................................................
6.0 Wetlands....... ............ ............................. ____ ....
Background Information ................................................
Success Criteria.............................................................
Results..........................................................................
7.0 References............................................................
List of Tables
Table 1. Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives ...............................................
Table 2. Groundwater Model Results........................................................................
Table 3. Preconstruction Ditches (Average Ditch Depths) .........................................
Table 4. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary .............................................
Table/Graph 5.....................................................................................
2007 Onsite Climatic Data_vs._30-year Historic Data .................................................
Table 6. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Preconstruction through 2010
Attachments
Attachment A. Figures
Figure A 1.
Site Location
Figure A2.
Preconstruction Conditions
Figure A3.
Revised Mitigation Units
Figure A4.
2006/2007 Drought Maps
Attachment B. As
-built Construction Figures
Figure 5.
Wetland Restoration Activities
Figure S.
Planting Areas 2000
Figure 9.
Planting Areas 2002
Attachment C. Preconstruction Gauge Location Maps
Figure A.
Well Locations (1999)
Figure B.
Well Locations (2000)
Figurc C.
Wcl l Locations (2001)
Figure D.
Well Locations (2002)
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Inc.
h E P Project Number 183
Johnston County, North Carolina
4
4
.....4
6
7
7
9
... 10
... 10
... 13
.5
.6
.6
.S
12
Closeout Report
September 2010
page 3

1.4 Introduction HOWELL WOODS CLOSEOUT REPORT
The Howell Woods Wetland Restoration Site (Site) is located within United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03020201 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] subbasin 03-
04-04) of' the Neuse River Basin. The Site includes an approximately 140-acre tract, located 8.5 miles
southeast of the Town of Smithfield in southern Johnston County (Figure A 1, Attachment A). The Site is
contained within an approximately 2000-acre tract of land managed by Johnston County Community
College as part of the Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center. This report summarizes
monitoring of the Site over an eight year period from 2002 to 2009.
2.0 Proiect Goals
The primary goals of the project included the following.
l . Enhance water duality functions in the Gat- Gut Creek and Mill Creek watersheds.
2. Reestablish a functioning backwater slough system, which extends through developing
bottomland hardwood forests.
3. Restore riverine wetlands through canal/ditch backfilling/plugging,
4. Create additional wetlands by excavating a littoral shelf.
5. Provide educational opportunities to show the importance of wetlands for water quality.
6. Maximize the area returned to historic wetland function and hydroperiods.
3.0 Project Structures and Objectives
® Prior to construction activities the Site was characterized by agriculture, fallow fields, and forest
communities located at the outer edge of the primary Neuse River floodplain and its adjacent terrace. The
primary restoration feature at the Site consisted of an approximately 5400-linear foot dredged and
straightened canal, man-made ponds, and five secondary ditches that effectively drained a portion of the
Site and based on DRAINMOD modeling dramatically reduced wetland hydrology within the remainder
of the Site (Figure A2, Attachment A). The canal was dredged along the toe of slope at titre outer
floodplain edge. This area historically supported a backwater slough, as evidenced by relict channel
reaches within forested sections of the Site situated adjacent to the excavated canal.
Land use activities in the drainage area and adjacent tracts are limited due to frequent flooding from the
Neuse River and poorly .drained soils. Onsite land use was characterized by farming (agricultural row
crops), hunting, and recreational activities associated with tite Howell Woods Environmctital Learning
Center.
Restoration activities at the Site entailed the following (sec Figures 5 and 8-9 from the As -built
Construction Plan, Attachment B).
1) ditch cleaning prior to backfill,
2) impervious ditch plug construction,
3) ditchIcanal backfilling,
4) access road improvements,
5) littoral shelf creation,
6) pond .outfall structural upgrades,
7) redirecting stream flows into relict channel reaches in the forested southern portion of the Site,
and
8) restoring surface water flows through the abandoned backwater slough using passive stream
restoration in northern portions of the Site.
Howell Woods ftxiom Environmental, Inc. Closeout Report
EEP Project Number 183 September 2010
Johnston County, North Carolina page 4

. At the time of project completion, stream restoration projects entailed traditional alterations to channel
dimension, pattern, and profile, as outlined in Applied River h4orphoing4, (Rosgen 1996). However,
recent guidance (USACE et al. 2005, 2007) for the restoration of backwater sloughs in low -slope settings
(outer Coastal Plain) indicates that stream restoration may be achieved through the reestablishment of
braided stream morphology through passive measures, including ditch filling and natural progression of
the stream through historic sloughs, braids, and channels. Under this scenario, stream restoration success
criteria may include the successful restoration of hydrology within areas previously drained by ditching or
other hydrology alterations. Using this guidance, approximately 5253 linear feet of backwater slough
stream channel has been enhanced (level 11) (at a minimum) within the Site (Figure A3, Attachment A).
0
Wetland restoration acreages and locations were determined in the October 2001 Detailed Wetland
Restoration Plan. Wetland restoration areas were defined as portions of the Site that were hydrologically
impacted (hydrology below 12 inches of the ground surface for most of the growing season) by drainage
ditch excavation. Wetland restoration areas were determined utilizing DRAINMOD computer
simulations to predict the effect Site drainage features had on adjacent groundwater tables. However, the
abandoned backwater slough channel, which served as an
approximately 2 to 3 foot deep drainage feature prior to � t ` July 7,2�
' ' v
restoration aC11VIt1e5, was not included in the original 1 �' •• r
Downstream
�' S :`' Swan Pond.
DRAINMOD model simulations. Utilizing drainage effect site construe
estimates from the October 2001 Detailed Welland
��" reach was a6:
Restoration Plan, the abandoned backwater slough channel ;•! .: nc� cnna�
_ originally re.
drained an additional 10 acres of' wetland at the Site prior to stream Wows
restoration activities. These revised acreages are depicted on _
Figure A3 (Attachment A) and are described in the following
table (Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives). The
DRAINMOD wetland degradation model is Further explained
in the next section of this document.
Table 1. Projject Mitigation Structures and Objectives
Project 1\amcli\fumber: Howell Woods EEP Project Number 183)
Segment or
Mitigation
Revised Linear
Mitigation
Comment
Reach ID
Type"
Footage or Acreage
Units
Restored forested wetlands to areas effectively
Howell Woods
R (Riparian)
38.6 acres
38.6
drained by historic ditch/canal
Howell Woods
R (Riparian)
4.8 acres
4.8
Restored freshwater marsh to areas effectively
drained by historic ditch/canal
Enhanced forested wetlands to areas with
Howell Woods
E (Riparian)
71.3 acres
35.7
hydrology effected by ditcheslcanaf, but not
drained below jurisdictional threshold
Flowell Woods
C (Riparian)
3.4 acres
1.1
Littoral shelf excavation
Totals
80.2 WNI Us
Passive backwater slough restoration by
Swan Pond
Ell
5253 feet*
2101
redirecting stream flows into the historic channel
Totals
2101 SNI Us
Howell Woods Nutrient Offset 1,0 acre
1.0 Planting of native forest ve *etation.
Totals
1.0 Nutrient Offset MUs
* Liircar footage based on clown valley distance of the braided stream channel based on inter agency guidance (USACE et. al. 2005, 2007)
**R = Restoration
E = Enhanccrncnt
Ell — Enhancement (Level 11)
® C = Creation
Flowell Woods Aviont Environmental, Inc C'Joseout Report
EEP Project Number 183 September 2010
Johnston County, North Carolina page 5

EJ
0
4.0 Groundwater Wetland Dey_radation Model
A wetland degradation model was utilized during detailed planning to forecast the maximum zone of
ditch influence based on reference wetland hydroperiods (NCWRP & EcoScience 2001). In Chastain
soils, the model predicted that the reference hydroperiod (30% of the growing season) is expected to be
adversely impacted throughout and beyond the boundaries of the Site. Model simulations indicated that
ditches effectively eliminate groundwater driven wetlands at distances ranging from 38 to 132 feet from
onsite ditches ( l to 8-foot deep ditches).
Based on results of groundwater modeling and data collected from reference gauges it was concluded that
Site canals and ditches effectively drained adjacent ]and below jurisdictional thresholds. Prior to
construction these areas were considered uplands characterized by hydric soils and a lack of hydrology.
In addition, modeling results suggested that the drainage influence of Site canals and ditches adversely
impacted the entire Site. Therefore, even though areas of the Site were still considered to be jurisdictional
wetlands they were greatly altered from reference conditions by a dramatically decreased wetland
hydroperiod.
Table 2 summarizes results from groundwater modeling completed during the detailed design phase of
this project. Table 3 gives the average ditch depths of the channclized main canal (Swan Pond), the
abandoned reach of Swan Pond, and five additional ditches located on the Site prior to construction
(Figure A2, Attachment A).
Table 2. Groundwater Model Results
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods
EEP Project Number 183
Forested Stages (10+ years of restoration)
Ditch Depth (feet)
Wetland Hydroperiod (% of growing season)
0-50/,
5-12.50/,
Zone of Influence (feet)*
1
8.5
38
2
17.5
58
3
25
75
4
32.5
90
6
50
115
8
65
132
* The zone of intlucnce is equal to'/x of the modeled ditch spacing.
Table 3. Preconstruction Ditches (Average Ditch Depths)
Project Name/Nunlber: Howell Woods EEP Project Number 183)
Ditch
Average Ditch Depth (feet)
1
5.0
2
4.0
3
5.5
4
5.0
5
1.0
Main Canal (Swan Pond)
5.0
Abandoned (teach of Swan Pond
3.0
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Inc.
UP Project Number 183
Johnston Comity, North Carolina
Closeout Report
September 2010
page 6

•
5.0 Vegetation
Background Information
In the fall of 2001, vegetation monitoring plots were randomly established within the Site. Each sample
plot was composed of two-300-foot transects extending from a central point, usually a groundwater
monitoring gauge. The Site was monitored for the as -built and the 2002 (year 1) growing season utilizing
this methodology with vegetation success achieved.
During the 2003 (year 2) monitoring period, North Carolina State University implemented a revised
vegetation monitoring procedure based on the Draft Vegetation Monitoi-ing Plan fbr NCPVIZP Riparian
Buffer and Wetland Restoralion Projects document (undated). Five-10 meter square plots were
established and permanently marked with pipe. The location of each vegetation monitoring plot is
depicted on Figure A3. These plots were surveyed for .four monitoring seasons using this methodology.
Due to the revised monitoring protocol during the second year of vegetation surveys, no comparisons of
as -built or 2002 (year I) can be made to the subsequent monitoring years. Therefore, planted species
have been based upon previous annual monitoring reports and percent survival is based on a comparison
of 2003 (year 2) totals, where possible. The phased vegetation monitoring schedule made it difficult to
determine planted trees from naturally recruited trees; therefore, the number of "planted" species was
based on the experience and judgment of the monitoring team, and counts for planted species may be
influenced by naturally recruited stems.
Success Criteria
Success criteria dictated an average density of' 320 stems per acre must be surviving in the first three
monitoring years. Subsequently, 290 Character Tree Species per acre must be surviving in year 4 and 260
Character Tree Species per acre in year 5. Five vegetation plots had been previously established by North
Carolina State University. The plots are 10 meters square and arc located randomly within the Site.
Results from vegetation surveys exceeded success criteria with 346, 1806, 1401, and 1 101 planted stems
per acre present in years 2 through 5, respectively; with an increase in species diversity over the
monitoring period. Vegetation surveys were completed in year 5 and no data was collected in subsequent
years.
Results
Results from vegetation surveys exceeded success criteria with 346, 1806, 1401, and 1 101 planted stems
per acre present in years 2 through 5, respectively with an increase in species diversity over the 5-year
monitoring period (see the following table, which summarizes results). Vegetation surveys were
completed in year 5 and no data was collected in subsequent monitoring years with the exception of
photographs; photographs for year 8 (2009) follow. Vegetation problems were not present after the
eighth monitoring year. Based on these results, Site vegetation should be considered successful.
Howell Woods Ariom Environmental, Inc. Closeout Itepurt
EEP Project Number 183 September 2010
Johnston County, worth Carolina page 7

0
Table 4. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EEP Project Number 183)
Species
Year I
(2002)
Totals*
Year 2
(21103)
Totals
Year 3
(2004)
Totals
Year 4
(2005)
Totals
Year 5
(2006)
Totals
%
Survival
Ce ludevahus occiderualis
Q
w
Q
0
0
0
0
Cralac rns se.
0
0
8
Dias > yrus viqgioiiana
*
0
0
2
Fraxinu.+ pennsvlvanica
22
21
28
19
86
Ilex decidilas
"
0
0
1
Plalanus oc•cielenlcrlis
4
3
3
5
125
Pry rrlus heteru Irvlla
"
0
0
1
rtercus lvrala
ti
0
0
1
--
uercus ni gra
I
I
I
fi
0
uerc•trs Pagoda
4
5
4
CO
uercrts lrellus
7
7
6
_
! 8
114
ttercav s .
�.�
0
0
2
--
Tavuclitrtn dislichum
I
1
1
2
200
Ultnuv cuneric-ana
*
0
0
1
Ul►rrus rubra
*
0
0
4
Ulnrus s .
*
185
130
80
Total Stems Per Plot
45*
223
173
136
Stems Per Acre
364
1806
1401
1101
* - Historical project dOCllrnetlt- necessary to provide this duct+ were unaVailable.
I•lowell Woods Axiutn Environmental, Ito•. Closcuut Report
EEP Project Number 183 September 2010
Johnston County, North Carolina page 8

•
n
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Taken July 2009
6.0 Wetlands
Background Information
Prior to construction ten groundwater monitoring gauges (nine within the Site and one reference) were
maintained and monitored in 1999. Following floods resulting from several hurricanes in the fall of 1999
these gauges were removed and twelve groundwater monitoring gauges were maintained and monitored
prior to construction through 2010. Construction at the Site occurred from June 18-July 26, 2002;
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Inc Closeout Report
EEP Project Number 183 September 2010
Johnston County, North Carolina page 9

0 0 0

• therefore, data collected from 1999-2002 was collected prior to construction for comparison to post -
construction data collected from 2003-2010. In addition, two reference gauges, installed prior to 2002,
are located within the reference wetlands immediately northwest of the Site.
LJ
•
Site wetlands are comprised of Wehadkee-Chastain soils (Topic Fluvaquents) that consist of poorly
drained soils on broad floodplains that are frequently flooded. Wchadkee soils are typically found near
stream channels, are moderately permeable, and comprised of loam to approximately 18 inches. Chastain
soils are typically found at the base of uplands, in slack -water areas, and in sloughs, and are characterized
by slowly permeable soils comprised of a surface layer of silty clay and a subsoil of clay.
Success Criteria
Success criteria based on the 2001 Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Design Plan will be evaluated two
ways.
1) During years with average rainfall wetland hydrology will require inundation or saturation within
12 inches of the ground surface for a consecutive period of 12.5 percent (28 days) of the growing
season. The growing season in Johnston County begins March 21 and ends November 4 (229
days). Upper landscape reaches and hummocks within wetland areas that exhibit surface
saturation/ inundation between 5 and 12.5 percent of the growing season can be classified as
wetlands depending upon factors such as the presence of hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils.
OR
2)
Alternatively, hydrology success criteria may be evaluated by comparison to DRAINMOD
estimates of growing season saturation and groundwater gauge data between the wetland
restoration areas and the reference wetland. Specifically, DRAINMOD estimates indicate that the
Site is expected to be saturated within 12 inches of the soil surface for 30% (68 days) of the
growing season. In addition, reference gauge data indicate saturation within 12 inches of the soil
surface for 23% (53 days) of the growing season. If the Site exceeds 75% of the hydroperiod
exhibited by DRAINMOD and/or references gauges, restoration credit will be requested from
regulatory agencies. I ,
Results
All groundwater gauges have a presence of
hydrophytic wetland vegetation and hydric soils
based on criteria set forth in the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental
Laboratory 1987). Groundwater hydrology data is
sparse for 2003-2005; however, all gauges met
hydrology success criteria in from 2006-2010 with
the exception of Gauge 2 in 2007 and Gauge 3 in
2006 and 2007.
Gauges 2 and 3 are located within hydric Chastain"
soils, which are predominantly comprised of
impermeable clay. These soils are primarily flooded
by surface flooding with subsequent ponding of water. Hydraulic conductivity (slug) tests conducted
within the Site during detailed restoration planning confirmed very slow hydraulic conductivity rates
within Site soils especially along the outer extents of the floodplain as a result of surface and subsurface
clay content. During drought years these soils will be affected to a greater extent due to a lack of surface
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Inc. Closeout Report
EEP Project Number 183 September 2010
Johnston County, North Carolina page 10

•
11
0

flooding and will take longer to recover from extended periods of drought such as the drought
experienced in 2006-2007,
Onsite rainfall data for the 2006 monitoring season is unavailable; however, the season started off
abnormally dry and remained that way for most of 2006 and 2007 as indicated by the drought maps in
Figure A4 (Attachment A). The 2007 monitoring season was extremely dry with half of the 30-year
historic normal rainfall. A table and graph of 2007 rainfall data collected from an onsite rain gauge and
30-year historic rain data collected from a nearly station in Smithfield, North Carolina are included below
(NOAA 2004).
Table/Graph 5.
2007 Onsite Climatic Data
VS.
30-year Historic Data
Month
2007 Data
Mean 30-year
Historical
January
3.14
4.24
February
2.52
3.66
March
2.02
4.57
April
1.34
3.24
May
0.76
4.16
June
0.63
4,14
July
2.52
5.14
August
1.07
4.59
Se tmber
3.25
4.54
October
5.51
3.16
Totals
22.76
41.43
January February March April May June July August Septmber October
O 2007 Data W Mean 30-vear Historical
Table 6 gives groundwater for the Site prior to construction from 1999-2002 and after construction from
2003-2010. Data collected shows an increase in the wetland hydroperiod averaging 25% (ranging from 5-
60% increase) at all gauges with the exception of Gauges 2 and 3. In addition, significant uplift in
wetland enhancement areas resulted from the project as evidenced by increased hydroperiod in areas
outside of the jurisdictional effect of preconstruction ditches. The hydroperiod within enhancement areas
(Gauges 4, 7, 10, and 1 1) increased from less than 12.5% of the growing season prior to construction to
greater than 20-30% of the growing season after mitigation activities. Based on all available onsite data
(groundwater gauge data, Reference gauge data, DRAINMOD predictions, and historic rainfall
information), groundwater wetland hydrology at the Site should be considered successful.
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Ine- Closeout Report
EEP Project Number 183 September 2010
Johnston County, North Carolina pate I 1

0 0 0
Smius Criteria l Donny )ran %kih a,crage rmofall wetland hydrology well rryLnre Llalndat1.n or unrran+n within 12 Innis of the pond ,muse
Table b. Nnmmsn of Gronadvs stew Gauge Results For Prearonstructian through 2010
fa a CIMx %31111e pcnUd of 12 A rkTwnt 418 days) of the growing season Tile growing Yawn in Johnston C.wmt%begins Mar'h 21 and enlis No,emhet
4 f224 days) Upper Iunld,Lap,- ruches and hurmnoco, within wetland mess that r%Ntmi surfaLv aalLaatnrl imnda im hctuccm Sand 12.5 pa"mt a IN-,-
Project 1amelVumber• Howell Hoods IEEP Project Number 11L31
yr-ng >•<as.xt can iar .t,..sq� r1 ay x.Llwd+.lcp`e.1,ng u fan.°s �rh as n.e pr`.¢ner .,f h}a1r.gMlyue v.teelunm and kydn. swl.
I - Sac L`Wlanalmmi did ma ocL Lntl) Jae I N-July 26. 2002: Ihae&re, gauge dau 1 n-' cd fm,ur 1 121*211, prl UI,rI[1+11UI J u
OR
2 - D Aa hr Mist .1 dw- er 1 ul Illr gn-ing . j,oti wa<
Saeees Crilerla 2 AlknialiwK. 11Ndrialop a-,, mtcna may b,' naluatcd b% .votjmr-v tL. DRAINMUD c flrrours of p[owtng reasrw smlratlen
3 - liraph is Lnncllaled in the yvar.112091 reptxt lily L of the Inftmii� gatg<,. how ... T. 1t tors the lndicuic which one
and grWildwaLT ga.gc daW I1L'iwe'erl the N'L'tiand R.1+1ra[Itr4 area) Jnd ills` ref aeMl• w�tLvnl SpceltivallN. DRAINMUD r`f71lIHLC3 iflGtitl[G Shat If► Slit
4 - li:WgLs nalflrnLVLawJ fur L(1e firs x•,ersl months UT Lhc grmLsng seasurt
is cap lecd to be .itian" within I: 1L1.h- .,t th soil -race rm 3(r. 16a da).1 of the lar"ing Nisi in aklin.xt mtro V gang. Bala irki-[c
5 . Claugr data was Lkownluada`d throLlgh Augu,t _'6. _'OIU
sarurmlLm wLLlun I: i11t'hts of ncv atxl ,rlrfwc kx 23°. (53 day',1 of the growing +sawn It IM 511c csLXW, 75°. Irf it, by hof mod cahit itcd by
• - thilmc dL'sL'nptnms are difterrnl fur 19W the. oItk, Near- bLz':u.,c gauges win 4lmK d by humrark. in th, fall and weir rm",d from the Site
DRAINMOD and m refcre-mes puW,. re5ft1rwim LTedlt will b,- ro4ac- tcd lion1 R'61' IlatRy :Igv'nll.'t
and r,•pland In dntTmani l calims in 20a1. s w hgurc in Anw lviwnt 1) fur gauge locations In 19" Data Firmrired in Lhn table Is from tlr
Mgmning of the growing w ,vn and dlsrceards humcancs that mcamil m the fall of !slut)
%'.I- Nay 111 a,m--d m t1m and I• LLx1I f w c[n m for 2000 and 2001 data
PRECONSTRUCTION GAUGE DATA POST'CONSTRLCTION GAUGE DATA
Historic
w
Description
SerFaE
Number
Success Criteria K 1 Achlevedltiuccess Criteria s2 Achieved/Mali Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percrulake)
19"
2000
I001
20021
Year 2 2W3'
rear 3 2UIN `
fear 4 J SWS
Yrar 5(2006)RYear
6 2007
Year 7(100111),Year
200
fear 9 (20IU1`
YivNo
Yc'sN,-
Yr,Ycs
Yes No
Y'esYcs.'
Yc%Yc,
No No
Yes Yes
1
RDSA
113f10EA4
-
No Data
No C)ata
No Data
•]2.5°'°
.12.51
I'_.5°°
34LIuv,1I4.80-61
43dd.II8.R°.1
fs4+1:Ly+127°t°,II
.'_ dal" f9.(°.,)
.iBdap, IIh.6°'.I
_
RDSB
113 1'_B26
<L No ` 4°„
Ycs No
N es N,�
Yes Yes
No Data
No Data
MAlfunctlLmL•d°
Nu Na
N."m
No No
No; No
No No,
(RDSFI a
._ 1_.5°�'
�I'S"•�
1_S° .
i
_5da,r{I1(i°'.)
10days 144 I
%
Ilday�l5".I
_NLB IE_.2°-°
2 1 days 19.2".I
_
RDSC'
86517N11
__
No Nu
N+L NI.
No No •
No Data
No Date
MaltunttlonLaf'
No No
N yNo,
No No
NNNN
No'No
1 5-12.5%
51.
1
8 days 13.91.1
8 da c (3.9 %j
I I dais 15 °.1
22 da%% 0.61.)
17 days 7.4".1
No(Nov
NaNu
No No
Ym Ycs
Yes Ycs'
Yes Yew
Yes Yes
YmYLs
4
1N1`6
665131 S
I
No Data
No Data
No Data
0%
5-12.51.
. 51.
76 davL 133 2%)
66 da J2K.N'.i
KU da%N 1-4 le.)
MY days (47,6°.)
100 da a 443-7%)
NLYNa
NwWo
No No
Yaa Yea
Yes/Ycs
Ye, Yes
Yea Ycs
Yes'Yes
5
FNF'S
EBD3BE3
-
No D:ua
No Data
No Data
<5%
5°.
0°.
229 days (100 x-.1
KU dan 134.9 1.1
% days 141.9%)
217 days (941%1
111 days t48.51.)
6
RDSD
B684FBY
-
NdNul
NolNcv
NoNu,
No Data
No Data
MaifunetiOneda
Yes No
Yn Yes
Ycs No
Yes. Ycs
Ycs Yes
5-115%
5.12.5°'.
r5%
33 days 14.4 "'n)
47 days 420.5 °.l
35 da s 115.3".1
92 shwa 435-8°.1
4N daNs t? I-U°'.i
INF1
NoNo.
NoNo
No'Noi
Yes Yes
Yes NA
Yes:Yes
Yta Yea
Ycs Yes
Yes Yes
Yea Yea
7
EBDK5(.'9
-
No Data
JG6
•. 5%
•_5%
Ml.
73 days 131.91.I
36 days t 15. 7 %1
168 da . 173.4 %1
68 da s 129.7 "61
K2 days 135.8%1
201 days 1 K7-N".1
104 day.- 145.4°-. )
NoNoi
NLL'No'
Na No,
No No
N'oNo,
No'Na
Ycs No
Naha
K
INF2
A3C095A
-
Malfunctioned
No Data
No Data
5-12.5%
0%
4N.
19 da . 0 3 ° 6)
15 days 46.6 1n1
18 dap (7,9%1
35 dlys 4 15.31.1
28 days 112.4%)
9
RDSF
B652374
NQ Nis
NoNo
Naha
Ye No,
Yes Yes
Ycs/No
Yallo,
5-12.5°'.
5-12.5" .
c5%
No Data
No Daly
MalfuncliLmeda
'_9 days 112.7 °'.1
44 dayst 19.2''xl
37 cb 16 9%)
34 da (14.9%
.
Malfunctioned
No No
No'Nn
No,No
Yes'Yes/
1'csYcs
Ycvye.a
YevYesr
Ye& Nry
Yes/Yeti
IU
INF4
A2K6A?D
No Data
No Data
5-12.5%
5-12.5%
<5%
54 days (23.6%)
6K da . (29.7 %)
43 days 118.8 %)
63 dayN 127.3%)
40 days (17.5°.1
68 days (30.096)
No No;
NwNo
NoeNw
Yevlt'esr
YcvNo.
YmNa
YrhlYes
Yes No
11
INF3
AB36608
__
No DeLa
No Dala
Malfllncuonid
5-12-5°.
S-12S°'x
5-12.5%
54 days (23.61.)
32 de (14.0 °,.1
41 da : t 17.9 %)
51 days 22 3°.t
3N Lh s 116.71.1
12
RDSF
3652409
_
NoNa
N"cv
NNNN
No Data
No Data
Malfunctioned
Ye>'NLv
YcYea
N'es Yes:'
Ycs Yes
Yes Yes
5-12.S'.
5.12.5%
<516
52 da 122.7 1.)
43 days (IK.R °6)
51 days (22.21a1
73 days (31.91.1
38 days 16.6".6)
RDSAx
S2C9894
No Nos-12.3%
RDSB°
S2FAD22
No, No
-
-
-
--
RM'°
S2EAD39
Na'N&0•-.
--
-
--
RDSE°
MAD39
NaN.Ar.
Rl isw
S2C95K4
Na No. 5S%
REFERENCE GAUGE DATA
REF
53 days 123-1 •.
ml
Rai
A2R63C6
-12.5•..
70 dayz 130-6°.)
No Data
No Data
34 da s 1 l4-N °'.I
56 da,s 124.4 %t
tit sYays 127-9°.1 74 Lis (32.39.I 1
NialfuuLtianed
Ref2
REF2
N3F36AA64
-
-125".
74 da s13_2 1%1
No Data
No Dafa
72days0141,.i
55 da s 124 U °61
63 da 127.5°.) L 6[ diiys 126.6".1 I
43 da s 41N.N°.1
IlowclJ Woods
FEr NuioC % Numbs 1M3
Johnston C-nutay. North Carollm
Axiom Enviroratsrarllf. Inc.
C lo%c n Relim
SeprcmhLT 2u to
JmF 12

0 0 0

7.0 References
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report
Y-87-1. United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP). Undated. Draft Internal Guidance for
Vegetation Monitoring Plans for NCWRP Riparian Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP). 2001. Compensentory Wetland Mitigation
Design Plan Howell Woods Site, Johnston County. North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP). 2002. Howell Woods Wetland Restoration
Site As -built Construction Report. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Ralcigh, North Carolina.
National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC). 2010. US Drought Monitor (online). Available:
http://drouglit.uni.edu/dni/archive.html [July 11, 20101.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2004. Climatography of the United States
No. 20; Monthly Station Climate Summaries, 1971-2000. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, National
Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
Rosgcn, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources. 2005. Information Regarding Stream Restoration in the Outer Coastal Plain
of North Carolina. Available:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/documents/CoastalPlainSTreamMitigatiofFinalDraftPolicy
Nov28.doc [October 30, 2006].
United States. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1994. Soil Survey of Johnston County, North
Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture.
Weather Underground. 2009. Station at Moore Farm (KNCFOUR02) in Four Oaks, North Carolina.
(online). Available: http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=
KNCFOUR02 [November 10, 2009].
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Inc.
EEP Project Number 193
Johnston County. North Carolina
Closeout Report
September 20 10
page 13

t

•
Attachment A
Figures
Figure A I . Site Location
Figure A2. Preeonstruction Conditions
Figure A3. Revised Mitigation Units
Figure A4. 2006/2007 Drought Maps
IE
• Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Inc. Closeout Report
EEP Project Number 183 September 2010
Johnston County. North Carolina Attachments

s
E

9 0 0

0 0 0

I
d
Note- Groundwater modeling and reference gauges indicated
�y O
that Site canals and ditches effectively drained adjacent land
below jurisdictional thresholds Prior to construction
these areas were considered uplands characterized by hydric
soils and a lack of hydrology. In addition, modeling results
suggested that the drainage influence of Site canals and ditches
i Therefore, Ya
adversely Impacted the entire Site The a ore, even though areas m
of the Site were considered to be jurisdictional wetlands they
-
were greatly altered from reference conditions by a
Rd"arc
dramatically decreased wedand hydroperiod
f
0 500 1,000 2,000 3.000 4,000
Feet
Miles
Scale = 1 7200
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
0
Legend N
QConservation Easment Boundaries
- Open Water = 3-8 acres
jai, i Jurisdictional Wetland = 65.1 acres
Uplands = 70.7 acres
CanaWDitches
Abandoned Reach of Swan Pond
Fallow Fields
Roads
2-root LIDAR contours
Groundwater Model Results
kr.vm ♦1� i 1\� .�•n .� r•Mw.lri
N rtW Ihtr�rti.i IA •1 �AwIK vw•.,
Wkb lAplk {Y'.n Fa•. tIS �'.
7r r 1.�.�'r iYwr
I ■�
r•
is_�s col
i tl.
• 13v nale aiwlllu+Me ..pdto d1b. o. Md JduhIpwaq
G
Preconstruction Average Ditch Depths
:f
Ll.nfrd lMvr.+d• '
•
A.dm I;nvroivrwNal. WK.
Rapared for
r�
Ej�cYnyti�e��� .
Pn>leu
HOWELL
WOODS
RESTORATION
SITE
Johnston County. NC
Title
Pre
Construction
Conditions
Drawn by.
CLF
Dale
AUG 2010
Scale'
1 720C
Proied fJo.;
10-009
FIGURE
A2

0 0

r�
•
1 `f
;, d {• `Alt
Project Structures and Objectives
P-W.
NMInnrE
2 1
I--
Ngiu.�r
14...�i Na.►
M
Ux�ar.
4n
4arcJGmW xaCaMbrtea Nn'ernr
iu.J+. Lr�.L.E.ay
kea.ul ua.h.aer r.hb ry.r6aurrir
eti.4•
a
{Ewrn
{r
JnsJ.w M1..br. JJJ.�
�yilu. W uyr,o�J x[Yah b Y<i rrN
Yair.J frww kulJ vwd WrrhW
4EwckkNn�
l'
1�rrn
I I
Libra'..Ertl r<.m am
Tw�Y
w]MNl.
.r PW 111 +:1i fM
:lul T�`•"r bai.aer ��e.�u� n<
rcJac. WeerfM1rv<voh bnn, chosl
11.1 SUL•
IEr.<��M'.••M wWVM 1]@.r1 IOcae
Ill P WwEK fl+et•
TIr1.6
1A 1�hMIrI IIRM YI.
.Pn•r•arr.rJr-1tln� .ail .�.,. �.....�.�e���o...�.�.����.
M+�s�
u Fnea<a lS—ll.
•
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 i
Feet
Miles Scale = 1 7200
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Legend
Conservatwn Easmeu Boundanes
Enhancement (Level III = 5253 linear feet
Y Littoral Shelves (Wetland Creation = 3 4 acres
Forested Welland Restoration = 386 acres
- Freshwater March Welland Restoralion = 4 8 acres
Forested Welland Enhancement = 71-3 acres
Open Water = 3.8 acres
Nulneal Offset = 1.0 acre
Uplands = 16.8 acres
Vegetation Plots
Gauges
0 � or = REF (100%)
• � or = REF (75%)
0 >12-5% of grown) season
0 5-12.5%of growng season
RoadslUpLmds
h
•
N
'_.�.�En.w.unenw 1nr.
,,pared for
lewall
-alecl
HOW€LL
WOODS
RESTORATION
SITE
ohnston County, NC
e
Revised
Mitigation
Units
Drawn by
CLF
Date
AUG 2010
Scale
t 720C
neci. No
10-009
FIGURE
A3

0 0 0

January 31. 2006 February 28, 2006 March 28, 2006 April 18, 2006 May 2. 2006
880"
4901---
ao wo-].I
June 13, 2006
July 18, 2006
August 22. 2006
September 12, 2006
September 26, 2006
October 31, 2006
February 20, 2007
March 13, 2007
April lO.2007
May 8, 2007
z k ASNAV&
A4* A11000011W
May 15, 2iw
007 May 29, 2007 June 12. 2007 July 17, 2007 August 14, 2007
AAV
AAW
jAV
-11" �-
1-41
jow
September 4, 2007
October 2, 2007
October 23, 2007
November 6, 2007
November 20. 2007
Aaw
December 18, 2007
40

0
4)
.7
Howell Woods
EEP Project Number 183
Johnston County, North Carolina
Attachment B
As -built Construction Figures
Figure 5. Wetland Restoration Activities
Figure 8. Planting Areas 2000
Figure 9. Planting Areas 2002
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Closeout Report
September 2010
Attachments

0 0 0

FORD INVERT
ELEV.-9L0
lµ�
FORD INVERT
i`
ELM -WO
DITCH PLUG
1
ELEV.•90.0
,
'
DITCH PLUG
-
-
DITCH PLUG
_ O. _ ___
f"` rOITCH PLk*-
•-"'
- -
tr 1.���ELEV.-90.0
9
ELEV. 9D.5
ELEV.•90.5
l
d'r J
OIrcH PLUG
ah
-_-- �
O
ELEV-.9W 1Itl
RESTORATION LEGEND
I
Q BENCHMARHS
""' ' FLOOD PLAIN SLOUGH
® POND OUTFALL UPGRADE
11 FLO00 PLAIN
' 1 ISOLATED DEPRESSIONS
. {]ITCH PLUG
i
® CHANNEL FORD
DITCH BACKFILL
CANAL BACKFILL
LITIORAL SHELF CREATION AREA
MAT' COMPILED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRiC MFTHOD
MAP LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
EXISTING ROADS
APPROX WNOR CONTOUR
APPRO% MAJOR CONTOUR
WOOD
L� OPEN WATER
FORD "VERT
-.k ELEv.-91.0
-^b
1-1
WETLANDS
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
Role,gn, N0,11 CQ, Iing
HOWELL
WOODS
WETLAND
RESTORATION
AS --BUILT PLAN
JOHNSTON COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
h.'. ,•1
I� WETLAND
All, ., RESTORATION
ACTIVITIES
LORD MYERT
ELEv,•88.0 ..
MAF1 DEC 2007
WGL I"- 500'
913-De 7.15
FYGlA2E
5

0 0 0

0 0 0
LT_ MAP LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
WOODS
OPEN WATER
REFERENCE FOREST
ECOSYSTLM VLCETAIIVE
SA►IPI-ING PLOTS
PLANT COMMUNITIES
E LOODPL AIN _ --_-
I BOTTOULANO 12, 5±
HARDWOOD
® STREAM EDGE 2.2i
►tESIC
. UPLAND SLOPE 4J-
UAP COMPILED BY PHOTOGRAMM[MC WETHOOS,
0
mo
WETLANDS
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
Ral—gn. Nortn Cor otino
HOWELL
Wr%nnc
RESTORATION !
AS -BUILT PLAN
A MN5IGN COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
PLANTING
AREAS
12000)
' MAE NOV 2002
fre fl, `Fa
WGL 1". SOD'
L' 98-D47.151I
FIGURE I
1�

0 0 0

0 0 0
WETLANDS
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
Rdeigh. North Ca,oimc
HOWELL
%Alr%f%r%C
RESTORATION
AS —BUILT PLAN
JOHNSTON COUN7Y,
NORTH CAROLINA
PLANTING
AREAS
(2002)
MAF DEC 2GG2
wcL 111- 500'
98.04715
FIGURE
MIA-P COMPILED BY PHOTOGHAMIAL IRIC ME SHOOS.

E
4.)
Attachment C
Preconstruction Gauge Location Maps
Figure A. Well Locations (1999)
Figure B. Well Locations (2000)
Figure C. Well Locations (2001)
Figure D. Well Locations (2002)
Howell Woods Aviom Environmental, Inc.
> EP Project Number 183
Johnston County, North Carolina
Closeout Report
September 2010
Attachments

El
0

0 0 0
1
— %
> 12.51 GROWING SEASON
5-12 5s GROWING SEASON
C 51 GROWING SEASON
WELLS
MAP LEGEND
NO$ WELLS
OS2C989�
O� 52EAD22
V S2EA039
O52E ACD6
O52C961D
OS2C9584
i cil�ifl171f-If111
Nalnµh, Vrn6 1:�.},W.
IN
WETLANDS
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
Ralegc. N.. th C—Ad a
HOWELL
WOODS
JOHN57CN CUUNIY.
NORTI4 CARULrNA
WELL
LOCATIONS
(1999)
J
g1AF OCT 2001
WGL 500'
98 Oa 7,13
F ICuRE
A

L
r- I
•
<��
`�♦ _------- -- �•�
I \
> 12.5s GROWING SEASON
5-12.5% GROWING SEASON
59 GROWING SEASON
MAP LEGEND WELLS
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
TELEPHONE POLE
FENCE
WOODS
APPROX. MINOR CONTOUR
APPRO% MAJOR CONTOUR
1+ WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
No$ WELL$ O
IMHIY7TY wfus O
OS20894
0 N36i3506
OS2EAD22
O —2121
Y^ S2EA039
0N5KVC2
`1 S32663A
. hLM5160
O52EAC06
SD N38FS158
OS2CMID
O N3BE4CBF
I
I.( J!"cirllrl
l :In I)111;II I O I I
NaMa2k. Y�� awid+na �
WETLANDS
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
Aareigh, Nor In C-6— h
HOWELL
WOODS
JOHNSTON COUNTY.
NORTH CAROUNA
WELL
LOCATIONS
(2000)
MAF OCT 2001
WCL r'• 500.
98 047-13
I+CURF.
B

0 0 0

0 0 0
I WELLS
iw o ha wo .ao
su M mi /
I IGLRE
C

0 0 0

• . •
V
O
1t
TpI
•5'.
5
4
♦
`wFLL PULLED
N AUGUST
�1
1
1
♦:--- ------- - - - - --
----- _
RAN GANG£
(d '
�
1
\
�
2 12.51 GROWING SEASON
S
5-12.5X GROWING SEASON
c 5X GROWING SEASON
♦'
5
Mar LEGEND
PROPERTY BOUNDAR,
TELEPHONE QOLF
FENCE
WOODS
APPROX MINOR CONIOUR
APPRO%,MAJOR CONTUUN
WATER SURFACE ELEVATION
Welts
Ll
O
O
nos WELLS
lwiwy WELLS
O52CVN9•
OI m"7506
O521AD22
O MSA£2121
OC S200"
p! N3EEVC2
aS32083a•
o N3K516D
OS2EAC06
OS .-WSW
rO S2C9@ID
O NW4CSf
`MALFUNCTIONING WELL PULLCD IN AUGUST
1�
i J (1: 4 ILA It I
i 71 IR it:191c n1
ul'/� w
E1Ww1VR
S
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
RoWigh, Npr lh C,,
HOWELL
WOODS
"A"
7
MONITORING
JOHNSTON COQNTY,
NORTH CAROLNA
WELL
LOCATIONS
(2002 )
MAF ❑EC 2002
w'GL T-• 500'
',4 7 1M
FIGURE j

0

0
0

• ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
HOWELL WOODS
WETLAND RESTORATION
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 183)
Monitoring Year 8 of (2009)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Ralcigh, North Carolina
0 November 2009

•
E
•

• ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
HOWELL WOODS
C
WETLAND RESTORATION
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 183)
Monitoring; Year 8 of 8 (2009)
Submitted to. -
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by/Monitoring Performer:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
20 Enterprise St. Suite 7
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Design Firm:
EcoScience Corporation
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27592
r�
iiem
�',ill�il C`111C'llf
Axiom Environmental. Ind.
November 2009

11
•
•

• 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Howell Woods Wetland Restoration Site (Site) is located within United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03020201 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] subbasin 03-
04-04) of the Neuse River Basin. The Site includes an approximately 140-acre tract, located 8.5 miles
southeast of the Town of Smithfield in southern Johnston County (Figure 1). The Site is contained within
an approximately 2000-acre tract of land managed by Johnston County Community College as part of the
Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center.
The primary goals of the project included the following.
. Enhance water quality functions in the Gar Gut Creek and Mill Creek watersheds.
2. Reestablish a functioning backwater slough system, which extends through developing
bottomland hardwood forests.
3. Provide educational opportunities to show the importance of wetlands for water quality.
4. Maximize the area returned to historic wetland function.
Success criteria dictate an average density of 320 stems per acre must be surviving in the first three
monitoring years. Subsequently, 290 Character Tree Species per acre must be surviving in year 4 and 260
Character Tree Species per acre in year 5. Five vegetation plots had been previously established by North
Carolina State University. The plots are 10 meters square and are located randomly within the Site.
Results from vegetation surveys exceeded success criteria with 346, 1806, 1401, and 1101 planted stems
per acre present in years 2 through 5, respectively; with an increase in species diversity over the
monitoring period. Vegetation surveys were completed in year 5 and no data was collected in subsequent
years. No data was available for year 1 monitoring.
SSuccess criteria based on the 2002 Monitoring Plan for wetland hydrology require inundation or
saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface for a consecutive period of 12.5 percent of the growing
season. The growing season in Johnston County begins March 21 and ends November 4 (229 days).
Areas inundated less than 5 percent of the growing season (1 I days) are classified as nonwetlands. Areas
inundated between 5 percent and 12.5 percent of the growing season can be classified as wetlands
depending upon factors such as the presence of hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils. in order to attain
hydrologic success, saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface is required for at least I I
consecutive days (5 percent of the growing season) or 29 consecutive days (12.5 percent of the growing
season). All gauges are currently functioning and recorded groundwater hydrology within 12 inches of
the ground surface for at least 5 percent of the growing season with a presence of hydric soils and
hydrophytic vegetation.
•
In summary, the Site achieved success criteria for hydrology and vegetation in the Eighth Monitoring
Year (2009). Based on available data, the Site achieved success criteria for hydrology and vegetation
over the entire 8-year monitoring period. Summary information and data related to the occurrence of
items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and
monitoring elements can be found in table and figures within this report's appendices. Narrative
background and supporting infonnation formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation
and restoration plan documents available on EEPs website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures
in the appendices is available from EEP upon request.
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of 8 (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina page i

�1
Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................
2.0 METHODOLOGY....................................................................
2.1 Vegetation Assessment..........................................................
2.2 Wetland Assessment..............................................................
3.0 EIGHT -YEAR MONITORING ASSESSMENT ......................
4.0. REFERENCES.........................................................................
List of Figures
............................................1......I.... l
....................................................... 3
....................................................... 3
....................................................... 3
....................................................... 4
....................................................... 5
Figure1, Site Location............................................................................................................... Appendix A
Figure 2. DRAINMOD Revised Mitigation Unit Calculations ................................................. Appendix A
Figure 3. Monitoring Plans........................................................................................................ Appendix A
List of Tables
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives...................................................................Appendix B
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ..................... .....Appendix B
..............................................
Table 3. Project Contacts Table..................................................................................................Appendix B
Table 4. Project Attribute Table..................................................................................................Appendix B
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table ...................................................Appendix C
Table 6. Wetland Criteria Attainment.........................................................................................Appendix C
Table 7. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species...............................................................Appendix C
Appendices
APPENDIX A. FIGURES AND PLAN VIEWS
Figure I. Site Location
Figure 2. DRAINMOD Revised Mitigation Unit Calculations
Figure 3. Monitoring Plans
APPENDIX B. GENERAL PROJECT TABLES
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
APPENDIX C. VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 6. Wetland Criteria Attainment
APPENDIX D. GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 7. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years I through 8
Year 8 (2009) Groundwater Gauge Graphs
APPENDIX E. YEAR 8 (2009) GAUGE VEGETATION LISTS
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of 8 (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina page ii

.7
•
•

• 2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
In the fall of 2001, vegetation monitoring plots were randomly established within the Site. Each sample
plot was composed of two-300-foot transects extending from a central point, usually a groundwater
monitoring gauge. The Site was monitored for the as -built and the 2002 (year 1) growing season utilizing
this methodology with vegetation success achieved.
During the 2003 (year 2) monitoring period, North Carolina State University implemented a revised
vegetation monitoring procedure based on the Draji Vegetation Monitoring Plan.for NCWRP Riparian
Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects document (undated). Five-10 meter by 10 meter plots were
established and permanently marked with pipe. The location of each vegetation monitoring plot is
depicted on Figure 3 (Appendix A). These plots were surveyed for five monitoring seasons; results for
years 2 through 5 (2003 through 2006) are included in Table 7. No reference area was studied; therefore
no comparisons could be made to reference conditions.
Due to the revised monitoring protocol during the second year of vegetation surveys, no comparisons of
as -built or 2002 (year 1) can be made to the subsequent monitoring years. Therefore, planted species
have been based upon previous annual monitoring reports and percent survival is based on a comparison
of 2003 (year 2) totals where possible. The phased planting schedule made it difficult to determine
planted trees from naturally recruited trees; therefore, the number of "planted" species was based on the
experience and judgment of the monitoring team, and counts for planted species may be influenced by
naturally recruited stems. During preparation of this monitoring report, no as -built mitigation plan or data
for 2002 (year 1) totals were available.
• Results from vegetation surveys exceeded success criteria with 346, 1806, 1401, and 1101 planted sterns
per acre present in years 2 through 5, respectively with an increase in species diversity over the 5-year
monitoring period. Vegetation surveys were completed in year 5 and no data was collected in subsequent
years with the exception of photographs, which are included in Appendix C. No data was available for
year I monitoring. Based on these results, Site vegetation should be considered successful.
E
2.2 Wetland Assessment
Fourteen groundwater monitoring gauges have been maintained and monitored throughout the year 8
(2009) growing season (Appendix D). Twelve are located within the restoration areas and two are located
within the reference wetlands immediately northwest of the Site. The groundwater gauges record daily
readings of groundwater depth. Daily rainfall data was acquired from the Moore Farm Weather Station in
Four Oaks, North Carolina (Weather Underground 2009). Table 7 summarizes success criteria for
groundwater gauges over the 8-year monitoring period.
Success criteria based on the 2002 Monitoring Plan for wetland hydrology require that the area be
inundated or saturated within l2 inches of the ground surface for a consecutive period of 12.5 percent of
the growing season. The growing season in Johnston County begins March 21 and ends November 4
(229 days). Areas inundated less than 5 percent of the growing season (1 1 days) are classified as
nonwetlands. Areas inundated between 5 percent and 12.5 percent of the growing season can be
classified as wetlands depending upon factors such as the presence of hydrophytic vegetation and hydric
soils. In order to attain hydrologic success, saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface is required
for at least I 1 consecutive days (5 percent of the growing season) or 29 consecutive days (12.5 percent of
the growing season).
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina page 3

•
•
r�

•
All groundwater gauges had a presence of hydrophytic wetland
criteria set forth in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
1987). Vegetation lists for each gauge can be found in Appendix E
vegetation and hydric soils based on
Manual (Envirronmental Laboratories
Groundwater hydrology within 12 inches of the soil surface occurred for greater than 12.5 percent of the
growing season for the year 8 (2009) growing season at Gauges 2 and 4-12 and greater than 5 percent of
the growing season at Gauges 1 and 3.
3.0 EIGHT -YEAR MONITORING ASSESSMENT
In summary, the Site achieved success criteria for vegetation and hydrology for over the eight -year
monitoring period.
Results from vegetation surveys exceeded success criteria with 346, 1806, 1401, and 1 101 planted steins
per acre present in years 2 through 5, respectively; with an increase in species diversity over the
monitoring period.
Previous vegetative problem areas within the Site have resolved naturally and no vegetation or wetland
problem areas were present within the Site during year 8 (2009) monitoring.
Groundwater hydrology within 12 inches of the soil surface occurred for greater than 12.5 percent of the
growing season for the year 8 (2009) growing season at Gauges 2 and 4-12 and for at least 5 percent of
the growing season at Gauges 1 and 3. Vegetation documented in the vicinity of each of the twelve
restoration area groundwater gauges was considered hydrophytic wetland vegetation. In addition,
wetland criteria set forth in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual were met with the
presence of the three criteria, 1) hydric soils, 2) hydrophytic vegetation, and 3) wetland hydrology at all
gauges.
In summary, the Site achieved success criteria for hydrology and vegetation in the Eighth Monitoring
Year (2009). Based on available data, the Site achieved success criteria for hydrology and vegetation
over the entire 8-year monitoring period.
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of 8 (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina page 4

•
•
E

0 4.0. REFERENCES
•
•
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report
Y-87-I. United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP). Undated. Draft Internal Guidance for
Vegetation Monitoring Plans for NCWRP Riparian Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
United States. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1994. Soil Survey of Johnston County,
North Carolina. United. States Department of Agriculture.
Weather Underground. 2009. Station at Moore Farm (KNCFOUR02) in hour Oaks, North
Carolina. (online). Available:
http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstationAV XDai IyHistory.asp? I D=K-NCFOUR02
[November 10, 2009]. Weather Underground.
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of 8 (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina page 5

0
•

•
C7
APPENDIX A
FIGURES AND PLAN VIEWS
Figure 1. Site Location
Figure 2. DRAINMOD Revised Mitigation Unit Calculations
Figure 3. Monitoring Plans
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring
EEP Project Number 183
Johnston County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, ►nc. Monitoring Year 8 of (2009)
November 2009
Appendices

n 1 Directions to the Site, i
From Highway 70 Business in Smithfield
Travei south on Route 701 forapproxmtarcly 15 miles
1 I turn left/southeast on Devil's Racetrack Road
.C�� • for approximately 10 miles
It -
Turn left into the Howell Woods Environmental
Fe _
70 a Learning Center
See Jaime Sasser or Kinchon Taylor at the Ureter office
211) , D6 i. \, �, for a gate key and directions into the Site 70
.x
- �.. APPROX.t �.
SITE
- LOCATION
mot
IL
16
/ 11Cr`� � 13
F.
l -
Orl
4q,I �� w J � - �' Y�'tpp
1 mi.
1:158,400 r �. �. r I a ;
Sources 1977 North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer, p,153.
SITE LOCATION Dwn. by: CLF
FIGURE
Axiom Environmental HOWELL WOODS RESTORATION SITE Ckdby:
20 Enterprise St. #7 WGL
r Raleigh. PVC 27607 Project Number 183 Date
[phone] Year 8 (2009) Monitoring Report Nov 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina project 08-001

CI
•
•

•
MAP LEGEND (DETAILED PLAN)
PROJECT BOUNOARY
APPROX MINOR CONTOUR
APPROX MAJOR CONTOUR
WETLAND HYDROLOGY
OPEN WATER'
ammsdbated sediments
5.5
® UPLANDS
JARLa'Statm ASao tong
331
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
(>$25%1
73.5
-5
113
® 5`4-12 5".
if, 5
Tom I-..
.!AP COMPLIED BY PTIOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS
�
4 0 -.
lc7f
MAP LEGEND (REVISIONS)
® REVISED - 5%
5 4 aces
f_ REVISED 5%-T2.5 %
4 4 av
....,. REVISED STREAM CHANNEL
5251 iwwIeo
0
250 m -,._10 750
WETLANDS
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
Rate.yh. Nonh Cwol, w
p"w
HOWELL WOODS
RESTORATION SITE
13�m...o.r Stu
rem a laoon luo*I�+w 1tann
JOHNSTON COUNTY.
NORTH CAROLINA
Tine
❑RAINMOD
REVISED
MITIGATION UNIT
CALCULATIONS
Dwn y Date
WGL SW 20D8
y
WGL 1•=5w
WrF",—oc No
O&OO I
FIGURE
2

0 0 0

0 0
Note
Reference Gauges
Apprpai Iefy 500 feel
upst w
1
MAP COMPILED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS.
250 0 250 500 750
SCALE IN FEET
WETLANDS
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
Raleigh. NoM Carolina
HOWELL WOODS �j
RESTORATION SITE
Pryeel hl. a 183
Y6ar 6 (200a Man .v FPa1)
JOHNSTON COUNTY.
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING
PLAN
WGL Sep12009
WGL x1•=500'
--k
0&001
FIGURE
3

L`
•
n
APPENDIX B
GENERAL PROJECT TABLES
Table 1. Site Restoration Structures and Objectives
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attributes Table
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of 8 (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

•
�J
Table 1. Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives
Project Name/Number- Howell Woods EEP Project Number 183
C
d
�
o
�
Revised
Project
•;;
c
Linear
Linear
Ln
Segment or
a
Footage or
Footage or
Reach ID
°'
Acrea a
Acreage
Comment
Areas Effectively Drained by Historic
Howell Woods
R
---
14 acres
34 acres
---
Ditch/Canal
Areas with Hydrology Effected by
Howell Woods
E
---
74 acres
64 acres
---
Ditches/Canal, but not Drained Below
Jurisdictional Threshold
Howell Woods
C
---
4 acres
4 acres
---
Littoral Shelf Excavation
Howell Woods
R
---
--
5251 feet
*
Passive Backwater Slough Restoration
* No stationing along the reach, linear footage is based on down valley distance of the braided stream channel, as based on inter
agency guidance (USACE et. al. 2005)
**R = Restoration
E = Enhancement
C = Creation
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EEP Project Number 183)
Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion
Data
Collection
Completion
Actual
Completion
or Deliver
Initial Feasibility Report
---
---
Apr 1999
Mitigation Alternatives Analysis
S rinu 2000
---
Spring 2000
Initial Site Planting (approximately 19 acres)
Mar 2000
---
Mar 2000
Year I Monitoring (2001)
Fall 2002
--
Nov 2002
Additional Property Acquisition
---
---
Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Design Plan
Oct 2001
---
Oct 2001
Site Implementation (Wetland/Backwater Slough)
Fall 2002
--
Jul 2002
Site Planting (approximately 12 acres)
Dec 2002
---
Dec 2002
Year 2 Monitoring 2003)
Dec 2003
---
Dec 2003
Year 3 Monitorin (2004)
Dec 2004
--
Dec 2004
Year 4 Monitoring (2005)
Dec 2005
--
Dec 2005
Year 5 Monitoring (2006)
Dec 2006
Nov 2006
Nov 2006
Year 6 Monitoring 2007) (Groundwater Gauges Only)
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Nov 2007
Year 7 Monitoring (2008) (Groundwater Gauges Onl)
Dec 2008
Nov 2008
Dec 2008
Year 8 Monitoring (2009) (Groundwater Gauges Only)
Dec 2009
Nov 2008
Nov 2009
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

E
•

•
•
0
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EEP Project Number 183
Designer
EcoSciencc Corporation
101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Jerry McCrain [phone]
Construction Contractor
Backwater Environmental
PO Box 1654
Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312
Wes Newell (919) 5234375
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvies
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
Dwi& McKinney
Monitoring Performers
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Years 5-8 (2006-2008)
20 Enterprise Street, Suite 7
Ralci h, North Carolina 27607
Monitoring Point of Contact
Grant Lewis 919-215-1693
Table 4. Project Background Table
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EEP Pra'ect Number 183
Project County
Johnston County, North Carolina
Drainage Area
Primary Neuse River- 1870 square miles
Secondary Gar Gut - 9.8 square miles
Drainage impervious cover estimate ("/o)
< 5
Stream Order
second
Ph sio ra hic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces
Ros en Classification of As -built
D-ty2c
Cowardin Classification
PFOI
Dominant Soil Types
Altavista, State, Wehadkee, and Chastain
Reference Site ID
Onsite
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
Project and Reference — 03020201
NCDWQ Subbasin for Project and Reference
Project and Reference — 03-04-04
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed'?
No (Stream Index #27-52-7)
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed se ment?
Yes, reach of the Neuse River in Subbasin 03-04-05 -
Stream Index # 27-(56b)
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
Mercury Level in Fish
% of p ro'ect easement fenced
0
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring
EEP Project Number 183
Johnston County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of 8 (2009)
November 2009
Appendices

•
�J
•

•
•
E
APPENDIX C
VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table b. Wetland Criteria Attainment
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 8 of (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County. North Carolina Appendices

•
11
0
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EEP Project Number 183
Species
Year 1
(2002)
Totals*
Year 2
(2003)
Totals
Year 3
(2004)
Totals
Year 4
(2005)
Totals
Year 5
(2006)
Totals
°v°
Survival
Ce phalanthtr.s oc•c•idenudis
Q
p
z
6
0
0
()
0
Crulae us s .
*
0
0
8
Dios rros vir inictncr
*
0
0
2
Frcrrinus rennsvlvanicu
22
21
28
19
86
Ilex deciduas
*
0
0
1
Plcrtanus occidentalis
4
3
3
5
125
Po mhts hetero rimlla
*
0
0
1
uercus lvrato
0
0
0
1
--
uercus ni ra
1
I
1
0
0
uercus pagodti
4
5
4
2
50
uerrtcs phellos
7
7
6
8
114
nercus SP.
0
0
0
2
--
Tavodium distichum
1
1
1
2
200
Ulnuts umeric•ancr
*
0
0
1
Ulmus nrbra
*
0
0
4
Ulmus s .
*
185
130
80
Total Stems Per Plot
45*
223
173
136
Stems Per Acre
364
1806
1401
1101
* - Historical project documents necessary to provide this data were unavailable at the time of this report submission.
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Taken July 2009
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of 8 (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

•
C7
•

J
11
C]
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring
EEP Project Number 183
Johnston County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of 8 (2009)
November 2009
Appendices

0 0 0

Table 6. Wetland Criteria Attainment
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EEP Pi
Gauge ID
Hydrology
Threshold
Met?
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Criteria Met?
Yes
Yes
2
Yes
Yes
3
Yes
Yes
4
Yes
Yes
5
Yes
Yes
6
Yes
Yes
7
Yes
Yes
8
Yes
Yes
9
Yes
Yes
10
Yes
Yes
11
Yes
Yes
12
Yes
Yes
•
ect Number 183
Site
Mean
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold
Met?
Site
Mean
1
Yes
100 %
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
100 %
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of 8 (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

0
•
•
APPEND[X D
GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT DATA
Table 7. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years I through 8
Year 8 (2009) Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 8 of 8 (2009)
EEP Project Number 183 November 2009
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

•
r
LJ
0

0 0 0
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods (EEP Project Number 1831
Table 7. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for 1 cars 1 through 8
11lstoric
Serial
Success Criteria Achlecedlilas Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Pereenlage)
L
Description
Number
year 1 (2002),
Year 2 (2003)•
Year 3 (2004)'•
It 4 f20051
Year 5 (20061
fear 6 (2007)
Year 7(2008)
Year 912009►
1
RDSA
S2C'9994
Yes--125°.
No Data
No Dam
No Data
YL-04 da -s f 14. K "o!
Yes 43 days ( I N,x °9i
Ycs 64 days (27-4'.)
Ye, 22 dia s l961.)
2
RDSB
B6522D1
Yes,12.5'.
No Data
No Data
-Malfuur:tioncd••'
Ycs25 duvs t I I u ")
No 10 days 1441.1
Ycs I I dons (5 °.]
Yes2K days 112-20.1
1
RDSC
B666EU9
No - 5".
No Dula
No Data
Malfunctioned"*
No, 9 Jay, 13 y %1
Nv 9 da s 43.9 ".1
Yes l I day; t 5 `.1
Yesr22 days
1
1 INF6
A279A59
I M1ialfuaclwned
No Data
No Data
No Data
Yes 76 days (11 _2'..)
Yea G6 da s ('_x, M'ol
Y"80 da s (34.91,.)
Yes 199 days 147.6%)
Maifunctioned
5
iNFi
A2x984F
No Data
No Data
No Data
ti'e+'?2v days I 100 "•!
1'e NO days 134.9 ".l
Yes 96days {41.v°°)
Ycv217 days 194.8" of
ti5°y
Malfunctionedk
RDSD
B6B4 FB9
No Data
No Data
M1fallunctioru-d• ••
Yes 33 days f 1 i,# °-.!
Yes 37 days I'_U.S "al
1'ci35 days 115.3°-.1
Yes Ks_ days 135.K°-.1
<59•
INFI•
Ycv7]p da
7
EBD$5 v
C
,
YMS_ I 5°"
No Data
1'cs 3h days 1 15 7 °°I
Yes 16K days f 71.4 .)
Y'ctihx days I247 •,.►
Yes K_, days 135.8°.!
i'es2Ul day, IxT.K'"1
JGk
(31 v".I
K
INF2
AX095A
Malfunctioned
Mal- funchunod
No Data
No Data
Yes 19 day, +s 3 "..l
Yc, 15 dais (6.6 °'ol
1'n 18 days (7 91.)
Yes 33 days 15.31.)
'Iialfuss Novi
9
RDSE
B652374
Nu:-i%
No Data
No Data
YC%29 day+ I I' - -'� I
Yes 44 days 119.2 %)
Ycs 37 day.l Ih. °°"i
Ycs:3i Says 114.8°.1
M1lallurtelroucd
Yes 54 daysNfiA2D
lU
INFi
A2
No Data
No Data
1 i`s fix days 129.7 °-•I
1'es 43 days I I x.K •;>
S's63 days (27,51:;)
}'ey 413 days 117.51"I
5"a
t23,6°°!
Malfunctioned,
Yes 54 day.
I[
INF3
AB36trlM
No Data
No Data
YLs, 32 days (14 0 1"1
Yes,41 days 117 H 1.1
Yes'; I days 122-3%w
Ycsr3K days 116.T°.I
Ma[tunctioucd
12
RDSF
8652408
Nw'<5%
No Data
No Data
4 days t [ 7 °.1
Ycs 52 days 122.7 °.1
Yes 43 days l I x.x 1.)
Yes. 51 days (2' 2%)
Yes.73 day, 13 t.9°.)
Ycs'70 days
Kell
REF I
N386AYE I
Ycs>.1' 5%
No Dalu
No Data
Yvv34 days 114.9 %1
Yes 56 days (24.4 °i)
Yes 64 days (27.9%)
Yci 74 days (32.3".1
(30.61 a)
rR,'_
Yes 73 days
REF?
N3B6A11d4
ti'c.-12.5°.,
N�DnW
No Data
1'cs7_'daysl31,-.1
Ycs;;daysl_4U"e)
Y'ey63days127.j"°)
Ycskidays f2k.h°ol
11'_3°.j
(iatlges nvallunrnuned tur [lie mawnh ullhe gruwing ­ n Sac eunstnipgrn d)d nul occur until mid -growing wa ou. th,,efum, gauge, will he munpo.,d toi , ,Isla growing
• - Data for most of Ow end of die growing ecmvn was unasadalrkc
•• . ritaph is included in the vcw 3 (NXA) rep xr lur owof the Infinmes gauges. huwc%er. it don IkK Mdtcjtc which orw
••• - Uauges nwIrulleu.ned tot the first s %rral nwnth, ofthe growing warm
Final Howell Woods Ararual Mtntitunng
EEF f4upcef Numb" IK3
Jrdwton Cam[ty. Noa Carolina
Atrium Eavironxrenr01. leer.
Mrmnunng Year x nI912txau)
tios rnber'_IMw
pats' o

0 0 0

3/2/2009
3/10/2009
311812009
3/26/2009
4/3/2009
4/ 11 /2009
4/19/2009
4/27/2009
5/5/2009
5/ 13/2009
5/21 /2009
5/29/2009
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
0 7/8/2009
1p 7/16/2009
7/24/2009
811 /2009
8/9/2009
8/ 1712009
8/25/2009
9/2/2009
9/10/2009
9/18/2009
9/26/2009
10/4/2009
10/12/2009
10/20/2009
10/28/2009
11 /5/2009
11 /13/2009
Water Level (inches)
(�J
CnAN006mAI Njmm mANQO VAOOOONA
O O O O O — N
�O N A C3� Od
Precipitation (inches)
•

0
0

Water Level (inches)
OOD�ANOODmANdUD� ANOOo�ANdNAd'�O�ONA
3/2/2009
3/ 10/2009
3/18/2009
3/26/2009---------� ------
_��
4/3/2009
4/11/2009 °, N
0
4/19/2009 0
4/27/2009
5/5/2009
5/13/2009 � e
5/21 /2009
CL
5/29/2009 H w
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
7/8/2009 n
7/ 16/2009
7/24/2009
8/1 /2009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009
8/25/2009
9/2/2009
9/10/2009
mz
9/18/2009 0.
°3
9/26/2009 Q
m
10/4/2009
� A
10/12/2009
10/20/2009 m
m
10/28/2009 a
11 /512009
11/13/2009 �`�----- ------
O O O O O -• s — N
N A 6 �O Iv A i� Oo
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
CD
0
0
a
d n�i
00 cQ
-CD
N N
0
a
ca
c
tC
CD
v
rt
01
4#
•

0
•
.7

Water Level (inches)
A W W W W N N N N N .� .� j L ...a i i i i s��
O CO 07 A N O OD O A N O M M A N) CD M M A N O N A M M 10 N) A
3/2/2009
3/10/2009
3/18/2009
3/26/2009
4/3/2009 0 zr
_
4/ 11 /2009 6)
4/19/2009 g
4/27/2009 a
5/5/2009 f°
5/13/2009 °
5/21 /2009
K
5/29/2009
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
v 7/8/2009
7/ 1612009
7/24/2009
8/1 /2009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009
8/25/2009
9/2/2009
9/10/2009 m Z
7 O
9/18/2009 a m
9/26/2009 6) Cr
10/4/2009 g
10/12/2009 cc
10/20/2009 m
10/28/2009 0
11/5/2009
11/13/2009 _
0 CO O 0 0 1 1 N
N A im DD N A Cb 0
Precipitation (inches)
•
•

Water Level (inches)
I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
c00 A NO00MArQCDWMAN)C)MMANONAMc00NAM00
3/2/2009
3/10/2009
3/18/2009
3/26/2009
4/3/2009
4/11 /2009
4/19/2009
4/27/2009
5/5/2009
5/ 13/2009
5/21 /2009
5/29/2009
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
v 7/8/2009
m
7/16/2009
7/24/2009
8/1/2009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009
8/25/2009
9/2/2009
9/10/2009
9/18/2009
9/26/2009
1014/2009
10/12/2009
10/20/2009
10/28/2009
11/512009
11 /13/2009
0 O O O O N
N A Q3 60 N A Q? 00
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
0
0
O
a
00(a
.-. 0
N 41,
O
0
co
G�
m
cc
m
O
n�
m
(D
L r

•
0
•

3/3/2009
3/11 /2009
3/19/2009
3/27/2009
4/4/2009
4/12/2009
4/20/2009
4/28/2009
516/2009
5/14/2009
5/22/2009
5/30/2009
6/7/2009
6/15/2009
6/23/2009
7/1/2009
v 7/9/2009
7/17/2009
7/25/2009
8/2/2009
8/ 10/2009
8/18/2009
8/26/2009
9/3/2009
9/11 /2009
9/19/2009
9/27/2009
10/5/2009
10/13/2009
10/21 /2009
10/29/2009
11 /612009
Water Level (inches)
.AW W W W WNNNNN���js i i i ...aa.a.
O m m A N O m m A N O m m A N 0 m m A N O N A m m O N Al.
a m
O
-k� N
1
O
m
0
0
aj
mz
a<
CD
G) CD
o
� A
En
m
m
U)
0
0
O O O O O s 1 1 1 N
N A im OO N A �T) QO
Precipitation (inches)
2
O
O
O
O
a
cfl 0
CO (a
�CD
N C
CDn
0
W
0
m
CO
(D
Cl
2)
rt
G!
•
C1

3/2/2009
3/10/2009
3/18/2009
3/26/2009
4/3/2009
4/11 /2009
4/19/2009
4/27/2009
5/5/2009
5/13/2009
5/21/2009
5/29/2009
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
p 7/8/2009
a�
7/16/2009
7/24/2009
8/1 /2009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009
8/25/2009
9/2/2009
911012009
9/ 1812009
9/26/2009
10/4/2009
10/ 12/2009
10/20/2009
10/28/2009
11 /512009
11 /13/2009
Water Level (inches)
AW W W W WNNNNN' �+j�� iiiJi
QO0'mANOpo0AN0CPOAN004��NONAmCOONAC806
a
K N
�
" a
� n
o
YJ i
1
O
r^
N
O
1-7
m z
a
d N
70
a<
0 CD
C)C
o �+
A
d
Vi
O
O O O O O
N A i37 i]O iV A � 00
Precipitation (inches)
O
CD
O
O
a
M
�C)
2)
CO ca
r. cti
N
O
0
to
G)
m
c
to
O
v
a�
(f
•

Water Level (inches)
OOo�ANOODOaANO0o0ANO0Dd�ANONAQ10odNA00o
3/2/2009
3/ 10/2009
3/ 18/2009
3/26/2009 _ �—�-- —�— — cng
a, d
4/3/2009
o =r
4/11 /2009 C
4/19/2009
4/27/2009 m'
5/5/2009
y
5/13/2009 C
5/21 /2009
5/29/2009
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
p 7/8/2009
m
@ 7/16/2009
7/24/2009
811 /2009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009
8/25/2009
9/2/2009
9/10/2009 rn z
= o
9/18/2009 Q'
0 �
9/26/2009 G)
10/4/2009 g A
10/12/2009 cn
CO
10/20/2009
10/28/2009
11/5/2009 ------------- --
11/13/2009
O o O 0 O 1 1 - Iv
N A im 0O
Precipitation (inches)
E-j
•

Water Level (inches)
I I I I I I I 1 l 1 1 I 1
O M O7 A N O W M A N O W M A N O M M A N O N A M CO O N?
3/2/2009
3/10/2009
3/18/2009
— — — — — — —
3/26/2009
m �+
4/3/2009 a
�N o 3
4/ 11 /2009 0
1
4/19/2009
4/27/2009 in
5/5/2009
5/13/2009 GL0
K N
5/21 /2009
5/29/2009
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009 -
6/30/2009
p 7/8/2009 .
7/16/2009
7/24/2009
811 /2009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009
8/25/2009
9/2/2009
9/10/2009 06rn z
0
9/18/2009 c m
0
9/26/2009 Cr
10/4/2009 g° A
10/12/2009
10/20/2009 m
V+
10/28/2009 °
7
11/5/2009 ���--------- —
11/13/2009
O O O O O J J J J N
N A 0O N A Co
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
c�
O
0
a
d a�i
MCC
(o
NCO
0
v
co
c
co
cD
v
a�
.1
•
•

•
.7
•

Water Level (inches)
G7 W W W W N N N N N� 1 I L L i i i I
0000) A NOODTN00D0 � NOODO Ja NOIV A MCOOlV A
3/2/2009
3/10/2009
3/18/2009
3/26/2009
4/3/2009
4/11 /2009
4/19/2009
4/27/2009
5/5/2009
5/13/2009
5/21 /2009
5/29/2009
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
p 7/8/2009
7/16/2009
7/24/2009
8/1 /2009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009
8/25/2009
912/2009
9/10/2009
9/ 1812009
9/2612009
10/412009
10/12/2009
10/20/2009
10/28/2009
11/512009
11/13/2009
--------------
0 O O 0 0 s rl s r")
N A m OD N A O 0O
Precipitation (inches)
O
ro
O
O
CL
C)
fl! 0
0o cO
m
bito
a
cp
0
cc
ro
O
m
w
v
•
•
•

Water Level (inches)
I. W W W W W N N N ►V N J J
OODOANOOOQ3A NO ODO)ANO(o6) ANONArnCOOIV A
3/2/2009
3/10/2009
3/18/2009
3/26/2009 ��—l---- — -- ��
4/3/2009 a
4/11/2009
4/19/2009 C
4/27/2009 0
5/5/2009 N
5/13/2009 N 0
5/21 /2009
5/2912009
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
p 7/8/2009
a
� N
7/16/2009
7/24/2009
8/ 112009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009
a
8/25/2009
9/2/2009
9/ 1012009
a m Z
3
9/18/2009 a m
9/26/2009 ~'
C)r
10/4/2009 f A
10112/2009 <a
Ch
10/20/2009
10/28/2009 fl
11/5/2009------- ------ —
11113/2009
O p 0 O 0 i J J J ry
N A Cn OD IV A Gn G10
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
co
0
0
a
U)
coo W
m _
W
_ ro
N i
00
0
cD
0
w
p
cQ
c�
0
is
•
•

Water Level (inches)
O M M A N O M M A N O M M A N O M M A N O N A M M
3/2/2009
3/10/2009
3/ 18/2009
3l2612009-------- ---- — cnK
m °
4/3/2009 n 0
I 0 T
4/11/2009
4/19/2009 °
4/27/2009
5/5/2009 N
5113/2009 0
5121 /2009
5/29/2009 =
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
p 7/8/2009 a
7/16/2009
7/24/2009
811 /2009
8/9/2009
8/ 17/2009
8/25/2009
9/2/2009
9/10/2009 m z
" :3 0
9/18/2009 0. m
0
9/26/2009 rr
0 10
10/4/2009 g
10/12/2009 to
cn
10/20/2009
m
10/28/2009 °
1115/2009 — ------ --
11 /13/2009
4 O O O O —+ — --• — — N
N A 0o N A O 00
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
CD
0
0
a
co C)
m �
� G
oa �
�CD
N �
O �
0
10Cl
J
•

Water Level (inches)
A W W W W N AJ N N N��" 1- i i —
OMM N000 MAN0000)ANODDOANONA0700ONA
3/2/2009
3/10/2009
3/18/2009
3/26/2009-------- --- — Ca g�
413/2009
O
4/ 11 /2009 C)
4/19/2009 °
a
4/27/2009 N w
5/5/2009 N
5/13/2009 0
5/21/2009
5/29/2009
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
p 7/8/2009 a
7/16/2009
7/24/2009
8/1/2009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009
8/25/2009
912/2009
9/10/2009 - m z
7 O
9/18/2009 °- <
0 3
9/2612009 C) Cr
10/4/2009 a
10/12/2009 +�
10/20/2009 w
w
10/28/2009 °
------......... ----- _.,
11/5/2009
11/13/2009
N A CO TV A 60
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
m
O
a
CL
CCD
CO
_ ro
O N
0
cD
L.
•
0

Water Level (inches)
� �s...a
C)MM NO000� .N)0M 7ANQwmJLIVOrV Am67ONA
3/2/2009
3/10/2009
3/18/2009
3/26/2009----------- — Ca
�m
4/3/2009 0
0 =r
4/11 /2009 -k}
4/19/2009
a
01 V
4/27/2009 a (Q
cn
5/5/2009
N
5/13/2009
5/21 /2009
—5t
5/29/2009
6/6/2009
6/ 14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
p 7/8/2009
fll n
m
7116/2009 N
7/24/2009
811 /2009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009 NEEL—b
d
8/25/2009
9/2/2009
9/10/2009 n rn z
_
9/18/2009 a <
o
9/26/2009 r
10/4/2009 g a
5
10/12/2009
10/20/2009
N
10/28/2009
111512009 — ----� ��--�!
11 / 13/2009
O O O O O J — — N
N A dO N A W
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
O
O A
a0
i 0
00 0
N0
oC
o�
to
0 cD
ce
(fl
0
•

•
0

Water Level (inches)
W W W W CW tV tV Iv tV N _'. - -
0M0141IQ0C.0 41 NOOoOA-iV 86D61- V ON A0)OOON A
3/2/2009
3/10/2009
3/18/2009
3126I2009-------- --- — «,�
m �
4/3/2009
O =r
4/11 /2009
1
4/19/2009 °
a� �
4/27/2009 K
�a
5/5/2009 (n
y
5/13/2009 °
5/21/2009
5/29/2009
6/6/2009
6/14/2009
6/22/2009
6/30/2009
p 7/8/2009
7/16/2009
7/24/2009
8/1/2009
8/9/2009
8/17/2009
8/25/2009
912/2009
9/10/2009 m z
= 0
9/18/2009 a 0
°, �
9/26/2009 G) Cr
10/412009 °g a
10/12/2009 ca
cn
10/20/2009
y
10/28/2009 a
11/5/2009 ------------- -
11/13/2009
O O O O O
N A � 00 N A OS 03
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
iD
0
0 ;0
CL 0
to
0
c4 CD
m �
0
Co CD
N y
o�
o�
c° CD
0
c
ca
v
m
a�
•
•
E

•
APPENDIX E
YEAR 8 (2009) GAUGE VEGETATION LISTS
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County. North Carolina Appendices

E
•
•

YEAR B (2009) GAUGE VEGETATION LISTS
HOWELL WOODS RESTORATION SITE
July 13, 2009
GAUGE
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
1.
Qucrrrtrs phellos
Canopy
FACW-
2.
Fraxinus perrnsvlvanicu
Canopy
FACW
1,
Liquidamharstyrarifhca
Canopy
FACT
4.
Ulnrus ameriyana
Canopy
FACW
S.
Celris laevigafa
Canopy
FACW
6.
Uhrnis alufa
Sapling
FACU i
',.
Corpinuscurolinianu
Sapling
FAC
g
Quercus hrafcr
Sapling
OBL
y
Iles decidua
Shrub
FACW-
1
Cana cordiformix
Shrub
FAC
l I
Carex spp.
Herb
FAC to OBL
1
Cornmelina virginica
Herb
FACW
13.
Leersiu lenficularis
herb
OBL
14.
.4rundirrariagiganfean
Herb
FACW
I S
Spndar rofundifolia
herb
OBL
Percent
of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,
or FAC (except
FAC-) = 93%
GAUGE2
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
I.
Ulmns alas
Canopy
FACU+
2.
Fraximes pennsvI vanica
Canopy
FACW
3.
Liquidamhar sfvraciJlrra
Canopy
FAC 1
4.
Ulnn,s sp.
Canopy
FAC to FACW
S.
plafantr.c oc 4 idenfalis
Canopy
FACW-
6.
Querruspagoda
Canopy
FACW-
7.
Crafcregu.s Sp.
Canopy
FAC to OBL
g,
Dulchiunt arundinarcnrm
Herb
OBL
q
Jtafcas efcsus
Herb
FACW+
10.
Car -ex hrrida/comosa
Flerb
OBL
11.
Cumpsis radicun.s
Herb
FAC
12.Toricodrndran
rculicans
Herb
FAC
Percent
of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,
or FAC (except FAC-) = 92%
GAUGE3
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
Uhnrrs a/afo
Canopy
FACU+
2.
Fiarim" penns,vlvanica
Canopy
FACW
3.
Liquichrnrharslyraciflua
Canopy
FAC+
4.
.4cerruhrunr
Canopy
FAC
5.
Carex spp.
Herb
FAC to OBL
6-
Parihenuciasusquingr 1olia
Herb
FAC
7„
Toxicodemlron radicun.s
Herb
FAC.
Percent
of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (except FAC-) = 86%
0

YEAR 8 (2009) HOWELL WOODS (continued)
July 13, 2009
GAUGE4
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
I _
Nysscr hilloru
Canopy
OBL
2
Ulnrusamevicana
Canopy
FACW
3.
Acer ruhrum
Canopy
FAC
4,
Quercus lvrala
Canopy
OBL
5.
Rev ele•ciehnr
Shrub
FAC-
6.
Carer spp.
Herb
FAC to OBL
7
Leersia lenricularis
herb
OBL
g.
Bocehinerhrrvlindricu
Ilerb
FACW
9.
Sarrrunrs cernrrus
Herb
OBL
10,
Commehria virginivet
Herb
FACW
i I .
Smilax bona -pox
I lerb
FAC
Percent
of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,
or FAC (except FAC-) = 91 %
GAUGE5
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
I.
ULnus americuna
Canopy
FACW
2.
Nvssci biijlnr-u
Canopy
OBL
3
Ligrrrdanrhur smrucr111W
Canopy
FAC+
4.
Celris laevigaia
Sapling
FACW
5.
Craraegus sp.
Sapling
FAC to OBL
6.
Carpinuscandirriurru
Sapling
FAC
7.
Fruxinus prnrrsylranica
Shrub
FACW
g
IlesSlecldu
Shrub
FACW-
9.
Boeirrrreviu (;rlindrica
}Serb
FACW +
10
Carex spp.
I terb
FAC to OBL
11.
Popu&rs delroides
herb
FAC+
12
Acernrhrum
Ilerb
FAC
13.
Corrrniviinu Orginic•a
Herb
FACW
14
Arundinariagrganrean
herb
FACW
15
Leersia lenriculark
Ilerb
OBL
16
Saw-ur•uscer•nuus
Herb
OBL
17
Tar ichum drsuchum
I lerb
OBL
1
Toxlcoclemb•on radiccrrrs
Ilerb
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW,
or FAC (except FAC-) = 100%
GAUGEb
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
indicator
I.
Ulmers alaru
Canopy
FACU+
2.
U1111us nr6ra
Canopy
FAC
3.
Liyuidanrhurslvracilhra
Canopy
FAC}
4,
.4cer• nihr•um
Canopy
FAC
5,
Fi•axinnspenn.sOvaniva
Canopy
FACW
h,
Benda rrigr•u
Canopy
FACW
7.
Cirrrr spp.
Herb
FAC to OBL
H,
Carnpsis rae icons
Herb
FAC
9.
Baehnreria evIinekka
Herb
FACW f
i().
Carnrnelina virginiru
HCrb
FACW
Percent
of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (except FAC-) = 90%
0

YEAR 8 (2009) HOWELL WOODS (continued)
July 13, 2009
GAUGE 7
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
1.
.NtMW hifloru
Canopy
OBL
• 2.
Celli,vlavvigula
Canopy
FACW
3.
Arerruhrum
Canopy
FAC
4,
Frarimrs pennsvlvanic•a
Canopy
FACW
5,
Liquidambur.srvracifluu
Canopy
FAC+
h.
Omits rrihra
Sapling
FAC
7.
llerdeyirluu
Shrub
FAC'W-
g,
Cellis luevigala
Shrub
FACW
9.
Carex spp.
Herb
FAC to OBL
10,
S"Wax rolundijbha
Herb
FAC
11,
Microslegiunr vimeneum
Herb
FAC+
12.
Commelinu virginicu
Herb
FACW
13.
Boehmeria eylirubleal
Herb
FACW+
14
Smilax hona-Frox
Herb
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL FACW,
or FAC (except
FAC-) = 100%
GAUGES
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
indicator
I
Querells phelld)s
Canopy
FACW-
2
Liquidamhur+hracilluu
Canopy
FAC+
3.
Ulmus unrericancr
Canopy
FACW
4.
.4cer rubrron
Canopy
FAC
5.
Diospyras vieginhow
Sapling
FAC
h•
Calpinux curulildrnra
Sapling
FAC
7.
Cellis luevigula
Sapling
FACW
g.
Frusinus pennsyivanica
Shrub
FACW
9.
Cumpsis nulicarr.s
1 lerb
FAC
10•
Carer spp.
Herb
FAC to OBL
11
Commelinuvirginiva
Iferb
FACW
12
Boehmeria cylindrical
Iferb
FACW+
1 j
Smiles rolundif[llta
Iferb
FAC
14.Taricoderalrwr
radicals
Herb
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,
or FAC (except FAC-) = 100%
GAUGE9
Dominant Plant Species
Strarum
Indicator
I
Canopy
FAC+
2.
Diosprros virginiuna
Canopy
FAC
3"
populla dellolds
Canopy
FAC+
4"
Ulmuc americ•ana
Canopy
FACW
5,
4c•er ruhrenn
Shrub
FAC
6,
Sulir nigru
Shrub
OBL
7,
Cephelartihux occhlenralis
Shrub
OBL
S.
llihiscusmoscheurro
[[orb
OBL
9"
Aver vimineus
Herb
FAC
10.
Anclropogon I'll., inicus
Herb
FACU
11.
Carer spp.
Herb
FAC to OBL
12
Polygoltulnpuncrallnn
Herb
FACW+
13.
hincuseJ%uses
Herb
FACW+
14
Scirpuc c.rperinits
Herb
OBL
15.
Rdyncuspuracm-nicululo
Herb
OBL
16
Diodia virginiana
flerb
FACW
[7
Ruhusarguruv
Herb
FACUI
Percent
of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,
or FAC (except FAC-) = 88%

0
0

YEAR S (2009) HOWELL WOODS (continued) July 13, 2009
GAUGE 10
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
1.
Nvssa hillova
Canopy
OHL
2.
Acerruhrum
Canopy
FAC
3.
Liquidarnhccr srt•racili'ua
Canopy
FAC+
4•
Fravinus pennsvlvanica
Canopy
FAC+
5_
Ulmus americana
Canopy
FACW
h,
Caryimi.s earaliniana
Sapling
FAC
7.
flex de ciduas
Sapling
FAC W-
g.
Quercuspagoda
Shrub
FAC+
9,
Diospyra.s virglAft'ario
Shrub
FAC
10
Smilax rutundif6her
Shrub
FAC
l L
Care.r.spp.
Herb
FAC IoOBL
12
Comrnelina vi ginica
Herb
FACW
t 3.
Bignonia c'apreolaur
I Ierb
FAC
14
Leersia lertricularis
Herb
OHL
15
Toricodemh•on rcuhccrns
Herb
FAC
16.
Boehrneriac.0inilric'al
Herb
FACW+
17.
C•ampsk radicans
Herb
FAC
18.
Creragirs sp.
Herb
FAC to OBL
19.
X icreweghrm vimeneum
Herb
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OHL, FACW,
or FAC (except
FAC-) = 100%
GAUGE I
Dominant plant Sagcies
5tratum
Indicator
I.
Carpimrs curohniana
Canopy
FAC
2
Frrzrinuspenn.�vlvanica
Canopy
FACW
3.
Liquidarnharslvr'ac-illua
Canopy
FAC+
4.
ricer ruhrum
Canopy
FAC
5.
Diospvros virginiana
Canopy
FAC
6•
Herdecidua
Sapling
FACW-
7.
Car•ex spp.
1 Ierb
FAC to OBL
X.
Microstegium 0minerrnr
I Icrb
FAC
9,
Leersia lenticularis
Herb
OHL
I0.
Smilax rolurrdijidia
Herb
FAC
11
Compsis•raehcans
i[erb
FAC
12
Sarrnirus ce rinms
Herb
OBL
13.
Brrehmeriacrlindrica
herb
FACW+
Percent of Dominant Species that are OHL. FACW,
or FAC texcept FAC-) = 100%
GAUGE 12
Dominant Plant Skies
Stratum
Indicator
1.
Querrus lyrara
Canopy
OBL
2,
Quercrrspergoda
Canopy
FAC
3.
Quercusphello.s
Canopy
FACW-
4.
Crataegus sp.
Sapling
FAC to OBL
5.
Poludusdelroids
Sapling
FAC+
h,
Fra.rinus pennstylvanlc•a
Sapling
FACW
7•
Phclanusoccidenialis
Sapling
FACW-
8
Berrrla nigr r
Sapling
FACW
9.
Taxodirrmdi.sr&•hum
Sapling
OBL
10.
Ulnruscrlata
Sapling
FACU+
1 l
Hibiscus moschewos
Herb
OBL
11
Aster vimineus
Herb
FAC
13
Ac'er nihrum
Herb
FAC
14.
Curer Sp,
Herb
FAC to OBL
•
15.
Plachea canrphorwo
Herb
FACW
16.
Andropogon virgirricns
Herb
FAC-
Ptilimnucm capillacernn
Herb
OHL
Percent of Dominant Species that are OHL. FACW, or FAC (except FAC-) = 9

•
C7
•

L`
•
L.]
YEAR 8 (2009) HOWELL WOODS (continued)
July 13, 2009
REFERENCE GAUGE 1
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
I.
Quercrrs lrrara
Canopy
OHL
2.
Nussa N lora
Canopy
OBL
3.
Ulmus umer•icuna
Canopy
FACW
4.
Acer ruhmar
Canopy
FAC
5.
Fra.tbruspenmv.y varrica
Canopy
FACW
6.
Que,zuslarrrifolia
Canopy
FACW
7,
Carpinus carolinianu
Sapling
FAC
g,
LiyuiclambarsYtracrflua
Sapling
FAC+
9.
Rerdeciduu
Shrub
FACW-
10_
Cumrnelina virginicu
herb
FACW
11.
Curer Spp.
herb
FAC to OBL
12
Leersia lenlicufaris
Herb
OBL
13.
Boehmeriarviindrieu
Herb
FACW+
14,
Campsis r•adirarrs
llerb
FAC
15.
Sailor rutundlfirlia
FAC
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW, or
FAC (except
FAC-) = 100%
REFERENCE GAUGE 2
Dominant P€ant Species
Straturn
Indicator
1.
Quercus lvrinu
Canopy
OBL
2.
Quercrrs phellus
Canopy
FACW-
3
Acer rubrum
Canopy
FAC
4.
LiyuklarnharsvtraciJlua
Canopy
FAC+
5•
Carpinus curoliniaua
Sapling
FAC
6,
Ulmusmbra
Sapling
FAC
7•
Rex(let-Oucr
Shrub
FACW-
8.
Craracgus Sp.
Shrub
FAC toOBL
9.
Caresspp.
Ilerb
FACW+
I0.
Froxinus pennsvhTunica
I Ierb
FACW
11.
Conrnrelina virginica
}Ierb
FACW
I
Leersia lenricularis
herb
OBL
13
Snrikrr rruutrdifolia
Fferb
FAC
14.
Saunrruscernutrs
Herb
OBL
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or
FAC (except FAC-) — 100%

•
0
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
HOWELL WOODS
WETLAND RESTORATION
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 183)
Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
December 2008

0 0 0

. ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
HOWELL WOODS
•
•
WETLAND RESTORATION
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 183)
Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by/Monitoring Performer:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
2126 Rowland Pond Drive
Willow Spring, North Carolina 27592
Design firm:
EcoScience Corporation
l 101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27592
it r'-�J
1�'.n{1I'll 'temA
Axiom Env�ronmenlal, Inc. VK( ItAM
December 2008

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Howell Woods Wetland Restoration Site (Site) is located within the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03020201 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] subbasin 03-
04-04) of the Neuse River Basin. The Site includes an approximately 140-acre tract, located
approximately 8.5 miles southeast of the Town of Smithfield in southern Johnston County (Figure 1).
The Site is contained within an approximately 2000-acre tract of land managed by Johnston County
Community College as part of the Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center.
The primary goals of the project included the following.
I . Enhance water quality functions in the Gar Gut Creek and Mill Creek watersheds.
2. Reestablish a functioning backwater slough system, which extends through developing
bottomland hardwood forests.
3. Provide educational opportunities to show the importance of wetlands for water quality.
4. Maximize the area returned to historic wetland function.
Five vegetation plots had been previously established by North Carolina State University. The plots are
10 meters square and are located randomly within the Site. Results from vegetation surveys exceeded
success criteria with 346, 1806, 1401, and 1101 planted stems per acre present in years 2 through 5,
respectively, with an increase in species diversity over the monitoring period. No data was available for
year I monitoring.
No vegetation or wetland problem areas were identified during the year 7 (2008) monitoring year. All
gauges are currently functioning and recorded groundwater hydrology within 12 inches of the ground
issurface for at least 5 percent of the growing season with a presence of hydrophytic vegetation.
Groundwater hydrology at the Site will be monitored for one more growing season of 2009 during year 8.
C,
In summary, the Site achieved success criteria for hydrology and vegetation in the Seventh Monitoring
Year (2008). In addition, based on available data the Site achieved success criteria for hydrology and
vegetation over the entire 7-year monitoring period.
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiont Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page i

C,
•
�.J
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................
i
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................
I
1.1 Location and Setting.....................................................................................................................
1
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives..............................................................................................
1
1.3 Project History and Background.................................................................................................... 5
1.4 Monitoring Plan View................................................................................................................... 7
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS..............................................................
7
2.1 Vegetation Assessment................................................................................................................. 7
2.1.1 Soil Data................................................................................................................... 7
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas.........................................................................................
2.1.3 Stem Counts.............................................................................................................. 9
2.1.4 Vegetation Plot Photos............................................................................................
10
2.2 Wetland Assessment...................................................................................................................
10
2.2.1 Wetland Problem Area Plan View...........................................................................
10
2.2.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment...................................................................................
14
3.0 SEVEN-YEAR MONITORING ASSESSMENT............................................................................
14
4.0. REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................15
List of Figures
Figure1. Site Location........................................................................................................................... 2
Figure 2. DRAINMOD Revised Mitigation Unit Calculations.................................................................4
Figure3. Monitoring Plans..................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 4. 2008 Climatic Data vs. 30-year Historic Data......................................................................... 13
List of Tables
Table I. Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives..................................................................
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ...........................................................................
Table 3_ Project Contact Table.....................................................................................................
Table 4. Project Background Table..............................................................................................
Table5. Preliminary Soil Data.....................................................................................................
Table 6. Stem Counts for Planted Species Arranged by Plot .........................................................
Table 7. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years 1 through 7.....................................
Table 8. Wetland Criteria Attainment..........................................................................................
Appendices
APPENDIX A.
VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX B.
YEAR 7 (2008) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
APPENDIX C.
YEAR 7 (2008) GAUGE VEGETATION LISTS
APPENDIX D.
YEAR 1 (2002) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
APPENDIX E.
YEAR 2 (2003) GROUNDWATER GAUGE DATA
APPENDIX F.
YEAR 3 (2004) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
APPENDIX G.
YEAR 4 (2005) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
APPENDIX H.
YEAR 5 (2006) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
APPENDIX 1.
YEAR 6 (2007) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
ll E!
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page ii

0 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting
The Howell Woods Wetland Restoration Site (Site) is located within the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03020201 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] subbasin 03-
04-04) of the Neuse River Basin. The Site includes an approximately 140-acre tract, located
approximately 8.5 miles southeast of the Town of Smithfield in southern Johnston County (Figure l ).
The Site is contained within an approximately 2000-acre tract of land managed by Johnston County
Community College as part of the Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center.
Directions to the Site:
From Highway 70 Business in Smithfield
Y Travel south on Route 701 for approximately 15 miles
Y Turn left/southeast on Devil's Racetrack Road for approximately t0 miles
Turn left into the Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center
See Jaime Sasser or Kinchon Taylor at the Center office for a gate key and directions into the Site
The Site is located in the Southeastern Plains Physiographic Province, within the Southeastern
Floodplains and Low Terraces ecoregion and is immediately cast of the fall line of the Coastal Plain and
Piedmont regions of North Carolina,
The Site is situated within the Gar Gut watershed (slough -like tributary to the Neuse River) in the outer
perimeter of the Neuse River floodplain at the base of the escarpment between the Neuse River floodplain
and an elevated river terrace. Ponded depressions, swamps, and sloughs occur throughout the 3.5-milc
wide floodplain and are characterized by cypress -gum associations. Elevated, well -drained portions of
49 the floodplain support bottomland hardwood and mesic upland slope forests dominated by oaks and
ashes.
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Prior to implementation of wettand restoration activities, the Site was characterized by agriculture, fallow
fields, and forest. Land use activities in the drainage area and adjacent tracts are limited due to frequent
flooding from the Neuse River and poorly drained soils. Onsite land use was characterized by farming
(agricultural row crops), hunting, and recreational activities associated with the Howell Woods
Environmental Learning Center.
The primary restoration feature at the Site included 5400 linear feet of a dredged and straightened canal
and associated ditch network system that drained the majority of the Site. The canal was dredged along
the toe of slope at the outer floodplain edge. This area historically supported a backwater slough, as
evidenced by relict channel reaches within forested sections of the Site situated adjacent to the excavated
canal.
Wetland/backwater slough restoration at the Site entailed 1) ditch cleaning prior to backfitl, 2) impervious
ditch plug construction, 3) ditch/canal backfilling, 4) access road improvements, 5) littoral shelf creation,
and 6) pond outfall structural upgrades. In addition to hydrology alterations associated with ditch
backfilling, a primary component of the project entailed restoring surface water flows through the
abandoned backwater slough channel.
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page I

39
��rJJ- ??"•--- Directions to the Site:
From Highway 70 Business in SlnithtielcE
Travel south on Route 7f11 forapproximately 15 miles
Turn ICWSOutheast on Devil's Racetrack Road
�' F { �` ♦ fornpproximately IU miles
v�
/
es I � � Tttm Ectt into the Howell Woods F..nvin,nmental
Leaming Center
96 �+ See Jaime Sasser or Kinehon Taylor nt the Center otFee
z,o r Jam— f for a gate key and directions Into the Sitc
a i Ar c ,
:w
70 r.
APPROX.
SITE ,
- LOCATION
__.
J tL i
_� ��'" lot ; `�� .r' �~�f`-=� (�� `` •,
&A l ,,
,`
-�" �� '1. �� rim � I r � i • � *I'.` � ' 1�'--'.\4 t �,. , 13
{
13
' -- 11 •,'J'
IMN
• �6
� E
0 1 ml. 4 mi.
t , t ° I` .f
1:153,400 j1 '
Source: 1977 North Carolina Atlas and Gazelteer, p.63.
SITE LOCATION Own. by. CLF
2126RowlandPond Dr IiOWELL WOODS RESTORATION SITE FIGURE
Cktl by'
Willow Spring, NC 27592 Y11GL
(919y215-1693 Project Number'183 Date:
(919y341-3939lam Year 7 (2008) Monitoring Report Sept 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina Projec,: o&Ool

E

Based on an October 2001 Detailed Wetland Restoration Plan, the primary goals of the project included
1) maximizing the area returned to historic wetland function, 2) enhancing the water quality functions in
Gar Gut Creek and Mill Creek, and 3) reestablishing a functioning backwater slough system, which
extends through developing bottomland hardwood forests. Project structures and objectives are
summarized in Tables I and 2.
Table 1. Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods (EEP Project Number 183)
v
a
�
�
Revised
°
Project
c
Linear
Linear
Segment or
a
Footage or
Footage or
Reach ID
z
Acreage
Acreage
Comment
Howell Woods
R
---
24 acres
34 acres
___
Areas Effectively Drained by Historic
Ditch/Canal
Areas with Hydrology Effected by
Howell Woods
L
---
74 acres
64 acres
---
Ditches/Canal, but not Drained Below
Jurisdictional Threshold
Howell Woods
C
--
4 acres
4 acres
---
Littoral Shelf Excavation
Howell Woods
R
---
--
5251 feet
*
Passive Backwater Slough Restoration
* No stationing along the reach, linear footage is based on down valley distance of the braided stream channel, as based on inter
agency guidance (USACE et. al. 2005)
• **R = Restoration
E = Enhancement
C = Creation
At the time of project completion, stream restoration projects entailed traditional alterations to channel
dimension, pattern, and profile, as outlined in Applied River Motphologr (Rosgen 1996). However,
recent guidance (USACE et al. 2005) for the restoration of backwater sloughs in low -slope settings (outer
Coastal Plain) indicates that stream restoration may be achieved through the reestablishment of braided
stream morphology through passive measures, including ditch filling and natural progression of the
stream through historic sloughs, braids, and channels. Under this scenario, stream restoration success
criteria may include the successful restoration of hydrology within areas previously drained by ditching or
other hydrology alterations. Using this guidance, approximately 5251 linear feet of backwater slough
stream channel has been restored within the Site (Figure 2).
Wetland restoration acreages and locations were determined in the October 2001 Detailed Wetland
Restoration Plan. Wetland restoration areas were defined as portions of the Site that were hydrologically
impacted (hydrology below 12 inches of the ground surface for most of the growing season) by drainage
ditch excavation. Wetland restoration areas were determined utilizing DRAINMOD computer
simulations to predict the effect Site drainage features had on the adjacent groundwater table. However,
the abandoned backwater slough channel, which served as an approximately 2 to 3 foot deep drainage
feature prior to restoration activities, was not included in the original DRAINMOD model simulations.
Utilizing drainage effect estimates from the October 2001 Detailed Wetland Restoration Plan, the
abandoned backwater slough channel drained an additional 10 acres of wetland at the Site prior to
restoration activities. These revised acreages are depicted on Figure 2 and are described in Table l
(Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives).
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page 3

•
0
•

0 0 0
MAP LEGEND (DETAILED PLAN)
PROJECT BOUNDARY
APPROX MINOR CONTOUR
APPROX, MAJOR CONTOUR
WETLAND HYDROLOGY
aam
OPEN WATERI
urleo widated sediments
5.5
UPLANDS
._....._._.� (AllenalalSSale Aasoaalwnl
33.1
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
(>12-5%)
73-0
< 5%
11.3
® 5%-12.5%
165
Tour 140.0
MAP COMPILED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS
we
MAP LEGEND (REVISIONS)
Ada+uorlal
Mnatwn
REVISED � 5%
5 a ayes
IUA��II,rl REVISED $% -12 5 %
a e aaa
_ _ _ _ REVISED STREAM CHANNEL
5251 6^ear Ieel
250 D 250 500 7
SCALE IN FEET
WETLAN05
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
Ralegh. North Carolna
Pro}ect
HOWELL WOODS
RESTORATION SITE
Pr pw Ny IOU
-� v.r 7170a! ulord. "q Pyonl
JOHNSTON COUNTY.
NORTH CAROLINA
DRAINMOD
I REVISED
MITIGATION UNIT
CALCULATIONS
Y a
WGL So% 200a
Ckd By scale
WGL I� 500'
No
Ofi-0D2
50 FIGURE
J 2

0 0 0

•
•
1.3 Project History and Background
In the spring of 1999, a preliminary feasibility study was conducted at the Site, which included the
following activities: 1) property boundary surveys, 2) aerial photography and topographic mapping, 3)
soil mapping, 4) hydraulic conductivity estimates, 5) groundwater and surface water elevation
monitoring, and 6) planting plan development. A feasibility report was prepared in April 1999 that
described the results of these studies and presented mitigation options for the Site.
A mitigation alternatives analysis was subsequently conducted in the spring of 2000. The alternatives
analysis outlined five mitigation options for the Site. These mitigation options included 1) no action, 2)
stream restoration on new location, 3) in -canal structures and ford construction, 4) in -canal structures and
road elevation, and 5) backwater slough/passive stream restoration.
In March 2000 approximately 19 acres of agricultural fields within the Site were revegetated with native,
wetland -adapted tree species. Approximately 9600 tree seedlings were purchased and planted on 10 foot
centers. Monitoring of planted species occurred in the fall of 2001.
In an effort to expand the Site boundaries, additional acreage was acquired by the North Carolina Wetland
Restoration Program and an expanded Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Design Plan was prepared for
the Site in October 2001. Upon completion of the detailed plan the project was bid on May 17, 2002.
Backwater Environmental, a subsidiary of Osborne Co. Inc., was awarded the construction contract and
work initiated on June 18, 2002. Earthwork associated with the project was completed within 4 weeks
and the Site was planted in the winter of 2002.
Completed project activities, reporting history, and completion dates are summarized in Table 2,
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EEP Pro'eet Number 183)
Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion
Data
Collection
Completion
Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Initial Feasibility Report
---
---
Apr 1999
Mitigation Alternatives Analysis
Spring 2000
--
Spring 2000
Initial Site Planting (approximately 19 acres)
Mar 2000
Mar 2000
Year I Monitoring 2001)
Fall 2002
---
Nov 2002
Additional Property Acquisition
---
---
Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Design Plan
WNW
---
Oct 2001
Site Implementation (Wetland/Backwater Slough)
Fall 2002
---
Jul 2002
Site Planting (approximately 12 acres)
Dec 2002
---
Dec 2002
Year 2 Monitoring (2003)
Dec 2003
---
Dec 2003
Year 3 Monitoring 2004)
Dec 2004
---
Dec 2004
Year 4 Monitoring (2005)
Dec 2005
---
Dec 2005
Year 5 Monitoring (2006)
Dec 2006
Nov 2006
Nov 2006
Year 6 Monitoring 2007) Groundwater Gauges Only)
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Nov 2007
Year 7 Monitoring (2008) (Groundwater Gauges Only)
Dec 2008
Nov 2008
Dec 2008
Final Howel[ Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page 5

•
�J
•
Contact information regarding project designer, construction, planting contractor, and monitoring
personnel are summarized in Table 3 and relevant project background information is summarized in Table
4.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EP Project Number 183)
Designer
EcoScience Corporation
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Jerry McCrain [phone]
Construction Contractor
Backwater Environmental
PO Box 1654
Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312
Wes Newell 919) 5234375
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
Dwight McKinney
Monitoring Performers
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Years 5-7 (2006-2008)
2126 Rowland Pond Dr.
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Monitoring Point of Contact
Grant Lewis 919-215-1693
Table 4. Project Background Table
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EEP Project Number 183)
Project County
Johnston County, North Carolina
Drainage Area
Primary Neuse River - 1870 square miles
Secondary Gar Gut - 9.8 square miles
Drainage impervious cover estimate (%)
< 5
Stream Order
second
Ph sia ra hic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces
Ros en Classification of As -built
D-type
Cowardin Classification
PFOI
Dominant Soil Types
Altavista, State, Wehadkee, and Chastain
Reference Site ID
Onsite
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
Project and Reference — 03020201
NCDWQ Subbasin for Project and Reference
Project and Reference — 03-04-04
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed?
No Stream Index #27-52-7)
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed segment?
Yes, reach of the Neuse River in Subbasin 03-04-05 —
Stream Index # 27-(56b)
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
Mercury Level in Fish
of project easement fenced
0
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring A-viom Environmental, Inr— Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page 6

1.4 Monitoring Plan View
Monitoring activities for the Site, including relevant structures and utilities, project features, specific
project structures, and monitoring features are detailed in Figure 3.
Site features have been monitored through the use of continuous recording groundwater gauges,
permanently monumented vegetation plots, an onsite rain gauge, and photographic documentation. The
Site contains 14 groundwater gauges including two reference gauges and 12 mitigation area gauges.
Several gauges malfunctioned over the past few years and were replaced. The current groundwater
monitoring scheme is depicted in Figure 3. Gauge manufacturer and types include Remote Data Systems
(RDS) WL 40, RDS Ecotone, and Infinities.
There are five vegetation plots on the Site that have been permanently monumented with five-foot metal
fence posts, driven into each of the four corners of the plot, with PVC pipe attached for ease in plot
location identification.
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
In the fall of 2001, vegetation monitoring plots were randomly established within the Site. Each sample
plot was composed of two-300-foot transects extending from a central point, usually a groundwater
monitoring gauge. The Site was monitored for the as -built and the 2002 (year 1) growing season utilizing
this methodology with vegetation success achieved.
During the 2003 (year 2) monitoring period, North Carolina State University implemented a revised
• vegetation monitoring procedure based on the Draft Vegetation Monitoring Plan jor NCWRP Riparian
Buffer and Welland Restoration Projects document (undated). Five-10 meter by 10 meter plots were
established and permanently marked with pipe. The location of each vegetation monitoring plot is
depicted on Figure 3.
2.1.1 Soil Data
General soil conditions found onsite, including level of erosion and percentage of organic matter, are
summarized in Table 5.
Table 5. Preliminary Soil Data
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods (EEP Project Number 183
Series
Max Depth
inches
% Clay on
Surface
K
T
OM '%,
Altavista
+60
10 - 20
0.24
5
0.5 -
State
+60
5 - 15
0.28
5
<2
Wehadkee
+60
5 - 20
0.24
5
2-5
Chastain
+72
27 - 50
0.28
5
l - 6
Agricultural activities and excavation associated with Site implementation resulted in the exposure of
subsurface soil horizons; therefore, a reduction in percent clay and organic matter in the soil surface
layers occurred. In addition, erosion factors are calculated based on the percentage of silt, sand, and
organic matter and are likely to have been affected by Site development and implementation as well.
Values of erosion factors K and T have likely been elevated above the amount published in the Johnston
• County Soil Survey (USDA 1994).
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page 7

•
U

v
Note' I♦
Reference Gaepsa
Appvwmatety 500 Neel
Upstream
-----------
AO.q.,a - - - - - - - -
Org.a - - - -
A-
•r : —r
i�oo ' 7
-------------------------
�MAPLEGEND
PflOJECT BOUNDARY
-----
WOODS
APPROX. MINOR CONTOURS
APPROX- MAJOR CONTOURS
OPEN WATER
VEGETATXON MONITORING PLOT
-
MONITORING GAUGE (-12 S %)
MONITORING GAUGE IS - 12.5 %)
-
MONITORING GAUGE (c5 %)
MAP COMPILED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS
Rama• Y
- 1
,
Yb1a 1
A4 e
GwiOa 7
:t 1,
r
♦ 4
♦
♦
♦
r
250 0 250 500 750
SCALE IN FEET
•
WETLANDS
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
Ra* gh, North Cards
HOWELL WOODS
RESTORATION SITE'
Prod N­*' ra3
yw 7 I2006 Mwrbrrp RaPet0
JOHNSTON COUNTY.
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING
PLAN
WIM SW 200E
ca.w a�
WGL SOP
ad�w
O&MI
FIGURE
3

�J
•
•

r❑
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
No vegetation problem areas were identified within the Site during year 7 (2008) monitoring. All
previously noted vegetation problem areas have resolved naturally.
2.1.3 Stem Counts
Five vegetation plots had been previously established by North Carolina State University as depicted in
Figure 3. The plots arc 10 meters square and are located randomly within the Site. These plots were
surveyed for five monitoring seasons; results for years 2 through 5 (2003 through 2006) arc included in
Table 7. No reference area was studied; therefore no comparisons could be made to reference conditions.
'fable 6. Stem Counts for Planted Species Arranged by Plot
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EEP Project Number 183)
Species
Year 5 (2006) Individual Plot Data
0.0247 acre each
Year 2
(2003)
Totals
Year 3
(2004)
Totals
Year 4
(2005)
Totals
Year 5
(2006)
Totals
���
Survival
l
2
3
4
5
CelAaknalms occ•idewali.s
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
cralclegus s.
0
3
0
5
0
*
0
0
8
Dtos Evros Vlr >tuiano
0
1
0
1
0
*
0
0
2
l ru.rinus �enrtsVl� anica
0
14
0
5
0
22
21
28
19
86
Ilex deciduas•
0
0
0
I
0
*
0
0
1
Plantnus occidentalis
1
0
0
2
2
4
3
3
5
125
Po ulus hctero l vlla
0
1
0
0
0
*
0
0
1
xercus lvrcaa
0
0
0
l
0
0
0
0
1
--
uercus ni gra
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
uercus pagodel
l
0
1
0
0
4
5
4
2
50
uerctts phellos
1
5
2
0
0
7
7
6
8
114
uercus s.
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
--
Taxodituu distichtnn
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
200
Ulmus americana
0
0
0
0
1
*
0
0
1
Winits mbra
1
0
2
1
0
*
0
0
4
Uhnus• s .
0
1
36
16
27
*
185
130
80
Total Stems Per Plot
4
27
42
32
31
45*
223
173
136
Stems Per Acre
162
1093
1700
1296
1255
364
1806
1401
1101
* - Historical project docurnents necessary to provide this data were unavailable at the time of this report submission.
Due to the revised monitoring protocol during the second year of vegetation surveys, no comparisons of
as -built or 2002 (year 1) can be made to the subsequent monitoring years. Therefore, planted species
have been based upon previous annual monitoring reports and percent survival is based on a comparison
of 2003 (year 2) totals where possible. The phased planting schedule made it difficult to determine
planted trees from naturally recruited trees, therefore, the number of "planted" species was based on the
experience and judgment of the monitoring team, and counts for planted species may be influenced by
naturally recruited stems. During preparation orthis monitoring report, no as -built mitigation plan or data
for 2002 (year 1) totals were available and therefore, arc not included in the table.
Results from vegetation surveys exceeded success criteria with 346, 1806, 1401, and 1101 planted sterns
per acre present in years 2 through 5, respectively with an increase in species diversity over the 5-year
monitoring period. No data was available for year 1 monitoring. Based on these results, Site vegetation
should be considered successful.
Final Ihlowell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 Decembcr2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page 9

2.1.4 Vegetation Plot Photos
Photographs were taken at all permanent photo points and are included in Appendix A. The photographs
show that vegetation is generally growing well and consists of a good combination of' woody and
herbaceous species.
2.2 Wetland Assessment
Fourteen groundwater monitoring gauges have been maintained and monitored throughout the year 7
(2008) growing season (Appendix 13). Twelve are located within the restoration areas and two are located
within the reference wetlands immediately northwest of the Site. The groundwater gauges record daily
readings of groundwater depth. Daily rainfall data recorded from a rain gauge maintained and monitored
on the Site was used for seasonal comparison. Groundwater gauge graphs for years 1 (2002) through year
6 (2007) arc inciudcd in Appendices D-1, respectively. Table 7 summarizes success criteria for
graurtdwatCr gauges over the 7-year monitoring period.
Success criteria based on the 2002 Monitoring Plan for wetland hydrology require that the area be
inundated or saturated within 12 inches of the ground surface for a consecutive period of 12.5 percent of
the growing season. The growing season in Johnston County begins March 21 and ends November 4
(229 days). Areas inundated less than 5 percent of the growing season (l I days) are classified as
nonwetlands. Areas inundated between 5 percent and 12.5 percent oh the growing season can be
classified as wetlands depending upon factors such as the presence of hydrophytic vegetation and hydric
soils. In order to attain hydrologic success, saturation within 12 inches of the ground surface is required
for at least. I I consecutive clays (5 percent of the growing season) or 29 consecutive clays (12.5 percent of
the growing season)..
All groundwater gauges had a presence of' hydrophytic wetland vegetation and hydric soils based on
criteria set forth in the Corps (?I'Engineers Wetloncl Delineation r1'Icumal. Vegetation lists for each gauge
can be found in Appendix C.
Groundwater hydrology within 12 inches of the soil surface occurred for greater than 12.5 percent of the
growing season I'or the year 7 (2008) growing season at Gauges 1, 4-7, and 9-12 anti greater than 5
percent of the growing season at Gauges 2, 3, anti 8.
2.2.1 Wetland Problem Area Plan View
No wetland problem areas have been identified during the year 7 (2008) monitoring period. As depicted
in Appendix B, all gauges arc currently functioning and recorded groundwater hydrology within 12
inches of the ground surface for at least 5 percent of the growing season with a presence of hydrophytic
vegetation.
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom E tiviromnental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
FEP Project Number 18; December 2008
Johnston County, ,North Carolina page 10

Table 7. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years l through 7
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods (EEP Project number 183)
Success Criteria Achievedl,Mas Consecutive Days During Crowing Season (Percentage)
liistoric
Serial
year I {2002}^
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Description
Number
2003 *
2004)**
2005
2006
2007
2008
Yes/34 days
Yes/43 days
Yes/64 days
1
RDSA
S2C9894
Yes/> 12.5%
No Data
No Data
No Data
(14.8 %)
(18.8 %)
27.9%)
Malfunctioned
Yes/25 days
No/10 days
Yes/1 1 days
2
RDS13
B6522D l
Yes/� 12.5%,
No Data
No Data
***
(l 1.0 %)
{4.4 %}
(5 %)
Malfunctioned
Nc-/8 days
No/8 days
Yes/1 1 days
3
RDSC
B6B6EO9
No/<5%
No Data
No Data
***
(3.9 %)
(3.9 %)(5
%)
Yes/76 days
Yes/66 days
Yes/80 days
4
INF6
A279A59
Malfunctioned
No Data
No Data
Na Data
(33.2%)
(28.8%)
(34.9%)
Malfimclioned/
Yes/229 days
Yes/80 days
Yes/96 days
INF5
A28984F
No Data
No Data
No Data
Malfunctioned/
Malfunctioned
Yes/33 days
Yes/47 days
Yes/35 days
6
RDSD
136B4F139
No Data
No Data
<5%
***
(14.4 %)
(70,5 %)
(15.3%)
INF1/
Yes/73 days
Yes/36 days
Yes/168 days
Yes/68 days
Yes/82 days
7
EBD85C9
Yes15-12.5%
No Data
JG6
31.9%
15.7 %
73.4 %
o
0
1'es/19 days
Yes/15 days
Yes/18 days
8
INF2
A3C095A
Malfitnctioned
Mal- functioned
No Data
No Data
(8.3 %)
(6.6 %)
(7.9%)
Malfunctioned/
days
Yesl44 days
Yes/37 das
9RDSE
B652374
Na/<5°/a
No Data
No Data
4 days (1.7 %)Yes/29
y
Malfunctioned/
Yes/54 days
Yes/68 days
Yes/43 days
Yes/63 days
l o
INF4
A286A2D
No Dat;i
No Data
<5%
23.60/6)
(29.7 %)
18.8 %)
27.5%)
Malfunctioned/
Yes/54 days
Yes/32 days
Yes/41 days
Yes/51 days
1NF3
AB36608
No Data
No Data
<5%
(23.6%)
1
(14 0 %)
(17.9 %)
72.3%)
Final Ho%k,cll Woods Annual Monitoring
EEP Project Number 183
Johnston County, North Carolina
Axiom Errviro► newal, Inc.
Monitoring Year 7 of 8 (2008)
December 2008
page 1 1

Wf
Historic
Success Criteria Achieved/lt•1ax Consecutive bays
burin F Growing Season Percenta ►e
Serial
Description
Number
Year I (2002)^
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Ca
2003 t
2004 **
2005
2006
2007
2008
Malfunctioned/
No/
Yesf52 days
Yes/
Yes15l days
12
RDSF
B652408
No Data
No Data
4 days (1.7 %)
�5°/tr
(22.7 %)
43 days (18.8 %)
(22.2%)
***
Yes170 days
Yes/34 days
Yes/56 days
Yes/64 days
Ref�l
RL1' l
N386A9F I
Yesl> 12,5%
No Data
No Data
(30.6'%)
(14.8 %)
(24.4 %)
(27.9%)
N3B6AA6
Yes/74 days
Yesl72 days
Yes/55 days
Yes/63 days
Ref2
REF2
Yes> 12.5%
No Data
No Data
4
(32.3%)
(31.4 %)
(24.0 %)
(27.5%)
^ Gauges malfunctioned for the majority of the growing; season_ Site construction did not occur umil mid•groNving season; therefore, gauges will be monitored for a sixth
growing season_
* - Data for most of the end of the growing season was unavailable.
Graph is included in the year 3 (2004) report for one of the Infinities gauges; howe� or, it does not indicate which one.
- Gauges malfunctioned for the first several months of the growing season_
Final hdowell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 8 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 Deccrnber 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page 12

0 0 0
M
7
6
2
0
Figure 4. 2008 Climatic Data vs. 30-year Historic Data
March April May June July August September October
Growing Season Month
132008 Data o 30% Historical 0 70% Historical

2.2.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment
All monitored gauges within restoration areas met success criteria of inundation/saturation within 12
inches of the surface for at least 5 percent of the growing season with a presence of hydrophytic
vegetation (Table 8). Hydrogr•aphs containing precipitation and groundwater data for each gauge can be
found in Appendix B. Photographs for vegetation plots can be found in Appendix A.
Table 8. Wetland Criteria Attainment
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods (EEP Project Number 183)
Gauge ID
Hydrology
Threshold
Met"
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Criteria Met?
Site
Mean
J
Vegetation
Plot II)
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold
Met?
Site
Mean
I
Yes
Yes
100 %
1
Yes
100'%o
2
Yes
Yes
2
Yes
3
Yes
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
Yes
5
Yes
6
Yes
Yes
7
Yes
Yes
8
Yes
Yes
9
Yes
Yes
l0
Yes
Yes
I
Yes
Yes
12
Yes
Yes
3.0 SEVEN-YEAR MONITORING ASSESSMENT
In summary, the Site achieved success criteria for vegetation and hydrology for over the seven-year
monitoring period.
Results from vegetation surveys exceeded success criteria with 346, 1806, 1401, and 1 101 planted stems
per acre present in years 2 through 5, respectively; with an increase in species diversity over the
monitoring period.
Previous vegetative problem areas within the Site have resolved naturally and no vegetation or wetland
problem areas were present within the Site during year 7 (2008) monitoring.
Groundwater hydrology within 12 inches of the soil surface occurred for greater than 12.5 percent of the
growing season for the year 7 (2008) growing season at Gauges 1, 4-7, and 9-12 and for at least 5 percent
of the growing season at Gauges 2, 3, and 8. Vegetation documented in the vicinity of each of the twelve
restoration area groundwater gauges was considered hydrophytic wetland vegetation. In addition,
wetland criteria set forth in the Corps of Engineers lFetland Delineation Manual were met with the
presence of the three critcria, I) hydric soils, 2) hydrophytic vegetation, and 3) wetland hydrology at all
gauges.
In summary, the Site achieved success criteria for hydrology and vegetation in the Sevcnth Monitoring
Year (2007). Based on available data, the Site achieved success criteria for hydrology and vegetation
over the entire 7-year monitoring period.
Final Flowdl Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom F_nvironinentul, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 Decernbcr 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page 14

4.0. REFERENCES
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report
Y-87-1, United States Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi,
North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP). Undated. Draft Internal Guidance for
Vegetation Monitoring Plans for NCWRP Riparian Buffer and Wetland Restoration Projects.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2004. Climatography of the
United States No. 20; Monthly Station Climate Summaries, 1971-2000. National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and
Information Service, National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology, Wildland Hydrology (Publisher). Pagosa
Springs, Colorado.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources. 2005. Information Regarding Stream Restoration
in the Outer Coastal Plain of North Carolina. Available:
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlandsldOCttrtlents/CoastalPi.iinSTrearntvlitigatioiiFint►I Dr,lRPoticyNov2g.doc
[October 30, 2006].
® United States. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1994. Soil Survey of Johnston County,
North Carolina. United States Department of Agriculture.
LJ
Final Howell Woods Anl1tlal Monitoring Axiunt Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 ul 7 (2008)
EEP Projecl Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina page 15

11
E
APPENDIX A
VEGETATION PHOTOGRAPHS
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 ot'7 (2008)
HEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

•
Appendix A
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Taken September 2, 2008
A
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

0
•

J
0
APPENDIX B
YEAR 7 (2008) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 712008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

•
E

Water Level (inches)
I I ! I I I AI I I I I 1 1 1
0)?N0O0)4 N, 0OD M 4�-N)0MM A NJ N A M M 0 N4�L
3/2/2008
3/ 10/2008
3/18/2008
3/26/2008
4/3/2008
� n
4/11/2008 "" N
0 3
4/ 19/2008 0
a CCCC
4/27/2008
5/5/2008 N
m
m
5/13/2008 0
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
7/8/2D08
a.
0 7/16/2008
7/24/2008
8/1/2008
8/9/2008
8/ 1712008
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/ 10/2008
9/18/2008 m = o
9/26/2008 °3
n C)
1014/2008 m A c
10/ 12/2008
to
10/20/2008 cn
co
10/28/2008 rn
0
11/512008 — ----- "-
11/13/2008
0 0 N ns w w A 4�-
v7 ;r ip Ln
Precipitation (inches)
2
O
cD
O
O
CL
N
CD
IN
-40
m
N �
0
0
00
Q
a)
c
c�
v
w
m
17�
•

•
•
n
u

Water Level (inches)
AW W W W WNNNNNL1 L sL -�
r
OODQSANOOOMANQ0OG>A NQ000).AIV O NAMODC]N A
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/18/2008
3/26/2008
4/3/2008
4/11/2008
4/19/2008
4/27/2008
5/5/2008
5/13/2008
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/ 14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
718I2008
7/16/2008
7/24/2008
8/1/2008
819/2008
8/17/2008
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/ 10/2008
9/ 18/2008
9/26/2008
10/4/2008
10/ 12/2008
10/20/2008
10/28/2008
11/5/2008
11 /13/2008
Q O s N N
Vr U1 CTl
Precipitation (inches)
W W A l=-
C.71 U7
2
O
cO
O
O
a
V)
� m
c
-4C
CD
N N
0
c
CO
0
m
cn
ro
O
a�
P.
•
•

�i
E�
0

Water Level (inches)
PW W W(:0GONNIVNNLLLLL , , 1�1
0wm4>.NC)wm ANOOo0AN)0wm�NONAOOoONA
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/ 18/2008
3/2612008
4/3/2008
4/1112008
4/ 19/2008
4/2712008
5/5/2008
5/13/2008
5/21/2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/1412008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
7/8/2008
m 7/16/2008
7/24/2008
8/ 1 /2008
8/9/2008
8/17/2008
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/10/2008
9/18/2008
9/26/2008
10/4/2008
10/ 12/2008
10/20/2008
10/28/2008
11 /5/2008
11113/2008
m z
Q.
G) Cr
@
o
� A
C
0
0
O O 1 1 N N W W
Ch C11 CJ1 U1
Precipitation (inches)
A A
2
0
O
0
a
CD c�
m
-40
CD
N W
Q
Q
OD
Q
CM
v
a�
e
r�
�7

i
E,
�tl

Water Level (inches)
I I i I 1 1 { I I I I I I 1
W W W W W N N N N N J J J J J I I I I J J J ....a J
WM � MOO M4A- CD M MZ, CDOOQSANOPO4,M OON4 Q,MM
3/2/2008
3/ 1012008
3/18/2008
3/26/2008 i cn 3
..
m
4/3/2008 0 "
o_ =r
4/11/2008 p j
4/19/2008
4/27/2008 m
m o N
5/5/2008 m
in
5/13/2008 0
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
616/2008
6/14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
p 7/8/2008
7/16/2008
7/24/2008
8/1 /2008
8/9/2008
8/17/2008
8125/2008
9/2/2008
9/1012008 m z
m o
9/18/2008 0-
o
9/26/2008 Cj rr
a� -1 o
14
10/4/2008 °g a
10/12/2008
CA
10/20/2008
N
10/28/2008 0
111512008------- — ----- � -
11 /13/2008
O O J J N N W W
CJ1 U1 CT1 U't
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
CD
O
O
0.
a� ar
v U2
CD
N �
0
0
co
0
aw
0
CD
w
w
0
•

.7
•
•

Water Level (inches)
O 00 (M A N O CO (M 4A N 0 00 0M 4� N 0 W 0) 4� N O N A 0) 00 O N 4�
3/3/2008
3/11 /2008
3/ 19/2008
3/27/2008— — — — — — — —
— — —
-- 3
4/4/2008
0
4/12/2008 Gj j
4/20/2008 O
4/28/2008
5/6/2008
fA
5/14/2008 °
5/22/2008
5/30/2008
6/7/2008
6/15/2008
6/2312008
7/ 1 /2008
p 7/9/2008
m 7/17/2008
7/25/2008
8/2/2008
8/10/2008
8/18/2008
8/26/2008
9/3/2008
9/11/2008 m
7 °
9/19/2008 °- CD
9/27/2008 a C) cr
CD
10/5/2008 V ° a g
10/13/2008
10/21 /2008
m
10/29/2008 IF °
11 /6/2008
d d 1 N N W W
CJ1 CJt U1 f n
Precipitation (inches)
U-A
17J
J

v
C'
Water Level (inches)
W W WWWNNNNN .:)?—j 11i
OO�d'�ANOOoQ�ANOODOAN0000ANONAOC00NA000
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/18/2008
3/26/2008
4/3/2008
4/11 /2008
4/19/2008
4/27/2008
5/5/2008
5/13/2008
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
7/8/2008
7/16/2008
7/24/2008
811 /2008
8/9/2008
8/17/2008
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/10/2008
9/18/2008
9/26/2008
1014/2008
10/ 12/2008
10/20/2008
10/28/2008
11 /5/2008
11 /13/2008
O O -+ N N W W
U7 Cn U1 6
Precipitation (inches)
m z
= o
a<
o f°
rr
o
� A
U3
2
0
c�
O
O
Q.
N
cn 0
a) a,
I C
-4(0
N Cr)
a
0
00
Q
m
0
m
m
0
•
s

•
17L
0

Water Level (inches)
OOoOA MC3MMArQC OMMAi OJ 0MMA NON AMMCDri4 OMM
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/18/2008
3126/2008-------- -- -- � 3
m �
4/3/2008
0
4/ 11 /2008 C)
4/19/2008 °
4/27/2008 ca
5/5/2008
K N y
5/13/2008 °
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/14/2008
6/22/2008
w
6/30/2008
p 7/8/2008
7/16/2008
7/24/2008
8/1 /2008
8/9/2008
8/17/2008
8/2512008
9/2/2008
9/10/2008 rn z
:3 °
9/18/2008 °
0
9/26/2008 C) m
10/4/2008 K � A
w m.
10/12/2008 to
10/20/2008
y
10/28/2008
11/5/2008-------- --- --
11 / 13/2008
O O + N N W W
U1 Ch Cn Cli
Precipitation (inches)
2
O
O
0
Q.
y
0
a� m
-4 cQ
cD
N v
CD
0
00
M
cn
CD
D
m
•
•

Water Level (inches)
PWW WW W NNNNfV-�-it —+��L I i i 1 s— —
007MANOODMANO00MANOODM h-MQNJ A-MMC)NA
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/18/2008
3/26/2008 —
a � �
K A ¢} d
4/3/2008 a
o =r
4/11/2008 G j
4/19/2008 ,
4/27/2008 m 0
Cn
5/5/2008
5/13/2008 0
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
fl 7/8/2008
7/16/2008
7124/2008
8/1/2008
8/912008
8/ 1712008
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/10/2008 m z
m o
9/18/2008 °- CD
0 3
9/26/2008 C) Q
CD
10/4/2008 A
10/ 12/2008
10/20/2008
y
10/28/2008 O
— — — — — — —
— — — — — —
1115I200$ —
11 / 1312008
O O 1 N N W W
Precipitation (inches)
dA A
6
2
O
cR
O
O
a
N
c� 0
5► m
V fQ
.-. CD
N CO
0
v
00
0
m
c
cp
0
m
m
..r
s
•

•
0
•

Water Level (inches)
A W W W W WNNNNNLLLLL i i
OW0AtQ0MMANOWM4' -N)0M MA N01V 4t,0)Oo0NA
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/18/2008
— — — — — — — —
312612008-- — —
4/3/2008
o
4/11/2008 y
4/19/2008 °
IE
4/27/2008
0. N
5/5/2008
m
U)
5/13/2008 0
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
p 7/8/2008
m 7/16/2008
7/24/2008
8/112008
8/9/2008
8/ 17/2008
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/10/2008 m z
0 o
9/18/2008 m a <
9/26/2008rr
N" ° 3
10/4/2008
w ?. A
10/12/2008 to
10/20/2008 co
a� y
`dK o iil
10/2812008 ~ °
11/5/2008F
------- —
11/13/2008
O O N N W W
U1 CT1 Ut !Jt
Precipitation (inches)
•
•

•
0
•

Water Level (inches)
A W W W W W N N f V rV N 1 j L s L i i
OGDm4�NOQOmA"0mmA rQ0mm ANON 4�- OOOONA
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/18/2008
— — — — — — — —
-- 3/26/2008us
4/3/2008 d
0 =
4/11/200$ CL L) ^'
K W i
4/19/2008 w 0
4/27/2008
to
5/5/2008 m
a.
5/13/2008 0
m
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
p 7/8/2008
7/16/2008
7/24/2008
811 /2008
8/9/2008
8/17/2008
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/10/2008
m z
9/18/2008 '
a
y m 0 CD
9/26/2008
Cr
1 a14/2008 0 �
o .�
10/12/2008
�n
10/20/2008 CD
C
cu
10/28/2008 0
--4 ------- �— -
11 /5/2008
11/13/2008
O O s N N w W A A
C71 (Tt Cn U7 l�n
Precipitation (inches)
(0
w W
V �
N j
0 0
0
00
lei
•
U
•

Water Level (inches)
A W W W W W N N N N N i J J J J 1 1 1 1 J J J J J
OCOmANO000)ANO00CDANO00Q)ANONA0)O0QNAO00
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/ 18/2008
3/26/2008 cn 3
.. 3
4/3/2008
o
4/11/2008 n LI/~.�' ^'
K J
q �
4/19/2008 0
4/27/2008 '
ea
5/5/2008 coo
m
5/13/2008 0
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
v 718I2008PmErm
n 7/16/2008
7/24/2008
8/1 /2008
8/9/2008
8/ 17/2008
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/10/2008 Z
= o
9/18/2008 o
9/26/2008 boor---- 3
10/4/2008 f M 0 p
10/12/2008 cn
10/20/2008
10/28/2008 0
1115I2008 -------------- --
11113/2008
O O J J N N W W A 411,
CJ'i C.Ti CJ1 U1 Ch
Precipitation (inches)
-< G)
V (Om
IV �
o
0
CO
,Z
•
17J
•

•
LJ
•

Water Level (inches)
A W W W W W N N N N N j -� L sL I i I — s�
O WOANOCACr) ANO000)ANOOOaiANONAQ3070N A
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/18/2008
3/26/2008— — — — — — — — — — —
— — y �r
4/3/2008 n
D S
4/11/2008
a
4/19/2008 D
4/27/2008Cn
'
m
5/5/2008
5/13/2008 0
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
p 718/2008
7/16/2008
7/24/2008
811 /2008
8/9/2008
8/17/2008
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/10/2008
o
9118/2008 �� ` a <
a_ t°
9/26/2008 Cr
10/4/2008 g A
10/12/2008 cc
10/20/2008
10/28/2008 D
11 /5/2008Oro
11 /13/2008
Ca O N N W W A A
Ut C,ft U1 CTi CJl
Precipitation (inches)
X
•
u
.7

•
s
•

Water Level (inches)
A W W W W W fV N fV N N L 1 s -+
O Ca m A N O 00 0) A N O w m a N O m0) A N O fV A 0 m 0 N A
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/18/2008
— — — — — — — --
— --- 3/26/2008,n
4/3/2008
4/11 /2008
4/19/2008 d
4/27/2008
5/5/2008 C
a)
5/13/2008 0
5/21 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
p 718/2008
7/16/2008
7/24/2008
811 /2008
8/9/2008
a
8/17/2008 K
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/10/2008 m z
o
9/18/2008 m
9/26/2008 G) Cr
10/4/2008 a
10/12/2008 LO
10/20/2008
1 0/28/2008 0
11/512008 ----- --- ----- - -
11I13/2008
O O j N N W W
CJ'� Ui Cli Ch
Precipitation (inches)
A A
Ui
2
0
CD
0
0
CL CD
N m
CD
o� n
V CD
N p�j
o C:
c�
CO
1
c
0
•
•

Water Level (inches)
A A A A W W W W W N N N N N-- —+
M ND00oMANj0MMANOW O>AN00003ANON Ac7>coON
3/2/2008
3/10/2008
3/18/2008
-------` 3/26/2008— -- �—
v �
4/3/2008 0
0 3
4/11/2008 7
4/19/2008 °
a
4/27/2008
5/5/2008 f
m
5/13/2008 N0
5121 /2008
5/29/2008
6/6/2008
6/ 14/2008
6/22/2008
6/30/2008
p 7/8/2008
7/16/2008
7/24/2008
811 /2008
8/9/2008
8/17/2008
8/25/2008
9/2/2008
9/10/2008 m z
o
9/18/2008 R ° (D
9/26/2008CD
a
10/4/2008 f
N
10/12/2008
U)
10/20/2008 v
10/28/2008 0
11/5/2008 ------------- —
11 /13/2008
O O --+ N N W W A A
Ch N U1 6 Cn
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
CD
0
0 X
a. m
cn CD
0
01 0
-4 rn
N �
o�
00
) N
p1
c
c�
•
•

0
�J
APPENDIX C
YEAR 7 (2008) GAUGE VEGETATION LISTS
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

•
1
LJ
0

YEAR 7 (2008) GAUGE vEGETATION LISTS
HOWELL WOODS RES•rORATION SITE
July 14, 21)(18
GAUGE 1
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
L
Quercrrs phellos
Canopy
FACW-
2.
rrurinus pcnlrsrlrunicrr
Canopy
FALL`
3.
Liquidu,nhar,ctvruciJiuu
Canopy
FAC+
4.
Ulaut.s (Imeric•aao
Canopy
FACW
5.
Cellrs laev galla
Canopy
FALL'
6.
Ulums ruhru
Sapling
FAC
7
Calfrrnu,scaralmuoza
Sapling
FAC
g.
Que)+cus lrr•aur
Sapling
OBL
9.
Iles dechIlla
Shrub
FACW-
If).
CalyuCordiJornlis
Shrtlb
FAC
1 I.
Carer spp.
Herb
FAC to OBL
12
Conrnlelina'irgilrial
Herb
FALL'
1.1
LCersia lerlricnhwi.s
Ilcrb
OBL
14.
'Irrrnclbnn•iagigaruean
HQrb
FACW
15,
Srnn•uniscerpums
llerb
OBL
1 G
Smilax rolundiJblia
Vine
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,
or FAC (except
FAC-) = 100%
GAUGE2
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
lndicator
I.
Ulrutsulolu
Canopy
FACU+
2.
rrrrrinu.s penn..vlrrrnic•a
Canopy
FACW
3,
Liquidamhar srt•r•acilllra
Canopy
FAC+
4.
Ulnnls sp.
Canopy
FAC to FACW
5,
Plalanusoccidenmlis
Canopy
FACLr-
6.
Querells pagoda
Canopy
FAC+
7.
Querc•Irs phellos
Canopy
FACW-
S.
Crulaegus sp.
Canopy
FAC to OeL
q.
Quer•cus lvlvl r
Sapling
OBL
IO.
Dulchium arundinaceum
I lerb
OBL
1 1 .
Juncos effiacrls
Herb
FACW a
12_
Carer !lu idalconuasu
I lerb
0I4L
Percent
of Dominant Species that are Olin., FACW,
or FAC (except FAC-) = 92'%
GAUGES
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
1.
Ulmus alauo
Canopy
FACU+
2,
Fra inus
Canopy
FACW
3,
Liquidambursrl•rrtcilLter
Canopy
FAC+
4,
Acerrnhrum
Canopy
FAC
5.
Cellis laev garu
Canopy
FACW
6,
Crrrr%r spp.
I [crb
FAC to OBL
7.
Purthenoci.ssns quinquefarlia
I lerb
FAC
S.
Toxi odendron radicans
I Icrb
FAC
9.
Bochmeria cv-11ndric•a
Herb
FACL'+
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (except FAC-) = 89
0

YFAR 7 (2008) IlOXVFLL WOODS (continued)
.Jul 14,2008
Cr\UCE 4
Ruminant Plant Ski its
5tratttrn
Indicator
1.
Nr'.c.srr hillorrt
Canopy
OHL
2.
Ulrrrus umeric ana
Canopy
FACW
3.
Accr• vuhrum
Canopy
FAC
4.
�)uercus lvrcrla
Canopy
OHL
5.
flerdecielua
Shrub
FAC-
E.
Curer Spp.
herb
FAC to 0131-
7,
Leer.siu lentir-ularis
herb
OHL
R.
Bochrueria ct'lirrdrlccr
limb
FACW I-
9
Sanrwv.s ccr'ram.r
I Ierb
ORL
10.
Commelimr rirgilrica
Herb
FACW
I ].
smilarboom-no.r
Ilerb
FAC
12.
Alicromcgium viminerrrn
Herb
FAC r
Pcrccnt of Dominant Species that are ORL, FACW.
or FAC (except FAC-) = 92'Yo
GAUGE 5
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
1.
Ulrma' omericana
Canopy
FACW
I
rlressu hilloru
Canopy
OHL
3-
Lkluiehimhcm'.slyiaciflua
Canopy
FACt
4.
Cellis luevigula
Sapling
FACW
S.
C'ratacgnr sp.
Sapling
FAC to OHL
6.
Carpi ucs caraforfconr
Sapling
FAC
7.
F'ravinctspennsvlvalric'a
Shrub
FACW
S.
Ile.vdec'irlua
Shrub
FACW-
9.
Boehmeria cv1huh-icn
Herb
FACW+
®
10
uareev spp.
herb
FAC to OHL
1 I
Smila.r rolzuulifolia
Herb
FAC
12
Aeer r•uhrism
Herb
FAC
13.
Commelina Orginira
Herb
FACW
14.
:Irunc!lnrniagil;artlernr
herb
FACW
15
Leersialenticular•i.s
Herb
OHL
Percent of Dominant Species that are OHL. FACW,
or FAC (except
FAC-) = I W/4
CAUCF.6
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
I.
U!»rrrs alutu
Canopy
FACU t-
2.
Uhnrr.s rtrhrrt
Canopy
FAC
3.
Liguidambar gvraci/lua
Canopy
FAC t
4.
.-leer ruhrum
Canopy
FAC
5.
Fraxirms pem gh-cmica
Canopy
FACW
6.
Betuhrnirru
Canopy
FACW
7.
Cratrregus sp,
Sapling
FAC to ORL
K.
Cr)-ex spp.
Herb
FAC to ORL
9.
Campscs radicans
I lerb
FAC
10.
Satn•urusvermruS
Herb
OBL
I 1 _
Boehnreria arlindrico
I lerb
FACW i-
12.
Cornmelina viryinica
IIerb
FACW
Percent
of Dominant Species ]hat are OBI-, FACW,
Or FAC (except
FAC-) = 92'%,
11

YEAR 7 (2008) HOWFLI. WOODS (continued)
July 14, 2008
®
GAUGE 7
Species
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
1.
,Vi'ssa hilluru
Canopy
OBL
2.
Celrisluerigcna
Canopy
FACW
3,
elcerrubrian
Canopy
FAC
4.
!'rLil'imis penrt.Svlvanica
Canopy
FACW
5,
l.iyrridurnhur slrvacifluu
Canopy
FACF
6.
Ulmtr.e r•uhru
Sapling
FAC
7.
Acerruhrr,m
Sapling
FAC
9.
Cralcregris sp.
Sapling
FAC to 013E
9,
Iles Cie( lduus
Shrub
FACW-
10
cm-pinus curolirrirrnn
Shrub
FAC
11.
Curer spp.
I [erb
FAC to OHL
1
S7nila.r rolrardifoliu
herb
FAC
13.
,1lic•royegium virneneurn
I lerb
FAC F
14.
Commelhra virginica
Ilerb
FACl1'
15.
&ehmvriu cvlindric•a
Herb
FACW+
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBI., FACW,
or FAC (except FAC-) = 100'%
CAUCEH
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
1.
Querc•us phellus
Canopy
FACW-
2.
Liquidambeir src vruci]hru
Canopy
FACt-
3.
Ulnms americans
Canopy
FACW
4,
.dcer'rrehrum
Canopy
FAC
5.
Diospt'ros virginiema
Sapling
FAC
6.
Carpirws carolirrionu
Sapling
FAC
7.
lle.r deciclua
Sapling
FACW-
A.
Fruvintrs peen. lvlrunica
Shrub
FACW
9.
Vilir rorundifhliu
I lerb
FAC
10
C'ure.r spp.
I lerb
FAC to 0 B L
11.
Comarelimr virginicn
Herb
FACW
12.
Boeluneria r ,lindrical
I lerb
FACW+
13
Snlild,rr•onrmliJirlicr
I[erb
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FAC%V,
or FAC (e.xcept
FAG) — 100%,
CAUCE9
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
!.
l.ignidrnnhrrr,5lrruci]lria
Canopy
FAC+
2.
Diogpvros virginiarm
Canopy
FAC
3.
Populus delloids
Canopy
FAC+-
4.
.deer• rubrum
Shrub
FAC
5,
Salix nigru
Shrub
OBL
6.
Taxodium disrichum
Shrub
OBL
7.
Grcrruegus sp.
Shrub
FAC to 0BL
g.
Car•mrs amomum
Shrub
FAC11' F
9.
Ilibi.ec•us mo.rch WON
Hcrb
OBI,
10.
Aster vinrineus
Ilerb
FAC
1 1 .
Aneb-apogon virginhars
Ucrb
FACU
12
C'"'spp.
Herb
FAC to OJIL
13.
.hnrc'us of tsus
Iierb
FACW F
14.
Scirpers c;tyrru-imis
I lerb
OBL
15.
Seteriugenif-Ishru
Herb
FAC
is
16,
Rrdmvargurrr.s
ilerb
FACUF
Percent
ofDonunant Species that are OBL, FACW,
or FAC (except
FAC-) = 94

YEAR 7 (2008) HOWELl. WOODS (continued)
Ju1v 14, 2008
GAUCF, 10
Dominant Plan[ Species
Stratum
Indicator
L
Carpinus c•arolinirnra
Canopy
FAC
-.
rrcrrinreeprnn.<rhanir'rr
Canopy
FACW
3.
Lieliidamharsmracilluit
Canopy
FAC1
d.
.-leer ntrhrunr
Canopy
FAC
5.
Dioslnro vir;t;iniarrcr
Canopy
PAC
6.
iVr.eSa hy. lora
Canopy
OBL
,.
flexdec•idufr
Sapling
FACW-
8
Carer spp.
I lerb
FAC to OBL
y
Hicr-mlegimn vimineurn
Herb
FAC
10
Leersia lenficularis
Herb
OBL
11.
smilax r-afundiJolia
Herb
FAC.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW.
or FAC (except
FAC-) = 100'y
GAUGE I l
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
I,
Nvsscrhilloro
Canopy
Oki[,
2.
11cerruhrum
Canopy
FAC
3.
LignidarnharsrrrrrciJluu
Canopy
FAC{
d.
rra.rinus Pemrs.a•l+.anica
Canopy
FAC'
5.
Ulmlix sp.
Canopy
1'AC to I'ACti'
g_
Ccrrpinus carolinicnur
Sapling
FAC
7.
Ilex decidua
Sapling
FACW-
g
Dirrsprroc virginimia
Shrub
FAC
q.
Srniler.x rofundifi,lia
Shrub
FAC
I IL
Carer spP.
lierb
FAC to OBL
LI.
Commelina virgilric•a
Ilerb
FACW
©
12.
Bignonia crg,reolam
I lerb
FAC
13.
Leersia lenlica laris
Iferb
OBL
d.
ro.vic tWendron radican.s
I lerb
FAC
i5.
Saurnnta c•ermms
Ilerb
OBL
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW,
or FAC (except
FAC-1 = 1001%
GAUGE l2
Dominaat plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
1.
Onerc•rrs lcrafrr
Canopy
OBL
L
OtrenvsPagoda
Canopy
FAC
3.
Ottercus phellos
Canopy
FACt'-
4.
Cr•afac•grrs sp.
Sapling
FAC to OK
5.
PolmluS dellrrkls
Sapling
FAC {
6.
rrurimis penrrce•la•anic.w
Sapling
FACW
7,
Platanrrs occidentalis
Sapling
FACW-
8,
Refula nigra
Sapling
FACW
9.
Taxodium distichnni
Sapling
OBL
IU•
Ulmeis.sp,
Sapling
FAC to FACW
11.
Ligiridurnhcusnrrrrr'Jlual
Shrub
FAC+'
12
Hibiscusmoxcheuras
Herb
OBL
13.
"sfer rimhreu.v
Herb
FAC
14
Acerrubnein
Flerb
FAC
15
Carex Sp.
llcrb
FAC to OBL
16.
--IMAPha rhomboidea
Ilcrb
FAC:
l7.
Parricaon agrostoides
llerb
FACW
i S.
Uiogl vro.s virgint.mul
Flab
FAC
®
1
Plilinrnirrm capillaccrrrrr
herb
OBI.
Percent
of Dominant Species thatare OBL. FACW, or FAC (except
FAC-) = 95'%

VEAR 7 (2008) HOWELL WOODS (continued)
July la, 2008
RF;NCF; GAUGE 1
Species
Dominant Pliant Snecics Stratum
Indicator
I.
Quercus. vrwa
Canopy
OFiL
2.
Nllmw
Canopy
OBL
3.
Ulm ii, etmericcoui
Canopy
FACW
a.
Ace)- rubrunr
Canopy
FAC
5.
Fruein,rvpenn.�vlvanicu
Canopy
FACW
6.
Quercar,s larsl4lWia
Canopy
FACW
7.
CurI inns rurnlinicmu
Sapling
FAC
8.
Liquidambr,rsvoucilhw
Sapling
FAC+
y.
Ile.rdecidua
Shrub
FACW-
I O
Cournrelinu virgirrica
Herb
FACW
1.1.
Carey sPP.
I lcrb
FAC to OBL
12.
1eerviu lenricrrhu•is
Herb
ORL
t3.
Boehrner•iu c vlimlriea
Herb
FAC14+
14.
Curnlzsis rucllcun'
Herb
PAC
15
smilarr-otundi1Wiu
PAC
PAC
Percenrof Dorinant Species that arc OBL. FACW,
or PAC (except
PAC-) = loll%
REFERENCE GAUGE 2
Dominant Plant Species,
Stratum
Indicator
1.
Querc•as lt•rula
Canopy
011L
2.
Queremv pbellos
Canopy
FAC W-
3.
Ac•er rubrum
Canopy
FAC
q.
Liqtj idarirborsjlvwcrllua
Canopy
FAC+
5.
Ccu•pinus cal'ohnianu
Sapling
FAC
6.
U6nrc.c rrrbra
Sapling.
PAC
®
7.
lle.e dec•iduu
Shrub
FACW-
8.
Cruraeglis• sp.
Shrub
FAC to ORL
9.
Curer spp.
Herb
FACW i
10.
Fru.rinuc penngli•anic•a
Herb
FACW
[I.
Commelimr rirginica
Herb
FACW
12.
Leersicr lentic•uluris
Herb
OBL
13
;rn!&n rutunrlifblia
Herb
FAC
14.
sours s rer-rr,rrer
Herb
OBL
Percent of Dominant Species that are ORL, FACW,
or FAC (except PAC-) = loll%,
0

E
APPENDIX D
YEAR 1 (2002) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
Final Howell Woods AnnLlal Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Ycar 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Projcct Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

Howell Woods Wells 2002
Infinity -Reference Well 1 N366A9F1
2.5
2.0
C
v
1.5
0.5
0,a
40
36
32
1
I
I
24
Construction
I Period 1
o
20
I
June 48 - July 26
16
1
`
to c
12-
8
Q
a
4
0
-C
0
-
z
3 Q-
Q 0
-4
w
-12
------`-
3
—a— ---
1----L--------
—�
----
-16
-2n
o
-24
m
u-1
n�
o
-28
-32
I I
-36
-40
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun Jul
Aug
Sep Oct
Nov Dec
Month

Howell
woods Wells 2002IA
s
Infinity - Reference Well 2 N3136AA64
w
2.5
0
2.0
.
1.0
0.5
9
0.0
ku
40
36
32
I I
28
24
Construction
20
I
I Period
i June 18 July 26 i
L
Ca c
16
12
B
L �I
a a
E
�.
0=
o
I
Z.
CL
O qy
.4
Co
W
o
CU
-12
4
-16
a
-20
-24
U
I
4
-28
-32
i I
-36
-40
Jan
Feb Mar Apr May
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Nov Dec
Month

2.5
2.0
1.0
0.5
Wt
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
8
4
0
CL
a 0 -4
0
-8
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
-40
Howell Woods Wells 2002
Infinity - Well 1 N38F3506
Month

LI
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
Ix
0.5
0-0
40
36
32
2$
24
20
16
12
cc8
4
C
0
Q
o
-4
0
-8
-12
_-------
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
40
Jan Feb
a
Dowell Woods Wells 2002
Infinity - Well 2 N38E2621.
r
Construction
Period
June 18 - July 26
1
m
c9
0
ko
0
N
Out of Range En ire Period
lar
Apr
May
Jun
I Jul Aug Sep
Oct
Month
Nov f Dec

V
Howell
Woods Wells 2002
Infinity
- Well 3 N383009'I
'
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
_
`-'
1.2
w
1.0
0.8
Cr�
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
40
36
32
28
24
20
L
c� c
16
12
8
u
E
m
¢
Q
4
2
cl
0
N
o
z
��
p N
❑
0
-4
8
'Well Replaced
,°q
V) :'
_
o
v
-12
------`�----
-16
o
-20
-24
0
I
"'�
o
-28
"'
w
-32
-
Out of Range
-36
---FJan
Feb Mar
Apr F May
Junj Jul Aug Sep
Oct Nav Dec
Month

e
Howell Woods Wells 2002
Infinity -Well 4 N384E842
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
'
0.0
40
36
32'
i
f
I
24
Construction
20
I
I Period ;
June 18 Juiy 26
7$
12
L
1 f
:
(D
c
8
�
a
3�-
4
f I
y
�CL
a
M:
p
$
' Well Replaced
-12
------`
--------f------——__
---
16
-20
o
p
I f
-24
�'
o
-28
Out of Rdnge Remainder
L
-32
I of Monitoring Period
-36
-40
-
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec:
Month

9
2.5
2.0
c
1.0
0.5
0.0-j
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
12
c
8
coca
3
4
c
Q
o 0
-4
-12
-
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
-40
Jan
Howell Woods Wells 2002
Infinity -Well 5 N31 E5851
f
I
N
�
L
_ '
U
42
a.
a
GI
C
O
O '
y
of
y
N
o
�
�
c�
o
o
�
�
N
I
Feb Mar Apr May
I I
Construction
l Berlod E .,
June 18 - July 26
CU
I I
I 1
O
Z
I I
I I W
I Out of Range
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month

a
Howell
W ods Wells 20'02
Infinity
- Well 6 N38E4C,8E
2.5
2.0
1.5
w
1.0
J
0.5
0.0
40
36
E I
32
2$
I
` Construction'
24
Period
20
! June 18 - July 26
16
w
I
Q
Qf rti
12
-5
P
•pl
C
d
E
�.
�. a.
o
a
-4�,
m
L 0
-8
�'
L
-16
o
-20
c
I
-
-24
Z
�•
a
_
_zO
r
I
r
LU
-32
E Out of Range
'
-36
- - - -
-40
- -- -
- -Jan --- - Feb---
—Mar---
_,
Apr- _ - May- -
---- ,JUri
- -
A�9
- - - - -
Se?p
Oct
- f4ov
❑ec
Month "

Howell Woods Wells 2002
RDS -
Well A S2C9894
i
2.5
2.0
,.5
ca
1.0
0.5-
EL
0.0
40
36
I
32
28
Construction
24
I. Period
20
I
June 18 - July 26
16
I
12
a
=
a
F=
co
8
4
c�
°
e
°
°
Z
C N
O
A
co
to
N
I
-8
u7
-12
°1 e
-24
I
�2
-6
-28
cn
I
c
u'
-32
-36
-40
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr May
J __Jun.
_ Jul. --_..
-Aug--
- ----Sep
Oct- -`
Nov
Dec
Month �
� -

. Howell Woods Wells 2002
RIDS - Well B S2EAD22
2.5 .
2.0
cc
1.0
0.5
0.0
40
3fi
32
1 I
1
24
Construction
I Period j
20
18 • .tiny 26
16
ne
IJune
v
`-
.--,
12
8
n W
0
o
Z
0CL
°'
-4
m
-8
'
-12
-
-16
-20
a
-24
"'
-
o
-28
-32
Ui
-36
-40
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr May
Jun
Jul Aug
Sep
Oct'
Nov
Dec
Month

99�
Howell Woods Wells 2002
RIDS - Well C S32EAD39
2.5
2.0
C
c
i0
0.5
0.0
40
36
32
i
I I
I
I
24
Construction
I
I Period 1.
20
!
18 July 26
16
ry
fJune
v
12
, .-.
c� c
$
v
� m¢
n
a
E
4CL
I
I f
o
L
o
Z
o
0 N
omi
`n
L �
r^
-8
c
m
V
-12
-
m
�
4
-16
I I o
-20
-24
-28
w
-32
I
-36
-40
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep I Oct I Nov Dec
Month

Howell Woods Wells 2002
RIDS - Well D S32883A
2.5
2.0
v
C
1.S
�
n
_
0.5
AQ0.0
40
36
3228
-
24
Construction
20
I
I Period !'
'June 18 - July 26
L
16
12
! !
c
8
a
E
3�--
4
j
�.
I I
o
p tU
-4
(7
_8
or
-12
—
--0
-16
-20
O
e
I !
-24
-28
In
I !
_32
! 1 'Well Removed LU
-36
I
Malfunctioning
-40
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep Oct Nov
Dec
Month

2.5
2.0
c
~' 1.5
ro
1.0
0.5
0.0
40
36
32
28
24
20
16
a`- 12
�-' 8
t4 c
3 'v 4
0
CL
p Q -4
C� -8
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
-40
Howell Woods Wells 2002
RDS - Well E S2EAC06
Month

Ozi
41,
1.5
IT
1.0
0.5
[fit
40
36,
32
28
24
20
�16
12
m C 8
3 4
c a 0
o a -4
C7
-8
-12
-16
-20
-24
-28
-32
-36
-40
u
Howell Woods Wells 2002 "
RIDS - Well F S2C98 1 D
Month

E
•
0
APPENDIX E
YEAR 2 (2003) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiont 1:rrvironinenlal, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Jolinston County, North Carolina Appendices

Howell Woods 2003 INF1 N381`3506
Howell Woods
Infinity Well 1
2003
N38F3$F3506
Date
Time
Reading
01-Jan-2003
08:110:00
11.85
01-Jan-2003
20:00:00
11.77
02-Jan-2003
08:00:00
11.3
02-Jan-2003
20:00:00
11.03
03-Jan-2003
08:00:00
11.5
03-Jan-2003
20:00:00
12
04-Jan-2003
08:00:00
11.69
04-Jan-2003
20:00:00
10.24
05-Jan-2003
08:00:00
8.52
05-Jan-2003
20:00:00
5.78
06-Jan-2003
08:00:00
3.23
06-Jan-2003
20:00:00
1.39
07-Jan-2003
08:00:00
0.45
07-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-0.25
08-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-0.21
08-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-0.37
09-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-0.45
09-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-0.92
10-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-0.68
10-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-1.39
11-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-1.15
11-Jan-2003
20:00:00
•1.78
12-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-1.74
12-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-2.09
13-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-1.97
13-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-2.29
14-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-2.33
14-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-2.8
15-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-2.64
15-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-3.19
16-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.07
16-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-3.07
17-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-2.91
17-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-3.19
18-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-2.48
18-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-3.54
19-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.46
19-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-3.74
20-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.66
20-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-4.13
21-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.62
21-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-3.85
22-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.17
22-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-4.56
23-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.44
23-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-4.44
24-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.85
24-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-5.07
25-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.77
25-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-4.91
26-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.21
26-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-4.95
27-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.87
27-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-5.18
28-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.17
28-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-5.54
29-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-5.07
®29-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-4.95
30-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.36

Howell Woods 2003 INF1 N38F3506
30-Jan-2003
31-Jan-2003
20A0:00
08:00:00
-3.62
-3.38
31-Jan-2003
20:00:00
-3.27
01-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-3.23
01-Feb-2003
20:00:00
-3.54
02-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-3.5
02-Feb-2003
20:00:00
-4.13
03-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-3.85
03-Feb-2003
20:00:00
-4.24
04-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-3.74
04-Feb-2003
20:00:00
-4.4
05-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-4.24
05-Feb-2003
20:00:00
-4.52
06-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-4.28
06-Feb-2003
20:00:00
-3.46
07-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-1.5
07-Feb-2003
20:00:00
-1.54
08-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-1.35
08-Feb-2003
20:00:00
-0.99
09-Feb-2003
08:00:04)
1.43
09-Feb-2003
20:00:00
4.96
10-Feb-2003
08:00:00
9.07
10-Feb-2003
20:00:00
11.53
11-Feb-2003
08:00:00
11.69
11-Feb-2003
20:00:00
11.14
12-Feb-2003
08:00:00
10.91
12-Feb-2003
20:00:00
10.16
13-Feb-2003
08:00:00
9.62
13-Feb-2003
20:00:00
8.64
14-Feb-2003
08:00:00
7,74
14-Feb-2003
20:00:00
6,29
08:00:00
5.15
®15-Feb-2003
15-Feb-2003
20:00:00
3.19
16-Feb-2003
08:00:00
1.04
16-Feb-2003
20:00:00
0.85
17-Feb-2003
08:00:00
2.14
17-Feb-2003
20:00:00
2.33
18-Feb-2003
08:00:00
1.71
18-Feb-2003
20:00:00
1.04
19-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.96
19-Feb-2003
20:00:00
0.57
20-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.57
20-Feb-2003
20:00:00
0.06
21-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.22
21-Feb-2003
20:00:00
-0.25
22-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.02
22-Feb-2003
20:00:00
0.57
23-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.73
23-Feb-2003
20:00:00
0.1
24-Feb-2003
08:00:00
1,71
24-Feb-2003
20:00:00
5.7
25-Feb-2003
08:00:00
9.19
25-Feb-2003
20:00:00
11.53
26-Feb-2003
08:00:00
12.83
26-Feb-2003
20:00:00
12.9
27-Feb-2003
08:00:00
13.37
27-Feb-2003
20:00:00
15.06
28-Feb-2003
08:00:00
15.06
28-Feb-2003
20:00:00
14.51
01-Mar-2003
08:00:00
14.71
01-Mar-2003
20:00:00
18.58
02-Mar-2003
08:00:00
25.86
®02-Mar-2003
20:00:00
27.82
03-Mar-2003
08:00:00
26.8

Howell Woods 2003 INF1 N38F3506
03-Mar-2003
04-Mar-2003
20:00:00
08:00:00
25.51
24.85
04-Mar-2003
20:00:00
23.99
05-Mar-2003
08:00:00
22.93
05-Mar-2003
20:00:00
21.99
06-Mar-2003
08:00:00
22.58
06-Mar-2003
20:00:00
23.67
07-Mar-2003
08:00:00
24.46
07-Mar-2003
20:00:00
28.17
08-Mar-2003
08:00:00
32.52
08-Mar-2003
20:00:00
34.2
09-Mar-2003
08:00:00
32.79
09-Mar-2003
20:00:00
29.43
10-Mar-2003
08:00:00
25.67
10-Mar-2003
20:00:00
21.83
11-Mar-2003
08:00:00
18.78
11-Mar-2003
20:00:00
16.12
12-Mar-2003
08:00:00
14.12
12-Mar-2003
20:00:00
12.28
13-Mar-2D03
08:00:00
11.65
13-Mar-2003
20:00:00
10.79
14-Mar-2003
08:00:00
11.1
14-Mar-2003
20:00:00
11.1
15-Mar-2003
08:00:00
11.85
15-Mar-2003
20:00:00
13.02
16-Mar-2003
08:00:00
15.49
16-Mar-2003
M00:00
17.37
17-Mar-2003
08:00:00
19.17
17-Mar-2003
20:00:00
20.42
18-Mar-2003
WNW
21.52
18-Mar-2003
20:00:00
21.75
19-Mar-2003
08:00:00
21.28
19-Mar-2003
20:00:00
20.77
20-Mar-2003
08:00:00
21.68
20-Mar-2003
20:00:00
26.65
21-Mar-2003
08:00:00
29.19
21-Mar-2003
20:00:00
32.29
22-Mar-2003
06:00:00
36.67
22-Mar-2003
20:00:00
41.45
23-Mar-2003
08:00:00
42.74
23-Mar-2003
20:00700
39.96
24-Mar-2003
(18:00:00
35.77
24-Mar-2003
20:00:00
30.64
25-Mar-2003
(18:00:00
25.28
25-Mar-2003
20:00:00
20.46
26-Mar-2003
08:00:00
16.62
26-Mar-2003
20:00:00
13.61
27-Mar-2003
08:00:00
11.61
27-Mar-2003
20:00:00
10.28
28-Mar-2003
06:00:00
9.69
28-Mar-2003
20:00:00
9.85
29-Mar-2003
08:00:00
10.01
29-Mar-2003
2D:00:00
11.14
30-Mar-2003
08:00:00
10.79
30-Mar-2003
20:00:00
11.97
31-Mar-2003
08:00:00
12.63
31-Mar-2003
20:00:00
13.73
01-Apr-2003
08:00:00
16.23
01-Apr-2003
20:00:00
17.33
02-Apr-2003
08:00:00
16.23
02-Apr-2003
20:00:00
14.82
03-Apr-2003
08:00:00
14.39
03-Apr-2003
20:00:00
14.67
04-Apr-2003
08:00:00
15.72

Howell Woods 2003 INF1 N38F3506
04-Apr-2003
20:00:00
16.7
05-Apr-2003
08:00:00
17.45
05-Apr-2003
20:00:00
17.64
06-Apr-2003
08:00:00
17.52
06-Apr-2003
20:00:00
17.29
07-Apr-2003
08:00:00
17.21
07-Apr-2003
20:00:00
18,62
08-Apr-2003
08:00:00
18.97
08-Apr-2003
20:00:00
19.44
09-Apr-2003
08:00:00
22.42
09-Apr-2003
20:00:00
23.32
10-Apr-2003
08:00:00
23.59
10-Apr-2003
20:00:00
24,96
11-Apr-2003
08:00:00
29.7
11-Apr-2003
20:00:00
35.85
12-Apr-2003
08:00:00
42.03
12-Apr-2003
20:00:00
44.97
13-Apr-2003
08:00:00
45.21
13-Apr-2003
20:00:00
43.41
14-Apr-2003
08:00:00
40.63
14-Apr-2003
20:00:00
37.22
15-Apr-2003
08:00:00
33.5
15-Apr-2003
20:00:00
29.39
16-Apr-2003
08:00:00
25.63
16-Apr-2003
20:00:00
22.65
17-Apr-2003
08:00:00
20.58
17-Apr-2003
20:00:00
18.82
18-Apr-2003
08:00:00
17.8
18-Apr-2003
20:00:00
17.56
19-Apr-2003
08:00:00
18.54
19-Apr-2003
20:00:00
20.7
20-Apr-2003
08:00:01)
23,59
20-Apr-2003
20:00:00
25.9
21-Apr-2003
08:00:00
28.17
21-Apr-2003
20:00:00
30.01
22-Apr-2003
08:00:00
31.7
22-Apr-2003
20:00:00
32.29
23-Apr-2003
08:00:00
32.87
23-Apr-2003
20:00:00
33.15
24-Apr-2003
08:00:00
33.42
24-Apr-2003
20:00:00
33.3
25-Apr-2003
08:00:00
33.19
25-Apr-2003
20:00:00
33.54
26-Apr-2003
08:00:00
32.99
26-Apr-2003
20:00:00
32.29
27-Apr-2003
08:00:00
31.58
27-Apr-2003
20:00:00
30.6
28-Apr-2003
08:00:00
30.25
28-Apr-2003
20:00:00
30.29
29-Apr-2003
08:00:00
30.84
29-Apr-2003
20:00:00
30.88
30-Apr-2003
08:00:00
30.56
30-Apr-2003
20:00:00
29.78
01-May-2003
08:00:00
28.92
01-May-2003
20:00:00
27.67
02-May-2003
08:00:00
26.53
02-May-2003
20:00:00
24.81
03-May-2003
08:00:00
23.2
03-May-2003
20:00:00
21.64
04-May-2003
08:00:00
20.38
04-May-2003
20:00:00
18.7
05-May-2003
08:00:00
16.66
05-May-2003
20:00:00
13.96
06-May-2003
08:00:00
12.36

Nowell Woods 2003 INF1 N38F3506
06-May-2003
20:00:00
10.4
07-May-2003
08:00:00
8.6
07-May-2003
20:00.00
6.88
08-May-2003
08:00:00
5.78
08-May-2003
20:00,00
3.9
09-May-2003
08:00:00
3.04
09-May-2003
20:00:00
1.47
10-May-2003
08:00:00
1.08
10-May-2003
20:00:00
0.41
11-May-2003
08:00:00
0.41
11-May-2003
20:00:00
0.02
12-May-2003
08:D0:00
-0.09
12-May-2003
20:00:00
-0.49
13-May-2003
08:00:00
-0.49
13-May-2003
20:00:00
-1.D3
14-May-2003
08:00:00
-1.15
14-May-2003
20:00:00
-1.86
15-May-2003
08:00:00
-1.85
15-May-2003
20:00:00
-2-6
16-May-2003
08:00:00
-2.76
16-May-2003
20:00:00
-3.19
17-May-2003
08.00:00
-3.54
17-May-2003
20:00:00
4.05
18-May-2003
08:00:00
-4.28
18-May-2003
20:00:00
-4.64
19-May-2003
08:00:00
-3.66
19-May-2003
20:00:00
-2.6
20-May-2003
08:00:00
-2.76
20-May-2003
20:00:00
-3.46
21-May-2003
08:00:00
-3.54
21-May-2003
20:00:00
-4.13
22-May-2003
08:00:00
-3.85
22-May-2003
2D:00:00
-3.7
23-May-2003
08:00:00
-1.43
23-May-2003
2D:00:00
-1.07
24-May-2003
08:00:00
-0.96
24-May-2003
20:00:00
-1.15
25-May-2003
08:00:00
-0.96
25-May-2003
20:00:00
1.9
26-May-2003
08:00:00
10.71
26-May-2003
20:00:00
8.52
27-May-2003
08:00:00
8.79
27-May-2003
20:00:0(1
8.99
28-May-2003
08:00:00
8.52
28-May-2003
20:00:00
7.58
29-May-2003
08:00:00
7.97
29-May-2003
20:00:00
8.09
30-May-2003
08:00:00
8.32
30-May-2003
20:00:00
8.13
31-May-2003
08:00:00
8.75
31-May-2003
20:00:00
12
01-Jun-2003
08:00:00
12.63
01-Jun-2003
20:00:00
12.98
02-Jun-2003
08:00:00
1478
0

Howell Woods 2003 INF3 N38300091
Howell Woods 03
Infinity Well 3 N3830091
Date Time
Reading
01-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-0.62
02-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-0.62
03-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-0.47
04-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-0.39
05-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-0.98
06-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-1.06
07-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-1.25
08-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-1.02
09-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-1.29
10-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-1.68
11-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-2.62
12-Jan-2003 DB:00:00
-3.6
13-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-3.64
14-Jan-2003 08:00:00
4.54
15-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-5.05
16-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-5.44
17-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-1,41
18-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-2.7
19-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-4.23
20-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-4.93
21-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-5.32
22-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-4.85
23-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-5.48
24-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-4.62
25-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-4.54
26-Jan-2003 M00:00
-5.48
27-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-5.44
28-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-5.24
29-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-5.6
30-Jan-2003 OB:DO:00
-2.54
31-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-0.51
01-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-1.21
02-Feb-2003 08:00.00
-1.99
03-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-2.74
04-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-2.43
05-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-3.13
06-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-4.81
07-Feb-2003 08:00:00
0.04
08-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.86
09-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-1.02
10-Fab-2003 08:00:00
0.43
11-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.66
12-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.66
13-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.98
14-Fed-2003 08:00:00
-1.02
15-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.23
16-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.86
17-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.31
18-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.59
19-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.78
20-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.86
21-Feb-2003 08-00:00
-1.02
22-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0-82
23-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0-23
24-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-1.13
25-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-1.21
26-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.9
27-Feb-2003 08:00:00
0.28
28-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.08
Day

Howell Woods 2003 INF3 N38300091
D1-Mar-2003
02-Mar-2003
08:00:00
08:00:00
-0.23
12.49
03-Mar-2003
08:00M
12.92
04-Mar-2003
08:00:00
10.65
05-Mar-2003
08:00:00
8.15
06-Mar-2003
08:00:00
7.52
07-Mar-2003
08:00:00
10.73
08-Mar-2003
08:00:00
20.28
09-Mar-2003
08:00:00
20.01
10-Mar-2003
08:00:00
11.51
11-Mar-2003
08:00:00
3.02
12-Mar-2003
08:00:00
0.12
13-Mar-2003
08:00:00
-0.12
14-Mar-2003
08:00M
0.12
15-Mar-2003
08:00M
0.08
16-Mar-2003
08:00:00
0.24
17-Mar-2003
08:00:00
4.03
18-Mar-2003
08:00:00
6.81
19-Mar-2003
08:00:00
5.09
20-Mar-2003
08:00700
6.93
21-Mar-2003
08:00:00
16.17
22-Mar-2003
08:00:00
24.98
23-Mar-2003
08:00:00
31.32
24-Mar-2003
08:00:00
23.38
25-Mar-2003
08:00:00
11.2
26-Mar-2003
08:00:00
1.06
27-Mar-2003
08:00:00
0.24
28-Mar-2003
08:00M
0.08
29-Mar-2003
08:00:00
0.24
30-Mar-2003
08:00700
0.2
31-Mar-2003
08:00:00
0.39
01-Apr-2003
08:00:00
1.53
02-Apr-2003
08:00:00
0.79
03-Apr-2003
08:00:00
0.32
04-Apr-2003
08:00:00
0.59
05-Apr-2003
08:00:00
2.31
06-Apr-2003
08:00:00
2.23
07-Apr-2003
08:00:00
1.8
08-Apr-2003
08:00:00
3.92
09-Apr-2D03
08:00:00
8.42
10-Apr-2003
08:00:00
9.67
11-Apr-2003
08:00:00
17.35
12-Apr-2003
08:00:00
31.05
13-Apr-2003
08:00:00
32
14-Apr-2003
08:00:00
29.33
15-Apr-2003
08:00:00
20.95
16-Apr-2003
08:00:00
11.87
17-Apr-2003
W00:00
5,44
18-Apr-2003
08:00:00
2.35
19-Apr-2003
08:00:00
3.45
20-Apr-2003
08:00:00
10.1
21-Apr-2003
08:00:00
15.39
22-Apr-2003
08:00:00
19.34
23-Apr-2003
08:00:00
20.75
24-Apr-2003
08:00:00
21.38
25-Apr-2003
08:00:00
20.91
26-Apr-2003
08:00:00
20.52
27-Apr-2003
08:00:00
18.87
28-Apr-2003
08:00:00
17.27
29-Apr-2003
08:00:00
18.21
30-Apr-2003
08:00:00
17.7
01-May-2003
08:00:00
11.83
02-May-2003
08:00:00
12.81
03-May-2003
08:00:00
9.09
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44

Howell Woods
2003
INF3 N38300091
11
0
04-May-2003
05-May-2003
06-May-2003
07-May-2003
08-May-2003
09-May-2003
10-May-2003
11-May-2003
12-May-2003
13-May-2003
14-May-2003
15-May-2003
16-May-2003
17-May-2003
18-May-2003
19-May-2003
20-May-2003
21-May-2003
22-May-2003
23-May-2003
24-May-2003
25-May-2003
26-May-2003
27-May-2003
28-May-2003
29-May-2003
30-May-2003
31-May-2003
01-Jun-2003
02-Jun-2003
08:00:00
5.17
45
08:00:00
1.29
46
08:00:00
0.67
47
08:00:00
0.12
48
08:00:00
-0.62
49
08:00:00
-1.6
50
08:00:00
-7.16
51
08:00:00
-4.15
52
08:00:00
-6.97
53
08:00:00
-11.23
54
08:00:00
-14.21
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
OB:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00:00
08:00100
08:00:00
-16.83
-17.23
-18.63
-19.1
-6.93
-7.4
-12.49
-12.57
0.55
-0.98
-6.97
0.12
0.16
-0.47
-1.41
-1.06
-7.05
-0.15
-1.09
8
9
10
11

Howell Woods 2003 INFO N384EB42
Howell Woods 2003
Infinity Well 4 N384E84E842
Date Time
Reading
01-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
02-Jan-2003 08:00:00
0.61
03-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
04-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
05-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
06-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
07-Jan-2003 08700700
Out of Range
08-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
09-Jan-2003 08:00:00
0.1
10-Jan-2003 08:00:00
-0.09
11-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
12-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
13-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
14-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
15-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
16-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
17-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
18-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
19-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
20-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
21-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
22-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
23-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
24-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
25-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
26-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
27-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
®
28-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
29-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
30-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
31-Jan-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
01-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
02-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
03-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
04-Feb-2003 08:00:00
-0.25
05-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
06-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
07-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
08-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
09-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
10-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
11-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
12-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
13-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
14-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
15-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
16-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
17-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
18-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
19-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
20-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
21-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
22-Feb-2003 08:00:00
0.38
23-Feb-2003 08:00:00
1.08
24-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
25-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
26-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
27-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
®
28-Feb-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range

Howell Woods 2003 INF4 N384E842
01-Mar-2003 08:00:00
02-Mar-2003 08:OD:00
Out of Range
13.34
03-Mar-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
04-Mar-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
05-Mar-2003 08:00:00
9.26
06-Mar-2003 08:00:00
8.72
07-Mar-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
08-Mar-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
09-Mar-2003 08:00:00
20.7
10-Mar-2003 08:00:00
12.32
11-Mar-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
12-Mar-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
13-Mar-2003 08:00:00
1.08
14-Mar-2003 08:00:00
1.35
15-Mar-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
16-Mar-2003 08:00:00
3.35
17-Mar-2003 08:0 M
5.7
18-Mar-2003 08:00:00
8.05
19-Mar-2003 08:00:00
7.62
20-Mar-2003 08:00:00
8.25
21-Mar-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
22-Mar-2003 08700700
25.63
23-Mar-2003 08:00:00
32.05
24-Mar-2003 08:00:00
24.18
25-Mar-2003 08:00:00
11.93
26-Mar-2003 08:00:00
2.57
27-Mar-2003 08:00:00
1.39
28-Mar-2003 08:00:00
1.28
29-Mar-2003 08:00:00
1.32
30-Mar-2003 08:00:00
1,12
31-Mar-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
01-Apr-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
02-Apr-2003 08:00:00
2.96
03-Apr-2003 08:00:00
1.94
04-Apr-2003 08:00:00
3.47
05-Apr-2003 08:00:00
4.6
06-Apr-2003 08:00:00
4.53
07-Apr-2003 08:00:00
4.1
08-Apr-2003 08:00:00
5.78
09-Apr-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
10-Apr-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
11-Apr-2003 08:00:00
18.27
12-Apr-2003 08:00:00
31.58
13-Apr-2003 08:00:00
35.03
14-Apr-2003 08:00:00
29.74
15-Apr-2003 08:00:00
21.44
16-Apr-2003 08:00:00
12.51
17-Apr-2003 08:00:00
6.91
18-Apr-2003 08:00:00
4.25
19-Apr-2003 08:00:00
5.47
20-Apr-2003 08:00:00
11.1
21-Apr-2003 08:00:00
16.27
22-Apr-2003 08:00:00
19,95
23-Apr-2003 08:00:00
21,48
24-Apr-2003 08:00:00
22.07
25-Apr-2003 08:00:00
21.52
26-Apr-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
27-Apr-2003 08:00:00
19,21
28-Apr-2003 08:00:00
18,23
29-Apr-2003 08:00:00
18.97
30-Apr-2003 08:00:00
18.54
01-May-2003 08:00:01
16.47
02-May-2003 08:00:00
13.45
03-May-2003 08:00:00
10.09

Howell Woods 2003 INF4 N384E842
04-May-2003 08A0:00
05-May-2003 08:00:00
6.8
2.7676
06-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
07-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
08-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
09-May-2003 08:00:00
0.02
10-May-2003 08:00:00
-0.29
11-May-2003 08:00:00
-0.8
12-May-2003 08:00:00
-2.4
13-May-2003 08:00:00
-6.08
14-May-2003 08:00:00
-10.08
15-May-2003 08:00:00
-13.48
16-May-2003 08:00:00
-14,54
17-May-2003 08:00:00
-16.07
18-May-2003 08:00:00
-17.13
19-May-2003 08:00:00
-2.13
20-May-2003 08:00:00
-6.59
21-May-2003 08:00:00
-9.37
22-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
23-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
24-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
25-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
26-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
27-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
28-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
29-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
30-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
31-May-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
01-Jun-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
02-Jun-2003 08:00:00
Out of Range
El

Howell Woods 2003
REF1 N3B6A9F1
► Woods 2003
Infinity
Well 1 REF N3B6A9F1 riser ht 3.32
Day
time
reading
corrected
01-Jan-2003
08:00:00
0.96
4.28
02-Jan-2003
08:00:00
0.46
3.78
03-Jan-2003
08:00:00
0.3
3,62
04-Jan-2003
08:00:00
0.06
3.38
05-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-0.25
3.07
06-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-0.41
2.91
07-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-0.68
2.64
08-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-0.88
2.44
09-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-1.07
2.25
10-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-1.27
2.05
11-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-1.82
1,5
12-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-2-56
0.76
13-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-2.83
0.49
14-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3-07
0.25
15-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.38
-0,06
16-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.13
-0,81
17-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-2.09
1.23
18-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.54
-0.22
19-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.13
-0.81
20-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.89
-0.57
21-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.97
-0.65
22-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.4
-1.06
23-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.63
-1.31
24-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-5.38
-2.06
25-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-5.38
-2.06
26-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.56
-114
27-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.87
-1.55
28-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-5.81
-2.49
29-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.99
-1.67
30-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.03
0.29
31-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-0.99
2.33
01-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-1.89
1.43
02-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-2.79
0,53
03-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-3.26
0.06
04-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-3.38
-0.06
05-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-3.66
-0.34
06-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-4.13
-0.81
07-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.01
3.31
08-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.45
2.87
09-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.48
2.84
10-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.02
3.34
11-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.1
3.42
12-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.02
3.34
13-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.29
3.03
14-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.33
2.99
15-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0,05
3.27
16-Feb-2003
08:00M
-0.25
3.07
17-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0,77
4,09
18-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.42
3.74
19-Feb-2003
08100:00
0.18
3.5
20-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0-18
3.5
21-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.34
3.66
22-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.14
3.46
23-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.53
3.85
24-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.18
3.5
25-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.01
3.31
26-Feb-2003
08:00:00
2.02
5.34
27-Feb-2003
08:00:00
3.04
6.36
28-Feb-2003
08:00:00
5.51
8.83

Howell Woods
2003
01-Mar-2003
02-Mar-2003
08:00:00
08:00:00
5.43
17-33
8.75
20.65
03-Mar-2003
08:00:00
18.03
21.35
04-Mar-2003
08.00:00
16-12
19.44
05-Mar-2003
08:00:00
14.08
17.4
06-Mar-2003
08:00:00
13.57
16.89
07-Mar-2003
08:00:00
15.33
18.65
08-Mar-2003
08:00:00
23.67
26.99
09-Mar•2003
08:00:00
23.32
26.64
10-Mar-2003
08:00:00
16.78
20.1
11-Mar-2003
08:00:00
9.97
13.29
12-Mar-2003
08:00:00
5.94
9,26
13-Mar-2003
08:00:00
3.43
6.75
14-Mar-2003
08:00:00
1.9
5.22
15-Mar-2003
08:00:00
1.04
4.36
16-Mar-2003
08:00:00
3.78
7,1
17-Mar-2003
08:00:00
8.87
12.19
18-Mar•2003
08:00:00
11.54
14.86
19-Mar-2003
08:00:00
11.54
14.86
20-Mar-2003
08:00:00
12.2
15.52
21-Mar-2003
08:00:00
19-68
23
22-Mar•2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
23-Mar-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
24-Mar-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
25-Mar-2003
08:00:00
16.31
19.63
26-Mar-2003
08:00:00
9.26
12.58
27-Mar-2003
08:00:00
5.47
8.79
28-Mar-2003
08:00:00
2.88
6.2
29-Mar-2003
08:00:00
1,55
4,87
30-Mar-2003
08:00:00
1.2
4.52
31-Mar-2003
08:00:00
1,67
4.99
08:00:00
5.04
8.36
®01-Apr-2003
02-Apr•2003
08:00:00
6.88
10.2
03-Apr•2003
08:00:00
5.31
8.63
04-Apr-2003
08:00:00
5.7
9.02
05-Apr•2003
08:00:00
7.54
10.86
06-Apr•2003
08:00:00
8-05
11.37
07-Apr-2003
08:00:00
7.89
11.21
08-Apr•2003
08-00:00
9.42
12.74
09-Apr-2003
08:00:00
13-14
16.46
10-Apr-2003
08:00:00
14-9
18.22
11-Apr•2003
08:00:00
20.66
23.98
12-Apr•2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
13-Apr-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUEI
14-Apr-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUEI
15-Apr-2003
08:00:00
23.87
27.19
16-Apr-2003
08:00:00
16.66
19.98
17-Apr-2003
08:00:00
12.04
15.36
18-Apr-2003
08:00:00
8.95
12.27
19-Apr-2003
08:00:00
8.83
1215
20-Apr-2003
08:00:00
14
17.32
21-Apr-2003
08:00:00
19.21
22.53
22-Apr-2003
08:00:00
22.77
26.09
23-Apr•2003
08:00:00
23.87
27.19
24-Apr-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUEI
25-Apr-2003
08:00:00
24.03
27.35
26-Apr-2003
08,00:00
23.75
27.07
27-Apr-2003
08:00:00
22.46
25.78
28-Apr-2003
08:00:00
21.25
24.57
29-Apr-2003
08:00:00
21.83
25.15
30-Apr-2003
08:00:00
21.48
24.8
01-May-2003
08:00:00
19.56
22.88
®02-May-2003
08:00:00
17.37
20,69
03-May-2003
08:00:00
14.39
17.71
REF1 N3B6A9F1

Howell Woods 2003 REFS N3B6A9F1
04-May-2003
05-May-2003
08:00:00
08:00 00
11.61
8.52
14,93
11.84
06-May-2003
08:00:00
6.88
10.2
07-May-2003
08:00:00
4.76
8.08
08-May-2003
08:00:00
2.84
6.16
09-May-2003
08,00.00
1.28
4.6
10-May-2003
08:00:00
0.92
4.24
11-May-2003
08:00:00
0.69
4.01
12-May-2003
08:00:00
0.14
3.46
13-May-2003
08:00:00
-0.6
2.72
14-May-2003
06:00:00
-1.74
1.58
15-May-2003
08:00:00
-2.44
0.88
16-May-2003
08:00:00
-2.48
0.84
17-May-2003
08:00:00
-3.38
-0.06
18-May-2003
08:00:00
-3.97
-0.65
19-May-2003
08:00:00
0.1
3.42
20-May-2003
08:00:00
-0.52
2.8
21-May-2003
08:00:00
-1.86
1.46
22-May-2003
08:00:00
-1,15
2.17
23-May-2003
08:00:00
0.57
3.89
24-May-2003
08:00:00
0.38
3.7
25-May-2003
08:00:00
0.14
3.46
26-May-2003
08:00:00
3.2
6.52
27-May-2003
08:00:00
4.84
8.16
28-May-2003
08:00:00
4.14
7.46
29-May-2003
08:00:00
2.45
5.77
30-May-2003
08:00:00
1.12
4.44
31-May-2003
08:00:00
0.61
3.93
01-Jun-2003
08:00:00
1.63
4.95
02-Jun•2003
08:00:00
4.8
8.12
n
E

Howell Woods 2003
Ref2 N3B6AA64
Howell Woods 2003
Infinity Well 2 REF N3136AA64 riser ht 3.33
Date
time
reading
corrected
01-Jan-2003
08:0(1:00
2.33
5,66
02-Jan-2003
08:00:00
1.55
4,88
03-Jan-2003
08:00:00
0.81
4.14
04-Jan-2003
08:00:00
0.61
3,94
05-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-0.17
3,16
06-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-0.99
2.34
07-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-1.39
1.94
06-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-1.58
1.75
09-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-1,78
1.55
10-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-1.97
1.36
11-Jan.2003
08:00:00
-2.52
0.81
12-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.11
0.22
13-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.23
0.1
14-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.26
0.07
15-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.46
-0.13
16-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-4.44
-1.11
17-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-2.32
1.01
18-Jan-2003
08:00.00
-3.5
-0.17
19-Jan-2003
08:00:04)
-3.58
-0.25
20-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.3
0.03
21-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.46
-0.13
22-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.73
-0.4
23-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.77
-0,44
24-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.73
-0.4
25-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.58
-0.25
26-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.81
-0.46
08:00:00
-3.93
-0.6
®27-Jan-2003
28-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.97
-0.64
29-Jan-2003
08:00:00
-3.62
-0.29
30-Jan-2003
05:00:00
-2.83
0.5
31-Jan-2003
O8:00:00
-1.54
1.79
01-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-2.13
1.2
02-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-2.6
0.73
03-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-2.87
0.46
04-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-2.68
0.65
05-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-3.26
0.07
06-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-3.54
-0.21
07-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.68
2,65
08-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-1.46
1.87
09-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-1.31
2.02
10-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.6
2.73
11-Feb-2003
08:00:00
1.36
4,69
12-Feb-2003
08:00:00
1.2
4.53
13-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.3
3,63
14-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.29
3.04
15-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.45
2.88
16-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-1.15
2.18
17-Feb-2003
08:00:00
1.24
4.57
18-Feb-2003
08:00:00
1
4.33
19-Feb-2003
08:00:00
1-04
4.37
20-Feb-2003
08:00:00
0.61
3.94
21-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.09
3.24
22-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.68
2.65
23-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-0.37
2.96
24-Feb-2003
08:00:09
-0.99
2.34
25-Feb-2003
08:00:00
-1,03
2.3
26-Feb-2003
08:00:00
3.7
7.03
27-Feb-2003
08:00:00
4.64
7.97
28-Feb-2003
08:00:00
6.99
10.32

Howell Woods 2003 Ref2 N386AA64
01-Mar-2003
02-Mar-2003
08:00:00
08:00:00
6.88
18.7
10.21
22.03
03-Mar-2003
08:00:00
19,37
22.7
04-Mar-2003
08:00:00
17.53
20.86
05-Mar-2003
08:00:00
15,45
18.78
05-Mar-2003
08:00:00
14.9
18.23
07-Mar-2003
08:00:00
16.74
20.07
08-Mar-2003
08*00*00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
09-Mar-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
10-Mar-2003
08:00:00
18.11
21.44
11-Mar-2003
08:00:00
11.69
15.02
12-Mar-2003
08:00:00
7.54
10.87
13-Mar-2003
08:00:00
4.96
8.29
14-Mar-2003
08:00:00
3.59
6.92
15-Mar-2003
08:00:00
2.33
5-66
16-Mar-2003
08:00:00
5.54
8-87
17-Mar-2003
08:00:00
9.81
13.14
18-Mar-2003
08:00:00
13,06
16.39
19-Mar-2003
08:00:00
13.06
16.39
20-Mar-2003
08:00:00
13.61
16.94
21-Mar-2003
08:00:00
21.32
24.65
22-Mar-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
23-Mar-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
24-Mar-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUEd
25-Mar-2003
08:00.00
17.68
21-01
26-Mar-2003
08:00:00
10.36
13.69
27-Mar-2003
08:00:00
6,92
10.25
28-Mar-2003
08:00:00
4AI
7,74
29-Mar-2003
08:00:00
2.61
5.94
30-Mar-2003
08:00:00
2.37
5.7
31-Mar-2003
08:00:00
3,39
6.72
01-Apr-2003
08:00:00
6.6
9.93
02-Apr-2003
08:00:00
8.52
11.85
03-Apr-2003
08:00:00
6.95
10.28
04-Apr-2003
08:00:00
7.39
10.72
05-Apr-2003
08:00:00
9.15
12.48
06-Apr-2003
08:00:00
9.46
12.79
07-Apr-2003
08:00:00
9.3
12.63
08-Apr-2003
08:00:00
10.6
13.93
09-Apr-2003
08:00:00
14.75
18.08
10-Apr-2003
08:00:00
16,43
19,76
11-Apr-2003
08:00:DD
22.15
25.48
12-Apr-2003
08*00*00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
13-Apr-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
14-Apr-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
15-Apr-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
16-Apr-2003
08:00:00
18.23
21.56
17-Apr-2003
08:00:00
13.57
16.9
18-Apr-2003
08:00:00
10.13
13.46
19-Apr-2003
08:00:00
1D,01
13.34
20-Apr-2003
08:00:00
15.29
18.62
21-Apr-2003
08:00:00
20.66
23-99
22-Apr-2003
08:00:00
23.95
27-28
23-Apr-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
24-Apr-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
25-Apr-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
26-Apr-2003
08:00:00
Out of Range
#VALUE!
27-Apr-2003
08:00:00
23.99
27.32
28-Apr-2003
08:00:00
22.89
26.22
29-Apr-2003
08:00:00
23.44
26.77
30-Apr-2003
08:00:00
22.97
26.3
01-143y-2003
011:00:00
21.211
24,61
02-May-2003
08:00:00
18.9
22.23
03-May-2003
06:00:00
16.08
19.41

Howell Woods
2003
04-May-2003
08:00:00
13,45
16.78
05-May-2003
08:00:00
9.73
13.06
06-May-2003
08:00:00
8.52
11.85
07-May-2003
08:00:00
6.45
9.78
08-May-2003
08:00:00
4.64
7.97
09-May-2003
08:00:00
2.26
5-59
10-May-2003
08:00:00
0.89
4.22
11-May-2003
08:00:00
-0.41
2,92
12-May-2003
08:00:00
-1,07
2.26
13-May-2003
08:00:00
-2.09
1.24
14-May-2003
08:00:00
-3.11
U2
15-May-2003
08:00:00
-4.13
-0.8
16-May-2003
08:00:00
-3.81
-0.48
17-May-2003
08:00:00
-5.1
-1.77
18-May-2003
08:00:00
-5.18
-1.85
19-May-2003
08:00:00
-0.72
2.61
20-May-2003
08:00:00
-1.89
1.44
21-May-2003
08:00:00
-2.95
0.38
22-May-2003
08:00:00
-2.56
0.77
23-May-2003
08:00:00
-0,01
3.32
24-May-2003
08:00:00
-0.56
2.77
25-May-2003
08:00:00
-0.64
2.69
26-May-2003
08:00:00
5
8-33
27-May-2003
08:00:00
6.56
9.89
28-May-2003
08:00:00
5.86
9.19
29-May-2003
08:00:00
4.21
7.54
30-May-2003
08:00100
2.88
6.21
31-May-2003
08:00:00
1.32
4.65
01-Jun-2003
08:00M
3,43
6.76
02-Jun-2003
08:00:00
6.56
9.89
L ],
Rel2 N386AA64

Howell Woods 2003 Rain Gauge
Howell Woods
Rain Gauge
2003
date
time
reading
01-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0.45
02-Jan-2D03
22:00:00
0
03-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0.13
04-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
05-Jan-2003
22:00:00
O.D1
06-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
07-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
08-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
09-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
1O-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
11-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
12-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
13-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0.01
14-Jan-2003
22:DO:00
0
15-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
16-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0.08
17-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0.12
18-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
19-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
20-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
21-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0.05
22-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
23-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
24-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
25-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
26-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0
22:00M
0
®27-Jan-2003
28-Jan-2003
22M:00
0
29-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0.01
30-Jan-2003
22:00:00
0.44
31-Jan-2003
22:00:00
CIA
01-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0
02-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0
03-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0
04-Feb-2003
22:0 M
0.08
05-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0
06-Feb-2003
22:00M
0.36
07-Feb-2003
22:0 M
0.64
08-Feb-2003
22700700
0
09-Feb-2003
22:O M
0
10-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0.52
11-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0
12-Feb-2003
22:00M
0
13-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0
14-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0
15-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0.12
16-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0.9
17-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0.1
18-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0.04
19-Feb-2003
22:O M
0
20-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0
21-Feb-2003
22:0 M
0
22-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0.36
23-Feb-2003
22:OO:DO
0.01
24-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0
25-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0
26-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0.1
27-Feb-2003
22:00M
0.93
28-Feb-2003
22:00:00
0.04

Howell Woods 2003 Rain Gauge
01-Mar-2003
02-Mar-2003
22:00;00
22:00:00
0.09
0.11
03-Mar-2003
22:00:D0
0
D4-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0
05-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.14
fib-Mar-2003
22:00:00
1.27
07-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0-06
08-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.01
09-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0
10-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0
11-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.06
12-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0
13-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0
14-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.26
15-Mar-2003
22:DD;00
0.09
16-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.3
17-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.01
18-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.04
19-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.02
20-Mar-2003
22:00:00
2.09
21-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.07
22-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.01
23-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0
24-Mar-2003
22:00;00
0
25-Mar-2003
22:00:00
001
26-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0
27-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0
28-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.24
29-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.64
30-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.12
31-Mar-2003
22:00:00
0.06
22:00:00
0.03
®01-Apr-2003
02-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0
03-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0
04-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0
05-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.02
06-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.02
07-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.81
08-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.24
09-Apr-2003
22:00:00
1.14
10-Apr-2003
22:00:00
1.03
11-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.03
12-Apr-2003
22:00M
14.39
13-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.05
14-Apr-2003
22:00M
0
15-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0
16-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0
17-Apr-2003
22:00700
0.01
18-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.01
19-Apr-2003
22:00:00
D.01
20-Apr-2003
22:00;00
D.01
21-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.23
22-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.01
23-Apr-2003
2100:00
0
24-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.01
25-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.3
26-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.21
27-Apr-2003
22:00700
0.01
28-Apr-2003
22:00:00
0.01
gauge malfunction
E

•
•
APPENDIX F
YEAR 3 (2004) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 47 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

0 0 0
'Fatter Table Depth Data
Hrowell Woods Site - 2004
40
s ti�
r+ u
C�
�r r�
ti
JJ 1�y� �1-CU MA4

E,
r�
APPENDIX G
YEAR 4 (2005) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
Final Nowell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc: Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

�l

10
5
0
-5
-10
- t 5
d
-20 -
tti
3 -25
-30
-35
-40
45
Jan-05
Water Table Depth Data - JG6
Howell Woods Site - 2005
Feb-05 Apr-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Sep-05 Nov-05
Date
Dec-05

0 0 0

0
-5
-10
-15
C -20
t
r
Q
.0 -25
•
Water Table Depth Data - Howell 1
Howell Woods - 2005
regulatory zone
O
U)
co
m
m
o)
c
O
� C
O
tV
O
Q7
C_
2
�7
c
missing data
Jan-05 Feb-05 Apr-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Sep-05 Nov-05 Dec-05
Date

0 0 0

0
-5
-10
-15
c -20
t
Q
-25
-30
-35
-40
-A5
Water Table Depth Data - Howell 2
Howell Woods - 2005
regulatory zone
C
O
tt5
N
c
0
a�
m c
m 0
U)
m
m
m
rn
c
0
L
data mising Cl)
m
•
Jan-05 Feb-05 Apr-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Sep-05 Nov-05 Dec-05
Date

0 0 0

L_J
5161
sit
-A5
Jan-05
Water Table Depth Data - Howell 3
Howell Woods - 2005
Feb-05 Apr-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Sep-05 Nov-05
Date
I
Dec-05

0 • •

0
-5
-10
-15
c 20
r
a
-25
-30
-35
-40
-45
Jan-05
Water Table Depth Data - Howell 4
Howell Woods - 2005
Feb-05 Apr-05 Jun-05
Date
is
Jul-05 Sep�05 Nov-05 Dec-05

0 0 0

-5
-15
Q.
10 -25
-35
-45
Jar -05 Feb-05 Apr-05
Water Table Depth Data - Howell 5
Howell Woods - 2005
Jun-05 Jul-05
Date
Sep-05
l76 1

0 0 0

•
•
.7
APPENDIX H
YEAR 5 (2006) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPH
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, lnG Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EFP Project [Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County, North Carolina Appendices

0 0 0

Water Level (inches)
w cWn cn'n cr, it cn cn vNi twn 4.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13-Feb-06
21-Feb-06
01-Mar-06
09-Mar-06
17-Mar-06
25-Mar-06 — CA 3
m
02-Apr-06 n
s
� O N
10-Apr-06 G�
18-Apr-06 g
26-Apr-06 cQ
Cn
04-May-06 w
U)
12-May-06
20-May-06
28-May-06
05-Jun-06
13-Jun-06
p 21-Jun-06
Cu
m 29-Jun-06 « "
07-Jul-06
15-Jul-06
23-Jul-06
31-Jul-06
08-Aug-06
16-Aug-06
24-Aug-06
01-Sep-06 a
2m
K m
09-Sep-06
17-Sep-06
25-Sep-06
03-Oct-06
11-Oct-06
a
19-Oct-06 « "
27-Oct-06
04-Nov-OB — — — — ---L -—---------
mz
m 0
a<
3
Cr, 0
� A
m
u7
co
a�
0
Precipitation (inches)
•
•
•

•
0

0
13-Feb-06
21-Feb-06
1-Mar-06
9-Mar-06
17-Mar-06
25-Mar-06
2-Apr-06
10-Apr-06
18-Apr-06
26-Apr-06
4-May-06
12-May-06
20-May-06
28-May-06
5-Jun-06
13-Jun-06
p 21-Jun-06
a�
m 29-Jun-06
7-Jul-06
15-Jul-06
23-Jul-06
31-Jul-06
8-Aug-06
15-Aug-06
23-Aug-06
31-Aug-06
8-Sep-06
16-Sep-06
24-Sep-06
2-Oct-06
10-Oct-06
18-Oct-06
26-Oct-06
3-Nov-06
Water Level (inches)
c.� s 1 w cn co i ca cn � (0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O 1 s N N
U1 U1 (n
Precipitation (inches)
r
N
•

Eli,
0

Water Level (inches)
00 a) A N O CO 0) A N O CO M A N 0 OD 6) A N O N A 0) OD O
13-Feb-06
21-Feb-06
1-Mar-06
9-Mar-06
17-Mar-06 cCn
ar m
24-Mar-06
a 0 S
1-Apr-06
9-Apr-06 0
17-Apr-06 m
25-Apr-06 C
3-May-06 3
1 1-May-06
ti N
N
19-May-06
27-May-06
a
N
4-Jun-06 m
�W
12-Jun-06
v 19-Jun-06
m 27-Jun-06
5-Jul-06 N N
13-Jul-06
a
� w
a
21-J u I-06
29-Jul-06
6-Aug-06
14-Aug-06
22-Aug-06
30-Aug-06
7-Sep-06
m z
15-Sep-06
= o
a
23-Sep-06 0 3
0
Cr
1-Oct-06 - m
0
A
9-Oct-06
in
17-Oct-06 v,
0
a�
25-Oct-06 y
0
2-Nov-06---------- ------ - —
O O 1
Ln
Precipitation (inches)
N N
in
0
•

E

Water Level (inches)
O M M A N O Oq 6) .4 N O N A O W O N A m
13-Feb-06
20-Feb-06
27-Feb-06
6-Mar-06
13-Mar-06
20-Mar-06 — — — — — —
(n
27-Mar-06 m
3-Apr-06 o zr
n
-% N
10-Apr-06 C G)
a 1
0
17-Apr-06 g
24-Apr-06to
Cn
1-May-06
m
8-May-06 0
15-May-06 '
22-May-06
29-May-06
5-Jun-06
12-Jun-06
19-Jun-06
v
26-Jun-06
3-Jul-06
10-Jul-06 S
17-Jul-06
24-Jul-06
31-Jul-06
7-Aug-06
14-Aug-06
21-Aug-06
28-Aug-06
4-Sep-06
11-Sep-06 m N
a� mz
18-Sep-06 a
CD
25-Sep-06 ° a
Cr
2-Oct-06
9-Oct-06 S A
16-Oct-06
Cn
r m I -
23-Oct-06 so
to
Cft
30-Oct-06
U1 ()7
Precipitation (inches)
N N
Gn
•
•
is

•
r1
LJ

Water Level (inches)
A N O OD N O N A m CO O
13-Feb-06
20-Feb-06
27-Feb-06
6-Mar-06
13-Mar-06
20-Mar-06
27-Mar-06
3-Apr-06
10-Apr-06
17-Apr-06
24-Apr-06
1-May-06
8-May-06
15-May-06
22-May-06
29-May-06
5-Jun-06
12-Jun-06
19-Jun-06
v
26-Jun-06
�o
3-Jul-06
10-Jul-06
17-Jul-06
24-Jul-06
31-Jul-06
7-Aug-06
14-Aug-06
21-Aug-06
28-Aug-06
4-Sep-06
11-Sep-06
18-Sep-06
25-Sep-06
2-Oct-06
9-Oct-06
16-Oct-06
23-Oct-06
30-Oct-06
mz
3 o
a<
o 3
�rr
VD
0
to
m
y
O
0 0 av N
Precipitation (inches)
Z
•

0
•
•

Water Level (inches)
I l i 1 I 1 1 1 k 1 1 1 1 I 1 1
CD CO M A N O CO CD A N o OD M .A N O OD M .A N O V A M 0a
2/13/2006
2/23/2006
3/5/2006
3/15/2006
3/25/2006
4/4/2006 Y
4/ 1412006
4/24/2006
5/4/2006
a
� a
5114/2006 "
5/24/2006
6/3/2006
6/13/2006
v 6/23/2006 d w
� M 8
7/3/2006
7/13/2006
7/23/2006 W
8/2/2006
8/12/2006
8/22/2006
9/1 /2006
a
IK
N
9/11 /2006
9/21 /2006
10/ 1 /2006
10/11 /2006
10/21 /2006
10/31 /2006
o a
[Ti U1
Precipitation (inches)
n
D
u
n
•
•
is

0
•

Water Level (inches)
IQ NO 00 CD A N O m Q7 A N O fV A m m O
13-Feb-2006
21-Feb-2006
01-Mar-2006
09-Mar-2006
17-Mar-2006
25-Mar-2006
02-Apr-2006
10-Apr-2006
18-Apr-2006
26-Apr-2006
4-May-2006
12-May-2006
20-May-2006
28-May-2006
5-Jun-2006
13-Jun-2006
v 21-Jun-2006
m 29-Jun-2006
7-Jul-2006
15-Jul-2006
23-Jul-2006
31-Jul-2006
8-Aug-2006
16-Aug-2006
24-Aug-2006
1-Sep-2006
9-Sep-2006
m
3
0
~' N
1
0
cc
Cn
m
o�
0
3
17-Sep-2006 a o
25-Sep-2006 0, 3
Cr
3-Oct-2006 m
o
11-0ct-2006
mw
19-Oct-2006
c�
27-Oct-2006 K
N O
4-Nov-2006 ---- --- ----
N
Lrt
0 n 1 1 IQ
i n cn
Precipitation (inches)
CD
0
Ln
N =
o(0
CD
rn -4
v
E
�J

LI
•

Water Level (inches)
� � �
N00D0A N0 M M 4 HOOD MANOOD61, NONA MMC8
13-Feb-06
20-Feb-06
27-Feb-06
6-Mar-06
13-Mar-06
20-Mar-06 — — — — — —
27-Mar-06 d
3-Apr-06 0
10-Apr-06 j
17-Apr-06
24-Apr-06
1-May-06
8-May-06 0
15-May-06
22-May-06 w
29-May-06
5-Jun-06
12-Jun-06
19-Jun-06
26-Jun-06
a�
�o
3-Jul-06
10-Jul-06
CL
17-Jul-06
N
24-Jul-06
31-Jul-06 K A
a
7-Aug-06
14-Aug-06
21-Aug-06
28-Aug-06
4-Sep-06
11-Sep-06 m
18-Sep-06 a
25-Sep-06 °
0
2-Oct-06
0
9-Oct-06
16-opt-06
23-Oct-06 `b
m
N
30-Oct-06
O O s
U1 Cii
Precipitation (inches)
z
0
CD
m
A
J
a]

Water Level (inches)
00 m A N O m m4�1 N O m m A N O M M A N O N 4 m m o
13-Feb-06
23-Feb-06
5-Mar-06
15-Mar-06
25-Mar-06 a CA
'�mC P ai
4-Apr-06 0
C j
14-Apr-06 0
a
4m
a �
24-Apr-06 to
cn
4-May-06 m
Vi
a O
14-May-06
24-May-06
3-Jun-06
13-Jun-06
v 23-Jun-06
m �e
� w
3-Jul-06
13-Jul-06
23-Jul-06
a
2-Aug-06
12-Aug-06
22-Aug-06
1-Sep-06 CL
11-Sep-06 a
mz
3 o
21-Sep-06 °-
1-Oct-06 c
0
� A
11-Oct-06 a 3'
m m cQ
21-Oct-06 cn
m
m
31-Oct-06 0
0 0 1 s
fJt Cn
Precipitation (inches)
•
40
•

D,7
•
0

Water Level (inches)
O OD Cr) A N O w m A N O m m A N 0 00 N 0 N A m w
13-Feb-06
20-Feb-06
27-Feb-06
6-Mar-06
13-Mar-06
20-Mar-06 — —t 7—
u7 �
27-Mar-06
3-Apr-06 c
% N
10-Apr-06 a G)
17-Apr-06 g
24-Apr-06
1-May-06 M
m
8-May-06 c
15-May-06
22-May-06
29-May-06
5-Jun-06
12-Jun-06
19-Jun-06
v
m 26-Jun-06
rt m
�D w
3-Jul-06
10-Jul-06
17-Jul-06
24-Jul-06
q
31-Jul-06
7-Aug-06
14-Aug-06
21-Aug-06
a
m
28-Aug-06
a�
4-Sep-06
11-Sep-06 rn z
18-Sep-06 Q- <
0 CD
25-Sep-06
Cr
2-Oct-06 e m
9-Oct-06
��
16-Oct-06 � Cn
23-Oct-06 d
N
30-Oct-06
Fi-NnU-(}F— — — — — — — — -------
O O s N N
Precipitation (inches)
•

0
•
•

m�
Water Level (inches)
N O m m A N O m m� N 0 m m
i �
o0 O
A N O N Am)
13-Feb-06
20-Feb-06
26-Feb-06
5-Mar-06
12-Mar-06
19-Mar-06
—
26-Mar-06
(n 3
2-Apr-06
a
K
w �
C
9-Apr-06
-% j
G)
16-Apr-06
f
23-Apr-06
30-Apr-06
U,
7-May-06
m
N
14-May-06
a
21-May-06
28-May-06
4-Jun-06
11-Jun-06
18-Jun-06
a
v
w 25-Jun-06
: m
2-Jul-06
9-Jul-06
16-Jul-06
a
23-Jul-06
30-Jul-06
6-Aug-06
13-Aug-06
20-Aug-06
27-Aug-06
3-Sep-06
M
10-Sep-06
m
17-Sep-06
0
24-Sep-06
0
1-Oct-06
ego
o
8-Oct-06
a
15-Oct-06
a to
22-Oct-06
;W
29-Oct-06
m
0
5-Nov-06
---------
-------'—
O
O 1
N N
Ch Cri
CJ1
Precipitation (inches)
CD
0
u+ w
�r
QCD
0 1
v
•
•
•

a]
E

Water Level (inches)
W N N + N N W W A A [n (n 0) m
o m o to o m d cn o cn n cn o cn o cn o cn a to
13-Feb-06
21-Feb-06
1-Mar-06
9-Mar-06
17-Mar-06 _______
25-Mar-06
2-Apr-06 p ° G :7
1 o-Apr-06
O
18-Apr-06 :.
3
26-Apr-06
Cn
4-May-06
m
12-May-066077
20-May-06
28-May-06
5-Jun-06
71
13-Jun-06
0 21-Jun-06
mCL
29-Jun-06 N
7-Jul-06
15-Jul-06
23-Jul-06
31-Jul-06
8-Aug-06
16-Aug-06
24-Aug-06
1-Sep-06
9-Sep-06
IAA
m z
17-Sep-06 a <
m
25-Sep-06 Cr
3-Oct-06 0
a : A
11-Oct-06 m
19-Oct-06 N
a CD
r m 01
27-Oct-06 a o
4-Nov-06---------------
O O -+
U'i cn
Precipitation (inches)
•
0
•

Water Level (inches)
J 1I 1 J
0 CT 0 Ln o C n 0 L" o I n 0 (n 0 (I1 C) Ul
13-Feb-06
20-Feb-06
27-Feb-06
6-Mar-06
13-Mar-06
20-Mar-06- — — -
� 3
27-Mar-06 �+
m
a :t 0
3-Apr-06 a 0 3-
10-Apr-06
17-Apr-06
24-Apr-06 ca
1-May-06 a
8-May-06 p c
15-May-06
22-May-06
29-May-06
5-Jun-06
12-Jun-06
19-Jun-06
CL
26-Jun-06
ro �ti
N
3-Jul-06
10-Jul-06
17-Jul-06
24-Jul-06
31-Jul-06
� N
7-Aug-06 "
14-Aug-06
21-Aug-06
a
28-Aug-06 „
4-Sep-06
11-Sep-06 m o
18-Sep-06 0
25-Sep-06 cr 3
m
W
G�
2-Oct-06 o
_ : A
a _
9-Oct-06---------------------------
0
16-Oct-06 cn
m
23-Oct-06 v
0
30-Oct-06 3
— — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — —
in v,
Precipitation (inches)
N
is
•
•

E
0
•

Water Level (inches)
W (A N N L - N N W
Ch O Ch O M O Cn O Cn O 01 O m O
2/13/2006
2/20/2006
27-Feb-2006
06-Mar-2006
13-Mar-2006
20-Mar-2006
27-Mar-2006
03-Apr-2006
10-Apr-2006
17-Apr-2006
24-Apr-2006
01-May-2006
08-May-2006
15-May-2006
22-May-2006
29-May-2006
05-Jun-2006
12-Jun-2006
19-Jun-2006
v
26-Jun-2006
03-Jul-2006
10-Jul-2006
17-Jul-2006
24-Jul-2006
31-Jul-2006
07-Aug-2006
14-Aug-2006
21-Aug-2006
28-Aug-2006
04-Sep-2006
11-Sep-2006
18-Sep-2006
25-Sep-2006
02-Oct-2006
09-Oct-2006
16-Oct-2006
23-Oct-2006
30-Oct-2006
06-Nov-2006
Precipitation (inches)
m z
0 0
a c
0 0
%3
0
00
� A
m
01
0
0
•
•

0
r-�
APPENDIX 1
YEAR 6 (2007) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
Final Howell Woods Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2008)
EEP Project Number 183 December 2008
Johnston County. North Carolina Appendices

E

Water Level (inches)
?� 4. W W W W W n J l U T V N N L L 1 j 1 —+
AK)0MM4NOW[�ANOOoMANjCDMM�NOij4 O,Mw0NA
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/18/2007
3/26/2007
4/3/2007
4/ 11 /2007
4/ 19/2007
4/27/2007
5/5/2007
5/13/2007
5/21 /2007
5/29/2007
6/6/2007
6/14/2007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
0 7/8/2007
F 7/16/2007
7/24/2007
811 /2007
8/9/2007
8/ 17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/ 10/2007
9/18/2007
9/26/2007
10/4/2007
10/12/2007
10/20/2007
10/28/2007
11/5/2007
CO O 1 s N N W W
Precipitation (inches)
2
O
O
O
a
U)
m 0
w d
rn cB
j
O
0
V
0
w
C
to
0
v
n�
m
•
•
•

�l
I
4

m
0
Water revel (inches)
A W W WW W W NNNNN—j— — — , , 1--� �
OOOm P to0wmANOd9m4 NOOoCh A NON Am ODON A
3/2/2007
3/ 10/2007
3/18/2007
3/26/2007 m m
413/2007 C . c 0
10
q yy
4/11/2007
N 0
4/ 19/2007
4/27/2007
CA
5/5/2007
5/13/2007 3
5121 /2007
5/29/2007
6/6r2007
6/14/2007
6/22/2007
6/3012007
7/8/2007
7/ 1612007
7/24/2007
811 /2007
8/9/2007
8/17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/10/2007 m z
9/18/2007 a m
o
9/26/2007 ~`
o �
10/4/2007 A
10/12/2007 '
to
10/20/2007 a
H
10/28/2007
11/5/2007-------
O O s N N W W
Ln iTl C71 V1
Precipitation (inches)
is

�"
E

Water Level (inches)
AAA W W W W 6NN1VtUNLLa , -- , i 3j1
9 ILM0MMAN)CDMMAN)CDMMANOMO4LNON.4-MM NA
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/18/2007
3/26/2007
4/3/2007
4/11/2007
4/ 19/2007
4/27/2007
5/5/2007
5/13/2007
5121 /2007
5/29/2007
6/6/2007
6/14/2007
6122/2007
6/30/2007
v 7/812007
0 7/16/2007
7/24/2007
8/1/2007
8/9/2007
8/ 17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/ 1012007
9/18/2007
9/26/2007
10/4/2007
10/12/2007
10/20/2007
10/28/2007
11/5/2007
U1 CJ1 UI
Precipitation (inches)
mz
m a
M a
°� 3
o �
A
7
m
W W
2
O
O
O
a
CD W
0
0
M
C
IC
CD
v
m
d
•
•
•

0
•

Water Level (inches)
Oo M A N 0 OO M A N 0 M M A N O m� A N O N A m w O N A
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/18/2007
3/26/2007 3 + m
4/3/2007
°
4/1 1/2007 1
4/19/2007 °
4/27/2007
5/5/2007 v
5/13/2007 0
5/21 /2007
5/29/2007
6/6/2007
6/ 14/2007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
p 7/8/2007
7/16/2007
7/24/2007
8/ 112007
8/9/2007
8/17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/10/2007 rn z
a 0
9/18/2007 °- <
O
9/26/2007 Cr
10/4/2007 °
:E A
10/12/2007
Cn
10/20/2007CD
10/28/2007 °
11 /5/2007
O O —+ N N W W
CJ� Ut L)1 Ul
Precipitation (inches)
2
O
m
0
0
a
G7
w �
rnC
m
IV A
0
0
4
G?
m
tO
cn
O
m
r.
m
•
0
0

u
El
•

Water Level (inches)
4h.NOGDmANQWmAmCPma)ANOOO(nAN0N10.Q)000N41.
3/3/2007
3/11 /2007
3/19/2007
3/27/2007
4/4/2007
4/12/2007
4/20/2007
4/28/2007
5/6/2007
5/14/2007
5/22/2007
5/30/2007
6/7/2007
6/15/2007
6/23/2007
7/ 1 /2007
p 7/9/2007
7/17/2007
7/25/2007
8/2/2007
8/10/2007
8/18/2007
8/26/2007
9/3/2007
9/11 /2007
9/19/2007
9/27/2007
10/5/2007
10/13/2007
10/21 /2007
10/29/2007
O O i N N w w
C!l CJ1 U1 Ui
Precipitation (inches)
r
0
•

L91
E J
E

Water Level (inches)
AAA W W W 6G]NNNNiJ1s1L L e.
4�NO000)AN000CDANO00CDANO00Cn41-N0NA07000NA
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/18/2007
3/26/2007--------- — cn 3
4/3/2007
N V O �
4/ 11 /2007
GO
4119/2007 0
4/27/2007
5/512007 CD
m
5/13/2007 0
5/21 /2007
5129/2007
6/6/2007
6/ 1412007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
p 7/8/2007
m
7/16/2007
7/24/2007
811 /2007
8/9/2007
8/17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/10/2007m Z
� o
9/18/2007'
o
9/26/2007 G) Cr
10/4/2007 g
10/12/2007 ca
10/20/2007
10/28/2007
11 /512007
d d 1 N N W
61 Vi CJ�
Precipitation (inches)
W
cn
•
1-1

•
IE

Water Level (inches
L A A W W W W W N N I V N N . _' .. j L L
A- N O W M A N O M O A N O W 0) L� N O W M A N O N A M M O N 4�,
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/18/2007
3/26/2007
4/3/2007
4/11/2007
4/ 19/2007
4/27/2007
5/5/2007
5/1312007
5/21 /2007
5/29/2007
6/6/2007
6/14/2007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
7/8/2007
7/16/2007
7/24/2007
8/ 1 /2007
8/9/2007
8/17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/10/2007
9/18/2007
9/26/2007
10/4/2007
10/12/2007
10/20/2007
10/28/2007
11 /5/2007
O
U1 Cf1 C!1
Precipitation (inches)
C
0 3
0
Ch
ua
m
0
mz
z 0
Q. <
cr
o M
3
m
0
•
•
•

0
•
El

Water Level (inches)
? 11. ? W W W W W N N N N N i i i i i�. . I
0-N)0 MMAN)0MMANOODOSAN0ODMANONAQ)OONA
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/ 1812007
312612007---.__.----- -- � to �
4/312007
a C�
°, s
4/11/2007 i
G
4/19/2007
4/27/2007 Ck
a N
5/5/2007
5/13/2007 0
5/21 /2007
5/29/2007
6/6/2007
6/14/2007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
p 7/8/2007
m
7/16/2007
7/24/2007
811 /2007
8/9/2007
8/17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/10/2007 m z
m o
9/18/2007 0.
CD
9/26/2007 p Cr
10/4/2007 A
10/ 12/2007 c�
10/20/2007
10/28/2007
11/5/2007
O O i N N W W
& Un Cn Un
Precipitation (inches)
2
O
ro
O
O
O.
cn G)
m c;p
CD
N OD
a
0
0
Qj
cn
c�
v
m
•
�-I
•

Water Level (inches)
ANOOoM 4�-.NOOoO�NOCoM�N)0W M 4�,NON�MCOON�
3/2/2007
3/ 10/2007
3/ 18/2007
3I2612007 ~l------ — cn
F.
d �►
4/3/2007
o
4111 /2007
1
4/19/2007 °
f
4/27/2007
Cn
5/5/2007 m
5/13/2007 �� w o
q
5/21 /2007
5/29/2007
6/6/2007
6/14/2007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
p 7/8/2007
m 7/16/2007
7124/2007
8/1/2007
8/9/2007
8/17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/10/2007 m z
7 °
9/18/2007 a
°, 3
9/26/2007 C) q
1014/2007 :
10/12/2007 d ti cn
N W
10/20/2007 CD
y
10/28/2007 °
11l5I2007~----
O
Gi UZ Ch 6
Precipitation (inches)
6
0
•

Water Level (inches)
--r.
O OD O A N 0 0 m A NJ m 0 AM 0 w m.4 N O N� m w O N.-a 'A
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/18/2007
3/26/2007
4/3/2007
4/11/2007
4/19/2007
4/27/2007
5/5/2007
5/13/2007
5/21 /2007
5/29/2007
6/6/2007
6/14/2007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
0 7/8/2007
m 7/16/2007
7/24/2007
8/1 /2007
8/9/2007
8/17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/10/2007
9118/2007
9/26/2007
10/4/2007
10/12/2007
10/20/2007
10/28/2007
11 /5/2007
O 0 N N W W
U1 V� V1 Ch
Precipitation (inches)
1V
Q O
a
A
cc
m
1-1
is
•

•
r�

Water Level (inches)
O 06 M A N C3 M M A N O M O A N O M O4�L N O N A M M O N�
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/18/2007
312612007—����--- -- -- c� ��
4/3/2007,
0 3
4/11 /2007 C
4/19/2007
F
4/27/2007
5/5/2007 CO
m
5/13/2007 0
5/21 /2007
5/29/2007
6/6/2007
6/14/2007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
p 7/8/2007
7/16/2007
7/24/2007
8/1/2007
8/912007
8/17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/10/2007 m z
9/18/2007 Q-
0
9/26/2007 Gy Cr
101412007 � A,
10/12/2007 ca
10/20/2007
10/28/2007 0
3
1115/2007—____-- —rT — — — — — —
--
11/13/2007
O d s 1 N N
C11 Ch Ul
Precipitation (inches)
a)
c
Q
CD
v
0)
•
•

0

Water Level (inches)
j� j
QODQA NC)mmA NQODQANQcaOALNQN AQ07QN A
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/18/2007
3/26/2007— — — — — — — —
— — — — cn
4/3/2007
o �
4/1112007
4/19/2007 °
4/27/2007
5/5/2007 m
5/13/2007 0
5/21/2007
5/29/2007
6/6/2007
6/14/2007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
p 718/2007
0 7/16/2007
7/24/2007
8/1 /2007
8/9/2007
8/17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/10/2007 m z
9/18/2007 0
0
3
9/26/2007 rr
10/4/2007 g° A
3'
10/12/2007
Cn
10/20/2007 m
m
10/28/2007 °
11/5/2007
Q Q N N W W
CJi 6 Cn Cn
Precipitation (inches)
Ire
•
•
•

�J
0
•

Water Level (inches)
A A A W W W W W N NNN nJ Ll LL LL, ,
41.NOOOMAN0OD0)ANO030)ANCDCOm NONA4)000mA
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/18/2007
— — — — — — — — —
3/26/2007
4/3/2007
0
4111 /2007 j
a
4/19/2007 a 19 0
4/27/2007 �a
5/5/2007 N
U)
5/13/2007 0
5/21 /2007
5/29/2007
6/6/2007
6/14/2007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
7/8/2007
7/16/2007
7/24/2007
8/1 /2007
8/9/2007
8/ 1712007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/1012007 m z
3 0
9/18/2007 Q-
o �
9126/2007 C) Cr
10/4/2007 � 4.
10/12/2007 a
cn
10/20/2007
N
10/28/2007 0
3
11/5/2007 — — — — — —
— — — — —
-
11 /13/2007
Q O N N W c 3
(T1 V7 Cl7 U7
Precipitation (inches)
0
ro
0
0 ;u
0_ m
C
m
rn CD
� 0
0)
ns �
0 0
OCO
4 CD
0 j
cQ
0
•
0

4)

Water Level (inches)
1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 i 1 1 f 1 1 1
A A A A W W W W W N N N N N� J J j J 1
0)ANOC7DCAAN000a)AfQ0000)ANOODMA1V0rVAMCD0NA
3/2/2007
3/10/2007
3/18/2007
3/26/2007
4/3/2007
4/ 11 /2007
4/19/2007
4/27/2007
5/5/2007
5/ 13/2007
5121 /2007
5/29/2007
6/612007
6/14/2007
6/22/2007
6/30/2007
p 7/8/2007
7/ 16/2007
7/24/2007
8/1/2007
8/9/2007
8/17/2007
8/25/2007
9/2/2007
9/10/2007
9/18/2007
9/26/2007
10/4/2007
10/12/2007
10/20/2007
10/28/2007
11/5/2007
� n
o
"^^' N
C)
Q
o
r �
3'
m
y
O
m z
0 0
CL
C)C
o
A
co
d
y
4- — — — — — — — — — — — — —
—
O CD N N W
CJl 6 Cn CT
Precipitation (inches)
2
0
ro
0
0 ;u
a ro
CD
ro ro
0
rn CD
N �
Q C
CD
v ro
+n N
01
ro
•
•

s
El

0
-v-

ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
HOWELL WOODS
WETLAND RESTORATION
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(EEP Project Number 183)
Monitoring Year 5 of 6 (2006)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by/Monitoring Performer:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
2126 Rowland Pond Drive
Willow Spring, North Carolina 27592
Design Firm:
EcoScience Corporation
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27592
1',1i xii.'CvC'nt
Axiom Envuonmenlal, Inc. rKuurenM
February 2007

U, XECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Howell Woods Wetland Restoration Site (Site) is located within the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03020201 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQj subbasin 03-
04-04) of the Neuse River Basin. The Site includes an approximately 140-acre tract, located
approximately 8.5 miles southeast of the Town of Smithfield in southern Johnston County (Figure 1),
The Site is contained within an approximately 2000-acre tract of land managed by Johnston County
Community College as part of the Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center.
The primary goals of the project included the following.
1. Enhance water quality functions in the Gar Gut Creek and Mill Creek watersheds.
2. Reestablish a functioning backwater slough system, which extends through developing
bottomland hardwood forests.
3. Provide educational opportunities to show the importance of wetlands for water quality.
4. Maximize the area returned to historic wetland function.
Five vegetation plots had been previously established by North Carolina State University. The plots are
10 meters square and are located randomly within the Site. These plots were surveyed in late June and
early July 2006 for the 2006 (year 5) monitoring season. Based on the number of stems counted, the
average plot density was measured at 1101 planted stems per acre, or 27 planted stems per plot for 2006
(year 5) monitoring, which is well -above the required 260 stems per acre for success. The dominant
species identified at the Site were elm species (Ulmus rubra and Ulmus americans) and green ash
(Fraxinus penmvylvanica). Four out of the five individual vegetation plots were well above the success
criteria with 1093 to 1700 planted stems per acre. Vegetation plot I was low with 162 planted stems per
acre present; however, natural recruits comprised an additional 148 stems for the plot (approximately
5992 stems per acre).
Vegetation problem areas include an area within the northwestern portion of the Site that had been burned
and partially bush hogged prior to year-5 (2006) monitoring. Burning resulted in some dieback, however,
the majority of the burned or cut stems are resprouting. This area is expected to recover as long as
burning and bush hogging activities are not resumed In addition, vegetation on the outer rim of the
southeastern littoral shelf is sparse and survival of planted vegetation is poor, most likely resulting from
soil infertility due to the removal of nutrient rich surface soils during site construction.
No wetland problem areas have been identified during the year-5 (2006) monitoring year. Groundwater
hydrology within 12 inches of the soil surface is occurring for greater than 12.5 percent of the growing
season for year-5 (2006) at Gauges 1, 4-7, and 9-12 and greater than 5 percent of the growing season at
Gauges 2 and 8. Groundwater hydrology was within 12 inches of the soil surface for less than 5 percent
of the growing season for Gauge 3; however, this gauge is located on the margin of an upland area. In
addition, all groundwater gauges have a presence of hydrophytic wetland vegetation based on criteria set
forth in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual.
In summary, the restoration site achieved success criteria for hydrology and vegetation in the Fifth
Monitoring Year (2006). In addition, based on available data the site achieved success criteria for
hydrology and vegetation over the entire 5-year monitoring period. However, the Site was not
constructed until mid -way through the first year growing season; therefore, the Site will be monitored for
a sixth growing season.
Howell Woods Axiom Environmenud, Me- Monitoring Year 5 of 6 (2006)
EEP Project Number 193 February 2007
Johnston County, North Carolina page i

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT ........................ ................ ........ ......I ..................... ....
i
1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND... ...................... .... _-_1 .... I ......... ........................................................
I
1.1 Location and Setting.....................................................................................................................1
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives ...................................... ........................ ............ .....................
1
1.3 Project History and Background.... ..................................... ..........................................................
6
1.4 Monitoring Plan View...................................................................................................................7
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS..............................................................
8
..............................
2.1 Vegetation Assessment................................................................................ ...
8
2.1.1 Soil Data...................................................................................................................8
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas.........................................................................................8
2.1.3 Stem Counts............................................................................................................
10
2.1.4 Vegetation Plot Photos............................................................................................11
2.2 Wetland Assessment .......................... .................. I., ............ I ........... ........... ..,...... ............. .,........
11
2.2.1 Wetland Problem Area Plan View... ........... ............................................................
13
2.2.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment...................................................................................13
3.0 FIVE-YEAR MONITORING ASSESSMENT................................................................................14
4.0. REFERENCES..................................................... ............ .............................................. ...............
is
List of Figures
Figure 1. Site Location......................................................... .......------......2
Figure 2. DRAINMOD Revised Mitigation Unit Calculations.................................................................4
Figure3. Monitoring Plans..................................................................................................................... 5
Figure 4. Vegetation Problem Areas.......................................................................................................9
0 -
List of Tables
Table 1. Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives.....................................................
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ..............................................................
Table 3. Project Contact Table........................................................................................
Table 4. Project Background Table.................................................................................
Table 5. Preliminary Soil Data .......................... ............................... ...............................
Table 6. Vegetation Problem Areas.. ...............................................................................
Table 7. Stem Counts for Planted Species Arranged by Plot ............................................
Table 8. Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years 1 through 5 ........................
Table 9. Wetland Criteria Attainment.............................................................................
Appendices
APPENDIX A.
VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX B.
GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
APPENDIX C.
GROUNDWATER GAUGE RAW DATA
APPENDIX D.
CVS LEVELS I & 2 DATA FORMS
APPENDIX E.
GAUGE VEGETATION LISTS
APPENDIX F.
YEAR 1 (2002) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
APPENDIX G.
YEAR 2 (2003) GROUNDWATER GAUGE DATA
APPENDIX 1.1.
YEAR 3 (2004) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
APPENDIX 1.
YEAR 4 (2005) GROUNDWATER GAUGE GRAPHS
....................... 3
....................... 6
....................... 7
....................... 7
....................... 8
..----....10
............I........10
.....................12
.....................13
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Ina Monitoring Year 5 of 6 (2006)
EEP Project Numbcr 183 February 2007
Johnston County, North Carolina page ii

1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Location and Setting
The Howell Woods Wetland Restoration Site (Site) is Iocated within the United Stales Geological Survey
(USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03020201 (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] subbasin 03-
04-04) of the Neuse River Basin. The Site includes an approximately 140-acre tract, located
approximately 8.5 miles southeast of the Town of Smithfield in southern Johnston County (Figure 1).
The Site is contained within an approximately 2000-acre tract of land managed by Johnston County
Community College as part of the Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center.
Directions to the Site:
From Highway 70 Business in Smithfield
7 Travel south on Route 701 for approximately 15 miles
➢ Turn left/southeast on Devil's Racetrack Road for approximately 10 miles
Turn lets into the Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center
➢ See Jaime Sasser or Kinchon Taylor at the Center office for a gate key and directions into the Site
The Site is located in the Southeastern Plains Physiographic Province, within the Southeastern
Floodplains and Low Terraces ecoregion and is immediately east of the fall line of the Coastal Plain and
Piedmont regions of North Carolina.
The Site is situated within the Gar Gut watershed (slough -like tributary to the Neuse River) in the outer
perimeter of the Neuse River floodplain at the base of the escarpment between the Neuse River floodplain
and an elevated river terrace. Ponded depressions, swamps, and sloughs occur throughout the 3,5-miie
wide floodplain and are characterized by cypress -gum associations. Elevated, well -drained portions of
the floodplain support bottomland hardwood and mesic upland slope forests dominated by oaks and
ashes.
1.2 Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Prior to implementation of wetland restoration activities, the Site was characterized by agriculture, fallow
fields, and forest. Land use activities in the drainage area and adjacent tracts are limited due to frequent
flooding from the Neuse River and poorly drained soils. Onsite land use was characterized by farming
(agricultural row crops), hunting, and recreational activities associated with the Howell Woods
Environmental Learning Center.
The primary restoration feature at the Site included 5400 linear feet of a dredged and straightened canal
and associated ditch network system that drained the majority of the Site. The canal was dredged along
the toe of slope at the outer floodplain edge. This area historically supported a backwater slough, as
evidenced by relict channel reaches within forested sections of the Site situated adjacent to the excavated
canal.
Wetland/backwater slough restoration at the Site entailed 1) ditch cleaning prior to backfiill, 2) impervious
ditch plug construction, 3) ditch/canal backfilling, 4) access road improvements, 5) littoral shelf creation,
and 6) pond outfall structural upgrades. In addition to hydrology alterations associated with ditch
backfilling, a primary component of the project entailed restoring surface water flows through the
abandoned backwater slough channel.
® Howell woods "om Envirotrmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 6 (2006)
EEP Project Number 183 February 2007
Johnston County, ]North Carolina page 1

r
From I fighway 70 Builinrss in Smithfield
J, Travel south on Route 701 for approximately 15 miles
Turn ieft/souLlicasl on Devil's Racetrack Road
for approximately 10 Miles
Turn left into the Howell Woods Environmental
Learning Center
See Jaime Sasser or Kinchon Taylor at the Center office
for a gale key and directions into the Site
1m.
r
Alp l It t
J
Y
L-.4
it
k A- -4,
71P
40 0,
V
v,
i7
N
S
P.
MA.4
A A AN
�- NJ
I J,
1.�jj
s
=:j7
A X.
17
Moi
l i,
J-7N,
A"k
F,
.9 �V- -U 'r
q q-
.4-
gy,
011,r
777" E4-
-5k
� � ���. 1 � F�`i i �l. l �r �°}� r�` 1LL xl} v ,l �i y M ��ti �,;•r•rt, 't� 4 ijr��j*�
C
I MI. 4 mi,
Source: 1977 North Carolina Atlas and Gazetteer .63. 2.1
SITE LOCATION Dwn� by: WGL FIGURE
2120 Ra*Aand Pond Dr Ckd try.
wftuw SWQ. tic 275M HOWELL WOODS RESTORATION SITE wGL
1919)215-1693 Project Number 183 Dale-
Year 5 (2006) Monitoring Report ?40V
Johnston County, North Carolina Project 06-002

•
Based on an October 2001 Detailed Wetland Restoration Plan, the primary goals of the project included
1) maximizing the area returned to historic wetland function, 2) enhancing the water quality functions in
Gar Gut Creek and Mill Creek, and 3) reestablishing a functioning backwater slough system, which
extends through developing bottomland hardwood forests. Project structures and objectives are
summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1. Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EP Project Number 183)
l-�
c
G
Revised
Project
o
Linear
Linear
Segment or
a
Footage or
Footage or
Reach ID
a
Acreage
Acreage
I Comment
Howell Woods
R
---
24 acres
34 acres
__
Areas Effectively Drained by Historic
Ditch/Canal
Areas with Hydrology Effected by
Howell Woods
E
---
74 acres
64 acres
---
Ditches/Canal, but not Drained Below
Jurisdictional Threshold
Howell Woods
C
---
4 acres
4 acres
--I
Littoral Shelf Excavation
Howell Woods
R
---
-
5251 feet
I Passive Backwater Slough Restoration
No stationing along the reach, linear footage is based on down valiey distance of the braided stream channel, as based on inter
agency guidance (USACE et. al. 2005)
'•R = Restoration
• E = Enhancement
C = Creation
At the time of project completion, stream restoration projects entailed traditional alterations to channel
dimension, pattern, and profile, as outlined in Applied River Morphology (Rosgen 1996). However,
recent guidance (USACE et al. 2005) for the restoration of backwater sloughs in low -slope settings (outer
Coastal Plain) indicates that stream restoration may be achieved through the reestablishment of braided
stream morphology through passive measures, including ditch filling and natural progression of the
stream through historic sloughs, braids, and channels, Under this scenario, stream restoration success
criteria may include the successful restoration of hydrology within areas previously drained by ditching or
other hydrology alterations. Using this guidance, approximately 5251 linear feet of backwater slough
stream channel has been restored within the Site (Figure 2).
Wetland restoration acreages and locations were determined in the October 2001 Detailed Wetland
Restoration Plan. Wetland restoration areas were defined as portions of the Site that were hydrologically
impacted (hydrology below 12 inches of the ground surface for most of the growing season) by drainage
ditch excavation- Wetland restoration areas were determined utilizing DRAINMOD computer
simulations to predict the effect Site drainage features had on the adjacent groundwater table. However,
the abandoned backwater slough channel, which served as an approximately 2 to 3 foot deep drainage
feature prior to restoration activities, was not included in the original DRAINMOD model simulations.
Utilizing drainage effect estimates from the October 2001 Detailed Wetland Restoration Plan, the
abandoned backwater slough channel drained an additional 10 acres of wetland at the Site prior to
restoration activities. These revised acreages are depicted on Figure 2 and are described in Table 1
(Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives).
Howell Woods Axiom Enviranmenta4 Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 6 (200 rD
EEP Project Number 183 February 2007
Johnston County, North Carolina page 3

-_- __-__-_-_�--__''--_-- --__�-----_---_--___--__- - �
__ _-_-_____ _ __-_-_'__-__ ____- ________-_ ___ _ _ _-_ __-_
-- — -- — —
|
-
. `..
. . .
.... ..........
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Fv-
WETLANDS
RESTORATION
PROGRAM
U",io= N
|
| |
' |
HOWELLWOODS
RESTORATION SITE
MAP LEGEND (REVISIONS) 4OHNSTON COUNTY.
NORTH CAROLINA
REVISED
CALCULATIONS
| MAP COMPILED o,rmnoo"AM"ETwcMETHODS.
' | SCALE ~ FEET
— 0 N �� ��
0 0 0

m
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
, . Ate- Emtvrseai, lnc
I _
t �.4 u. Y r •i.:=""s`_•>.�, Y. M. Owli _=�sOiF�f '•�I°tl , - a� �� - _ _ ice; � cra s, •' ,i.` f�. -d`.
ll
♦ f!, t, `r;_'_ ` Ja i _ y I '""sue_=-�-' `'� r. uY-� .4r1:.t; `rs�~ •�
y^`\,c` `Jig:+ __•� wn t rJ- ``" ` i WETLANDS
I NtAe: ♦+Y .`1'I -I ,f". �, v ,L - �'-�I�.�. `° •.� _,�'•ti :''' ` r':`v „`, .� RESTORATION
Refamtca Ga♦`` .�` f • ,- `�J,_: r - `*- v PROGRAM
UP anI �,♦ «__�_"-'' -'r• v�l' -� v; Raleigh: North CamUne
- " f _ I S �J--4� • 5
projem
♦_ �_ r t
`w ,`• r r l � • - __ _ H4V4'ELL W0005
_ II RESTORATION SITE
`�L. •�tr L l
JOHNSTON COUNTY,
� � v �•• /+ CAR 1NA
---
APPROX. MAJOR OPNTMRS
rx'.4x,
OPEN WATER
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT
A
MONITORWG GAUGE l-1-%)
MONITOMNG GAUGE f5 - I" %I
®
MONri ORJNG GAUGE CeZ
MnP CCWMJFD BY PHMOGRWM.ETAIC M -"NODS
I r
''_..ICAbSfip_Mon3lotvJp_Plan.dgn t 111-01 8 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ -- _ _ _ _ _ ... -
\♦ram , -I , )'t _ '} NORTH OL
ice_:= •_i f� }� � •`,:� P-M
} r tr
`♦ - WGL OCT 2wi
WGL V- 50Q
06-002
• FlG'J�F.
250 0 2W M* no n
SC,AI_F %N FEET r{

E
1.3 Project History and Background
In the spring of 1999, a preliminary feasibility study was conducted at the Site, which included the
following activities: 1) property boundary surveys, 2) aerial photography and topographic mapping, 3)
soil mapping, 4) hydraulic conductivity estimates, 5) groundwater and surface water elevation
monitoring, and 6) planting plan development. A feasibility report was prepared in April 1999 that
described the results of these studies and presented mitigation options for the Site.
A mitigation alternatives analysis was subsequently conducted in the spring of 2000. The alternatives
analysis outlined five mitigation options for the Site. These mitigation options included 1) no action, 2)
stream restoration on new location, 3) in -canal structures and ford construction, 4) in -canal structures and
road elevation, and 5) backwater slough/passive stream restoration.
In March 2000 approximately 19 acres of agricultural fields within the Site were revegetated with native,
wetland -adapted tree species. Approximately 9600 tree seedlings were purchased and planted on 10 foot
centers. Monitoring of planted species occurred in the fall of 2001.
In an effort to expand the Site boundaries, additional acreage was acquired by the North Carolina Wetland
Restoration Program and an expanded Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Design flan was prepared for
the Site in October 2001. Upon completion of the detailed plan the project was bid on May 17, 2002.
Backwater Environmental, a subsidiary of Osborne Co. Inc., was awarded the construction contract and
work initiated on .tune 18, 2002. Earthwork associated with the project was completed within 4 weeks
and the Site was planted in the winter of 2002.
Completed project activities, reporting history, and completion dates are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods (EEP Pro'eet Number, 183
Activity or Report
Scheduled
Completion
Data
Collection
Cam letion
Actual
Completion
or Delivery
Initial Feasibility Report
---
---
Apr 1999
Mitigation Alternatives Anal is
Spring 2000
--
Spring 2000
Initial Site Planting (approximately 19 acres
Mar 2000
---
Mar 2000
Year 1 Monitoring 2001
Fall 2002
--
Nov 2002
Additional ELL er Acquisition
---
---
Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Design Plan
Oct 2001
--
Oct 2001
Site Implementation (Wetland/Backwater Slough)
Fall 2002
--
Jul 2002
Site Planting a rox imately 12 acres
Dec 2002
--
Dee 2002
Year 2 Monitoring 2003
Dec 2003
-
Dec 2003
Year 3 Monitoring 2004)
Dee 2004
--
Dec 2004
Year 4 Monitorin r 2005
Dee 2005
---
Dec 2005
Year 5 Monitoring (2006)
Dec 2006
Oct 2006
Nov 2006
Contact information regarding project designer, construction, planting contractor, and monitoring
personnel are summarized in Table 3 and relevant project background information is summarized in Table
4.
isHowell Woods Axiom Environmenla4 Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 6 (2006)
EEP Project Ntunber 183 February 2007
Johnston County, North Carolina page 6

E
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods EEP Project Number 183
Designer
EcoScience Corporation
101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Jerry McCrain 919) 828-3433
Construction Contractor
Backwater Environmental
PO Box 1654
Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312
Wes Newell [phone]
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
Dwight McKinney
Monitoring Performers
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
2126 Rowland Pond Dr,
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Monitoring Point of Contact
Grant Lewis 919-215-1693
Table 4. Project Background Table
Project NamelNumber: Howell Woods (EEP Project Number 183
Project County
Johnston County, North Carolina
Drainage Area
Primary Neuse River - 1870 square miles
Secondary Gar Gut - 9.8 square miles
Drains a impervious cover estimate %)
¢ 5
Stream Order
second
Physiographic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecore =ion
Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces
Ros en Classification of As -built
D- e
Cowardin Classification
PFOI
Dominant Soil Types
Altavista, State, Wehadkee, and Chastain
Reference Site ID
Onsite
USGS HUC for Project and Reference
Project and Reference; — 03020201
NCDWQ Subbasin for Project and Reference
Project and Reference — 03-04-04
Any portion of an ro'ect se ment 303d listed?
No (Stream Index #27-52-7)
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed se ent?
Yes, reach of the Neuse River in Subbasin 03-04-05 —
Stream Index # 27- 56b
Reasons for 303d listin or sa=sor
McrcTy Level in Fish
% of prylect easement fenced
0
1.4 Monitoring Plan View
Monitoring activities for the Site, including relevant structures and utilities, project features, specific
project structures, and monitoring features are detailed in Figure 3.
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Ycar 5 of (2006)
EEP Praject Number 183 February 2007
Johnston County, North Carolina page 7

1;x Site features have been monitored through the use of continuous recording groundwater gauges,
,r F . , ,.PermanentlY monumented vegetation Plots an ansite rainPabe, and photographic
documentation. The
Site contains 14 groundwater gauges including two reference gauges and 12 mitigation area gauges.
-Several gauges malfunctioned over the past few years and were replaced.' The current groundwater
monitoring scheme is depicted in figure 3. Gauge manufacturer and types include Remote Data Systems
(RDS) WL 40, RDS Ecotone, and Infinities.
There are five vegetation plots on the Site that have been permanently monumented with five -fool metal
fence posts, driven into each of the four corners of the plot, with PVC pipe attached for ease in plot
location identification.
2.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
In the fall of 2001, vegetation monitoring plots were randomly established within the Site. Each sample
plot was composed of two-300-foot transacts extending from a central point, usually a .groundwater
monitoring gauge. The Site was monitored for the as -built and the 2002 (year l) growing season utilizing;
this methodology with vegetation success achieved.
During the 2003 (year 2) monitoring period, North Carolina State University implemented a revised
vegetation monitoring procedure based on the Draft Vegetation Monitoring Plan for NCWRP Riparian
Buffer and Weiland Restoration Projects document (undated). Five-10 meter by 10 meter plots were
established and permanently marked with pipe. The location of each vegetation monitoring plot is
depicted on Figure 3.
2.1.1 Soil Data
General soil conditions found onsite, including level of erosion and percentage of organic matter, are
summarized in Table S.
Table S. Prelitminary Soil Data
Project NameINumber: Howell Woods MEPProJectNumber 183
Series
Max Depth
inches
% Clay on
Surface
K
T
OM %
Altavista
+60
10 - 20
0.24
5
0.5 - 3
State
+60
5 - 15
0.28
5
<2
Wehadkee
+60
5 - 20
0.24
5
2--5
Chastain
+72
27 - 50
0.28
5
1-6
Agricultural activities and excavation associated with Site implementation resulted in the exposure of
subsurface soil horizons; therefore, a reduction in percent clay and organic [natter in the soil surface
layers occurred. In addition, erosion factors are calculated based on the percentage of silt, sand, and
organic matter and are likely to have been affected by Site development and implementation as well.
Values of erosion factors K and T have likely been elevated above the amount published in the Johnston
County Soil Survey (USDA 1994).
2.1.2 Vegetative Problem Areas
Vegetation problem areas within the Site are depicted on Figure 4 and are outlined in Table 6. An area
within the northwestern portion of the Site had been burned and partially bush hogged prior to year 5
Rowell Woods Axiom Environmental, lnr. Monitoring Year or6 (2006)
El?P Project Number 183 February 2007
Johnston County, North Carolina page 8

E
(2006) monitoring. Burning resulted in some dieback; however, the majority of the burned or cut stems
are resprouting. This area is expected to recover as long as burning and bush hogging activities are
ceased. In addition, vegetation on the outer rim of the southeastern littoral shelf is sparse and survival of
planted vegetation is poor, most likely resulting from soil infertility due to the removal of nutrient rich
surface soils during site construction.
Table 6. Vegetation Problem Areas
Pro'eet Name/Number: Howell Woods(EEP Project Number 183
Feature/issue
Location
Probable Cause
Photo
Weak vigor
Northwestern
Burning and partial bush hogging
Problem Area Photo 1
Portion of Site
(Appendix A)
Poor vegetation development
Removal of top soillsoil nutrients
Problem Area Photos
Littoral Shelves
during construction
2-3 (Appendix A)
The Site is characterized by planted seedlings exhibiting various degrees of vigor. Overall, vigor was
noted as good, although a few seedlings appeared to be lacking vigor as the result of burning and bush
hogging activities. Most seedlings within Plot 1 were natural recruits, and many seedlings within Plot 2
exhibited weak vigor due to the burning and bush hogging.
2.1.3 Stem Counts
Five vegetation plots had been previously established by North Carolina State University as depicted in
Figure 3. The plots are 10 meters square and are located randomly within the Site. These plots were
surveyed in late June and early July 2006 for the 2006 (year 5) monitoring season; results are included in
Table 7. No reference area was studied; therefore no comparisons could be made to reference conditions.
Table 7. Stem Counts for Planted Species Arranged by Plot '
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods (EEP Project Number 183)
Species
Year 5 (2006) Individual Plot Data
0.0247 acre each
Year 2
(2003)
Totals
Year 3
(2004)
Totals
Year 4
(2005)
Totals
Year 5
(2006)
Totals
"�a
Survival
1
2
3
4 1
5
Ce halanlhus occidentalis
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
t1
0
0
Cratae s s.
0
3
0
5
0
*
0
0
8
Bias vros virginjana
0
1
0
1
0
*
0
0
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0
14
0
5
0
22 1
21
28
19
86
flex deciduas
0
0
0
1
0
*
0
0
1
Platanus occidentalis
1
0
0
2
2
4
3
3
5
125
Po rrlus hetem h lla
it
1
0 1
0
0
*
0
0
1
uercus l rata
0
0
.0
1
0
0
0
0
1
-
ercus ni ra
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
6
ercus a oda
1
0
1
0
0
4
5
4
2
50
kercus hellos
1
5
2
0
0
7
7
6
8
114
ercus s.
0
2
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
2
--
T=odium distichum
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
2
200
Ulmus americona
0
0
0
0
1
*
0
0
1
"
Ulmus ruhra
1
0
2
1
0
*
0
0
4
Ulmuss T.
0
1
36
16
27
*
185
130
80
"
Total Stems Per Plot
4
27
42
32
31
45*
223
173
136
Stems Per Acre
162
1093
1700
1296
1255
364
1806
1401
11111
' - Historical project documents necessary to provide this data were unavailable at the time 01 this report submission.
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Inc- Monitoring Year 5 of 6 (2006)
EEP Project Number 183 February 2001
Johnston County, North Carolina page 10

•,,)Rue to. the revised monitoring protocol during the second year of vegetation surveys, no comparisons of
as -built or 2002 (year 1) can be made to the subsequent monitoring years. Therefore, planted species
have been based upon previous annual monitoring reports and percent survival is based on a comparison
of.2003 (year 2) totals where possible. The phased planting schedule made it difficult to determine
,. _planted trees from naturally recruited trees; therefore, the number of "planted" species was based an the
experience and judgment of the monitoring; team, and counts for planted species may be influenced by
... naturally recruited stems_ During preparation of the 2006 (year 5) monitoring report, no as -built
-mitigation plan or data for 2002 (year 1) totals were available and therefore, are not included in the table.
Based on the number of stems counted, the average plot density monitored at this Site is greater than 260
sterns per acre and is considered successful. The average plot density has been measured at 1101 stems
per acre, or 27 stems per plot for 2006 (year 5) monitoring. The dominant species identified at the Site
were elm species (Ulmus rubra and Ulmus americana) and green ash (Fraxinus pennaylvanica). Four out
of the five individual vegetation plots were well above the success criteria with 1093 to 1700 planted
stems per acre. Vegetation plot 1 was low with 162 planted stems per acre; however, natural recruits
including various elms, swcetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acrer rubrum), hawthorne
(Crataegus sp.), cherrybark oak (Quercur pagoda), and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) comprised an
additional 148 stems for the plot (approximately 5992 sterns per acre),
Several new species were recorded this year: 1) hawthorn (Crataegus sp.), 2) persimmon (Diorpyros
virginiana), 3) possumhaw (flex decidua), 4) swamp cottonwood (Populus heterophylla), and 5) overcup
oak (Quercus lyrata). This is likely due to an earlier sampling time and subsequent lower densities of
vigorous herbs and vines.
Shrub diversity is not particularly high within plots; however, various species would be expected to
colonize the Site over time. Species documented within the shrub layer include possumhaw (flex
,Y decidua), hawthorn (Crutaegus sp.), and crimson -eyed rosemallow (hibiscus moscheutos). Other plant
qspecies found an the Site can be found in Appendix E in the gauge vegetation lists.
2.1.4 Vegetation Plot Photos
Photographs were taken at all permanent photo points and are included in Appendix A. The photographs
show that vegetation is generally growing well and consists of a good combination of woody and
herbaceous species.
2.2 Wetland Assessment
Fourteen groundwater monitoring. gauges have been maintained and monitored throughout the year-5
(2006) growing; season. Twelve are located within the restoration areas and two are located within the
reference wetlands immediately northwest of the Site. The groundwater gauges record daily readings of
groundwater depth. Daily rainfall data recorded from a rain gauge maintained and monitored on the Site
was used for seasonal comparison; however, the gauge malfunctioned and rain data after August 14, 2006
could not be recovered. Graphs of groundwater hydrolog7and precipitation arc included in Appendix B.
Success criteria for wotland hydrology require that the area be inundated or saturated within 12 inches of
the ground surface for a consecutive period of 12.5 percent of the growing season, The growing, season: in
Johnston County begins March 21 and ends November 4 (229 days), Areas inundated less than 5 percent
of the growing season (I 1 days) are classified as nonwetlands. Areas inundated between 5 percent and
12.5 percent of the growing season can be classified as wetlands depending upon factors such as the
presence of hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils. In order to attain hydrologic success, saturation
within 12 inches of the ground surface is required for at least I 1 consecutive days (5 percent of the
growing season) or 29 consecutive days (12.5 percent of the growing; season).
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 6 (2006)
EEP Project Number 183 February 2007
Johnston County, North Carolina page 1 1

7
11
Jalile 8; Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years l through 5
'Project Name/Number: Howell Woods (EEP Project Number 183)
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing
a
Serial
Season (Percentage)
Number
Year t
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
C�"
x
(2002)^
(2003)*
(2004)**
(2005)
(2006)
e14
I
RDSA
S2C9894
No Data
No Data
No Data
7Yes/ �°
34 Sys 8 %)
Yes/
Malfunctioned
Yes/
2
RDSB
B6522D1
No Data
No Data
>l2 5%
*„*
25 da 11.0%
No/
Malfunctioned
No/
3
RDSC
B6B6EQ9
No Data
No Data
<S%
***
g days 3.9
Yes/
4
INF6
A279A59
Malfunctioned
No Data
No Data
No Data
76 days (33.2%
Malfunctioned
Yes/
5
INF5
A28984F
No Data
No Data
No Data
/<5%
229 days 10Q %}
Malfunctioned
Malfunctioned
Yes/
6
RDSD
B6B4FB9
No Data
No Data
/<5%
**
33 da s 14A %
Yell
INFI/
Yes/
Yes/73 days
Yes/
7
EBD85C9
No Data
36 days (15.7
JG6
5-12.5%
(31,9°10}
168 days (73.4 %}
0!0)
Yes/
8
INF2
A3C095A
Malfunctioned
Mai functioned
No Data
No Data
19 days 8.3
Malfunctioned/
No/
Yes!
9
RDSE
B652374
No Data
No Data
4 days (1.7 %)
�5%
29 clays (12.7 %)
Malfunctioned
Yes/54 days
Yesf
10
INF4
A286A2D
No Data
No Data
/<5%
23.6%
68 days 29.7
Malfunctioned
YW54 days
Yes/
l l
1NF3
AB36608
No Data
No Data
/<5%
23.6%
32 da (14.0 %)
Malfunctioned/
12
RDSF
B652408
No Data
No Data
4 day* (1.7 %)
5 %
52 days (22.7 %)
Yes/
Yes/70 days
Yes/
Refl
RE1 I
N386A9F!
No Data
No Data
>12.5%
(30.6%
34 days (14.8
Yes/
Yes/74 days
Yes/
Ref2
R.EF2
N366AA64
No Data
No Data
>I2.5%
32.3%o)
72 days (31 A %)
^ - Gauges malfunctioned for the rnajoriry of the growing season. Site construction did not occur until mid -growing season,
r therefore, gauges will be monitored for a sixth growing season.
• - Data for most of the end of the growing season was unavai table.
• - Graph is included in the year 3 (2004) report for one of the Infinities gauges; however, it does not indicate which one.
`"• - Gauges malfunctioned for the first several months of the growing season.
l
i
1
f Howell W(XAs "am Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 5 of 6 (2006)
EEP Project Number 183 February 2007
{ Johnston County, North Carolina page 12

Groundwater gauge graphs or data for years 1 (2002) through year 4 (2005) are included in Appendices F
through I, respectively. Table 8 summarizes success criteria achievement for groundwater gauges over
the 5-year monitoring period.
Groundwater hydrology within 12 inches of the soil surface occurred for greater than 12.5 percent of the
growing season for the year-5 (2006) growing season at Gauges 1, 4-7, and 9-12 and greater than 5
percent of the growing season at Gauges 2 and 8. Groundwater hydrology was within 12 inches of the
soil surface for less than 5 percent of the growing season for Gauge 3; however, this gauge is located on
the niarbrin of an upland area as depicted on Figure 2 of this document and within the Detailed Restoration
Plan. In addition, all groundwater gauges had a presence of hydrophytic wetland vegetation based on
criteria set forth in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Vegetation lists for each gauge
can be found in Appendix E.
2.2.1 Wetland Problem Area Plan View
No wetland problem areas have been identified during the year-5 (2006) monitoring year. As depicted in
Appendix B, all gauges are currently functioning and recorded groundwater hydrology within 12 inches
of the ground surface for greater than 5 percent of the growing season with a presence of hydrophytic
vegetation except for Gauge 3, which is located along an upland margin as depicted on Figure 2 and in the
Detailed Restoration Plan.
2.2.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment
All monitored gauges within restoration areas met success criteria of inundation/saturation within 12
inches of the surface for at least 5 percent of the growing season with a presence of hydrophytic
vegetation except for Gauge 3, which is located along an upland margin (Table 9). Hydrographs
containing precipitation data and raw data for each gauge can be found in Appendices B and C,
respectively. Photographs and CVS Levels 1 & 2 Data Forms for vegetation plots can be found in
Appendices A and D, respectively.
Table 9. Wetland Criteria Attainment
Project Name/Number: Howell Woods (EEP Project Number 183)
Hydrology Hydrophytic
Gauge 1D I Threshold Vegetation Site Vegetation
Met? Criteria Met? I Mean Plot ID
1
Yes
2
Yes
3
No
4
Yes
Yes
6
Yes
7
Yes
8
Yes
9
Yes
10
Yes
11
Yes
12
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
92
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold
Met?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Site
Mean
100 `%
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year of 6 (2006)
FEP Project Number 183 February 2007
Johnston County. North Carolina page 13

3.0 FIVE-YEAR MONITORING ASSESSMENT
In summary, the restoration site achieved success criteria for vegetation and hydrology for all restoration
area groundwater gauges with the exception of a gauge (Gauge 3) located along an upland margin in the
Fifth Monitoring Year (2006).
Results from vegetation surveys exceeded success criteria with 346, 1806, 1401, and 1101 planted stems
per acre present in years 2 through 5, respectively with an increase in species diversity over the 5-year
monitoring period. No data was available for year l monitoring.
Vegetative problem areas within the Site include a burned and partially bush hogged area that is expected
to recover, and an area of poor vegetation development along the outer rim of one of the littoral shelves.
Groundwater hydrology within 12 inches of the soil surface occurred for greater than 12.5 percent of the
growing; season for the year-5 (2006) growing; season at Gauges 1, 4-7, and 9-12 and greater than 5
percent of the growing season at Gauges 2 and 8. Groundwater hydrology was within 12 inches of the
soil surface for less than 5 percent of the growing season for Gauge 3; however, this gauge is located on
the margin of an upland area as depicted on Figure 2 of this document and within the Detailed Restoration
Plan. Vegetation documemed in the vicinity of each of the twelve restoration area groundwater gauges
was considered hydrophytic wetland vegetation. in addition, wetland criteria set forth in the Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual were met with the presence of the three criteria, l) hydric soils,
2) hydrophytic vegetation, and 3) wetland hydrology at Gauges 1-2 and 4-12-
In summary, the restoration site achieved success criteria for hydrology and vegetation in the Fifth
Monitoring Year (2006). Based on available data, the site achieved success criteria for hydrology and
vegetation over the entire 5-year monitoring period. However, the Site was not constructed until mid -way
through the first year growing season; therefore, the Site will be monitored for a sixth growing season.
Howell Woods Axiom Environmental, In" Monitoring Year 5 of 6 (2006)
EEP Project Number 183 February2007
Johnston County, North Carolina page 14

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCGO20000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020798
STORMWATER AND MINE DEWATERING DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Johnston Community College
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater and mine dewatering wastewater from a facility
located at
Howell Woods Sand Pit
6601 Devils Race Track Rd.
Four Oaks
Johnston County
to receiving waters designated as Swan Pond, a class C; NSW water in the Neuse River Basin, in
accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth
in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG020000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective January 11, 2012.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this the l 1'h day of January, 2012.
ORIGINAL SIGNED W
KEN PICKLE
for Charles Wakild, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

M=
NCG020798
N
W E
S
Map Scale 1:24, 000
3 4 I
Swan
Pond
_
95 /
Johnston Community College
Howell Woods Sand Pit
Latitude: 351 22' 45" N
Longitude: 781 17' 10" W
County: Johnston
Receiving Stream: Swan Pond
Index No.: 27-52-7
Stream Class: C; NSW
Sub -basin: 03-04-04 (Neuse River Basin)
L1
Facility Location

N /
JOHNSTON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS - GIS UNIT
k coormAno" w"m nw
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL. HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
swe
SCAU FOR INIA CAMIMi
.,� •ow
VICINITY MAP

4

■ Complete items f, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece,;
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
JAAAES,G. SASSER
JCC.HOWELL WOODS
6601 DEVILS RACETRACK ROAD
FOUR OAKS NC 27524
A. Signature
X © Agent
❑ Addressee
B. Received by ( Printed Name)' C1. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑ Yes
It YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
NOV-2011-DV-0195.NCG020000 3. S r ice Type f
HOWELL WOODS MINE.JOHNSTON COUNTY Certified Mail ❑ Express Mall -
7/15111.MAILED.7/1 all I.SWP.WITHERSPOON
i. ❑ Registered -Return Receipt for Merchandise I,
❑ Insured Mall ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) © Yes
?. Article Number ; t 7010 1870 0001- 3423 0643,
(T'ransfer from service labeq
:IS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02•M-1540

CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC.
June 8, 2011
Ms. Judy Wehner
NCD1rNR, Div. of Land Resources
16I2 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Subject: Howell Woods Sand Pit, Permit #51-35, Johnston County
Johnston Community College, Owner
Application for Renewal and Modification
Dear Ms. Wehner:
JUN .10 2011
Please find attached an application for renewal and modification of the above -
referenced Mining Permit. The requested modifications serve to bring the operation into
compliance with existing site conditions. First, the haul road was an existing farm path
that has been in use throughout the life of the operation, but was never shown on the site
map. It has been added to the site map, and the 10.a acres it covers has been added to the
bond calculation worksheet and the affected acreage chart. Second, the site has been
discharging fresh water from the mining area throughout the life of the mine, but it was
discovered that this was not included in the original application or site map. The
discharge. point has been added to the map along with the pump and pond location. A
large portion of the previously mined area serves as a pond for sediment from the active
mining area to settle before it is pumped from the pit and discharged through a ditch and
pond (also shown). Application is being made with the Division of Water Quality for
NPDES General Stormwater Permit for Mining (NCG020). Finally, a clarification has
been made to the original permit requirements regarding wetland buffers. The original
permit application listed a 250 foot buffer for wetlands, supposedly based on the county
Special Use Permit. Actually the county Special Use Permit makes no mention of any
wetland buffer, and it has always been assumed that the required buffer was 50 feet. The
Jurisdictional Wetlands on the site were recently delineated by Wyatt Brown, and this
information has been added to the site map.
As we have discussed, Johnston Community College will pay the required permit fees
($1,000 for renewal and $1,000 for modification) via transfer. If you have any questions,
Please contact me.
Sincerely, +
L�
James C. ]zzell, Jr. PG
P.O. Box 429, GARNER, NC 27529 (91 9)779-0017 FAX: [phone]-
OFFICES AT 1 01 WEST MAIN STREET, GARNER, NC IV
, 42;�

f

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
LAND QUALITY SECTION
APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
Name of Mine Howell Woods Sand Pit permit 51-35) County Johnston
River Basin Neuse
Latitude (decimal degrees to -four places) 78-17-10
Longitude (decimal degrees to four places) 35-22-45
2. Name of Applicant* Johnston Community College _
3. Permanent address for receipt of official mail** 6601 Devils Race Track Rd.
Four Oaks. NC 27524
Telephone ( ) - 919-938-01„15 Alternate No.. (
4. Mine Office Address same
Telephone _ }
5. Mine Manager James Sasser
We hereby certify that all details contained in this Permit Application are true and correct to the best of our
knowledge. We fully understand that any willful misrepresentation of facts will be cause for permit
revocation.
* * * Signature
Print Name -I'PnACS S)a,5Sc-P—
Title ' Aor^ t :-Oio `t4-
Date (© 0W E --O I I
* This will be the name that the mining permit will be issued to and the name that must be indicated on the
reclamation bond (security) that corresponds to this site.
** The Land Quality Section must be notified of any changes in the permanent address or telephone number.
*** Signature of company officer required.
G.S. 74-51 provides that the Department shall grant or deny an application for a permit within 60 days of receipt
of a complete application or, ifa public hearing is held, within 30 days following the hearing and the fling of any
supplemental information required by the Department. All questions must be addressed and all required maps
provided before this application can be considered complete. Attach additional sheets as needed.
-E-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
MOTE: All of the following questions must be thoroughly answered with regards to your mining operation
for the intended life of the mine. All responses must be clearly conveyed on a corresponding, detailed mine
snap.
A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MINE
1. Answer all ot'the following that apply:
❑ If this is an application for a NEW pennit, indicate the total acreage at the site to be covered by the
permit (this is the acreage that the "new permit" fee will be based upon):
Of this acreage, how much is owned and ]low much is ]eased? Acres owned:
Acres leased: Property owner if leased:
X If this is an application for RENEWAL of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number and
the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit: Mining Permit No.: 51-35
Total permitted acreage (this is the acreage that the "renewal" fee will be based upon): 139.1
X If this is an application for a MODIFICATION to a mining permit, indicate the mining permit
number and the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit.
Mining Permit No.: 51-35 Total permitted acreage: 139.1
Does the modification involve acreage within the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes ❑ No ❑. If yes, indicate the acreage to be covered by this modification (this is the acreage
that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
Does the modification involve acreage outside the previously approved permitted boundary?
Yes❑ No ❑ . if yes, indicate the additional acreage to be covered by this
modification: . (NOTE: you must complete all of Section F. of this application form
entitled Notification of Adjoining Landowners).
Of this acreage to be added to the permit, will any portion of this acreage be affected (i.e.: disturbed,
ground cover removed) by the mining operation? Yes ❑ No ❑ (If no, a "minor modification"
fee of $100.00 is required, despite the "undisturbed" acreage to be added). If yes, indicate the
acreage to be affected within the acreage to be added to the permit (the total acreage to be added to
the permit is the acreage that the "major modification" fee will be based upon):
❑ If this is an application for TRANSFER of a mining permit, indicate the mining permit number and
the total (overall) acreage covered by the existing permit.
Mining Permit No.: Total permitted acreage:
SEE THE FEE SCHEDULE AT ,rHE END OF THIS FORM FOR THE PROPER FEE AMOUNT TO BE
PAID FOR THE REQUESTED PERMIT ACTION(S) AND CORRESPONDING ACREAGE NOTED
ABOVE
2_ Name of all materials mined: sand
3. Mining method:
H
Hydraulic Dredge R
Front-end Loader & Truck X Shovel & Truck
Dragline & Truck Self -loading Scraper
Other (explain):
4. a. Expected maximum depth of mine (feet) 25
Depth is relative to what benchmark? (e_g., natural ground level, mean sea level, road elevation, etc.)
natural ground Ievel _
b. Expected average depth of mine.(feet) 25
-2-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
5. Has any area(s) at this site been mined in the past? Yes X No ❑
If yes, when and by whom was this activity conducted? under current permit _
6. Number of years for which the permit is requested (10 years maximum):
B. MAPS
Clearly mark and label the location of your mining operation on six (6) copies of a 7.5-minute quadrangle
and a county highway reap, These maps, in addition to six 5 copies of all mine maps and reclamation
maps, must be submitted with each permit application.
7.5-minute quadrangles may be obtained from the N.C. Geological Survey:
Mailing Address: Physical Address:
1612 Mail Service Center OR 512 North Salisbury Street, 5"' Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
[phone]
www.ueoloav,enr.state.nc.us/
County highway maps may be obtained from the N.C. Department of Transportation:
North Carolina Department of Transportation — Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
Mailing Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
1587 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1587
Physical Address:
NCDOT GIS Unit
3401 Carl Sandburg Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
[phone]
www.ncdot.ori,/it/L,isContact/deiault.iitml
2. . Mine maps must be accurate and appropriately scaled drawings, aerial photographs or enlarged
topographic maps of the entire mine site. All aspects of the mine site must be clearly labeled on the
maps along with their corresponding (approximate) acreage. As a reminder, mining permits can
only be issued for up to 10 years; thus, all mine and reclamation maps must only denote those
activities that are intended to be conducted during the life of the mining permit. All maps must be
of a scale sufficient (see minimum requirements listed below) to clearly illustrate the following, at a
minimum:
a. Property lines of the tract or tracts of land on which the proposed mining activity is to be located
including easements and rights -of -way.
b. Existing or proposed permit boundaries.
c. Initial and ultimate limits of clearing and grading.
d. Outline and width of all buffer zones (both undisturbed and unexcavated).
e. Outline and acreage of all pits/excavations.
f. Outline and acreage of all stockpile areas.
g. Outline and acreage of all temporary and/or permanent overburden disposal areas.
h. Location and acreage of all processing plants (processing plants may be described as to location and
distance from mine if sufficiently far removed).
i. Locations and names of all streams, rivers and lakes.
j. Outline and acreage of all settling and/or processing wastewater ponds.
k. Location and acreage of all planned and existing access roads and on -site haul roads.
1. Location of planned and existing on -site buildings.
m. Location and dimensions of all proposed sediment and erosion control measures.
n. Location of 100-year floodplain limits and wetland boundaries.
o. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the reining
permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor
of the mine tract, names of owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet
of the mining permit boundary, must be provided on the aline map.
-3-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
p. Names of owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary which lie directly across and are contiguous to any highway; creek, stream, river,
or other watercourse; railroad track; or utility or other public right-of-way; if an adjoining tract is
owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, names of owners of
record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary; must
be provided on the mine map(s). NOTE: "Highway" means a road that has four lanes of travel or
less and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
q. Map legend:
I . Name of applicant
?. Name of mine
I North arrow
4. County
5. Scale
b. Symbols used and corresponding names
7. Date prepared and revised
8. Name and title of person preparing map
Map scales should meet the following guidelines:
PERMITTED ACREAGE
MAP SCALE
0-49 Acres
1 inch = 50 feet
50-199 Acres
1 inch = 100 feet
200+ Acres
1 inch = 200 feet
(NOTE: Smaller scaled maps may be acceptable if they clearly illustrate the above items)
-4-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
A table/chart must be provided on the mine map that clearly lists the approximate acreage of tailings/sediment
ponds, stockpiles, wastepiles, processing area/haul roads, mine excavation and any other major aspect of the
mining operation that is proposed to be affected/disturbed during the life of the mining permit. A table/chart
similar to the following will be acceptable:
CATEGORY
AFFECTED ACREAGE
Tailings/Sediment fonds
Stockpiles
Wastepiles
Processing Area/Haul Roads
Mine Excavation
Other (Explain)
Total Disturbed Acreage
NOTE:
IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, THE MAPS MUST ALSO INCLUDE ANY SITE -SPECIFIC
INFORMATION THAT IS PROVIDED IN THE ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
IN THIS APPLICATION FORM (PLEASE NOTE THE ITALICIZED QUESTIONS/STATEMENTS
THROUGHOUT THE FORM}. THIS APPLICATION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE
WITHOUT ALL RELEVANT ITEMS BEING ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE MINE MAPS.
-5-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1, Describe in detail the sequence of events for the development and operation of the mine and reference
the sequence to the mine rraap(.$). Attach additional sheets as needed,
This is an existing, operating sand mine. Mining will continue as currently operated
under current mining permit.
2. Describe specific erosion control measures to be installed prior to land disturbing activities and during
mining; to prevent offsite sedimentation (include specific plans for sediment and erosion control for mine
ezcavation(s), waste piles, access/mine roads and process areas), and give a detailed sequence of
installation and schedule for maintenance of the measures. Locate and label all sediment and erosion
control measurer on the mine map(s) and provide, typical cross-sections/construction details of each
measure. Engineering designs and calculations are required to justify the adequacy of any proposed
measures.
This mine has been configured to retain all stormwater within the mining area, therefore
the pit itself acts as the sediment and erosion control structure for the site.
3. the material mined, recycling process water, or other waste water a. Will the operation involve washing;
handling? Yes X No ❑. If yes, briefly describe all such processes including; an), chemicals to be used.
Water from the mining area is pumped to the wash plant. The process water then returns to
previously mined areas to allow the sediment to settle out. There is no discharge of process water,
b. Will the operation involve discharging fresh or waste water from the mine or plant as a point discharge
to the waters of the State? Yes [ No X. If ves, briefly describe the nature of the discharge and
locate all proposed discharge points (along with their method of stabilization) on your mine map(v).
Groundwater and stormwater are pumped from the mining area through a basin. The discharge
point is shown on the mine map.
- 6 -

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Will any part of the proposed mine excavation(s) extend below the water table? Yes X No ❑.
If yes, do you intend to dewater the excavation(s)? Yes X No ❑.
If yes, what impact, if any, will mine dewatering have on neighboring wells? F-stimated withdrawal rate
in gallons per day: 600.000 . Locale all existing wells on the mine maps) that lie i0thin
500 fee! of the proposed excavcition arect. Provide data to support any conclUSions or statements made,
including any monitoring well data; well construction data and current water withdrawal rates. Indicate
whether the proposed mine locale is served by a public water system or private wells.
There are no neighboring wells within 500 feet.
d. If you answered yes to any of the above questions, provide evidence that you have applied for or obtained
the appropriate water quality permit(s) (i.e., non -discharge, NPDES, Stormwater, etc.) from the Division
of Water Quality, Water Quality Section. In addition, the applicant is required to register water use with
the Division of Water Resources if the operation withdraws more than 10,000 gallons per day and needs
a capacity use permit from the Division of Water Resources if the operation lies in a capacity use area
and withdraws more than 100,000 gallons per day.
Application is being made with NCDENR-Div, of Water Quality for NPDES General Permit
for mining (NCG020)
4. a. Will the operation involve crushing or any other air contaminant emissions? Yes ❑ No X
If yes, indicate evidence that you have applied for or obtained an air quality permit issued by the
Division of Air Quality or local governing body.
b. How will dust from stockpiles, haul roads, etc., be controlled?
Periodic spray with water as necessary.
-7-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
5. a. A buffer will be required between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary or right-of-
way. It may be an unexcavated buffer (no excavation, but roadways, berms and erosion &
sedimentation control measures may be installed within it), an undisturbed buffer (no disturbance
within the buffer whatsoever), or a combination of the two, depending upon the site conditions. Note
that all buffers must be located within the mining pen -nit boundaries.
How wide a buffer will be maintained between any mining activity and any mining permit boundary
or right-of-way at this site? A minimurn buffer of 25 feet is recommended, although a wider buffer
may be needed depending on site conditions. Shaw all laz ffer locations and ia-idths on the mine
map(s).
A minimum Zip foot buffer is maintained between any mining activity and permit boundary
or right-of-way. "Phis is in accordance with local zoning and special use permit requirements.
b. A minimum 50 -foot wide undisturbed buffer will be required between any land disturbing activities
within the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands unless smaller
undisturbed buffers can be justified. Depending; on site conditions, a buffer wider than 50 feet may
be needed.
How wide an undisturbed buffer will be maintained between any land disturbing; activities within
the mining permit boundaries and any natural watercourses and wetlands at this site? Show all buffer
locations and widths on the mine metp(s).
A 50 foot wide undisturbed buffer will be maintained between and any land disturbing
activities. This is in accordance with local zoning and special use permit requirements.
b, a. Describe methods to prevent landslide or slope instability adjacent to adjoining permit boundaries
during mining. Minimum 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slopes or flatter for clayey material and
minimum 3 horizontal to i vertical slopes or flatter for sandy material are generally required, unless
technical justification can be provided to allow steeper slopes.
A 3:1 slope will be established for final excavated limits above static water level. Below water
level, the slopes will be at the angle of -repose or flatter.
-8-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
b. Provide a cross -,section on the mine map(s).for all.fill slopes (berms, ivastepiles, overburden disposal
areas, etc.), clearly indicating the intended side slope gradient, insfallation of any benches and/or
slope drains (ivilh supporting design information) rf needed, and the method of final stabilisation,
On site map.
c. In excavation(s) of unconsolidated (non -rock) materials, specify the angle of all cut slopes including
specifications for benching and sloping. Cross -sections for all cut slopes must he provided on the
mine map(s).
3:1 or flatter
d. In hardrock excavations, specify proposed bench widths and heights in feet. Provide cross -sections
of the mine excavation clearly noting the angles of the cut slopes, widths of all scfeo, benches and
mine benches, and the expected maximum depth of the excavation.
NIA
7. Describe other methods to be taken during mining to prevent physical hazard to any neighboring dwelling
house, public road, public, commercial or industrial building from any mine excavation. Locate all such
structures on the mine map rf they are within 300,feet of any proposed excavation.
This mine is several hundred feet from any such structures.
8. Describe what kind of barricade will be used to prevent inadvertent public access along any high wall area
and when it will be implemented. Vegetated earthen berms, appropriate fencing and adequate boulder
barriers may be acceptable high wall barricades. A construction detail/cross-section and loCCrti017 of each
type of barricade to be used n7ust be indicated on the mine map(s).
Remote location, gates, and vegetation prevent inadvertent public access.
- 9 -

APPLICATION FOR .A MINING PERMIT
9. Are acid producing minerals or soils present? Yes ❑ No X.
If yes, how will acid water pollution from the excavation., stockpiles and waste areas be controlled?
10. a. Describe specific plans (including a schedule of implementation) for screening the operation from
public view such as maintaining or planting trees, bushes or other vegetation, building berms or other
measures. Show the location of all visual screening on the mine maps) and provide cross -sections
through all proposed berms or proposed spacing, sizes and species.for tree plantings ,
This operation is natur div screened by its remote location and existing vegetation.
b. Could the operation have a significantly adverse effect on the purposes of a publicly owned park.
forest or recreation area? Iffso, how will such effects (i.e., noise, visibility, etc.) be mitigated?
no
11. Will explosives be used? Yes ❑ No X.
If yes; specify the types of explosive(s) and describe what precaution(s) will be used to prevent physical
hazard to persons or neighboring property from flying rocks or excessive air blasts or ground vibrations.
Depending on the mine's location to nearby structures, more detailed technical information may be
required on the blasting prograrn (such as a third -party blasting study). Locate the nearest of Site occupied
.structurG(s) to the proposed excavation(v) on the mine map and indicate its approximate distance to the
proposed excavation.
12. Will fuel tanks; solvents; or other chemical reagents be stored on -site? Yes X No ❑.
If ya. , describe these materials, hotiv they will be stored and method of containment in case of spill_ Indicate
the location(s) of all storage facilities on the mine map(s).
There is a diesel fuel tans: onsite for re -fueling, equipment. The tank has secondary containment.
- 10-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
1). RECLAMATION PLAN
Describe your intended plan for the final reclamation and subsequent use of all affected lands and indicate
the sequence and general methods to be used in reclaiming this land. This must include the method of
reclamation of settling ponds and/or sediment control basins and the method of restoration or establishment
of any permanent drainage channels to a condition minimizing erosion, siltation and other pollution. This
information must be illustrated on a reclamation inap and must correspond directly i0th the Information
provided on the !nine n7ap(4). In addition, design information, including t)fl?ical cross -sections, oj any
permanent channels to be constructed as part of the reclamation plan and the location(v) mall permanent
channels must be indicated on the reclamation map.
Mining area will be left as a pond. All other disturbed areas will be graded to a 3:1 slope or
flatter and seeded according to schedule.
2. Is an excavated or impounded body of water to be left as a part of the reclamation? Yes X No ❑.
If yes•, illustrate the location of the body(s) of waier on the reclamation map and provide a scaled
cross -sections) through the proposed body(s) of water. The minimum water depth must be at least 4 feet,
measured from the nomtal low water table elevation, unless information is provided to indicate that a more
shallow water body will be productive and beneficial at this site.
Will the body(s) of water be stocked with fish? Yes X No .
if yes, specify species.
Upon recommendation of qualified wildlife biologist.
I Describe provisions for safety to persons and to adjoining property in all completed excavations in rock
including what kind of permanent barricade will be left. Acceptable permanent barricades are appropriate
fencing, large boulders placed end -to -end, etc. Construction details and locations of all permanent
barricades must be shown on the reclamation map.
Safety considerations for the excavation include remote location, controlled access (gates),
and slopes of sides.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
4. Indicate the method(s) of reclamation of overburden, refuse, spoil banks or other such on -site mine waste
areas, including specifications for benching and sloping.' Final cross -sections and locations for such
areas must be provided on the reclamation map_
No mine waste is stockpiled in this operation.
5. a. Describe reclamation of processing facilities, stockpile areas, and on -site roadways.
All such areas will be graded to direct runoff into pond, scarified, and seeded according
to schedule.
b. Will any on -site roadways be left as part of the reclamation? Yes X No ❑.
If yes, identify such roadways on the reclamation map and provide details on permanent road and ditch
line stabilization.
Haul road will be left, however any culvert crossings will be converted to ford crossings.
6. Describe the method of control of contaminants and disposal of scrap metal, junk machinery, cables, or
other such waste products of mining. (Note definition of refuse in The Mining Act of 1971.)
No off-sitegencrated waste shall be disposed of on the mine site without prior written approval
from the NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Land Quality Section and either
the Division of Waste Management (DWM) or local governing body. If a disposal permit has been
issued by DWM for the site, a copy, of said permit must be attached to this application. All
temporary and permanent refuse disposal areas must be clearly delineated oil the mine maps) and
reclamation map, along vvitha list of items to be disposed in said areas.
Am, such material will be periodically removed from site.

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
Describe your plan for revegetation or other surface treatment of the affected areas. This plan must
include recommendations for year-round seeding, including the time of seeding and the amount and type
of seed, fertilizer, lime and mulch per acre. The recommendations must include general seeding
instructions for both permanent and temporary revegetation. Revegetation utilizing only tree plantings
is not acceptable. Recommendations can be sought from:
a. Authorized representatives of the local Soil and Vhater Conservation District;
b. Authorized representatives of the Division of Forest Resources, Department of Environment and
Natural Resources;
c. Authorized county representatives of the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, specialists
and research faculty with the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Forest Resources at
North Carolina State University;
d. North Carolina licensed landscape architects;
e. Private consulting foresters referred by the Division of Forest Resources, Department of
Environment and Natural Resources;
f. N.C. Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Manual;
g. N.C. Surface Mining Manual: A Guide for Permitting, Operation and Reclamation;
h. Others as may be approved by the Department.
LIME - RATE OF APPLICATION (tons/acre):
2,000 lbs. per acre or according to soil test
FERTILIZER - ANALYSIS AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre):
1,000 lbs. per acre 8-8-8 or 10-10-10 or according to soil test
SEED - TYPE(S) AND RATES) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING YEAR-ROUND SEEDING
SCHEDULE (pounds/acre): [NOTE: Include Legumes]
Seed Types: Seeding Dates: Seeding Rates:
See attached page for seeding schedule. It is the goal of Howell Woods to
maintain all native plant species on this site. All revegetation planting
will consist of native species only.
MULCH - TYPE AND RATE OF APPLICATION (pounds/acre) AND METHOD OF ANCHORING:
small grain straw, 2,000 lbs/acre, anchored with asphalt or roving, or as directed by
Howell Woods management (to preserve native species)
OTHER VEGETATIVE COVERS — TYPE (S) AND RATE (S) OF APPLICATION INCLUDING
SEEDING SCHEDULE (pounds/acre, trees/acre, spacing of trees/shrubs, etc):
Kevegetatyn aVcuor
Signature Gry\�
Print Name lei
Title —T-)vc?,c_Ao r-
Agency
n plan approved by:
[J tyd(
Date if) �Une ZD[I
-13-

Mine Reclamation Planting Recommendations
Grasses Seeding Rate
Virginia wild rye- Elymus virginicus 15% 8-12 PLSlacre
Eastern gammagrass- Tripsacum dactyloides 10% 4-5 PLSlacre
Little bluestem- Schizachyrium scoparium 10% 3-5 PLSlacre
Indian grass- Sorghastrum nutans 10% 3-5 PLSlacre
Deer tongue- Panicum clandestinum 10% 12-15 Ibslacre
Purple top- Tridens flavus
Forbs & Legumes
Patridge pea- Chamaecrista fasciculata
Planting Time
late fall
Feb -Apr
Feb -Apr
Feb -Apr
late fall -early spring
5% 15-20 PLSlacre spring
Grass Total: 60%
Showy tick trefoil- Desmodium canadense
Lance leaf tickseed- Coreopsis lanceolata
20%
10%
5%
Black-eyed susan- Rudbeckia hirta 5%
Forbs & Legumes Total: 40%
late fall or early spring
late fall or early spring
late fall or early spring
late fall or early spring

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
E. DETERMINATION OF AFFECTED ACREAGE AND BOND
The following bond calculation worksheet is to be used to establish (in approl)'riate bond (hayed upon a range
of S500 to $ ,000 per affected acre) for each permitted inine site based upon the acreage approved by the
Department to be affected during the fife of the inining perrhit_ Please insert the aW roxinmte acreage or each
insert the apjaropriate reclamation cost/acre for each cate.,,ory from the Schedule of Reclamation Costs
provided with this aDDlicalion forin) OR you can defer to the Department to calculate vour band for von ha.ved
AFFECTED
RECLAMATION
RECLAMATION
CATEGORY
ACREAGE
COST/ACRE*
COST
Tailings/Sediment Ponds:
Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
_ $
Stockpiles:
Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
— $
Wastepiles:
_ Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
_ $
Processing Area/Haul Roads:
118 Ac.
X
$
1800 /Ac.
_ $ 23.040
Mine Excavation:
75.4 Ac.
X
$
500 /Ac.
= S 17.700
Other:
Ac.
X
$
/Ac.
— $
TOTAL AFFECTED AC.:
88.2 Ae.
(TOTAL PERMITTED AC.:
139.1 Ae.)
Temporary & Permanent Sedimentation & Erosion Control Measures:
Divide the TOTAL AFFECTED AC. above into the following two categories: a) affected acres that drain into
proposed/existing excavation and/or b) affected acres that will be graded for positive drainage where measures will
be needed to prevent offsite sedimentation and sedimentation to onsite watercourses and wetlands.
a) Internal Drainage 88.2 Ac.
b) Positive Drainage Ac. X $1.500.00 = $
SUBTOTAL COST: $ 60,740.00
Inflation Factor:
0.02 X SUBTOTAL COST: $ 1,214.80 X Permit Life (I to 10 years): 10
INFLATION COST: S 12,148.00
TOTAL COST = SUBTOTAL COST+ INFLATION COST = $__ 72,888.00
Total Reclamation Bond Cost: $ 72,800
(round down to the nearest $100.00)
MEE

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
F. NOTIFICATION OF ADJOINING LANDOWNERS
The "Notice" form, or a facsimile thereof. attached to this application must be sent certified or registered mail
to:
(1) the chief administrative officer of each county and municipality in which an), part of the permitted
area is located as indicated on the mine map(s);
(2) all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary; if an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor
of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary) as indicated on the mine map(s); and
(3) all owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining
permit boundary which lie directly across and is contiguous to any highway; creek, stream, river,
or other watercourse; railroad track; or utility or other public right-of-way; if an adjoining tract
is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record
of tracts adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit
boundary) as indicated on the mine map(s). "Highway" means a road that has four lanes of travel
or less and is not designated as an Interstate Highway.
To verify receipt, DENR requests that the Notice be sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested.
The only exception to the above method of giving notice is if another means of notice is approved in advance
by the Director, Division of Land Resources.
A copy of a tax map (or other alternative acceptable to the Department) must be mailed with the completed
"Notice" form (the proposed overall permit boundaries and the names and locations of all owners of
record of lands adjoining said boundaries must be clearly denoted on the tax map).
The "Affidavit of Notification" attached to this application must be completed, notarized and submitted to the
Department, with the remainder of the completed application form, before the application will be considered
complete.
NOTES:
THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED FOR ALL APPLICATIONS FOR NEW MINING PERMITS
AND ALL MODIFICATIONS OF A MINING PERMIT TO ADD LAND TO THE PERMIT'CED AREA,
AS REQUIRED BY NCGS 74-50(bl).
SEE THE NEXT TWO PAGES FOR THE "NOTICE" FORM AND THE "AFFIDAVIT OF
NOTIFICATION"
- 15 -

NOTICE
Pursuant to provisions G.S. 74-50(b]) of The Mining Act of 1971. Notice is hereby given that
has applied on
(Applicant Name) (Date)
to the Land Quality Section. Division of Land Resources, North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, 1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612, for (check one):
❑ a new surface mining permit;
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area; or
❑ a modification of an existing surface mining permit to add land to the permitted area with no disturbance
in the area proposed. Please note that future modification(s) may be submitted by the applicant to
allow disturbance within this area without re -notification of adjoining landowners.
The applicant proposes to mine on acres located
(Mineral, Ore) (Number) (Miles)
al
of off/near road
(Direction) (Nearest Town) (Number/Name)
County.
*SEE ATTACHED MAP FOR PROPOSED PERMIT BOUNDARIES AND CORRESPONDING
ADJOINING LANDOWNER NAMES AND LOCATIONS*
In accordance with G.S. 74-50(bl), the mine operator is required to make a reasonable effort to notify all owners
of record, both public and private; of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining permit boundary; if an adjoining
tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract, all owners of record of tracts
adjoining these tracts must be notified (that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary). In addition, the
mine operator must also notify the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in which any part of
the permitted area is located. Any person may file written comment(s) to the Department at the above address
within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Notice or the filing of the application for a permit, whichever is later.
Should the Department determine that a significant public interest exists relative to G.S. 74-51, a public hearing
will be held within 60 days of the end of the 30-day comment period specified above.
A copy of the permit application materials are on file and available for public review during normal business
hours at the above listed address as well as at the appropriate regional office. For information regarding the
snecifics of the nronosed mininU activity, please contact the applicant at the following telephone number:
. For information on the mining permit application review process, please contact
the Mining Program staff at [phone]. Please note that the Department will consider any relevant written
comments/documentation within the provisions of the Mininv Act of 1971 throu;;hout the application review
nrocess until a final decision is made on the application.
(Addressee/Owner of Record's (Name of Applicant: Include Contact Person
Name and Address) & Company Name, if Applicable)
(Date of Issuance of this Notice/
Mailed to Addressee/Owner of Record)
(Address of Applicant)
-16-

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTIFICATION
1, , an applicant, or an agent; or employee of an applicant, for
a new Mining Permit, or a modification of an existing Mining Permit to add land to the permitted area, from the
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, being first duty sworn, do hereby attest that the following
are all known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land that are adjoining the mining permit
boundary (including, where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the applicant or is owned by the lessor of the
mine tract, all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are within 1,000 feet of the mining permit
boundary) and that notice of the pending application has been caused to be mailed, by certified or registered mail,
to said owners of record at their addresses shown below, such notice being given on a form provided by the
Department:
(Adjoining Landowner Name) (Address)
(Attach additional list if necessary)
I do also attest that the following individual is the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality in which
any part of the permitted area is located and that notice of the pending application has been caused to be mailed, by
certified or registered mail, to said office at the following address:
(Chief Administrative Officer Name) (Address)
[i.e.: City Manager, County Manager, Mayor, etc.]
The above attestation was made by me while under oath to provide proof satisfactory to the Department that a
reasonable effort has been made to notify all known owners of record, both public and private, of all tracts of land
that are adjoining the mining permit boundar}! (including, where an adjoining tract is owned or leased by the
applicant or is owned by the lessor of the mine tract. all owners of record of tracts adjoining these tracts, that are
within 1,000 feet of the mining permit boundary) and the chief administrative officer of the county or municipality
in which any part of the permitted area is located in compliance with N.C.G.S. 74-30(bl) and 1 5A NCAC 5B
.0004(d). I understand that it is. the responsibility of the applicant to retain the receipts of mailing showing that the
above notices were caused to be mailed and to provide them to the Department upon request.
Signature of Applicant or Agent
Date
If person executing Affidavit is an agent or employee of an applicant, provide the following information:
Name of applicant:
Title of person executing Affidavit
I,
a Notary Public of the County of
State of North Carolina, do hereby certify that
appeared before me this day and under oath acknowledged that the above Affidavit was made by him/her.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this day of
20
Notary:
-17-
my Commission expires:

APPLICATION FOR A MINING PERMIT
G. LAND ENTRY AGREEMENT
We hereby grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right of entry and travel upon our lands
or operation during regular business Hours for the purpose of making necessary field inspections or investigations
as may be reasonably required in the administration of the Mining Act of 1971 pursuant to G.S. 74-56.
We further grant to the Department or its appointed representatives the right to make whatever entries on the
land as may be reasonably necessary and to take whatever actions as may be reasonably necessary in order to carry
out reclamation which the operator has failed to complete in the event a bond forfeiture is ordered pursuant to G.S.
74-59.
LANDOWNER:
ASignature: *!�4
Print Name: �`+NG S Ca ASS G d2
Company 4L k �ev.�ll wocck5
(If applicable)
Address: ka oL "Dav: is � r � +G P-CL
Nc 276z 4-
Telephone: (4r 9 ) cf 39 ` 01/5
Date Signed: f p �JWJ it Zo- t
APPLICANT:
Signature :*�(
Print Name: J A M Es I(--- S ASS IZ
Title: �; nGL�r► l t,(1�` i� �2 l�jl`D �d�I�St
Company: 'ram Houea woods
Mine Name: nowel1 kxctj5 �.xincL_ —P,`
Telephone: (ql y ) 93e- ew .5
Date Signed: I D - j wt 'ze) l
*Signature must be the same as the individual who signed Page 1 of this application.
oriL-inal and five (51 conies of the completed aonlication, six (fi) conies of all location mans, mine ma
and reclamation mans, and the appropriate processing fee (see next page for fee schedule) in the form a check
or money order payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources must be
sent to the Land Quality Section Central Office at the address listed on the front cover of this application
form.
Inquiries regarding the status of the review of this application should be directed to the Mining Program staff at
[phone].
-18-

'!
-r
i
a
Y
�: �d- 1 "*
-fie• •�•. I , .ins . •I -� - . .rr - . »n •--- .,,T-r ... --
f
e; ,.

Pumping Operation
and Monitoring Plan
Howell Woods Sand Pit
Certificate of Coverage
NCc020***
Johnston Community College
6601 Devils Racetrack Road
Four Oaks, Johnston County, NC
July 20, 2011

Ell
This PUMPING OPERATION AND MONITORING PLAN was prepared in
accordance with the requirements specified in the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Mining (NCG020), and specifically
as applied in the Certificate of Coverage for this location:
Howell Woods Sand Pit
Certificate of Coverage
NCG020***
Johnston Community College
6601 Devils Racetrack Road
Four Oaks, Johnston County, NC
July 20, 2011
This plan is designed to satisfy the requirements of Part III, Section E of the
NPDES General Permit NCG0200.
ZA
c �i

0 Background:
The NPDES General Stormwater Permit for Mining (NCG020000) addresses
impacts of mine dewatering wastewater pumping and discharge on surrounding areas,
including potential impacts to wetlands. The NPDES Permit requires that the mine have
a site specific plan for, 1) groundwater monitoring strategies to demonstrate the effect of
pumping and establish any pumping regime necessary to reduce potential impacts to
surrounding areas, and 2) detailed plans to maintain surrounding hydrology and
respective monitoring to demonstrate compliance.
In order to develop these plans, detailed studies must be done to understand the
site -specific parameters. First, any wetlands that may be potentially impacted must be
delineated according to US Army Corps of Engineers criteria. Second, a study of
potential impacts of groundwater levels must be conducted. This should include a
detailed examination of soil types, permeability, and various zones of groundwater within
the zone of influence. Third, based on the groundwater data, an assessment of potential
impacts to the wetlands by mine dewatering should be estimated. Finally, based on the
potential impact, a plan should be developed to limit as well as monitor the potential
impacts to the wetlands.
Normally, an Operation and Monitoring (O&M) Plan is developed prior to any
discharge of mine dewatering wastewater. However, due to a misunderstanding of the
regulations by the operators of this site, mine dewatering discharges have actually been
10 occurring at this site since 2003. While this resulted in a Notice of Violation for the
owner, it has however provided valuable working data on impacts to adjoining wetlands.
Howell Woods Environmental Learning Center is actually a research center for
hardwood wetland habitat. In 2000-2001, the NCDENR Environmental Enhancement
Program (EEP) established a Wetland Restoration Area immediately adjacent to the
mining area. These wetland areas have been carefully monitored since that time, and
have shown success in maintaining both wetland hydrology and vegetation. The
success of the wetlands adjacent to the mine shows conclusively that the mine itself has
had no impact on the wetlands.
Site description:
The Howell Woods Sand Pit is located within the Howell Woods Environmental
Learning Center, a 2,000 acre educational facility owned and managed by Johnston
Community College. It is located within the USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201, North
Carolina Division of Water Quality subbasin 03-04-04, of the Neuse River Basin. The
mine excavation will eventually encompass 75 acres. Natural groundwater levels within
the sand mine are within 5 feet of the surface. The sand deposit being mined is an
alluvial deposit consisting of a coarsening -downward sequence of sediments, ranging
from a silty sand to a coarse sand and gravel. As part of the ongoing reclamation of the
site, the mining area is being continuously backfilled to create new wetland areas for
study, research, and environmental enhancement.

® Wetland description:
The wetlands around the Howell Woods Sand Pit were delineated in May 2011
by Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown Environmental. This delineation corresponds with
previous studies performed by NCDENR-DWQ. The wetlands consist of cypress -gum
and hardwood bottomland associations. Hydration of the wetlands is accomplished by
occasional flooding of Gar Gut and the Neuse River, as well as natural surface drainage
from rainfall. As described above, much of the surrounding wetlands are part of an
NCDENR EEP Wetland Restoration project for over 10 years. Detailed descriptions of
these areas are attached to this plan.
Pumping and mine dewatering:
As previously stated, an O&M Plan should be in place before any mine
dewatering activity takes place. However, in this case, mine dewatering has been
ongoing since 2003. Because of this, we can accurately determine the volume and time
of pumping of the mine dewatering. The volume of the pump is approximately 1,000
gallons per minute. Dewatering takes place at night, typically 13 hours per day, 5 days
per week, approximately 780,000 gallons per day. During the day, the pump is used to
circulate water to the washing plant, and the wash water is retained within previously
mined sections of the pit. This serves to accomplish a secondary purpose of the
excavation, the creation of new wetlands as the pit is backfilled.
48
Impact of dewatering on adjacent wetlands:
As previously stated, the NCDENR EEP established a Wetland Restoration area
immediately adjacent to the sand pit in 2000-2001. This project included detailed
studies of the wetland hydrology and vegetation for over 10 years. The study includes
monitoring well data, rainfall data, and measurements and qualitative studies of the
wetland vegetation. The reports of these studies are attached to this plan. These
studies conclusively show that 8 years of mine dewatering adjacent to the wetlands have
had no adverse impact whatsoever.
It should be noted that a dense and virtually impermeable clay layer underlies the
natural wetland areas, while soils in the sand mining area consists of very permeable
sand. Therefore, there is no connection between the groundwater in the sand mine and
the near -surface groundwater that provides hydration to the wetlands. This is further
supported by the observation that water within the observation wells in the wetlands will
quickly spike at high levels following a rain, while the deeper sand layer shows no
impact. The EEP studies have shown that hydration of the wetlands is accomplished by
surface water from rainwater runnoff and flooding, and not from the deeper groundwater
found in the sand mine. Therefore, the mine dewatering has no impact on adjacent
wetlands. In fact, it has been demonstrated that the discharge of the mine water into the
wetlands has enhanced the hydration and allowed the vegetation to thrive.
0

iu
Monitoring:
While studies and observations over the last 10 years have conclusively shown
that the mine dewatering at this mine has had no impact on the adjacent wetlands, a
monitoring plan should be established as a precaution.
1. Mine dewatering wastewater discharges should be quantitatively and qualitatively
monitored according to requirements of the NPDES permit. See the "Monitoring
Requirements" in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
2. The Discharge Point should be examined weekly to make sure that it is functioning as
designed and that no sediment has discharged into the wetland.
3. A written record shall be kept of pumping times and rates. A record of rainfall shall
also be kept in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
While the DLR Mining Permit is issued for 10 years, it is expected that mining will
end at this site in the next 5-6 years. Once mining has ended, the pits will be allowed to
fill with water, and no further monitoring will be necessary.
�J
0

ENGINE DRIVE
CURVE 4117
DATE 08-01-97
PAGE 3,01
SUPERSEDES
NEW
Nominal RPM; VARIOUS
Din. 12.75" Full Batcd on t:rcib water 0 80' F.
lmrcI%v! Rel cr to him Cninlog Mtixhnqm Wotking Ptccurc 16' P-51
.50
M
Ln
350
ho
-100 at —70
300
R .,t
50
r
20DO
200
125 Pill,
150
1003HL'
7—
7� L M
100 -
:4QBHp
so Blip
7=
1) 1000 I S nn 2001) 2.5 1) D
CAPAGMY IN M. GALLONS PEn WNLTE
C-1 236 oilqj 1'r. T01, 0.91,1 07-09-97 M006L E34GQE3H
is

� I'+ifk 1r_�91 �T file ,__„-._ �_ ��•� _' -_ — -- •s5 s� .�.._,. s r�.. s :� /i �r _{ r'?•f u }
-u
r
•5u
- J2-2
-
- l
Aw , r
1 -
tm
-.... M.r.m. LL.I" nerrowvlul.
41
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
ADJ❑INING LAND❑WNERI
O SYMBOL
OWNER
ELGIA FISH
13870 OLD STAGE RD
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC 27592
O
RM HAYES JR
494 B STRICKLANDS XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
O
JEAN HOPE J❑HNS❑N
1800 CREEKVIEW DR
CLAYT❑N, NC 27577
NOTE,
PROPERTY OWNER; JOHNSTON COUNTY COMMUNITY C❑LLEGE FOUNDATI❑N, INC.
6601 DEVILS RACE TRACK ROAD
FOUR OAKS. N.C. 27524
PHONE, 919-938-0115
CONTACTS JAMIE SASSER
TOTAL AREAL 2974,35 Ac,
AREA TO BE REZONED: 107.4.0 Ac, (138.50 -- 31.10 = 107.4)
(INCLUDES MINING AREA AND 250 FT, BUFFER)
MINING AREAS 75,4 Ac,
PLANT AREAi 2.5 Ac,
AFFECTED MINING AREAL 77,9 Ac,
CURRENT ZONING,
2943.25 Ac, AR
31,10 Ac, I-2 SPECIAL USE
PROPOSED ZONINGS
2835,25 Ac. AR
139.1 Ac, I-2 SPECIAL USE
INF❑RMATI❑N FOR THIS MAP WAS OBTAINED FROM JOHNSTON COUNTY GIS,
NO SURVEY WAS DONE AT THIS TIME.
J❑HN B ALLEN
1893 STRICKLANDS XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
DEVILS
RACETRACK RD,
J❑SEPH D MASSEY
2
R A H❑WELL
FL❑SSI A MASSEY on B❑X 528
7090 DEVILS RACETRACK RD SMITHFIELD, NC 21577
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
69913 BEVIES RACETRACK RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
J❑HN C SL
6294 DEVILS RACETRACK RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
JEREMIAH BEASLEY
379 DRIFTWOOD DR
BL❑UNTS CREEK, NC 27814 _ --
PAULINE DAVIS
121 WESTBR❑❑K L❑WGR❑UND RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
DENNIS RAYN❑R
619 RALEIGH ST
NEWTON GROVE, NC 28366
WILLIAM H. SMITH JR
606 BR❑❑KW❑❑D LANE
G❑LDSB❑R❑, NC 27534
NINA DUNNAGAN
P❑ BOX 219
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
TH❑MAS ALLEN
1993 STRICKLANDS XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
MILDRED ALLEN
1951 STRICKLAND XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
MILDRED LANGST❑N
313 BATTLEFIELD RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
C,C, COX HEIRS
165 SCOUT RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
JERRY L COX
165 SCOUT RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
J,W. LEE
1764 HARPER HOUSE RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
tttllllurlrr,rr -
CARD[
SEAS.
022064
s F �•: � ra ✓LGti.J
DATE
DESIGNED A R K
DRAWN
CHECKED
Pfzo.�, ENG. A R K
SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING, INC.
0
HAZEL S. HAYES
6852 DEVILS RACETRACK RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
T
1
I
� O
a
ELSIE S MASSEY
P❑ BOX 957
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
TH1NQ
SC�H '6,
201 GLEN ROAD
GARNER, N.C. 27529
919-773-0183
919 —773-0148 (FAX)I
APE ARCHITECTURE
JUDIE H❑LMES WHEELER
2612 NC 50 NORTH
BENSON, NC 27504
5
0
PARCEL
AREA (Ac)
1
528.77
2
28,83
3
543.55
4
164.59
5
72,28
6
1188.62
7
121.11
8
326.60
EDWARD STEWART
4877 US HWY 301 SOUTH
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
� JAMES EARL MASSENGILL
1281 TH❑MPS❑N RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
7
PLANT � b
/ AREA J
1
PIT "'�
� AREA �
N /O
N /O
J.D. McARTHUR HEIRS
P❑ BOX 327
G❑LDSB❑R❑, NC 27530
JOHNSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
RUDOLPH HOWELL AND SON
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
FOUR OAKS
JOHNSTON COUNTY
MARY W WADSW❑RTH
3246 GRABT❑WN RD
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
EMMA LEE
2835 TH❑MPS❑N FD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
-.OPERATION PLAN
1. DATE OF C❑MMENCEMENTI JULY 2001
2. HOURS OF ❑PERATI❑N1 M❑N, - FRI, 7 AM TO 5 PM
SAT, 7 AM - 12 NOON CIF REQUIRED)
3. ESTIMATED VOLUME OF EXTRACTI❑N, 3025000 CY
4, METHOD OF OPERATION: SHOVEL AND TRUCK
5, SITE SHALL BE GRADED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT RUN-OFF FROM
FROM PLANT AREA SHALL BE DIVERTED BACK INTO POND AND
MINING AREA.
6. THE PLANT AND/DR OPERATIONS MANAGER SHALL BE RESP❑NSIBLE
FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND UP KEEP ON ANY EXISTING ALL WEATHER
ROADS USED FOR MINING ❑PERATI❑NS,
7, THE PLANT AND/DR OPERATIONS MANAGER SHALL BE RESP❑NSIBLE
FOR THE USE OF WATER TRUCKS AND/DR OTHER METHODS USED TO
CONTROL BUST AS NECESSARY,
8. UPON RECLAMATI❑N ANY HARDENED SURFACES SHALL BE OBLITERATED
THESE AREA SHALL BE REGRADED AND SHAPED TO DIVERT RUN -LIEF
INT❑ P❑ND AREA.
9. UPON RECLAMATION ANY DEBRIS LEFT ❑N SITE GENERATED BY MINING
OPERATION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE. BURIAL OF TRASH OR
DEBRIS WILL NOT BE ALL❑WED,
DATE,
0
REZONING MAP /
OVERALL MINE PLAN
R MASSENGILL
5055 LITTLE CREEK CHURCH RD
CLAYT❑N, NC 27520
STEWART 1996 FAMILY LMT PTNSHP
C\❑ WADE STEWART
480 STEWART RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
GRAPHIC SCALE
1" = 1000'
2000 1000 500 0 500 1000
�� l5 it 1`1 LS
WR ?_ � ^nrn
L1ENR
tANQ QUALITY SECTfOly
DEC 2000
SW PR❑J. # SW000218
DWG FILE # 1C--1
SCALE
1`=1000`
VERTICALS
NA
2000
SHEET N❑. I
HORIZONTAL:
,J �� � �_ � '�1! � 1 � s, s� i I 1 i,i t s i} •� -' a 1�11 ,'
� � � ! I f j a! � r + ! t ,, r r r . ! 1 � 1 • J `, �, l 1 tr � j l { , 5,
RANSOM

CA
o4�SSJp;�,.9
SEAL
022064
f
*%.I GIN ,G•��x,i
REV Nq. DESCRIPTIONS DATE
REVISI❑NS
Zk
DATE
DESIGNED
A R K
DRAWN
CHECKED
PROD. ENG,
A R K
, H � SCUT WAND
E
SURVEYING AND 201 GLEN ROAD
ENGINEERING, INC. GARNER, N.C. 27529
919-773-0183
919-773-0148 (FAX)
JOHNSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
RUDOLPH HOWELL AND SON
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
FOUR OAKS
JOHNSTON COUNTY
MINING PLAN
DATE, DEC 2000
SW PR❑J. # SW000218
DWG FILE # Q-2
f SCALE 1
H❑RIZ❑NTAL,
1'=200'
VERTICAL,
NA
SHEET NO.
C2
OF,

:. _.I! � I.f ,[ _l.._. si J_.. a ice.—�» .i�i.� .._.....: :..:.. .:.'.. ._ ._. �' r .— a_�.�.1'_�..1iu1:4.• a�L'�i .��.. �_� �1 �...
t �. r f �. � ! ,, _ r r,. f:, `�I it f �, nr r I 'T�1�,
i f� r r� I I :, i 5: � �",

L.L'i. L..._!.._.. _.5�_i_._ �___._..._ �.-.. _..i ., _. .___._ ___.2 _�.�� _...ESL+I_�.1.♦_i.1i:!�_-���i.�_.s�.�_�:.
a
1
25
20
15
10
5
0
35
30
25
20
15
to
5
0
EXI
TING GRAB
10'
(
SAFETY
YP.)
:ENCH
4'-5'
----------
PI u
40' MI
1'
MAXIMUM
WATER SURFACE
ELEV.
=III
�IIII1111
III
3
IIII�flllill�,
3 1111111111�111-
3 j'
3
20'-25-
111--1I
I -I
-III=1
I
�111—III_—III`—
I
I I
Ial
I I I I
11E1 I
I=1 I
I 11=1 I I
�
I
I
R❑P❑SED GRADE
i
l
ElIF-11
III----I11
.�ITIIIIIIIIIIII
III-111_
1117::�I, I
IIIIII1
SEC
I❑N ��A—A
N❑TE, E
ESS INC HE DEVELOP
LAUNCH OR WETL
RANDOMLY DEP❑SI
E TM❑FETH
ND AREAS
ED WITHIN
LSITE, BOA --
SHALL BE
THE EXCAVATED
EXISTING
GRAD
i
10
(
AFETY BENCH
YP,)
4'-5'
1'
1
6' MAX,
l
2
Q'
PROPOSED
GRAD
I
20'-25'
SECTION
LAUNCH
T
AREA
RU B
CT
AT
R)
REV.ND. DESCRIPTIONS DATE
REVISI❑NS
d N a� r9r i. '1 -
SEAL _
022asa
DATE
DESIGNED
A R K
DRAWN
CHECKER
PROJ, ENc.
A R K
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
HKLM I U UKLM I to IJL.HNIJJ HNJJ rLNINJULAN.
`
EXISTING
GRAD
10'
(
SAFETY BENCH
YP.)
4'-5'
i
I
1' MA
X.
i
3
1
PR❑
❑SED GRAD
20'-25'
I
SECTION
WET
T
AND AREA
RU
TYR)
XI
_
919-773-0183
SOUTHWIND
9 SURVEYING AND 201 GLEN ROAD
ENGINEERING, INC. GARNER, N.C_ 27529
919--773-0148 (FAX)
S URVEYING ENGINEERING LAN SCAPE ARCHITECTURE
JOHNSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
RUDOLPH HOWELL AND SON
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
FOUR OAKS
.JOHNSTON COUNTY
TYPICAL CROSS
SECTIONS
HORIZONTAL SCALD
1 N = 100'
200 100 50 0 50 100 200
f
VERTICAL SCALE: -
1& = 5'
10 5 2.5 0 2.5 5 10
DATE, DEC 2000
SW PROD. # SWO00218
DWG FILE
1 SCALE [
HORIZONTAL,
NOTED
VERTICALF
NOTED
SHEET NO.
X-
OF, —
a'
,1�i i , , i
,� + � Ii �'
t I <I i, Ik + �•, ti� •r.� =1a
+;, � ,�• Is,l �<,tJ .�.,

IttIisIIT/r, r tIIII4 IIitIIIIItIisIITII40 III A I-,f. IIsitIIIITI., f IitIIII-OL IIIIisItItIIIIIIiIliIIisIIItIs4 IiITIIIItIII01 IiII.4 sItIII�F IitIIIif 11 IIitsIiP A itI'IT IstII1w IIIIitIitIsIitIIIITItttsIIIiitIittIIIItIiIIIIITI7t tIIIII7 III�: HL 7 it IIIIIiIisItqi IIisIIIIIIIIItIistIIIIjii� 7, IIItIfirt or TIIitItIIIitIg, MW ItiIIItitIik. III4!, IApproximate Scale: one inch 200 feet tiDate: April 30, 2011 tIDate of Orthophoto: March, 2010 iisLegend tIIAt IPfoperly Li, IIitRL IitIIsisIIIJohnston County I " IIII215 '?I :A .3 IFax )k J, tIItIj4

dL _ - - ___ _..._ _ � _�- �� � Js�::�'•.�.�i', � `. ..-- L 'I_-� _ Lti i _,�1 r.'i .-1, . 1_. 1.Li..%�l . —.� _,.. � — 3_,��r.F2.i_ A r. "..L. 'ryi i
HAVL .ROQ4) I eN i'RA NLC
LOCA i 10 hi MAP
FWPRoX. C=110001
kz,�,A '. 75.E
TECHNICAL IMAGE PRODUCTS
Z rr.,P.- 17�-
J{q It" �. I !I r� !- -it rl '�ti �•' s. �- `- t 2 is { l '�. it �`�� i'�� �ti�ly ril*;s -i �' FI �'e I }� �'i� boos
Zvi 0A WIT KAKI;
l(¢;i
1� s o €€ i t al 7 i 1 -is � ; ,1. ` s ti'•,� isi �,'� frA i��.{', •y,
mynnery 7-15 -1 !

A V L RD IIJ i IRA Al LE
LOCAT ID ka r4\A,%P
PIPP201A, Vh = 1) 000,
EN t•C AN Ct '?-0 AAD - 56-C % L
� M Apwc- ,-- P� CA ct-
K(-- kz,,,A :
d a a;-,q -
TECHNICAL IMAME PROOL107M
ll T
0

l
I
DATE
�w•`` N CARD,
: -;�.e iESSIp;':9 ?
SEAL �• /
4 022064
• Q r C� 1�( (�LG�✓
9� :FNGIt4
:, �FN R • A,. �'
DATE
DESIGNED
A R K
DRAWN
CHECKED
PRDJ. ENG.
ARK
.%� SOUTH WIND
SURVEYING AND
ENGINEERING, INC
E
201 GLEN ROAD
GARNER, N.C. 27529
919-773-0133
919-773-0148 (FAX)
JOHNSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
RUDOLPH HOWELL AND SON
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
FOUR OAKS
JOHNSTON COUNTY
1 'L 1
DATE, DEC 2000 SCALE
MINING PLAN HORIZONTAL
SW PROD. # SW000218 1'=200'
DWG FILE C-2 VERTICAL
NA
SHEET NO.
C2
OF,
1

`$ 1
--s�r�
j �
I ✓
vM1
s
'18 .J
MTRHdo
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
ADJOINING LANDOWNER,
O SYMBOL
OWNER
O
ELGIA FISH
13870 OLD STAGE RD
WILLOW SPRINGS, NC 27592
O
RM HAYES JR
494 B STRICKLANDS XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
O
JEAN HOPE JOHNSON
1800 CREEKVIEW DR
CLAYTON, NC 27577
NOTE,
PROPERTY OWNER, JOHNSTON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION, INC.
6601 DEVILS RACE TRACK ROAD
FOUR OAKS. N.C. 27524
PHONE, 919-938-0115
CONTACT, JAMIE SASSER
TOTAL AREA: 2974,35 Ac,
AREA TO BE REZONED, 107.4.0 Ac. (138.50 - 31.10 = 107,4)
(INCLUDES MINING AREA AND 250 FT, BUFFER)
MINING AREA, 75,4 Ac,
PLANT AREA, 2.5 Ac.
AFFECTED MINING AREA, 77.9 Ac,
CURRENT ZONING,
2943.25 Ac, AR
31.10 Ac, I-2 SPECIAL USE
PROPOSED ZONING,
2835.25 Ac. AR
139.1 Ac. I-2 SPECIAL USE
INFORMATION FOR THIS MAP WAS ❑BTAINED FROM JOHNSTON COUNTY GIS,
NO SURVEY WAS DONE AT THIS TIME.
`II 11\I111111///'
a' 2 = 46SS10.:.9
JOSEPH D MASSEY
6998 DEVILS RACETRACK RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
FLOSSI A MASSEY
7090 DEVILS RACETRACK RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
JOHN C BEASLEY
8294 DEVILS RACETRACK RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
JEREMIAH BEASLEY —
379 DRIFTWOOD DR
BLOUNTS CREEK, NC 27814 _
PAULINE DAVIS
121 WEST13ROOK LOWGROUND RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
DENNIS RAYNOR
619 RALEIGH ST
NEWTON GROVE, NC 28366
WILLIAM H. SMITH JR
606 BROOKWOOD LANE
GOLDSBORO, NC 27534
NINA DUNNAGAN
PO BOX 219
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
THOMAS ALLEN
1893 STRICKLANDS XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
MILDRED ALLEN
1951 STRICKLAND XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
MILDRED LANGSTON
313 BATTLEFIELD RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
C.C. COX HEIRS
165 SCOUT RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
JERRY L COX
165 SCOUT RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
J.W. LEE
1764 HARPER HOUSE RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
i SEAL
t 022064
1111110
DESIGNED
A R K
DRAWN
CHECKED
PRDJ, ENG.
ARK
JOHN B ALLEN
1893 STRICKLANDS XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
DEVILS
RACETRACK RD,
R A HOWELL'
PO BOX 528
SMITHFIELD, NC 21577
0
5
0
JUDIE HOLMES WHEELER
2612 NC 50 NORTH
BENSON, NC 27504
0
PARCEL
AREA (Ac)
1
528.77
2
28.83
3
543.55
4
164.59
5
72.28
6
1188.62
7
121.11
8
326.60
OEDWARD
STEWART
4877 US HWY 301
SOUTH
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
HAZEL S. HAYES
6852 DEVILS RACETRACK RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
O
JAMES EARL MASSENGILL
1261 THOMPSON RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
O
\ O
\
/
PLANT
b \
� \
/
AREA
ELSIE S MASSEY
PO Box 957
PIT �
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
\
/J
AREA
/
>
'
X,
`
r
r
`N
O
SOUTHWIND E
SURVEYING AND 201 GLEN ROAD
ENGINEERING, INC. GARNER, N.C. 27529
919-773-0183
919-773-0148 (FAX)
URVEYING ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
J.D. McARTHUR HEIRS
PO BOX 327
GOLDSBORO, NC 27530
0
I MARY W WADSWORTH
3246 GRABTOWN RD
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
JOHNSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
RUDOLPH HOWELL AND SON
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
FOUR OAKS
JOHNSTON COUNTY
EMMA LEE
2835 THOMPSON RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
❑PERATION PLAN
1. DATE OF COMMENCEMENT, JULY 2001
2. HOURS OF ❑PERATION, MON. - FRI. 7 AM TO 5 PM
SAT, 7 AM - 12 NOON (IF REQUIRED)
3. ESTIMATED VOLUME OF EXTRACTION, 3025000 CY
4. METHOD OF ❑PERATION; SHOVEL AND TRUCK
5, SITE SHALL BE GRADED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT RUN-OFF FROM
FROM PLANT AREA SHALL BE DIVERTED BACK INT❑ POND AND
MINING AREA.
6. THE PLANT AND/OR ❑PERATIONS MANAGER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND UP KEEP ON ANY EXISTING ALL WEATHER
ROADS USED FOR MINING ❑PERATIONS.
7. THE PLANT AND/OR ❑PERATIONS MANAGER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR THE USE OF WATER TRUCKS AND/OR OTHER METHODS USED TO
CONTROL DUST AS NECESSARY,
8. UPON RECLAMATION ANY HARDENED SURFACES SHALL BE ❑BLITERATED,
THESE AREA SHALL BE REGRADED AND SHAPED TO DIVERT RUN-OFF
INT❑ POND AREA,
9, UPON RECLAMATION ANY DEBRIS LEFT ON SITE GENERATED BY MINING
❑PERATION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE. BURIAL OF TRASH OR
DEBRIS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED.
�C C p r!V, 2000
lAll/
L___
UENP IF i =u ;xJAL�FrY
REZONING MAP /
OVERALL MINE PLAN
RANSOM R MASSENGILL
5055 LITTLE CREEK CHURCH RD
CLAYTON, NC 27520
STEWART 1996 FAMILY LMT PTNSHP
C\O WADE STEWART
480 STEWART RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
GRAPHIC SCALE:
1// = 1000,
1000 500 0 500 1000
f r li
-- -
UENR
LAND QUALITY SECTION
DATE, DEC 2000
SW PROD. # SW000218
DWG FILE #JC-1
SCALE
2000
HORIZONTAL,
1'=1000'
VERTICAL,
NA
SHEET NO.
C1
UA

_,L�_.18'_4�----i.e.i.�..l.�.i�:e.',,; ._. _..:.e:.•.t..��' ...d... .....,...;�'.. .._...i� ,.-.,�._�. �'..,� .:�3, asoh:!'i,i..�..:'i_ys�'-L''tri�'�.:-e:
A
i
35
30
25
15
10
5
0
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
LAI
TING GRADE.
1
<YYP.3
SAFETY JENCH
4'-5'
1'V
MAXIMUM
WATER SURFACE
ELEV.
40, MI
TV
.IIIIII�II
'III
III
I
I
1
_ICI
11 �Iill�lll
1 Il�lllilll�
III
3
1
3
�F)
-
-
20--25�
I=! k I
11=1 I I
Ti
I I !=1 I
II � ICI
R❑P❑SED G
ADE
-1 I I =1
III -III
I-!
III=lTI
I
I=i
I-
111-
I ICI
II I
II
M I
SEC
T
1ON ��
-A ��
NOTE,
INC H
LAUNCH
RAND
s D VEL❑PET
OR WETL
MLY DEPOSIfTED
OF THEOVERBURDENMATERIALSITE,
ND AREAS
WITHIN
NOT USED
BOAT
HALL BE
THE EXCAV
TED
1
(T
I
I
SAFETY
Y P,)
EXISTING GRAB
ENCH
4'-51
1
6' MAX.
�
2
0' -
PROPOSED
GRADE
I
I
SECTION
LAUNCH
T
AREA
RU B
CT
AT
P,)
10 CARQ(i
4,
# a SEAL.
022064 i
BATE
RE V.NC. DESCRIPTIMS Do T E
REVISIONS
DESEGNED
ARK
DRAWN
CHECKED
PRCJ ENG,
A R K
RE
25
F-7-0
15
10
5
AKLA I U LKLA I t IZ <LANDJ , AND F LNiNZ�ULAa.
EXI
TING GRAB
4'-5'
10'
(
SAFETY IENCH
YP.)
1' MA
.
3
1
PR❑
❑SED GRAD
20'--25'
SECTION
WETLAND
T
RU
REA
TYP,)
SOUTHWIND
SURVEYING AND 201 GLEN ROAD
ENGINEERING, INC. GARNER, N.C. 27529
919-773-0183
919-773-0148 (FAX)
S URVEYING ANGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
JOHNSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
RUDOLPH HOWELL AND SON
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
FOUR OAKS
JOHNSTON COUNTY
TYPICAL CROSS
SECTIONS
HORIZONTAL SCALE:
1" = 100'
200 100 50 0 50 100 200
VERTICAL SCALE
1" _ 5,
10 5 2.5 0 2.5 5 10
Q�
nds _
DATE, DEC 2000
SW PRDJ. # SWO00218
DWG FILE #JC--
SCALE I
HDRIZONTAb
NOTED
VERTICAL,
NOTED
SHEET NO,
X-
CIF.
y�: IT
777
777 :• af:r-.SPl�p.1
if . • � �� y', ('�.�arz: �.i: .. ... .... ...'�'.•.. ..:�.'r�:...-. -. -. .. .. ;4•i:�: �.-_r....•1! s'ia.hVl,.t..4 •,tii ... .� t .�u ..tt ..�6 .�r . �
.•'.�, n. t.. � .n,^q: :r:r� s', T�i��;- ..!,,.••f,.i•••.:•' !•`y"h:��'„•� ii«.'.f..a`•;s: •yyr:. �.,.
h re ..!la/�e•r: _ '�i. •..ai - - ... .

- i!—! I. -I L - . f I i L Il Q I� -,�: r , - - '., f. i _- !::. . ., - :." '.. I .- .. - " .." I,: ', -" 1. -AL i-L
HA L RO Vlf) tJ -k -RAN LE
LOCATtOls-S MAW
kmo-4. 1"=[)040
6 N-ozA Ne e /q(w v izo 49 - 1c7A I (
-
c:-
c-io A cat
-�Zo
�p_ ,�
*LS d QU
lnnpLk*ft F--#4luuuu-T5
7

_ .'Zl,: . - ' it .. a' .....� . _isi!-�_ _ `�'�'��.:5l.-• --- --- - . - i;.. - - - _ .... i � . t, ..r ...:i .... : p;_.yiid'li'L�, �+'{ tY:Nu_.t,itiai£il r --._ �:it.:il.'1' t ...
I�
K
30
20
15
10
25
20
15
10
5
0
EXI
TING GRAD
10'
(
SAFETY BENCH
YP.)
4'--5'
40' MI
1'X7
MAXIMUM
WATERSURFACE
ELE
II
IIl111TI1
III-
3
ROPOSED
ADE
iilllllllllll
3 ICI
III-- 3
3
20'-25'
I ICI I
I ----I
- III -III
II -ICI
-I11=1 I I
I ---I I I-
- III
I�I—I�I
1 f I I I-
i
SEC
TTNOT
1 ❑ N '
— A r�
_
NOTE,
IN H
LAUNC
RAND
' EVELOP
H OR WETLi
MLY DEPOSI
E T OF THELSITE,
ND AREAS
ED WITHIN
USED
]BOAT
SHALL BE
THE EXCAVATED
LAI
TING GRAD
I'
C
SAFETY BENCH
YP.)
4'-5'
1'
1
6' MAX.
GRADE.
i
20'-25,
2
0'
PROPOSED
SECTION
LAU
T
CH A
RU B
EA CT
AT
P,)
REV.NO. ➢ESCRIPTI6NS DATE
REVISIONS
SEAL
022064
;� �: • CD `:
DATE
DEs1GNED
A R K
DRAWN
CHECKED
PROJ, ENG.
A R K
30
15
10
0
AXLA I U UKLA f L iSLANM- AND F'LNINSULAS,
EXISTING
GRAD
4�-5'
1101
C
SAFETY BENCH
YPr)
1' MAX.
3
20'-25'
1 -
PROPOSED
_
i
GRAD
SEG
WETLAND
I ❑N T
RU
REA
TYP,)
SOUTHWIND-.,
SURVEYING AND 201 GLEN ROAD
ENGINEERING, INC. GARNER, N.C_ 27529
919-773--0183
919--'773-0148 (FAX)
JOHNSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
RUDOLPH HOWELL AND SON
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
FOUR OAKS
JOHNSTON COUNTY
TYPICAL CROSS
SECTIONS
HORIZONTAL SCALE
1" = 100'
200 100 50 0 50 100 200
VERTICAL SCALE:
1a - 51
10 5 2.5 0 2.5 5 10
DATE{ DEC 2000
SW PROJ. # SWO00218
DWG FILE #JC-2
SCALE I
HORIZONTAL,
NOTED
VERTICAL{
NOTED
�r
SHEET NO. �
ea
OF, I
-�- - -:{ - - �n r r'�r. -��. - - ter' - - --- + - .--rr-- .. t c-��..•.•.�i--' - —ri:,�l-tv„�p i•�: �' �?� y'i'r;(: ,ae;-� l+-
!r r i S I�i'r +�'rq' r '. �i i1S •' •�• '• �'• r'. '' ! i �' +: ,'�•{•,�''i i'{i i4 Y�4 .f`i;l�rlr r� r�•S1 j•�*�t
JJ
��,�I{ '41:, i1 r' •r`�'.r 1{e ,•. �, ,`S.`'+' •`r 'S; i.� i �,S .i iA ;rSj
ri �� i �� ! 1r' S' S' �• rt'S e• �• fil'•r ,4! �1� it ,1 '{,. }'♦'' :a ��lr'
� �.. � •� � � � {S. I.. �'-rk:)�'1�:�r. .. ...-, ,�?� _f .' -... _,- .. .. . , :.t .- y,i'..ie"• �.•r4:s',• v} �.,� 9+i !.�:.:. ° �• .'r .. .r �'�,�5.,:•5.�..

't., .. . t' . : 1 .. . -,I -L 1 m ..L...,_ - ,' - _ _ _ . _ , _ __ ' . r ., 'r-.. . _ ._,,, __ - .. _- 0. •IP .[°,u iL -N :, .Jrfa..-cc - v .. --___- _ .
r
r' A
Zzi..
,
-
.
114
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
ADJ❑INING LANDOWNER:
0 SYMBOL
OWNER
O
ELGIA FISH
13870 OLD STAGE RD
WILLOW SPRINGS. NC 27592
O
RM HAYES JR
494 B STRICKLANDS XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
JEAN HOPE JOHNSON
1800 CREEKVIEW DR
CLAYTON, NC 27577
NOTE,
PROPERTY OWNER, JOHNSTON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION, INC.
6601 DEVILS RACE TRACK ROAD
FOUR OAKS. N,C, 27524
PHONE; 919--938-0115
C❑NTACTk JAMIE SASSER
TOTAL AREA;
2974.35 Ac.
AREA TO BE REZONED,
107.4.0 Ac. (138.50 - 31.10 = 107,4)
(INCLUDES MINING AREA AND 250 FT. BUFFER)
MINING AREA,
75.4 Ac.
PLANT AREA;
2.5 Ac.
AFFECTED MINING
AREA; 77.9 Ac,
CURRENT ZONING,
2943.25
Ac. AR
31.10 Ac
I-2 SPECIAL USE
PROPOSED Z❑NING,
2835,25
Ac. AR
139.1 Ac,
I-2 SPECIAL USE
INF❑RMATION FOR
THIS MAP WAS ❑BTAINED FROM JOHNSTON COUNTY GIS,
NO SURVEY WAS DONE AT THIS TIME.
REV,Nd, DESCRIPTIONS DATE
REVISIDNS
J❑SEPH D MASSEY
6998 DEVILS RACETRACK RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
rL❑SSI A MASSEY
7090 DEVILS RACETRACK RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
HN C BEASLEY
82
8294 DEVILS RACETRACK RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
JEREMIAH BEASLEY
379 DRIFTWOOD DR
BL❑UNTS CREEK, NC 27814 �—
PAULINE DAVIS
121 WESTBR❑OK LOWGR❑UND RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
DENNIS RAYNOR
619 RALEIGH ST
NEWTON GROVE, NC 28366
WILLIAM H. SMITH JR
606 BR❑❑KWO❑D LANE
GOLDSBOR❑, NC 27534
NINA DUNNAGAN
P❑ BOX 219
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
THOMAS ALLEN
1893 STRICKLANDS XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
MILDRED ALLEN
1951 STRICKLAND XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
MILDRED LANGSTON
313 BATTLEFIELD RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
C.C. COX HEIRS
165 SCOUT RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
JERRY L COX
165 SCOUT RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
J.H. LEE
1764 HARPER HOUSE RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
GARo4lo
GLf '
SEAL ;
022064
J'��I R • ���,~ D / DATE
f�I11�lt�t��tttt, —
DESIGNED
A R K
DRAWN
CHECKER
PROJ. ENG,
A R K
J❑HN B ALLEN
1893 STRICKLANDS XRDS
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
DEVILS
RACETRACK R.D.
R A H❑WELL
P❑ BOX 528
SMITHFIELD, NC 21377
O
O
HAZEL S. HAYES
6852 DEVILS RACETRACK RD
FI3UR OAKS, NC 27524 3
ELSIE S MASSEY
P❑ BOX 957
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
O
SOUTHWIND-,
SURVEYING AND
201 GLEN ROAD
ENGINEERING, INC.
GARNER, N.C. 27529
919-773-0183
919-773--0148 (FAX)
i 1RVFYING /FNf,1NFFRIN(. A
ANFIS[;APF ARrHITFCT11RF
JUDIE 14OLMES WHEELER
2612 NC 50 NORTH
BENS❑N, NC 27504
S
0
PARCEL
AREA (Ac)
1
528.77
2
28.83
3
543,55
4
164.59
5
72,28
6
1188.62
7
121.11
8
326.60
EDWARD STEWART
4877 US HHY 301 SOUTH
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
JAMES EARL MASSENGILL
1281 TH❑MPS❑N RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
7
q
PLANT b
AREA
PIT\`
AREA
~ N
� r
r
N_
MARY W WADSWORTH
3246 GRABTOWN RD
f SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
I
J.D. McARTHUR HEIRS
PO BOX 327
GOLDSBOR❑, NC 27530
JOHNSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE
RUDOLPH HOWELL AND SON
ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER
FOUR OAKS
JOHNSTON COUNTY
CMMA LEE
2835 TH❑MPSON RD
FOUR OAKS, NC 27524
OPEEAT11IN PLAN
1. DATE OF COMMENCEMENT, JULY 2001
2. HOURS OF ❑PERATION: MON. - FRI. 7 AM TO 5 PM
SAT, 7 AM — 12 NOON CIF REQUIRED)
3. ESTIMATED VOLUME OF EXTRACTION: 3025000 CY
4. METHOD OF ❑PERATI❑N: SHOVEL AND TRUCK
5. SITE SHALL BE GRADED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT RUN-OFF FROM
FROM PLANT AREA SHALL BE DIVERTED BACK INTO POND AND
MINING AREA.
6, THE PLANT AND/OR OPERATIONS MANAGER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND UP KEEP ON ANY EXISTING ALL WEATHER
ROADS USED FOR MINING OPERATIONS,
7. THE PLANT AND/OR OPERATIONS MANAGER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE
FOR THE USE OF WATER TRUCKS AND/OR OTHER METHODS USED TO
CONTROL DUST AS NECESSARY.
8. UPON RECLAMATION ANY HARDENED SURFACES SHALL BE ❑BLITCRATED.
THESE AREA SHALL BE REGRADED AND SHAPED TO DIVERT RUN—OFF
INTO POND AREA,
9. UPON RECLAMATION ANY DEBRIS LEFT ON SITE GENERATED BY MINING
❑PERATION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE, BURIAL OF TRASH OR
DEBRIS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED.
0
REZONING MAP /
OVERALL MINE PLAN
RANSOM R MASSENGILL
5055 LITTLE CREEK CHURCH RD
CLAYT❑N, NC 27520
GRAPHIC SCALE:
1" = 1000`
2000 1000 500 0 500 1000
OENA
LAND QUALITY SECTION
DATE: DEC 2000
SW PROJ. ## SWO00218
DWG FILE #JC-1
i
i
i
v�l
ffi �`
sr :Eli i �
f_ J
s �
wB .�rT` • � ;
p:— wwatw Bra ,
2000
i
i
I SCALE I
HORIZONTAL;
V=1000,
VERTICAL:
NA
-w�-- ;'r'•(��r�}'T��r;.ii �f :F'�� ,-T.--.�.�.
.' r
� + i �}I � J i , �, .�I � y ��� ri .t t t � s rt ,'t s< 1. �t_� l'��i, <<r :�,, a. t• � '� r,r-� ,;
-
z